Nicole Scherzinger’s is doing God’s work in her Dirty Dancing role

To the career of Nicole Scherzinger, now, and a reminder that unlike the rest of us, actors never take jobs for a payday. They are better than that. There is almost always a desire to educate and inform the benighted public about a moral issue close to the star’s heart. How else do you think things like ABC’s sensationally unnecessary Dirty Dancing reboot get made?

It is certainly what prompted the former Pussycat Doll singer’s decision to refuse whatever other offers may have been out there – anyone? – in favour of playing Penny in the forthcoming drama. Now, if you don’t watch Dirty Dancing biannually while getting wasted with six girlfriends, I should probably remind you that Penny is the resort dance pro who gets pregnant by a no-good chancer of a waiter, and ends up having a backstreet abortion, the complications of which are eventually sorted out by Baby’s doctor father.

Alas, the offer of this role put Nicole in a corner. You see, as she is at pains to stress, she is profoundly anti-abortion. “I was like a crazy thing,” she reflects, “because my family … my papa’s a bishop and my family’s really hardcore against abortion. So I got the role and I almost didn’t take it because I didn’t want to promote abortion, because my character has an abortion.”

Cynthia Rhodes, as Penny Jones, in the original movie version of Dirty Dancing, with Patrick Swayze. Photograph: Allstar/VESTRON PICTURES

If you’re wondering how Nicole managed to square taking this high-profile, lucrative role that finally allows her to graduate from talent-show judging and move decisively into acting, she can explain. “I was like, hopefully they can learn from, you know, her ways, and I can be a positive influence.”

“Her ways”? Oof. Nothing says “well-rounded character” like a performance specifically delivered to remind us that with their “ways”, little tramps like Penny always end up getting what they deserve. Even so, Nicole is anxious to eliminate any last vestige of doubt you may have that she is playing someone who is 100% in the wrong here. As she puts it: “I just want to encourage everyone to, you know, keep their babies.”

Also, to cast her in things in future. That said, Nicole didn’t get to the decision without the help of her family. Her grandfather prayed on it, apparently, and got the green light from God. Though she doesn’t reveal the Almighty’s exact words on the matter, they were clearly something along the lines of: “I think Nicole should deffo take the part, which is to My glory, though can you ask them to change it so that Penny has the baby and has to marry the horrendous amoral prick of a waiter? If that’s not doable, can it be clear that at the end of the movie, Penny is cast from the Kellerman’s firmament to the moral hellfires of New York, where she maybe dies penniless, unloved, and of a her-ways-related illness at some point in the 70s?”

Nicole Scherzinger’s is doing God’s work in her Dirty Dancing role

Government "dancing to the tune of drinks industry", say senior physicians

David Cameron backed plans to impose a minimal value per unit of alcohol, and then dropped the policy in July final year above a lack of ‘concrete evidence’ it would lessen harmful consuming. Photograph: Dan Kitwood/Getty Images

Senior medical professionals have accused the government of “dancing to the tune of the drinks sector” soon after it emerged that wellness officials and ministers had 130 meetings with alcohol and supermarket lobbyists even though they have been considering new price tag controls.

An investigation by the British Health-related Journal was undertaken soon after David Cameron backed plans to impose a minimum price tag per unit of alcohol, and then dropped the policy in July final yr above a lack of “concrete evidence” it would minimize damaging drinking.

The policy had been opposed by many senior ministers over fears it would raise the price of beer, wine and spirits for buyers. Nonetheless, other individuals, which includes Dr Sarah Wollaston, the Tory MP for Totnes, and Labour, raised issues about the affect of lobbying by the drinks market.

In its new report, the BMJ found only quite couple of of the 130 meetings between the Division of Overall health and the business considering that 2010 have been publicly documented simply because they were mostly with officials, rather than at ministerial degree.

It also identified one with Jeremy Hunt, the wellness secretary, and another, with the then public heath minister, Anna Soubry, took area following the finish of an official consultation into the policy final 12 months.

The government mentioned the meetings were entirely proper and there were a comparable variety with wellness campaigners, but on Tuesday night, Labour and health-related experts condemned the access offered to lobbyists on such a significant public overall health situation.

In an open letter, 21 senior physicians and campaigners, including Prof Sir Ian Gilmore, particular adviser on alcohol for the Royal University of Doctors, raised fears that “huge business is trumping public wellness concerns in Westminster”.

“The drinks sector continues to have high-level accessibility to government ministers and officials even though no forum at the moment exists for the public well being local community to put forward its situation in an surroundings free from vested interests,” Gilmore mentioned.

“With deaths from liver disease swiftly increasing and teenagers now presenting with sophisticated liver failure, the government has a duty to realise its commitment to introduce minimal pricing.”

Andy Burnham, the shadow overall health secretary, stated it showed the government had been “located out cosying up to vested interests and standing up for the incorrect individuals”.

“It has become a hallmark of his government,” he explained. “Public wellness policy is in utter disarray. Soon after the tobacco business final 12 months, these revelations raise but a lot more considerations about the influence of big organization on this government’s policies.”

A spokesman for the Department of Wellness stated it was fully unfounded to “insinuate regimen meetings amongst departmental officials and industry representatives amounted to an improper connection with the drinks market.

“Employing the very same methodology of counting every single meeting in between every single official and a stakeholder representative in excess of the last 3 many years, the division has had a similar amount or much more meetings with wellness charities, overall health campaigners or the food market,” the spokesman mentioned.

“As you would count on from a government department in search of to effect public overall health change by way of a voluntary deal with market, a broad group of officials have numerous distinct meetings with a huge assortment of stakeholders, and we utterly reject the allegation of something untoward in the little proportion of these that took place with the alcohol sector.”

She additional that the government was still considering minimum unit pricing as a portion of its strategies to tackle alcohol abuse.

Government "dancing to the tune of drinks industry", say senior physicians