backlash etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
backlash etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

25 Nisan 2017 Salı

Backlash after report claims saturated fats do not increase heart risk

Saturated fat does not increase the risk of a heart attack by clogging up arteries, three cardiologists have said in a challenge to medical thinking, sparking a furious backlash.


In an editorial published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine the cardiologists also write that relying on foodstuffs marketed as “low fat” or “proved to lower cholesterol” to avoid heart disease is “misguided”.


A key previous research study, they say, “showed no association between saturated fat consumption and all-cause mortality, coronary heart disease, CHD mortality, ischaemic stroke or type-2 diabetes in healthy adults”. Instead they say that a Mediterranean-style diet and 22 minutes of walking a day are the best ways to prevent heart problems.


The paper co-authored by Pascal Meier, a cardiologist at University College London and editor of the journal BMJ Open Heart; Rita Redberg, the editor of the American journal JAMA Internal Medicine; and Aseem Malhotra, a cardiologist at the NHS’s Lister hospital in Stevenage, has triggered furious criticism from a range of experts in cardiology and evidence-based medicine. Some said the views were not based on reliable evidence and would mislead consumers and further confuse the public over which foods they should eat and which they should avoid.


They also dismiss the potential for a smaller intake of saturated fats to help prevent heart disease. “There is no benefit from reduced fat, including saturated fat, on myocardial infarction [heart attacks], cardiovascular or all-cause mortality,” they say.


Instead of adopting a low-fat diet, people seeking to cut their risk of heart problems should instead follow “an energy-unrestricted Mediterranean diet (41%) fat supplemented with at least four tablespoons of extra virgin olive oil or a handful of nuts”.


But critics responded by accusing the co-authors of naiveté, ignoring evidence which contradicts their theories and simplifying a hugely complex issue.


Dr Amitava Banrejee, a senior clinical lecturer in clinical data science and honorary consultant cardiologist at UCL, said: “Unfortunately the authors have reported evidence simplistically and selectively. They failed to cite a rigorous Cochrane systematic review which concluded that cutting down dietary saturated fat was associated with a 17% reduction in cardiovascular events, including CHD, on the basis of 15 randomised trials.”


Dr Gavin Sandercock, director of research at Essex University, rejected the trio’s claims about the benefit of “replacing refined carbohydrates with healthy high fat foods” as not true and not based on any existing evidence. “We must continue to research the complex links between fat, cholesterol and heart disease but we must not replace one myth with another”, Sandercock said.


Christine Williams, professor of human nutrition at Reading University, said the cardiologists’ dietary advice was impractical, especially for poorer people. “The nature of their public health advice appears to be one of ‘let them eat nuts and olive oil’ with no consideration of how this might be successfully achieved in the UK general population and in people of different ages, socioeconomic backgrounds or dietary preferences,” she said.


However, some experts did back the authors. Dr Mary Hannon-Fletcher, head of the school of health sciences at Ulster University, hailed their views as “the best dietary and exercise advice I have read in recent years. Walking 22 minutes a day and eating real food. This is an excellent public health message.


“The modern idea of a healthy diet where we eat low-fat and low-calorie foods is simply not a healthy option. All of these foods have been so altered they are anything but healthy. So eating real foods in moderation and exercising daily is the answer to keeping fit and healthy; it’s just too simple a message for the public to take on board,” she said.


Gaynor Bussell, a dietitician and member of the British Dietetic Association, also offered the authors qualified support. “Many of us now feel that a predominantly Med-style diet can be healthy with slightly more fats and fewer carbs, provided the fats are ‘good’ – such as in olive oil, nuts or avocados,” she said.


However, saturated fats should comprise no more than 11% of anyone’s food intake, she said – far less than the 41% fat level backed by the co-authors.


While carbohydrates should still be part of every meal, people should routinely consume high fibre or wholegrain versions, Bussell said.


Williams also accused the BJSM of publishing opinions seeking to portray saturated fats as “innocent” in the causation of heart disease in order to generate headlines. “Some would argue the journals have a very credible business model based on attracting controversy in an area of great importance to public health where clarity, not confusion, is required,” she said.



Backlash after report claims saturated fats do not increase heart risk

26 Eylül 2016 Pazartesi

BMA facing backlash from members over handling of contract dispute

The British Medical Association is facing a major backlash from angry members and an exodus by medics disillusioned with its “appalling” handling of the bitter junior doctors’ dispute.


There has been a spate of resignations from the doctors’ union after it announced, then called off, a series of five-day all-out strikes in a failed attempt to stop the health secretary, Jeremy Hunt, imposing a controversial new contract on the 54,000 trainee medics in the NHS in England.


Members are accusing the BMA of being “spineless” and “incompetent” and of betraying junior doctors, and there are growing calls for the creation of a rival trade union to represent them. BMA leaders, one of whom admitted privately that it has ended up “in a big mess”, are worried that its handling of the year-long contract row has left it divided and weakened in defeat.


Junior doctors have inundated their Facebook discussion group with angry messages about the BMA and Dr Ellen McCourt, the chair of the union’s junior doctors committee (JDC). Some have posted screengrabs of cancelled direct debit forms, showing that they are rescinding their membership.


“I don’t want to just cancel my direct debit. I want to tell the BMA why I am withdrawing my subscription. I want to tell them how spineless they have been,” said junior doctor Mukhtar Ahmed.


He criticised the BMA for endorsing in May a revised contract that it had negotiated without seeking members’ views. The contract was later rejected by 58% to 42% in a referendum among junior doctors.


“I want them to know that these series of blunders have not only lost us this fight, but any future fight and the NHS as a whole. I believe in the power of the union but not this one,” Ahmed said.


The BMA is examining alternative forms of protest against the contract, which will start being imposed from next week. It is due to announce details this week, though the options under consideration are believed not to involve any form of industrial action, such as a work-to-rule or refusal to do overtime.


Many doctors are angry that they heard from the BBC rather than the BMA last Saturday night that the union had called off planned strikes. Junior doctor David Pye said: “I am done. I shall not be sending you any more money. I have put up with utter incompetence, fucking survey monkey polls to see what I think, leaks, power struggles and, for the third time, I find out our master plan via BBC news and not via my union. Goodbye.”


Increasing calls to set up an alternative organisation to represent trainee doctors intensified after the decision. “Time to form a new trade union – run by junior doctors and only for junior doctors. Getting recognised won’t be easy and it may take too long for this dispute but now the BMA has proven it is not fit for purpose, this is our only option for the future,” said medic Christopher Howarth.


McCourt and the JDC decided to abandon further industrial action in the campaign against Hunt after large numbers of junior doctors made clear that they had deep misgivings about taking part. BMA leaders feared that turnout might be as low as 20%, well down on the majority support during the eight previous days of industrial action between January and May.


A five-day strike due earlier this month was cancelled after the BMA admitted giving hospitals too little time to make arrangements to cope with the disruption. The first long stoppage was due to take place on 5, 6, 7, 10 and 11 October, despite warnings from senior doctors, medical bodies and the chief executive of NHS England, Simon Stevens, that patients would be at risk.


There is widespread anger among junior doctors at the cancellation, even though it appears that many of them were opposed to such a long stoppage. Many think the U-turn was merely the latest in a series of tactical blunders by the union in their unsuccessful battle to force Hunt to back down.


A sizeable minority of members of the BMA’s ruling council fear the union has done itself potentially irreparable harm and that the plan for five-day strikes has severely damaged public trust in doctors and left them looking uncaring and reckless. Some believe that Dr Mark Porter, the union’s leader, allowed its JDC too much freedom under McCourt and her predecessor, Johann Malawana, to decide its own tactics.


In a post on the Facebook site in response to the torrent of online anger, McCourt insisted the junior doctors’ campaign would go on. Defending the cancellation, she said: “We had a choice that included continuing the current planned industrial action, changing the planned IA or suspending the action. The JDC, having weighed up the new information, debated the options and voted to suspend the IA and pursue other means of resisting the contract. This does not mean the fight against imposition and this contract is over.”



BMA facing backlash from members over handling of contract dispute