I"m a better doctor for accepting that I have a mental health problem

I didn’t realise I had a mental health problem. I’m a GP and it’s a common misconception that we don’t get them. We get stressed, of course. We get burnout – yes. But we don’t get mental health problems.

When I found myself working in a practice hit, like so many others, by the lack of GPs and nurses of course it was difficult. Spending days as the only doctor for 8,500 patients was horrific. On-call days started early with visits that were left over from earlier in the week because we hadn’t had enough doctors to go out. There was a list of patients to call back before the phone lines even opened, booked in by the receptionists because they had nowhere else to put them. Blood results to look at. Medication queries to answer. Letters to read and file. Repeat prescriptions to sign. Complaints letters to respond to. Care Quality Commission boxes to tick.

It was never ending. Somehow, in the middle of all this, I was expected to try and make a quiet calm, caring bubble with each patient for ten minutes. I was meant to put all this out of my mind and focus only on them. It’s what they deserved and it’s what I wanted to do. But I couldn’t.

Medicine is a busy job. General practice is a busy job. I never expected to have quiet days. But when arriving at 7am, and leaving at 11pm isn’t enough – what is? The constant pressure and the never-ending demands on my time got to me. I wanted to be a good doctor for my patients, and a good colleague to the staff who were all struggling. I pushed myself because that’s what we do. It didn’t matter that I hadn’t stopped to eat, drink, go to the toilet – as long as I was doing the job that was all that counted.

But what I couldn’t see was that I wasn’t doing the job. I was nowhere near being the doctor I wanted to be. I was so tired, I couldn’t concentrate. I had to double check everything I prescribed in case I’d made a mistake. I sat and filed hundreds of blood results like a robot. Clicking “normal” over and over again but not realising my brain could well be missing something important. My judgment went out of the window. My referral rates went up. I did blood tests on everyone because I couldn’t think through what was wrong with them. I thought I was being stoic, carrying on. I couldn’t admit to myself that actually I wasn’t safe.

I ignored all the signs – sleepless nights, early morning waking, overeating, drinking too much, no enjoyment in anything, dreading the next day. I ignored that I was burnt out. I ignored that I was depressed.

I did this very successfully for months, until – inevitably – it crashed down. One more frantic on-call day was the tipping point. I resigned and got ready to walk away from my career in medicine. I was 34 years old.

With the help of friends, family and my GP I got better. I started to value my own health and wellbeing. I can’t be the best doctor if I don’t look after myself. The more I talk about it, the more colleagues I find feeling like I did. This isn’t safe, and it isn’t fair on anyone.

I’m a GP. I have a mental health problem. But I’m a better doctor for accepting that.

Dr Zoe Norris is supporting Mind’s work to improve the mental wellbeing of primary care staff at work

If you would like to write a blogpost for Views from the NHS frontline, read our guidelines and get in touch by emailing sarah.johnson@theguardian.com.

Do you work in the NHS? Please take our survey and tell us whether bullying is a problem and how it affects your work

Join the Healthcare Professionals Network to read more pieces like this. And follow us on Twitter (@GdnHealthcare) to keep up with the latest healthcare news and views.

I"m a better doctor for accepting that I have a mental health problem

Jonathan Trott"s situation demonstrates we nevertheless are extended way off accepting imperfection

Sadly for Trott, commentators are suggesting his job at worldwide degree now seems to be more than with the ECB hugely unlikely to thrust him into a high-strain circumstance that is creating him so numerous problems.

But he is dealing with criticism as well – former England captain Michael Vaughn has stated that if Trott’s exit was not for mental health factors as critical as then suggested, he for one feels “conned”.

Trott’s story apparently demonstrates numerous of the problems nevertheless surrounding mental overall health: the difficulty of labels, uncertainties about severity, the non-patient’s need to have for a “cure” – all of which may possibly be amplified when the patient is heroic – and very profitable.

Element of the dilemma is that mental sickness, which influences 1 in 4 Britons, is broad-ranging: it encompasses a whole host of diagnoses from relatively brief episodes of lower mood (which might not need specific intervention, although help from loved ones is beneficial) to the sort of severe enduring mental illnesses this kind of as schizophrenia with which the public is much much more au fait.

Recent healthcare orthodoxy is that psychological sickness, thanks to advances in talking therapies and pharmacology, can be handled or managed. This is all very good information. But probably our optimism goes as well far?

Because the actuality is that medical professionals can not usually intervene and make our individuals much better – or manage their condition – for great.

Actually, we know now that in some circumstances, mental illness can be a recurring illness with episodes – of depression, say – which come and go, irrespective of therapy.

And despite the fact that the public is much far more conscious of psychological illness and a lot more compassionate towards these with it, there really is a great deal much less sympathy for someone who just keeps falling unwell.

It is understandable. If you knew a person who stored breaking the same leg in the very same place, wouldn’t you shed patience with them?

There is a theory that society can be understanding towards the sick as lengthy as the sick play by the guidelines – in other words, if you get assist, you must then get much better. Fail to do that, or fall sick again, and you breach the guidelines, and society starts to turn away.

This is exacerbated in circumstances of workplace tension. “Stress” itself is a nebulous term – is it an sickness, a symptom, a fashionable complaint? It is utilized indiscriminately.

How much worse this perspective is when the perpetual patient transpires to be well-known as well – like an international cricketer. Here, we see a guy who has a life so several of us aspire to (or did).

His inability not to get greater – especially from an illness that is neither defined or noticeable – can appear almost insulting to anybody whose personal life or profession is mundane. Why can’t he try harder?

Yet, possibly we need to be making use of them as an instance for why this variety of unpredictable, difficult to diagnose, recurring metal illness should be regarded as a lot more kindly. Elite athletes are put underneath incredible strain – considerably of it monetary.

They are mindful of possessing devoted thousands of hrs to getting great at a single, often really narrow, skill. If that ought to fail, it is not just a match that could be lost, but an whole occupation. This in turn, piles on a lot more inner nervousness.

Plus – unlike the instructor or physician who will take time off for mental health issues with privacy – sports activities folks are publicly exposed. We all come to feel some type of ownership and the correct to comment.

Thankfully, there are therapies that can assist with performance-associated anxieties, which are useful no matter whether you are an England cricketer or run your own organization.

I’ve discovered straightforward suggestions about work can help: pointing out that you can stroll away from your recent occupation to yet another which may possibly be more satisfying and profitable has been liberating for some anxious individuals.

Usually if a patient feels it is Ok to get a break, that can totally free them from nervousness ample to get back to operate.

Certainly, we are acquiring far better at accepting and comprehending psychological well being troubles – but Jonathan Trott’s case exhibits that there is even now a prolonged way to go before the public can accept imperfection.

Jonathan Trott"s situation demonstrates we nevertheless are extended way off accepting imperfection