Bedblocking etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
Bedblocking etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

15 Şubat 2017 Çarşamba

‘Bedblocking’ is stifling our hospitals. But there are ways to ease the burden | Anna Bawden

Lilian Hemsley, 86, was admitted to Queen’s Medical Centre on the outskirts of Nottingham on 30 December following a fall. Seven days later she was able to return home to Chilwell, south Nottinghamshire with a package of help in place. “The social workers were fantastic,” she says. “I had to have my bed moved downstairs and a commode – I wasn’t allowed home until they were sorted out. But they did it really quickly.” Following some interim homecare, Hemsley is getting help washing and dressing in the morning for four weeks through Nottinghamshire county council’s reablement service. She will soon be assessed for ongoing care needs.


But as last week’s figures from NHS England show, Hemsley was one of the lucky ones. All too often patients are stuck in hospital waiting for a social care package, even though they are fit to go home, including 89-year-old Iris Sibley, whose six months in Bristol Royal infirmary was widely reported. In December alone, across England, the number of patients who were officially recorded as stuck in hospital when they could have been discharged topped 6,000, while the number of delayed transfers of care days reached 195,286.


The issue of patients being fit to leave hospital but not able to be discharged – sometimes called “bedblocking” – costs the NHS some £800m a year. It leads to hold-ups in A&E as people are prevented from having operations and moving into wards. It also has an impact on elective surgery. About 70,000 delayed discharges were caused by social care provision not being in place either in the patient’s home or in nursing homes or residential care. As delayed transfers of care are very tightly defined, the true extent of patients remaining in hospital when they are fit to leave is widely believed to be much higher.


According to research by the Nuffield Trust, the number of patients delayed because they were waiting for a care package to be available at home or in a nursing home had risen 172% and 110% respectively since November 2010.


But Nottinghamshire is bucking the trend. Whereas in December, English councils were on average each responsible for 456 days’ delayed transfer of care, Nottinghamshire county council was responsible for just 65 days’ delay – none of them at Nottingham University hospitals trust, which runs QMC and the city hospital.


NUH is one of the biggest hospital trusts in the country, with 90 wards and 1,700 acute beds. On Friday, when I visit, it has 1,380 adult inpatients; 890 are aged over 65 and 111 are over 90. Each month, there are around 350 patients who need some form of social care on discharge.


Last year, Nottinghamshire county council introduced a “cluster” model that allocates 18 social workers to specific clusters of wards. They are the named care coordinators for those wards. From the moment a patient is admitted, the social workers are responsible for establishing potential care needs after discharge and sorting them out as quickly as possible.




As soon as a patient is admitted, social workers establish potential care needs – and sort them out quickly




“We have a nobody waits approach,” says Nicola Peace, a group manager at Nottinghamshire county council who is in charge of the social workers at both hospitals. That approach starts the moment a patient arrives in A&E. Like many hospitals, QMC is not meeting the target that 95% of patients should be seen within four hours in hospital A&E departments in England.


On Friday, 72.3% were seen within the four-hour window.


On a quiet day like Friday there were just three patients on a trolley waiting to go into one of the 20 dedicated bays where the most unwell patients are treated. Often this emergency assessment area is crammed to the rafters, says Dr Mark Simmonds, a critical care and acute medicine consultant at the hospital. “At one point over the new year, we had 180 patients in the emergency department,” he adds.


It is the community care officer Nicola Todd’s job to help ease the pressure on the emergency department. “Sometimes patients’ conditions could be dealt with in the community if they had a bit of social care,” she says. Todd spends most of her days on the phone organising urgent care packages for people who come through the emergency department’s doors but who don’t need to be admitted. Todd’s job is so demanding, the county council is paying for more temporary workers to help her do this triage.


QMC’s 45 wards are also under a lot of strain. On Friday, it had 93% occupancy, well above the 85% target. Over the winter it has opened 61 extra “escalation” beds and spent £139,000 running and staffing them in January alone.


The social workers liaise closely with doctors, nurses, occupational therapists, physiotherapists and dieticians to ensure discharge is not delayed. They attend daily “board round” meetings where patients’ medical progress and potential delays to discharge are discussed. And crucially, they assess patients’ social care requirements well before they are medically fit to go home. Peace says one of the best ways to prevent delayed discharge is to have a dedicated interim homecare service, which can provide services at very short notice, while a longer-term care package is organised.


On the dementia ward, Barry Jones, 83, is having the first assessment of his care needs. He has had a fall and may have heart problems and dementia. Denise Monaghan, a care coordinator based on the dementia ward, is here to do the assessment and to ensure social care doesn’t hold up his discharge when he is ready to return home. Monaghan explains to him that he will need more care and may not be able to go out as much as before. “My job is to make sure you will be safe and looked after at home,” she says. Monaghan checks that Jones wants to be at home and not in residential care. “I want to go home,” he says. Afterwards, Monaghan tells me he will need help getting dressed and ready for bed, and someone to help him with meals. An interim care package can be in place within 24 hours.


The case for reducing delays is overwhelming: on Friday there are 220 patients at QMC and the city hospital who are medically safe to go home, of whom 83 have already been logged as delayed transfers of care – most of them taking up beds because of bottlenecks within the hospital. These are not atypical numbers.


A homecare package costs £50 a day compared with the cost of a hospital bed of about £300. In Nottinghamshire, £818,000 of the health budget in 2016-17 has been redirected into the interim homecare service. This is in addition to £7.68m locally from the government’s Better Care Fund, which is designed to better integrate health and social care.


NUH could save £24.5m a year by cutting all its delays, as well as easing the pressure on the hospital. It has also invested heavily in a state-of-the-art IT system at both hospitals that records and monitors patients in real time. “Before, we used to walk around with pieces of paper and clipboards,” says Simmonds. “Now we no longer need observation charts at the end of patients’ beds. It connects everyone with the same information that’s totally up to date. And crucially it shows us where any delays are occurring.”


The system shows who is in A&E, how long they have been waiting, whether they are going to be admitted – and if so, to which ward. It shows where beds are available and possible pinch points. It is accurate to the minute and also flags up which patients could need social care before they can be discharged and what prescriptions they will need. Launched 18 months ago, this system, from the software company Nervecentre, has seen 6,500 mobile devices issued to all healthcare assistants, nurses, doctors, physiotherapists, occupational therapists and dieticians. They input patients’ medical details, any diagnostic tests or procedures that are necessary and provisional estimated discharge dates. Some social workers also have access to the system.


It is early days and Nottinghamshire has some way to go before it could be classed as the area with the fewest delayed transfers of care for social care. Latest NHS England figures from December show that Darlington reported none, Newcastle six and Rutland 10.


A spokeswoman for NHS England says: “Any increase in delays in being able to discharge patients as a result of pressures in social care affects the ability of hospitals to quickly admit emergency A&E patients, so the NHS is working closely with local councils and community health services to enable older patients to get the support they need after a hospital stay, back at home.”


Paul McKay, service director at Nottinghamshire county council, says: “The hospital discharge homecare service is a good investment as people can leave hospital sooner, and is also meeting the wishes of most older people who tell us they would prefer to live at home independently rather than in a care home setting.”


Liz Sergeant, part of the Emergency Care Improvement Programme (ECIP) at NHS Improve, says: “Our Emergency Care Improvement Programme teams are helping trusts to create teams within A&E and assessment units to allow patients to be treated at home when there is no clinical need for admission, or where the clinical needs can be met by services provided in the community.” Back in Chilwell, Hemsley is starting to feel much better. “I had my hair cut yesterday and tomorrow I’m going to church for the first time since before Christmas,” she says. “I’m really looking forward to that.”



‘Bedblocking’ is stifling our hospitals. But there are ways to ease the burden | Anna Bawden

8 Şubat 2017 Çarşamba

Bed-blocking three times worse than NHS figures show – study

The number of patients trapped in hospital despite being fit to leave is three times higher than official data shows, according to a study.


Nuffield Trust, a health thinktank said far more hospital beds were taken up by patients classed as “delayed transfers of care” than NHS England’s counting system detected.


NHS bosses said the findings bore out their own experience and the official figures hugely underestimated how many people had to stay in hospital because of problems elsewhere.


Nigel Edwards, Nuffield Trust’s chief executive, who undertook the research, said: “Our audits show that up to two-thirds of the patients stuck unnecessarily in hospital beds aren’t actually being counted in the official figures.


“That means that a typical 650-bed hospital may actually have only around 250 beds available for all its emergency patients, once you’ve taken out all the people who could go home if they had more support, and discounted maternity, paediatric and cancer beds.”


Delayed transfers – which some call bed-blocking – are running at their highest ever level, with 193,680 bed days lost because of it in November, according to the most recent official NHS figures.


Edwards cited his thinktank’s own research about bed occupancy trends at three small and medium-sized hospitals NHS hospitals and a separate study of 7,500 bed days in a large number of bigger hospitals.


In one small rural hospital, only 40 (24%) of the 277 patients examined were counted as delayed transfers of care (DToCs). However, 80 others (30%) were also fit to leave, and another 35 (13%) were not medically fit to be discharged but could have been safely looked after in a nursing home if places in them had been available.


Separate research by the Oak Group, a firm that reviews inpatient stays, found the same picture in the bigger hospitals it analysed. “These audits confirmed that significant numbers of patients could be cared for elsewhere; for typically 50%-60% of the acute bed days examined,” Edwards said.


He said 19% could have gone home without receiving any support afterwards, 28% needed nursing or social care support in order to get out of hospital, and 12% needed long-term supported live-in nursing or residential care.


“This failure to record the true situation is significantly increasing the pressure hospitals are facing. Speeding up the discharge of patients who would be better cared for elsewhere needs to be the top priority for the NHS and social services departments,” Edwards added.


Chris Hopson, the chief executive of NHS Employers, which represents NHS trusts, said: “Our hospital members tell us that because the official definition of delayed transfers is so specific, the actual number of patients medically fit to discharge, or who could be cared for in other settings, is much greater than the definition implies. So in that sense the problem of blocked hospital capacity is significantly greater than the DToC figures by themselves suggest.”


Separately, Whitehall’s spending watchdog has concluded that a £5.3bn reserve designed to relieve strain on overcrowded hospitals by integrating health and social care is failing to save money or stem the rise in admissions.


The Better Care Fund has not achieved the main targets set for it when it was established two years ago by the health secretary Jeremy Hunt, according to a report by the National Audit Office.


Health officials hoped to use the fund to reduce emergency admissions by 106,000, but the report discloses that admissions instead rose by 87,000. The fund was supposed to be used to make savings of £511m, but instead spent an additional £311m, the report says.


Officials had aimed to reduce the days lost when patients are ready to leave but cannot do so by 293,000, but instead that figure rose by 185,000, costing £146m more than planned, it adds.


Norman Lamb, the Liberal Democrats’ health spokesman, who helped draw up plans for the fund when a coalition minister, said the report showed the NHS was hurtling towards a “catastrophe” without a bigger financial injection.


“This does not undermine the case for joining up health and social care and ending the irrational divide which too often lets patients down. But it is a clear warning that with demand rising so rapidly, more funding is needed,” he said. “It would be unforgivable for the government not to act in light of these warnings.”


Meg Hillier, the chair of the public accounts committee, which scrutinises public spending for parliament, said the “deep flaws” in the fund were first highlighted two years ago but the warnings had not been heeded by ministers.


Under the Better Care Fund, councils receive money, mainly from the NHS budget, in return for introducing schemes to reduce demand for hospital care.


Auditors found that the Department of Health and NHS England were both over-optimistic about what the fund could achieve.


The NAO did notice some benefits from the fund, such as 90% of local areas agreeing or strongly agreeing that delivery of their plan had improved co-operation between different bodies.


A Department of Health spokesperson said: “The Better Care Fund is just one element of this government’s programme to integrate health and social care for the first time – and as the report recognises, it has already incentivised local areas to work together better. We will build on this for the future in making care even more joined up.”


An NHS England spokesperson said the NAO report was a “statement of the obvious” because the NHS never believed or claimed that cutting hospital budgets to fund social care would by itself save money.


“The obvious lesson for next phase of care integration is that joining up local NHS and council services may be worthwhile, but is not by itself a silver bullet solution to wider pressures on health and social care,” she said.



Bed-blocking three times worse than NHS figures show – study