Painkillers at £8.50 per pack are a bitter pill to swallow

I was admitted to a private London hospital off Harley Street for a minor operation. Before the procedure, I discussed pain relief with the anaesthetist and said I rarely take painkillers as I have a high pain threshold. I was surprised, just before my discharge, to be given three lots of pain relief of varying strengths, with only vague instructions from the nurse about how to take them.

I was even more surprised to receive a bill from the owner and healthcare provider, Phoenix, for a whopping £25.50 for the drugs (£8.50 a pack), which I presumed to be part of any day package involving surgery requiring a general anaesthetic.

I took a few paracetamol, which I would normally buy at 30p per pack of 16 tablets, but returned the other two packs (ibuprofen and dihydrocodeine) to the hospital. I was covered by private medical insurance via AXA PPP but consider this level of overcharging to be unprofessional and excessive. How can they get away with it? SR,Suffolk

They often get away with it because they can. You contacted your insurer, which explained that this pain relief was not covered by your policy as home drugs are an additional item, and suggested you take it up with the hospital. You would have been given the opportunity to decline the drugs – not necessarily practical if you were a bit woozy post-operation.

Phoenix reiterated its policy on home drugs, apologised for any lack of communication and agreed to refund £17 to your credit card. This is not a huge amount of money, but we can imagine how extras such as this add up. As for private prescriptions costing a whopping £8.50 for tablets costing pennies on the high street, welcome to the wasteful world of private medical insurance.

We welcome letters but cannot answer individually. Email us at consumer.champions@theguardian.com or write to Consumer Champions, Money, the Guardian, 90 York Way, London N1 9GU. Please include a daytime phone number

Painkillers at £8.50 per pack are a bitter pill to swallow

Bitter Pill to Swallow: Can The US Industry Bear The Value Of Sovaldi?

Sovaldi, the new drug to deal with and remedy Hepatitis C has undoubtedly brought on fairly an uproar in the US given that its FDA approval in December of 2013.  At $ one,000 per pill, the manufacturer, Gilead, has lots of men and women and payers to response to in purchase to justify this enormous cost, say sector professionals and watchdogs.

With approximately three million individuals in the US struggling from hepatitis C, the only options in the previous were Interferon and Ribavirin which led to many side effects along with unpredictable responses. Moreover, the alternative of liver transplant and ongoing end of daily life care were previously the only options for this devastating ailment.

“Sovaldi presents a dramatic example of the what-the-US-industry-can-bear pharmaceutical pricing practice,” explains John Thomas, a professor specializing in wellness law in the Quinnipiac University Schools of Law &amp Medication.

“It fees its manufacturer, Gilead, about $ 130 to produce every single pill that it then sells to US patients at $ 1,000 every,” Thomas explains. “In other nations like Egypt and India, however, Gilead provides Sovaldi at a 99% low cost off of the US price tag.”

“At the US cost, Gilead will recoup its Sovaldi growth investment of $ eleven billion in a single 12 months and then will stand to make extraordinary earnings off the backs of US consumers, who will subsidize the drug for other patients about the globe.”

According to Thomas, Gilead’s profit margin has tripled in recent instances and its at present running in the first quarter at a 44% revenue margin–which is more than double what a common pharmaceutical can make.”

The greatest illustration of the market place value of Sovaldi is primarily based on what Gilead charges to other industrialized nations—roughly half of what the US is currently being charged.

How does this happen?  According to Thomas, this is a perform of the “fractured payment system” in the US.

Thomas explains that in the United kingdom or in EU, in which they pay out half of what the US pays, there is not a lot leverage in that industry “because the single payer government technique and the payer speaks for everybody and they can negotiate half cost.”

Gilead is presently charging the US and other industrialized nations roughly twice what other countries are currently being charged.  A single explanation they can do this in accordance to Thomas is “because they can”, a perform connected to the nature of our fractured payment method. A 2nd essential reason is also since he believes Gilead is anxious about an additional drug in the pipeline 1-three many years out, and they want to make as significantly cash as they can ahead of there is another entity ready to sell a competing drug.

While Congress in theory could regulate the pricing of pharmaceuticals, there is presently no federal  legislative physique that has authority to oversee honest practices in setting pricing of pharmaceuticals–other than [e.g the FTC] addressing misrepresentations in public statements or in promoting, Thomas Explains.

One resolution, in accordance to Thomas, may possibly include creation of a single payer method, “so that we would be on par or even in a greater negotiating place than these other industrialized nations.”

Even so, Thomas believes that a far more realistic approach might involve a concerted campaign to spread the theme, “shame in the industry area, ” that might continue to spot external strain on Gilead to modify the pricing of their items.

“By publishing information, and presenting to numerous constituencies in the American wellness care technique, it may possibly be achievable to shame Gilead into retracting to some extent only what is palatable in this marketplace, ” adds Thomas.

The argument by Gilead–that the greater value of the drug will essentially eliminate prospective downstream costs related with hepatitis C- specially liver transplants and ongoing and finish of existence care- is in the end flawed in many respects.

Bitter Pill to Swallow: Can The US Industry Bear The Value Of Sovaldi?