married etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
married etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

26 Mart 2017 Pazar

If Colin Dexter had married a woman from Rotherham | Brief letters

The moderation-better-than-dry theory is built on a fallacious interpretation of statistics (Drinking can be good for the heart – but only in moderation, 23 March). A significant proportion of those over 30 who are absolute abstainers are former alcoholics – many having quit drinking on the basis of urgent medical advice. Though “former and occasional drinkers” were separated from the non-drinkers in the study, the dead former drinkers are notably absent from it. The drinks industry will no doubt be delighted with the apparent results.
Kevin Bannon
London


Ian Mitchell’s GP doesn’t need to read the Guardian (Letters, 25 March). If he is like most doctors, he routinely upwardly adjusts patient-reported alcohol consumption by a factor of two, or three, or four.
Dr George Rylance
Bexhill-on-Sea, East Sussex


Colin Dexter was apparently of the opinion that had he moved to Rotherham, rather than Oxford, he would never have become a writer (Obituary, 23 March). This may well be true. But, if like Anthony Trollope, he had married a woman from Rotherham, he might have been still more prolific.
Martin Brayne
Chinley, Derbyshire


Not only has “anent” (Letters, 24 March) survived in Scotland: it has undergone mutation. Some years ago in the Scottish Office I was asked to clear a draft beginning “I have received your comments on my letter of … , and note your comments thereanent”.
Sebastian Robinson
Glasgow


Re the letters about encouraging new cartoonists (15 March and 24 March), before this all goes any further can I just say how much I enjoy the Doonesbury classic cartoons? New cartoonists, yes, but please not at the expense of what seems like an old friend rejuvenated.
Bernadette Crowley
Wallasey, Merseyside


I can’t understand why the Scandinavian and Nordic nations are so happy, given the price of their beer (Report, 21 March).
Michael Cunningham
Wolverhampton


Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com


Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters



If Colin Dexter had married a woman from Rotherham | Brief letters

16 Şubat 2017 Perşembe

Unhappily married? You’re not alone | Virginia Ironside

The marriage between Tini Owens and her multimillionaire mushroom farmer husband, Hugh, doesn’t sound like one that most of us would relish. She tried to divorce him last year, but was told by a judge that she couldn’t, because they hadn’t lived apart for five years. Now she has asked the court of appeal to overturn that ruling.


Hugh had, according to evidence supplied by Tini, constantly berated her about a year-long affair she’d had, rowed with her in an airport shop, criticised her to the housekeeper, avoided speaking to her during a meal in a pub – and asked her to pick up bits of cardboard from the garden.


But the accusation of “unreasonable behaviour” was thrown out because the judge decided the grounds were too flimsy. This is a very odd conclusion – the judge essentially told poor Mrs Owens she must stay married to a husband she no longer wants, until enough time has elapsed for his agreement to no longer be required. Yet I don’t entirely blame the judge; he was just upholding laws requiring a couple to have lived apart for at least five years if one party opposes the marriage’s dissolution.


The letters I received as an agony aunt showed me the vast range of behaviours in a marriage that some people are prepared to put up with – and not put up with. One reader and her husband hadn’t spoken to each other for five years – and used their son as an intermediary. But neither wanted to divorce. Another woman put up with her husband having countless affairs. Miserable as such marriages might seem to us, for those couples they were good enough.


On the other hand, one man wrote to say he wanted to leave his wife and children just because he’d spotted her kissing another man while drunk at an office party. No matter how she grovelled and apologised, he couldn’t accept it.


I would guess the problem in the Owens’ marriage is not so much that one behaved entirely unreasonably to the other; it is that they have different expectations of marriage. A man of Hugh’s age, 78, a man who’s done national service, a man who may have seen his own father behave in the same cavalier way to his mother as he behaved to Tini, just doesn’t see the problem. Marriage for him is for life, even if his wife did have an affair.


She, on the other hand, is looking for warmth and compatibility. She described to the court feeling “unloved”. And as she can’t get the warmth she needs from Hugh, at 65 she understandably wants to move on.



Unhappy couple


‘We’ve all witnessed married friends arguing and bickering so much that we wonder how they can stand each other.’ Photograph: Alamy

Tolstoy said: “All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.” But he was wrong. Happy – or happyish – families can be very different. They range from being comfortable and loving to those in which both partners feel that the upside of being married only just outweighs the downside. Unless behaviour is intolerable by any person’s standards, how can a judge rule on it?


If one partner spends the night gambling away the family savings and yet the other can tolerate this behaviour, then the relationship could be regarded as OK. Not happy, but bearable. We’ve all witnessed married friends behaving in a way that we would find unacceptable. They argue and bicker so much that we wonder how they can stand each other. But we don’t know what each partner gets out of this. Who knows, perhaps it’s a weird kind of foreplay? After they’ve had a good public snipe, they may go back home for glorious sex. To outsiders it’s a mystery how the relationship works, but somehow it does.


And we’ve all seen relationships break up when one or other of the partners “reforms” their bad behaviour. A woman complains bitterly about her alcoholic husband but finds living with him sober too much to bear.


Sometimes dysfunctional relationships totter on because partners’ behaviour resembles what they each experienced as a child. Although the protagonists may not exactly enjoy it, at least it reminds them of the security of being at home.


As for Tini feeling “unloved, isolated and alone”, is this grounds for divorce? Who hasn’t had a row in an airport shop? A silent meal? I’ve sat through hundreds. In Tini’s position, another woman might tell Hugh to pick up his own cardboard and laugh at his grumpiness.


I don’t know what the appeal court will decide about the Owens’ marriage, but as judge James Munby pointed out this week: “It is not a ground for divorce if you find yourself in a wretchedly unhappy marriage – people may say it should be.”


I don’t – because it’s often too difficult to say whether the petitioner is being made unhappy by the other person, or whether she or he is the sort who finds insult and cruelty in every breath their partner takes.


I started off by saying the Owens’s marriage isn’t one that most people would relish. But on reflection, who am I to say? I’ve met too many people who can happily shrug off behaviour I find wretched, to judge.



Unhappily married? You’re not alone | Virginia Ironside

14 Nisan 2014 Pazartesi

Married couples who diet more likely to argue, examine finds

The decrease their sugar ranges the much more they wished to make their partner suffer and the much more pins they caught in the voodoo effigy.


In a separate test, the couples have been told they were pitting their wits against each and every other in a series of brainteasers and reaction tests.


After the exams, the winner, who had in reality been taking part in towards a personal computer, could blast the loser with a noise by way of headphones.


They chose the duration, sound degree and the noise from a list of irritating choices which includes fingernails on a blackboard or a pneumatic drill. Once more, they proved more vengeful if they had not had ample to eat.


“Participants who had lower glucose levels caught much more pins into the voodoo doll and blasted their husband or wife with louder and longer noise blasts,” the psychologists reported to the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.


Despite the fact that as well considerably glucose, a naturally taking place sugar, can cause diabetes, the researchers warned that a lack of power leads to a lack of self manage which in flip means sufferers cannot rein in their aggression.


In extreme instances this could lead to domestic violence, the review claimed, incorporating: “People are often the most aggressive towards the individuals to whom they are closest-intimate partners.


“Intimate spouse violence may be partly a end result of bad self-handle.


“Self management of aggressive impulses calls for vitality, and considerably of this vitality is presented by glucose derived from the meals we consume.”



Married couples who diet more likely to argue, examine finds

1 Mart 2014 Cumartesi

Stan and Eva, married for 60 years, my real-lifestyle position models

rehab column family

‘Perhaps my sorrow at their going relates to a secret hankering for this previous-fashioned togetherness.’




Stan and Eva, my neighbours, moved in to our street far more than 60 years ago. Often, soon after an early morning trip to the industry, I knock on their door and hand in excess of a couple of turnips – something they use in soup and can’t get at the regional store. They usually insist on paying out, regardless of the reality that they give me tomatoes from their greenhouse in summertime and drop the magazine that comes with their Sunday newspaper through my door every week. “Eva cannot study small print and I’m not into ladies’ fashion,” says Stan.


This time, when he opens the door and appears inside the brown paper bag, he says, “Still never know the difference among a turnip and a swede?” I sheepishly confess that I never, but he thanks me even now, saying that he’ll steam it and serve it with steak for dinner.


When I request how he is, Stan tells me he does not really feel any worse than usual but he was recently diagnosed with cancer. A nurse visits often to drain the extra fluid from his lungs. “In no way smoked although,” he says, matter-of-factly.


He invites me in and I accept, keen to prolong my time away from the inevitable Saturday morning chaos at residence. Within, I perch on the sofa following to Eva, who wears Karl Lagerfeld-style dark glasses at all times. She is almost totally blind, but her standards are high. She keeps her hair in a sharp, silver Mary Quant bob and serves biscuits on Edwardian painted plates.


Stan and Eva are moving. Ruddy-cheeked estate agents have been pulling up outside their property all week in logoed cars, attempting to charm the couple to sign up with them. They talk excitedly about parquet flooring, plump with hope for the huge commission that a swift sale from an elderly couple could supply.


I have only acknowledged Stan and Eva for a quick time and nevertheless I’m sorry that they are leaving. They are the oldest people on the street and I often view them out of my bedroom window as they stroll slowly, carefully – arms linked – up the road collectively. In the couple of years I’ve lived here, the places they travel to have become a lot more and more constrained. But they nonetheless get out, nonetheless wrap up warm and appreciate their occasional day journeys to the numerous supermarkets. They know in which the scorching deals are. “Of program, it utilized to be the images, the opera, and Regent Street,” Eva says.


Even though I regret that they are going, I discover they are not overly sentimental. They see their slow exit from the street – and at some point from this world – as something wholly unsurprising, an inevitable occasion in the last chapter of their daily life collectively.


Perhaps what I’m selfishly lamenting is not basically the fact that the street will lose them, the stalwarts, the originals, but the loss of Stan and Eva as real-lifestyle part versions, an illustration of men and women in a marriage that is reliable, sound and for life. They need to bicker, get annoyed with each other and disagree – I’m sure of that. Up till retirement they earned their living as marketplace stall-holders in south London. ”Eva usually wore the trousers,” Stan says.


“But he got away with a lot since he was so handsome,” says Eva.


Existence has not spared them hardship, but they have endured the tough instances with each other: the death of one of their adult daughters from cancer, which led to the loss of their once powerful Jewish faith Stan’s two heart attacks Eva’s sight deteriorating whilst the rest of her entire body even now worked properly well. They are even now side-by-side, however: still planning their evening meal, placing their coats on each day to fetch the newspaper.


Probably my sorrow at their going relates to a secret hankering for this outdated-fashioned togetherness. It is distinct to how my parents are – not that they are in a miserable marriage. But they have often fought against togetherness and sometimes I want they’d be a bit more accepting of it and every single other, because absolutely acceptance and enjoy isn’t going to suggest there is no area for ache, disappointment and differing views.


As I depart, I guarantee Stan a salt beef bagel from the greatest store in London, a area he used to frequent. Final time they had been out of salt beef, so I settled for the bagel alone, which is by no means very the exact same. At property, I flip to R, who arrived early to watch the young children even though I went to the industry. He seems decidedly keen to depart for his afternoon shift at function, but before he goes I tell him that Stan and Eva are leaving. I say jokingly, but with a specific, apparent longing, that perhaps one particular day we’ll be the oldest individuals on the street.




Stan and Eva, married for 60 years, my real-lifestyle position models