Nauru etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
Nauru etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

5 Ağustos 2016 Cuma

Refugee with growing breast lump has medical transfer from Nauru cancelled

A refugee on Nauru with a growing lump in her breast has had her medical flight for treatment postponed indefinitely but has not been told why.


The 39-year-old Lebanese mother of four has had several scans over the past eight months that indicate the lump is growing, and doctors have requested she undergo a biopsy.


This week, more than a dozen refugees and asylum seekers who were scheduled to be flown to Papua New Guinea for medical treatment say they were told their flight, and their treatment, had been postponed for at least three weeks.


Related: NT royal commission ‘should also include children in immigration detention’


They were not told why their flights had been postponed but it has been reported that uncertainty over the legality of Australia’s offshore detention regime in that country has caused the flights to be abandoned.


The PNG supreme court ruled in April the Manus Island detention centre was “illegal and unconstitutional” and a decision in a second court challenge is imminent, which may further undermine Australia’s offshore regime there.


The woman on Nauru, whom the Guardian has chosen not to name, arrived in Australia in July 2013.


She first noticed a lump in her left breast about three years ago, but has developed increasing breast pain while living on Nauru, and has experienced a yellow-green discharge from her breast.


She underwent her first breast ultrasound on Nauru in late 2015. A subsequent ultrasound found two irregular masses in the woman’s left breast and confirmed at least one is growing.


Dr Paddy McLisky from Doctors 4 Refugees said a biopsy should have been arranged with some urgency at the first available opportunity.


“This is a medical scenario in which a biopsy is necessary to obtain a diagnosis and most importantly to rule out malignancy.”


McLisky said the woman did not have confidence in the Republic of Nauru hospital (RONH) to perform the biopsy safely.


“We are aware of multiple accounts that the RONH facilities are quite basic by Australian standards, and that general hygiene is a concern for refugees and asylum seekers who have attended RONH. The obvious solution is to have … [the refugee] assessed and a biopsy carried out in an appropriately resourced hospital in Australia.”


He said the woman was receiving a level of care “completely unacceptable in rural or metropolitan Australia”.


“Unfortunately, this case is only one of a multitude in which our government is falling far short of providing timely and adequate care to refugees and asylum seekers, due to political agendas.”


In response to questions from the Guardian, the department would not comment on the woman’s case specifically, but said in a statement:


“Due to unforeseen circumstances a medical transfer flight to Port Moresby scheduled for 4 August 2016 did not occur.


“The governments of Nauru and Australia are working with the government of Papua New Guinea to reschedule the transfer to Port Moresby for medical treatment as soon as possible.


“Persons scheduled for medical transfer will continue to receive medical treatment from the health services provider in Nauru.”


The department has consistently maintained that refugees and asylum seekers on Nauru and Manus Island have access to healthcare services “broadly comparable to those available within the Australian community”.


Australia has dedicated $ 26m towards upgrading Nauru’s hospital.


Meanwhile, on Australia’s other offshore detention island, Manus, refugees and asylum seekers held a late-night vigil for Pakistani refugee Kamil*, who drowned while swimming this week.


But refugees have also protested against plans by PNG authorities to bury the man on Manus Island. The detained refugees have said the man should be returned to his native Pakistan for burial, in accordance with his family’s wishes. They have even offered to sell their clothes and personal effects to fund the repatriation.


PNG authorities, after initially saying the man’s body could not be repatriated because it would cost too much, have agreed to meet with representatives of the refugees on Friday morning.


Australia funded the repatriation of two Iranian asylum seekers who died from injuries sustained while in detention on Manus: Reza Barati who was murdered by guards, and Hamid Kehazaei who died in a Brisbane hospital after his infection on Manus was inadequately treated.


However, a spokesman for the Department of Immigration and Border Protection said “funerary arrangements for refugees and transferees dying in Papua New Guinea are matters for the PNG government”.


“The department is aware that the PNG government has made contact with the deceased person’s next of kin and that local arrangements are being made for his burial.”


Iranian refugee Behrouz Boochani told the Guardian from inside the detention centre: “The Pakistani guys talked with Kamil’s family today and they do not agree to bury Kamil in Manus island. They want him sent back to Pakistan.


Related: Peter Dutton urged to ‘open his heart’ to plight of Iranian asylum seeker


“This is incredible that immigration want to bury him by force and it is immoral and inhumane. The Australian government is responsible and must send his body to Pakistan.”


Uncertainty over the future of the Manus regime has led to unrest in the detention centre compounds.


A Rohingyan refugee currently held at East Lorengau was prevented from a second suicide attempt in as many days, when fellow refugees took petrol from him. It’s understood the man had requested to return home, but because Rohingya people are not recognised as citizens by his native Myanmar he is legally stateless and cannot be returned there.


The Guardian has chosen to publish only the man’s first name, out of concern for his family in Pakistan.



Refugee with growing breast lump has medical transfer from Nauru cancelled

20 Haziran 2014 Cuma

Pregnant asylum seekers on Nauru transferred to Australia for abortions

Three pregnant asylum seekers have been transferred to Australia from offshore detention on Nauru soon after requesting abortions due to the harsh situations within the detention centre and because they did not want to deliver a little one up on Nauru, Guardian Australia understands.


Of the 3 girls – the first of whom was transferred in February – one had her pregnancy terminated although the other two have however to make a ultimate decision on the termination.


The February situation – of a Rohingyan girl named Salima – was reported by the ABC. Salima’s spouse Mamun advised the ABC from Brisbane: “If we born with a youngster in Nauru the youngster need to die since the services [are] not very good in there.


“There is a very little room. Households are given a fan. But in a single camp there is no fan. When you take meals – lunch and dinner – you need to be standing two hours in the line.”


The two most current instances involve pregnant ladies transferred to Darwin. A single family members were sent around three weeks in the past and an additional all around eight weeks in the past.


Youngster asylum seeker advocate group Chilout and a senior supply with expertise of the situations confirmed the transfers had occurred.


Chilout spokeswoman Sophie Peer explained all three females had cited conditions in detention and the longevity of remain on the tiny Pacific island state as reasons for their selections.


A leaked report, written by five independent health care specialists, documented the dire state of psychological overall health between pregnant ladies on Nauru. The report mentioned that most pregnant women on the island were struggling depression, with a lot of scoring 24 on the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale, in which depression is diagnosed with a score of ten.


Guardian Australia has also been advised by a senior supply that a 32-12 months-old woman was evacuated below emergency following a suicide try on Nauru last weekend.


“The actions taken by these families indicate just how dire the scenario is on Nauru,” stated Peer.


“From maternal overall health through to paediatric care and simple living situations, the entire facility on Nauru is inappropriate for women and kids.


“Our government has stripped these households of all hope and has created family members organizing decisions practically impossible.”


Immigration minister Scott Morrison did not respond to a request for comment.



Pregnant asylum seekers on Nauru transferred to Australia for abortions

16 Nisan 2014 Çarşamba

Nauru dengue fever outbreak sparks fresh worries about detention centre

An outbreak of dengue fever at an Australian refugee detention centre in Nauru sparked calls on Thursday for greater oversight at the facility, which has been criticised by rights groups and the United Nations.


Immigration minister Scott Morrison’s workplace said that health-related officers at the centre had confirmed three cases of the probably fatal tropical condition, which is transmitted by mosquitoes.


Two of people affected by the sickness are possible refugees awaiting processing, while the other was a member of employees working at the centre, they said.


“All 3 folks have been isolated and are getting suitable treatment and are anticipated to make a full recovery,” a spokeswoman for Morrison stated in a statement.


But Sarah Hanson-Youthful, immigration spokeswoman for the Greens, stated that outbreaks are inevitable in crowded camps like the 1 on Nauru and known as for higher independent oversight of the overseas refugee detention method.


“The government can not management these types of outbreaks in the harsh detention camp surroundings. With seven households to a tent, it truly is unattainable to preserve youngsters safe from the ailment,” she said in a statement.


Australia uses detention centres in Nauru and on Manus Island in Papua New Guinea to procedure would-be refugees sent there after attempting to get to Australia, usually in unsafe boats soon after paying out people smugglers in Indonesia.


Canberra’s difficult stance on asylum seekers, such as offshore processing and a blanket ban on men and women arriving by boat ever settling in Australia, has been criticised by the United Nations and other groups as unlawful and inhumane.


The UN large commissioner for refugees in a November report stated neither centre had a “fair and effective system for assessing refugee claims” nor offered “safe and humane situations of treatment method in detention”.


Nauru in specific has come underneath fire following president Baron Waqa earlier this 12 months unilaterally sacked the nation’s complete judiciary, 1 factor of what critics have called a creeping authoritarianism there.


Critics say that Australia has been unusually silent about developments in Nauru in purchase to make certain that the camp, which is vital to its immigration policy, stays open.


In February, a riot at the detention centre on Manus Island in Papua New Guinea left at least one particular asylum seeker dead and 77 a lot more injured.



Nauru dengue fever outbreak sparks fresh worries about detention centre