accurate etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
accurate etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

30 Kasım 2016 Çarşamba

LDL Particle Number: Possibly an Accurate Predictor of Heart Disease Risk

Many people today prefer to consume foods that contain less cholesterol such as lean meat, eating eggs by discarding the yolk or only taking a few eggs per week, and avoid eating seafood as they are believed to have high cholesterol levels. The main reason behind that is because we have been told that dietary cholesterol in foods raises blood cholesterol.


More recent evidence does not support the idea, which is based on a study performed on rabbits 50 years ago.


What is cholesterol?


Cholesterol is an organic molecule, a fat-like substance that occurs naturally in our body and all other animals living on earth. It is a 27-carbon molecule that many scientists and general public view it as being harmful, to the contrary, it is essential for our body to function.


Being a steroid alcohol, it can be “free” or “esterified” which is its active form. It also can exist in its “esterified”, a storage form which is known a cholesterol ester.


Cholesterol contributes to the strength of the membrane structure of every single cell in our body. It plays a crucial role in strengthening lipid rafts that contain protein-based molecules such as receptors and ion channels.


It is a building block for the production of vitamin D and various steroid hormones (including reproductive hormones) and bile acids. It is a very little known fact that cholesterol and its derivatives, namely vitamin D, bile acids, and bilirubin act as antioxidants.


Dietary cholesterol has little effect on body cholesterol


All this while, many people believe that dietary cholesterol would raise blood cholesterol levels. It’s only true for some people that are ‘high responders, which comprises about 25% of the population.


It’s also so true for diabetics, for instance, they are advised against taking eggs as elevated free radicals caused by high blood glucose (oxidative stress) leads to oxidative damage – meaning damage occurs at cellular levels to plasma and mitochondrial membrane. This condition causes blood cholesterol levels to rise because they are needed to repair both membranes.


Our body tightly regulates the synthesis of cholesterol by producing almost all the cholesterol it needs. At the same time, it absorbs a relatively small amount of cholesterol from foods containing it. When our dietary intake of cholesterol decreases our body would respond by producing more cholesterol. In contrast, when we eat larger amounts of cholesterol, our body produces less.


Most of the dietary cholesterol is not absorbed and is excreted by our gut in the form of stool. Much (> 50%) of the cholesterol we ingest from food is esterified, hence we don’t actually absorb much if any, exogenous cholesterol (i.e., dietary cholesterol). As only unesterified cholesterol is easily absorbable, dietary cholesterol which is high in esterified cholesterol has to be de-esterified to become an unesterified form in order to be easily absorbed into hepatic veins.


The aforementioned arguments are typically ignored by many scientists, dieticians, allopathic doctors, and educators. Their ignorance is believed to stem from focusing too much on lectures and materials in their college-year textbooks. The truth is that the material they obtain from lectures and textbooks can be very out of date.


Dr. Peter Attia says,


“About 25% of our daily “intake” of cholesterol – roughly 300 to 500 mg — comes from what we eat (called exogenous cholesterol), and the remaining 75% of our “intake” of cholesterol — roughly 800 to 1,200 mg – is made by our body (called endogenous production).  To put these amounts in context, consider that total body stores of cholesterol are about 30 to 40 gm (i.e., 30,000 to 40,000 mg) and most of this resides within our cell membranes.”


Our liver synthesizes about 20% of the made or synthesized cholesterol while the rest (80%) is synthesized by other cells in our body. This may be translated as only very few cells require a delivery of cholesterol because most of the cholesterol resides within our cell membranes.


Does particle size matter?


Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) is responsible for carrying cholesterol particles throughout our body. It makes up 60–70% of total blood lipoproteins and often referred to as “bad” cholesterol because it has been linked to atherosclerosis, or the buildup of plaque in arteries. High LDL levels are associated with an increased risk of heart disease – the higher the level, the greater the risk.


There are different types of LDL categorized according to particle size, namely small LDL, dense LDL or large LDL. People who have mostly small LDL particles are found to be at a greater risk of developing heart disease than those with mostly large LDL particles.


Still, some scientists argue that the most important risk factor is not the size of LDL particles. It is the number that matters the most. This measurement is called LDL particle number, or LDL-P. In fact, the higher number of LDL particles one have, the greater his/her risk of developing heart disease. Some experts believe it is a much more accurate of cardiovascular disease risk than either LDL or total cholesterol levels.


Elevated LDL particle number – affected by triglycerides levels


Besides cholesterol, LDL also carry triglycerides, fat-soluble vitamins, and antioxidants. You may imagine LDL primary task is to deliver all those vital nutrients to cells and tissues of the body.


Each LDL has a certain limit in term of the number of cholesterol it can carry. When the number of triglycerides increases, the amount of cholesterol it carries decreases, which in turn causes the liver to produce more LDL particles to transport the same amount of cholesterol around the body.


Elevated LDL particle number – mechanism


Several factors have been associated with elevated LDL-P, including insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, poor thyroid function, infections, leaky gut, and genetic. Mechanism of each factor is not discussed here as it would make the article becomes very long.


In alternative medicine, well-trained practitioners would always focus on finding the underlying or root cause of the problem. After identifying, appropriate measures such as lifestyle changes are always used as the first line of treatment. In a case of leaky gut, for instance, clients are always advised to change their diet by avoiding foods believed to exacerbate the condition while at the same time take more foods thought to be beneficial in alleviating it.


If the clients experience chronic stress, they are advised to manage the stress diligently. Some herbs such as adaptogens and relaxants may also help to relieve the stress. Most of the time, proper lifestyle intervention makes medication unnecessary.


All the factors associated with elevated LDL-P are believed can be addressed by adopting proper lifestyle changes, except genetic.


Note


Heart disease is a complex, multifactorial process, therefore, the likelihood of having a heart attack depends on numerous factors. This article does not suggest that LDL-P is the only risk factor that matters, or that other risk factors should not be taken into consideration.


Oxidized cholesterols and other oxidized lipids such as lipid peroxides, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and aldehydes, all of which formed when vegetable oils are heated and carried by LDL are also believed to be possible causes of atherosclerosis. So, frequent consumption of deep fried foods especially fried using polyunsaturated fats might not be a good idea. Chronis stress, smoking, heavy drinking, and toxin overload due to poor diet, overeating, or poor detoxification are also believed to cause atherosclerosis.


Studies also found that polyunsaturated fats are easily oxidized to aldehydes even when heated below smoke point. Aldehydes are potent oxidizing agents, meaning they are able to oxidize any molecules including that in the cell membrane, ie., various ion channels (for instance, they cause damage to calcium channel, eventually may cause calcium to enter cells at higher levels, which results in atherosclerosis).



LDL Particle Number: Possibly an Accurate Predictor of Heart Disease Risk

8 Temmuz 2014 Salı

HIV property-exams ban lifted but patience needed for an accurate consequence

HIV professionals have welcomed the lifting of a restriction on the sale of HIV property-exams in Australia, but say there is a danger some men and women may possibly check themselves as well early to get an precise end result.


As component of the government’s aim to significantly reduce HIV infections by 2020, companies of HIV house testing kits can apply to Australia’s drug regulator for approval of their exams and to promote them immediately to consumers.


The well being minister, Peter Dutton, also announced Monday that from July subsequent year, HIV antiretroviral medicines will be available through neighborhood pharmacies, with individuals at present limited to acquiring their treatment options from hospital pharmacies.


There had been far more than 1,200 new HIV infections in Australia last yr, the highest number in two decades. Up to twenty% of people with HIV in Australia are unaware they have it.


A clinical nurse advisor with the HIV and communicable conditions unit at St Vincent’s hospital in Sydney, John McAllister, stated simple access to testing was notably critical for challenging-to-reach groups who may possibly not usually see a medical doctor, such as these in rural places.


Once people knew they had HIV, most modified their behaviour to shield other people by disclosing the issue and employing condoms, he said.


But men and women essential to be conscious it could get up to three months from when very first turning into contaminated until the residence oral-swab exams could detect the infection, he mentioned.


“The danger is a person may well test also early, check negative, and assume they’re Okay when in reality they are not,” he stated.


“People with early undetected HIV infections are very infectious.”


People who believed they had been infected within the previous three months need to see their medical doctor for one of the other sorts of HIV exams accessible instead.


Most folks who get antiretroviral treatments as directed minimize their possibility of transmitting the virus to other people for the duration of unprotected intercourse by up to 96%. It indicates that making certain folks with HIV are conscious they have it, are receiving remedy, and can very easily access medication is crucial to avoiding its spread.


Director of the Institute for Immunology and Infectious Illnesses at Murdoch University in Western Australia, Professor Simon Mallal, explained home HIV testing and accessibility to HIV treatment method at regional pharmacies have been crucial additions to existing prevention approaches, this kind of as condom use.


“We require for it to be as easy as achievable for someone with HIV to select to be examined, see an skilled in HIV care regularly and consider HIV tablets for existence,” he explained.


But it was crucial support be accessible to these testing at home in case the consequence indicated HIV infection, he explained.


“An understandable nervousness around residence testing is that the patient misses out on the pre- and submit-test counselling they would get when tested in a doctor’s office,” Mallal said.


“When folks check at home they might obtain a outcome and not have that specialist guidance about how to interpret it, and they could be left on their personal to grapple with potentially scary information.


“It’s really crucial that individuals are extremely swiftly linked with an skilled who can reassure them that these days, HIV is a manageable disease with the proper therapy.”


It was also critical that individuals verify the test end result with their medical doctor, he stated.


The test is already widely obtainable in the US – the place they sell for about $ forty – and contains info about a 24-hour phone service for support if a positive result is indicated.



HIV property-exams ban lifted but patience needed for an accurate consequence

25 Mart 2014 Salı

The NHS fraud story would be horrible, if it have been accurate | Zoe Williams

Illustration by Belle Mellor

‘This government has denigrated the NHS so persistently that I locate it not possible to believe it didn’t have a hand in these trumped-up fraud claims.’ Illustration: Belle Mellor




Terrible information, isn’t it, that the NHS loses £5bn a year by way of fraud just awful … to consider that people would steal from the public institution we all claim to be so in enjoy with.


But like so a lot of fables of recent background – do folks truly breed for the child advantage? do foreigners really leave their homes and buddies and every little thing they know just to come and leech off our unemployment positive aspects, considering, “I hope I get cancer, that way I can really max out my EU entitlements”? – we can file this underneath “It would be horrible, if it had been true”.


The independent reality-checking organisation Total Reality took a restrained approach to this information, which was presented on Panorama earlier this week: it simply explained we could not know from the evidence we have whether or not this figure is proper. We have data covering bent dentists (or “bentists” as this report tragically by no means calls them) and we have evidence of fraud associated to patient charges, and the two figures combined amount to £229m (it sounds like a good deal, but as a proportion of the NHS’s annual £100bn spending budget, is not). It is also a prolonged way from £5bn.


If you want to speak about fraud across government, the biggest losses by a mile are by means of tax fraud and procurement, our general lesson is, will not tangle with wealthy men and women or the private sector, except if you want to drop your shirt. But let us be concerned about that some other time.


So exactly where on earth did the £5bn figure come from? Roy Lilley, wellness policy analyst and a former chairman of an NHS trust, says: “They took a whole lot of data from a lot of other countries, more than a extremely prolonged period, crashed it all together, and then stated, ‘This is the average percentage misplaced by means of fraud – if the NHS is common, then this is how considerably they lose’.” Even taking an average like that was methodologically flawed – the sample was small and the variety was enormous, running from .six% in a single nation to a lot more than 15% in another.


Assuming the NHS to be average is unreasonable – our healthcare is (altogether now) cost-free at the stage of use. There just are not as a lot of transactions within it, as there are in an insurance-based technique, for fraud to creep into. And why ought to the NHS accept a determination by an accountancy firm that they are most likely typical, and getting regular they most likely shed an regular – which is to say outrageous – volume of cash? They could reasonably flip close to and say: “We’re not common, we’re excellent. We are 1st or 2nd in the planet on most metrics.”


What possessed Panorama to run something on such weak proof? Has it had its budgets reduce? Does it have an anti-NHS mole at the highest level? Someone must do a Panorama into what’s going on at Panorama. Or it may well be less difficult just to collate an typical competency of investigative journalists across six countries and twenty many years and place them in the middle of it. See how they like it.


This government has denigrated the NHS so persistently that I discover it impossible to think it didn’t have a hand in these trumped-up fraud claims, nevertheless concurrently it truly is comparatively straightforward to think that it has poisoned the nicely against the wellness service so efficiently that conspiracy is pointless. The anti-NHS mood music has been set now it can stand back and let that other (as soon as loved) public institution, the BBC, do the function for them.


If you pan out from this story you will see that it truly is part of the new landscape in which fraud is everywhere and every person is out for what ever they can get. Councils are so fleeced by benefits’ claimants that they have to set up lie detector software program on their telephone systems (not simply because it operates, but to send a message). Outsourcing is a quagmire in which alleged dishonesty – charging the Ministry of Justice for tagging prisoners who do not exist, for instance – is nominally penalised, then rewarded with fresh contracts.


In the uncommon event there is no scope for fraud, public techniques are managed so badly that you’d be undertaking them a favour to steal from them, just to put them out of their misery. Student charges tripled and but the government discovered a way not to make any a lot more cash out of it. “We just received it incorrect,” it says, with a metaphorical shrug, and possibly a literal one particular as well.


You discover your self, if you spend even modest focus, thinking: “What is the stage of all this?” And that’s the point: to make public companies search like an impossible dream, yesterday’s utopia.


I was raised below governments that would place out their own eyes prior to they would admit to obtaining mismanaged anything at all, or admit any weakness in the way their institutions were run. It has been a tough adjustment to make, to 1 that actively seeks to undermine its institutions, blows its own whistle, admit its own error.


It appears like honesty, but it truly is not. The results of this hand-wringing can be traced most plainly in the university story: they admitted error just as a prelude to the declare that the entire sorry enterprise is now unaffordable. Will charges have to go up? They can’t rule it out. Is this the end of a costs cap altogether? You might feel that, they could not perhaps comment (right up until after the election). If they had come out fighting, we could have fought back coming out crawling, whimpering at their own inadequacy, all we can do is accept that they’ve done their greatest.


Except that I don’t feel it. I will not believe that everyone’s bent or incompetent. I don’t think our institutions are unviable. I just feel we have acquired the incorrect men and women in charge.




The NHS fraud story would be horrible, if it have been accurate | Zoe Williams