contempt etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
contempt etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

23 Haziran 2014 Pazartesi

The PIP chaos reveals the government"s contempt for disabled people | Sharon Brennan

Last yr, when I was waiting for a double lung transplant, my existence felt terrifyingly unpredictable. My lungs were failing, and it was challenging to cope emotionally, but a single factor that created factors slightly less difficult was the fast approach to secure disability residing allowance (DLA). This allowed me to make immediate decisions about getting carers to assist at home, getting the heating on far more, and taking taxis to appointments. It made a extremely hard time that tiny bit a lot more bearable.


Evaluate my encounter to that of Malcolm Graham, a 56-12 months-old from Romford. He was diagnosed with oesophageal cancer in September 2013 and applied for private independence payments (PIPs) on advice from Macmillan Cancer help and his nearby Citizens Suggestions. Pips are changing DLA and are supposed to assist individuals, regardless of whether in or out of work, to meet the added fees their disability triggers.


Graham says he has called the suitable department almost every single day in the eight months considering that he applied, and is nevertheless awaiting a last choice. Throughout that period he has endured 10 weeks of chemotherapy and a 10-hour operation in which big portions of his stomach and oesophagus were removed. He has had to rely on family and friends for monetary help, but is now in arrears on his electricity payments and has lately been visited by a debt recovery firm. With out the PIP mobility help he has utilized for, he is struggling to get out and about and says the wait has manufactured him feel ineffective and worthless. Following working for a lot more than 40 many years, he can not understand why the help he wants has been so far unattainable.


Graham is not alone in his wait for a selection. Last week, the public accounts committee report on the disastrous implementation of PIP however once more showed the cold-hearted contempt of the Division for Work and Pensions towards disabled folks. This has permitted us to be treated like guinea pigs, with an unwell-regarded and poorly trialed policy unleashed with tiny concern for the consequences.


PIPs had been at first trialed in the north of England in April 2013 just before currently being rolled out nationally just two months later on. In a very vital report on PIPs, published in February 2014, the Nationwide Audit Office mentioned this rush to implementation meant the DWP “did not allow ample time to test whether or not the assessment procedure could deal with big numbers of claims. As a result of this poor early operational efficiency, claimants face long and uncertain delays.”


By October 2013 only sixteen% of expected PIP choices had been created, partly because assessments by Atos and Capita, the private companies contracted by the government to approach these claims, have been only in a position to meet the anticipated 30 working-day turnaround of applications in 55% and 67% of situations respectively. The DWP had projected that 25% of assessments would avoid encounter-to-face consultations and be carried out solely on paper in actuality this figure is three%.


What is the result of this departmental failure? Terminally unwell folks, defined as those with less than 6 months to dwell, have waited for up to a month – 180% longer than expected – for a response as to regardless of whether they are entitled to government support in the final months of their lives. Beneath DLA the wait was 7 days. Ministers disingenuously protest that PIPs are a various benefit to DLA, when in fact the concepts for giving help to the terminally ill are the identical. What kind of government would make advantage changes that make terminally unwell people’s lives that bit harder anyway?


Mike Penning, minister for disabled individuals, protests that these delays have now been diminished to ten days, but there is no reply for those who are entitled to help but are not terminally ill. Last week’s report states that as a end result of delays of up to six months (despite the fact that charities have found that many candidates wait far longer), “some claimants have been forced to turn to meals banks, loans and charitable donations” although they wait for the rewards they are entitled to.


The DWP is lurching from 1 crisis to an additional, with genuine folks suffering genuine discomfort as a end result. David Cameron needs to urgently get to grips with what is taking place inside of that division. That procedure must start off these days, with a demand to Iain Duncan Smith that he publicly accepts accountability for the struggling that Graham, and the thousands of others like him, have gone through due to his department’s incompetence. Graham says he will get choked up just pondering about his predicament. He demands a determination – and an apology.



The PIP chaos reveals the government"s contempt for disabled people | Sharon Brennan

13 Mart 2014 Perşembe

Ministers accused of showing contempt with fresh squeeze on public sector spend

A nurse

Unison says it is a disgrace that 70% of nurses will get no spend rise this 12 months. Photograph: Christopher Furlong/Getty Photos




All around 600,000 NHS staff will acquire a reduce-than-anticipated pay rise soon after the government rejected a get in touch with for them to be awarded a 1% rise on prime of automated “progression spend” that averages around three%.


The government has also determined that 400 “very senior managers” in the NHS, who are no longer on progression pay will acquire no pay rise at all.


Danny Alexander, the chief secretary to the Treasury, explained the government necessary to press ahead with “public sector pay restraint” as he stated that the selections would conserve a complete of £200m in the NHS budget in 2014-15 and £400m in 2015-sixteen.


Christina McAnea, head of well being at Unison, mentioned: “This coalition government has taken a scalpel to the pay body’s report and will not escape the anger of NHS personnel. It’s a disgrace that 70% of nurses will not even get a shell out rise this yr – what sort of message does this give to the value this government spots on focused NHS workers?”


Unison criticised the government right after it set out how it would implement pay out rises for 2014-15 following it asked the pay assessment bodies to examine how a one% enhance could be applied to the pertinent public sector workforces.


In addition to the NHS selection the government announced a 1% boost for members of the armed forces, contractor medical doctors and nurses and members of the judiciary. Departments will award a 1% boost to senior civil servants on a discretionary basis and a one% rise will be awarded to the bulk of prison officers. Police and crime commissioners will acquire no enhance.


Alexander also announced that £1bn in employer public pension contributions will have to be paid by person government departments rather than from the treasury’s central “annually managed expenditure” pot. This will give Osborne an extra £1bn in up coming week’s spending budget, which he could invest in infrastructure. But it means that personal departments will have to make a higher contribution to pensions.


The training division will have to pay out an further 2.3%, working out at £330m in 2015-sixteen and £560m in 2016-17. For the civil services it will mean an additional two.2%, doing work out £275m a yr from 2015-16 and onwards. For the NHS it will be a .3% improve, functioning out at £125m a 12 months from 2015-sixteen.


The Treasury chief secretary mentioned of the 1% spend rises: “Public sector workers make a crucial contribution to the effective delivery of public services. We need to have to continue with public sector pay out restraint in order to place the nation’s finances back on a sustainable footing. We are delivering on our commitment to a one particular percent shell out rise for all except some of the most senior public sector employees.”


The determination on the NHS marks a rejection of the recommendation by the NHS Spend Assessment Entire body for all around 600,000 workers – around fifty five% of the complete.


Christina McAnea extra: “The government has proven complete contempt for the NHS, contempt for workers and contempt for individuals and will pay the cost at the ballot box. Even a straight 1% improve would be nowhere near adequate to meet the massive price-of-living increases that NHS workers have had to cope with given that 2010. Employees are on average 10% worse off than when the coalition came to power.”




Ministers accused of showing contempt with fresh squeeze on public sector spend