Realistic etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
Realistic etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

15 Ekim 2016 Cumartesi

Steve Hewlett: ‘People say I’m brave about cancer, but I’m realistic. I’m a storyteller’

Back in March, the broadcaster and journalist Steve Hewlett received the sort of mortal shock that frequently opens a newspaper article about how to deal with a serious illness: he was told by doctors, almost out of the blue, that he had an aggressive form of cancer that would be difficult to treat.


But Hewlett’s long experience as a journalist and media commentator for the BBC meant his story has followed a far less private path than most.


On hearing his diagnosis, Hewlett, 58, found himself, almost without missing a beat, wondering how best to communicate his situation and explain what he was learning along the way.


“My initial reaction, quite genuinely, was just to think ‘OK. My luck has finally run out.’ But there is something about journalism that is quite central to the person I am – a tendency to ask awkward questions. And I have realised over time that if I don’t understand something, it is quite possible that other people don’t either.”


So last month, Hewlett recorded the first of a series of candid radio interviews with Eddie Mair, the presenter of Radio 4’s PM news programme. Hewlett’s illness was not a secret among colleagues, but the impact of his decision to go public and talk on air about his medical journey was to give him the second big shock of his year, and this one was much more welcome.


“The size of the response has been amazing,” he told the Observer. “Hundreds of people are in touch. My social media followers went up by a thousand, for a start. People say I am brave about cancer, but I am just realistic. I have my moments, of course, when I well up.”


Hewlett suspects the strength of the public reaction is due to the rarity of hearing a couple of men just talking in a relaxed way about cancer. Hewlett’s analytical approach has always been no-nonsense, whether interrogating media executives on Radio 4, producing an award-winning 1991 BBC documentary from the Maze prison, or interviewing the late Libyan leader Colonel Gaddafi.


Now, in a chatty style, punctuated by his trademark phrase “to cut a long story short”, he has offered his listeners a down-to-earth assessment of his prospects, with honest reactions to his treatment, from details of his chapped hands and feet to his use of a cold cap to try to prevent major hair loss during chemotherapy.


The veteran radio critic Gillian Reynolds summed it up: Hewlett’s instinct for a strong story, she wrote in the Daily Telegraph, is what “makes him the best reporter on the unfolding story of his own physical change”.


For Hewlett though, Mair is at least half of the reason why the radio interviews work. “I have known Eddie for a long time, though not particularly well. When I was offered the chance to talk about the cancer on air, I suggested his show because it is a fairly free format. If he was willing – and warmed to the idea – I said, go ahead. But I have been amazed by the amount of time given to it. The first was almost a third of the programme. The second almost crashed the 6pm pips.”


Gwyneth Williams, controller of Radio 4, has also suggested that Hewlett record a diary for a separate documentary. “I have never had much trouble talking, after all,” Hewlett drily notes. “And so far I have had few side-effects from treatment.”


The scale of listener reaction is “enormously gratifying” to him and he says he has been especially pleased to hear from former colleagues, from his time as director of programmes at Carlton TV, where he produced the acclaimed Second World War in Colour, and right back to Panorama, where he was in charge when Princess Diana gave her famous “there were three of us in this marriage” interview to Martin Bashir in 1995.


Aside from replying to kind correspondence, Hewlett is persisting with research into potential treatments for his condition: advanced oesophageal cancer. Many of his doctors seem, he says, grateful to discuss possibilities with an informed patient. “I’ve looked up clinical trials and drug development programmes because I have the time. I don’t know how much anyone can do to alter the outcome, but you can make the journey better for yourself.”


The latest news on his condition is not great because the first round of chemotherapy failed two weeks ago, after a beguilingly positive start: “It gave me three or four months of improvement and without that I might not be here now. Now I have uncertainty again. I feel as if I have been given notice, that’s all, but can’t know yet if I will be one of those who respond well to the next kind of chemotherapy. There is only around a 4% chance of full remission in any case.”


There is a tendency to endow people who are confronting death with a superior brand of wisdom. Some deliver on these expectations, providing memorable music, in the case of David Bowie, or poetic visions, like the playwright Dennis Potter. Hewlett, however, is not of a contemplative or morbid bent. He is an enthusiast and, in his own phrase, “a question-asker”. So he has straightforward advice to offer, like the tip, passed on to him by his BBC colleague Nick Robinson, that chemotherapy can make you prone to sunburn.


“Most of us will end up in my position at some point, although it is not quite the same when an older person dies,” Hewlett says. “Then there is something almost orderly, or even natural, about gradually sloughing off this mortal coil. This is different.”


An avowed rationalist, he has now had to reconsider his easy dismissal of the “touchy feely” rhetoric of care. He now “listens to his body”, he says, and admits that the aromatherapy sessions set up by the Royal Marsden have helped him to relax: “It has challenged my attitudes.”


This week he is scheduled to rejoin Mair on PM alongside his three sons, Fred, 29, Bill, 24, and Bert, 19. His openness has helped them, he thinks.


“Some ill people feel an instinct to protect their family and say nothing, and that is common among men, apparently, as well as among mothers. But I found talking helps because it gives them a reason why I am behaving in a particular way. It seems important to tell people who might feel they can only see the same grumpy bastard.”


Hewlett’s long streak of luck, he recounts, started when he was taken from a children’s home in Birmingham as a baby and handed to his adoptive parents, Larry and Vera. “I did luck out there,” he says fondly, before listing a further series of fortunate incidents that shaped his career, starting with the moment he was on hand when the BBC needed a local Manchester journalist to find the identity of two men involved with a crime.


The fates nearly turned against him in the mid-1980s when his student activism was detected by the BBC’s covert vetting system and his contract was terminated. In 1985, his evidence to Observer journalists David Leigh and Paul Lashmar helped reveal the processes by which MI5 once controlled the hiring and firing of BBC staff.


Offered a job on the BBC1 consumer show That’s Life, Hewlett instead took a production role with independent company Diverse, making his name with The Friday Alternative and Brass Tacks, before joining Channel 4, then Carlton, then returning to the BBC.


He has, he says, a “tenacious” grip on a story and remains determined to tell this one. All the same, he is unsure whether to track down his birth parents. There is, he points out, now a genetic interest in finding out what happened to them. He would like to give his sons the information.


“It is a hard one,” he says. “It might be worth it, or it might bring someone a brief agony after a lifetime of emotional pain.”


Maybe caution will win out here. Or possibly Hewlett’s instinct is too strong. “I now realise that is really what I am about. I am a storyteller.”



Steve Hewlett: ‘People say I’m brave about cancer, but I’m realistic. I’m a storyteller’

28 Şubat 2014 Cuma

FDA Proposes Adjustments To Nutrition Label Including A lot more "Realistic" Serving Sizes

Get pleasure from a late-night bowl of ice cream? Confident you are consuming a “sensible” quantity of calories obtaining surveyed the back-of-package labeling? If that is you, the FDA is about to drop a sugar, unwanted fat and calorie-laden bomb all over your midnight delusions.


As portion of its proposal to update the Nutrition Details label that’s found on most food packages in the United States, as unveiled by 1st Lady Michelle Obama on Thursday, the FDA is revising serving sizes to reflect how considerably Americans in fact consume in one sitting nowadays. The recent serving sizes had been place in area in 1994, and there’s no question that appetites have grown because then.


At present, the labeling on a pint of ice cream claims to supply 4 servings that is just half a cup a serving. The new labeling doubles the portion sizes. A pint will give only two portions considering that that quantity is a much more genuine representation of how considerably is scooped into a bowl at a time. Ben &amp Jerry’s Chocolate Fudge Brownie taste currently functions 270 calories a serving. If the FDA’s modifications are implemented, the calorie count shoots up to 540 calories a serving. Less sensible, far more sensational.


Still, at least you’ll no longer be mystified as to why your jeans no longer match.


LABEL_REVISIONS_FINAL4_no_captions


In one more example of a lot more practical serving sizes, each twelve ounce and 20 ounce bottles of drink will equal one serving (at existing, twenty ounce bottles declare to offer 2.five servings), since men and women generally consume the two drink sizes in one particular sitting. The calorie estimate will enhance by 50 percent or 150 percent accordingly and will aid folks realistically calculate and track their calorie consumption. And buyers will not be in a position to miss these markers either since the most visible adjust is that the calorie counts are greater and bolder for greater emphasis.


While most food items and drinks are consumed in higher quantities than the labeling presently admits, this isn’t the situation with every thing. In accordance to in depth FDA research single-sitting consumption quantity for yogurts have shrunk from eight ounces to six ounces and the new labeling will be amended to reflect this.


“For 20 many years shoppers have come to depend on the iconic nutrition label to assist them make healthier food choices,” explained FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D. “To remain relevant, the FDA’s newly proposed Nutrition Details label incorporates the newest in nutrition science as a lot more has been discovered about the connection in between what we consume and the advancement of serious persistent illnesses impacting millions of Americans.”


The Nutrition Facts label was launched 20 years ago and the label has not transformed drastically considering that 2006 when details on trans body fat had to be disclosed on the label. Companies had been successful impelled to reduce partially hydrogenated oils, the major supply of trans unwanted fat, in a lot of processed foods merchandise, says the FDA.


In another substantial proposed label change, the panel will feature a separate line for additional sugars. This is meant to support customers differentiate in between sugars that are naturally present in food items and sugars that are added in the manufacturing process. The end goal is to have consumers make a lot more healthful choices where they opt for meals with normal sugars from substances this kind of as fruit purees or dried fruits.


Additionally, companies have to maintain data for a time period of two many years so they can show the variation amongst natural and added refined sugars if questioned by the FDA.


Nutritionists advise that we need to get only about ten percent of our calorie consumption from sugar. This is equivalent to about 13 teaspoons of sugar per day. On average, Americans get over 42 teaspoons of sugar a day (based on two,000 calories per day).


To make the dietary labeling a lot more pertinent and a lot more streamlined, the proposal suggests cutting the listing of calories from fat. Experts say this marker can be misleading given that type of unwanted fat is much more considerable to wellness than sum, a consideration of the truth that there are very good fats and undesirable fats. As a reflection of this, “Total Excess fat,” “Saturated Body fat,” and “Trans Fat” will nonetheless be required on the label.


“For 20 years shoppers have come to rely on the iconic nutrition label to help them make healthier food choices,” stated FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D. “To remain relevant, the FDA’s newly proposed Nutrition Facts label incorporates the latest in nutrition science as more has been learned about the connection among what we consume and the advancement of severe persistent illnesses impacting hundreds of thousands of Americans.”


The FDA says that it is accepting public comment on the proposed adjustments for 90 days. Need to they be authorized, there is no timeline set for when the new specifications will be implemented.


Extra proposed label alterations, in accordance to the FDA:



  • Present “dual column” labels to indicate the two “per serving” and “per package” calorie and nutrition data for greater packages that could be consumed in one particular sitting or multiple sittings.



  • Demand the declaration of potassium and vitamin D, nutrients that some in the U.S. population are not obtaining ample of, which puts them at increased threat for chronic condition. Vitamin D is crucial for its function in bone well being. Potassium is advantageous in reducing blood strain. Nutritional vitamins A and C would no longer be required on the label, although companies could declare them voluntarily.



  • Revise the Daily Values for a range of nutrients this kind of as sodium, dietary fiber and Vitamin D. Daily Values are utilized to calculate the Percent Every day Worth on the label, which aids shoppers understand the nutrition data in the context of a complete daily diet plan.



FDA Proposes Adjustments To Nutrition Label Including A lot more "Realistic" Serving Sizes