toll etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
toll etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

11 Eylül 2016 Pazar

9/11 health crisis: death toll from illness nears number killed on day of attacks

The death toll among those sickened by the toxic dust and ash of Ground Zero will within as little as five years exceed the number of people killed on the day of the 9/11 attacks, experts say.


As those who lost loved ones at the World Trade Center, at the Pentagon and on Flight 93 gather for Sunday’s 15th anniversary of the terror attacks that killed almost 3,000 people, a post-9/11 health crisis is growing.


At least 1,000 people – and probably many more – have died often lingering, painful deaths resulting from illnesses related to their exposure to debris that spread from the wreckage of the World Trade Center towers in downtown Manhattan. More than 37,000 are officially recognised as sick.


Calls are growing for a new monument to be added to the World Trade Center site, to pay tribute to those who have died or become sick since 9/11 because of toxic exposure.


“Within the next five years we will be at the point where more people have died from World Trade Center-related illnesses than died from the immediate impact of the attacks,” said Dr Jim Melius, a doctor at the New York State Laborers Union who also advises the White House on worker health, chairs the steering committee overseeing the government health program for 9/11 responders, and is a member of the advocacy group 9/11 Health Watch.


“There are a lot of people who are very, very ill with lung disease who will see at least 10 years taken from their normal life span,” he said, “and we are already seeing many more premature deaths occurring, and among younger people, from the cancers. There is going to be a new generation of widows and widowers.”


In 2001, government officials, most prominently the then head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Christine Todd Whitman, assured those in lower Manhattan in the days after the attacks that the air was safe.


In an interview with the Guardian this weekend, Whitman said for the first time that in hindsight she had been mistaken. She apologised to those affected by the toxic debris.


After al-Qaida terrorists flew hijacked passenger jets into the north and south towers of the World Trade Center, the towers collapsed. Clouds of fumes and debris billowed out over New York City. Of 2,977 people killed in the attacks, 2,753 died at the World Trade Center.


The debris left by the twin towers, the main concentration of which became known as “the pile”, contained asbestos, lead, glass, heavy metals, concrete, poisonous gases, oil and other dangerous substances that mixed with exploding jet fuel, the contents of hundreds of offices and dead bodies to fill the air and cover the area around the site.


“It was disgusting,” said Merita Zejnuni, 52, a cleaner who was working a few blocks from Ground Zero in the offices of banking giant Goldman Sachs on the morning of 9/11. “It coated your mouth and your throat. I was covered in it – I looked like a ghost.”


Zejnuni developed a violent, chronic cough and was recently found to have breast cancer. This weekend, speaking to the Guardian, she gave her first interview. Her lawyer, Troy Rosasco, said Zejnuni only found out last month she could apply for compensation. Rosasco believes thousands of other people are sick or dying as a result of exposure around Ground Zero, away from the public eye.


“There is a general consensus that people down there got huge exposure,” he said, “but many don’t even know why they are sick.”


Last month, researchers at Stony Brook University announced that cognitive impairment, a leading risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease, was being detected among first responders who went to Ground Zero on and around 9/11.


“That’s scary news,” said Rosasco. “I have probably gotten 50 calls in the last two days from people who are really frightened about that.”


In 2010, after years of political battle, Congress passed the $ 4bn Zadroga Act – named for a police captain who worked on rescue efforts at Ground Zero and died in 2006 after developing breathing problems – to cover the health costs of those poisoned by the debris and fumes of 9/11. Late last year, it agreed to extend the act’s provisions for 75 years. There is a separate, official Victim Compensation Fund.


In 2011, the federal World Trade Center Health Program (WTCHP) was established. It has 75,000 registered members, 87% of whom worked on rescue, recovery and clean-up. The rest are New York residents or workers. A total of 1,140 registered members have died since the program was created in 2011, WTCHP spokeswoman Christy Spring said.


“Because of the way the legislation was written,” she said, “there is an understanding that there is a link between the exposure and the illnesses people are suffering from.”


Causes of death are not recorded by the WTCHP. There is no central record for how many people died between 2001 and 2011 from illnesses linked to 9/11 fumes and debris, Spring said, nor any way of knowing exactly how many other people have died without any record of their illnesses having been caused by exposure near Ground Zero.


Melius said: “We know a significant number of people died before the WTCHP was set up; it’s likely to be in the hundreds. There are also probably hundreds of people outside the program who are sick and may have died.”


The WTCHP has certified 37,000 people as suffering from serious respiratory or digestive illnesses, cancer, or a combination. Most of those registered are from New York City and 82% are male.


Spring said: “There are health conditions covered in the program that will take years to develop and we don’t think the cancers we are seeing now is the end of it. It’s such an unprecedented disaster. It’s mind-boggling to think not just about the day but about the ripple effect on people’s health.”


The Manhattan borough president, Gale Brewer, told the Guardian she had “heard very high numbers” of people were at risk of dying from exposure to World Trade Center-related toxins.


“Many more than 3,000 or 4,000,” she said. “It’s very sad. I believe it will eclipse the number who died on 9/11 itself, because so many people were on the pile, or came to help, and so many people worked in the area. We are going to be dealing with this for years and years.”


In 2014, Brewer wrote to New York governor Andrew Cuomo and New Jersey governor Chris Christie, asking them to approve a plan to build a monument to those sickened and killed since 9/11, to be installed near where the towers stood.


The area now hosts the National September 11 Memorial and Museum and is dominated by monuments built where each tower stood and engraved with the names of those who died in the atrocity.


Brewer is lobbying for a competition to design a separate monument for those who have been sickened. It will not have names, because of lack of clarity about cause of death in all cases and because it will also be designed to offer solace to those still living but sick, she said.


“It needs to be universal,” she said.


She has had no formal response from either Christie or Cuomo. But when she collared Cuomo at the Democratic convention in Philadelphia this summer, she said, he told her: “Sounds good.”


Brewer is hopeful of adding the monument before the 16th anniversary of 9/11.


Jerrold Nadler, the US congressman whose district includes the World Trade Center site, said of the post-9/11 health crisis: “It’s ghastly, it’s horrible, the people will die early and I feel very frustrated because it was preventable.”



9/11 health crisis: death toll from illness nears number killed on day of attacks

31 Temmuz 2016 Pazar

Divorce continues to take a psychological toll on kids

In the early 1920s, a list of exceptionally bright children was assembled for a study about growing up as a genius. These individuals affectionately became known to psychologists, affectionately, as the “termites”, after the Stanford researcher – Professor Frederick Terman – who began the study. The termites completed many surveys over their lifetimes, and the vast majority of the group have now died.


Their death certificates reveal that those whose parents divorced before their 21st birthday lived four years fewer than those whose parents stayed together until at least that point. Male termites typically lived to 76 as opposed to 80; female termites made it to about 82, instead of 86.


Although this group was a bit different to the rest of us – they each scored a minimum of 135 in high school IQ tests – brains and possible dweebish tendencies don’t appear to have exacerbated the impact of parental divorce. Overall, the termites handled life no better or worse than the US population as a whole. They committed suicide, developed alcoholism and themselves got divorced at the national rates.


Related: Divorced by 30: why do so many young marriages come to an early end?


So if parental divorce reduced longevity among the termites, it suggested worrying things about how divorce might affect all kids in the long run. The research subjects’ early deaths were pinned on higher rates of smoking, perhaps indicating a greater lifelong psychological stress following parental divorce.


But is this finding relevant today?After all, the termites experienced their parents splitting up during a period when divorce was much less common and much more stigmatized than it is now. Moreover, since that time, the reasons for divorce and the profile of couples most likely to divorce have changed in all manner of ways. So it seems reasonable to expect that whatever may have led these termites to feel stress more intensely than the other termites is no longer part and parcel of watching your parents split.


Researchers have a lot of disagreements about divorce trends. Most agree that divorce is less common today due to a rise in the age at which people first marry. But some experts believe that divorce rates in the US reached a peak among couples who married in the 1970s, and ever since the 1980s marriages have been more enduring. Other researchers, working with a different set of surveys, counter that the drop-off in divorce in recent decades has been overstated. In their view, divorce seems to have declined among younger couples, but it doubled in the two decades before 2008 among people over 35.


Divorce used to be the preserve of the upper classes. But as it has become legally less onerous, and its financial and social costs have been reduced, lower class couples have composed an ever greater share of divorcees.


Similarly, a highly educated wife used to be linked to greater odds of divorce, but that pattern has at least weakened in European countries taken together, and reversed in the most developed ones. In the US, too, women with a college degree are today far less likely to divorce than women who haven’t surpassed a high school degree. College educated women are also happier in their marriages and with their family life.


But what do these patterns have to do with how much divorce affects kids later in life? To answer that question requires comparing divorce trends to divorcees’ kids’ outcomes over time – outcomes that can reveal their levels of stress and how they have responded to stress as they have matured.


Various studies attempt this, but none over as long a period as an analysis of Swedish children. Astonishingly, Swedish records allow for comparison of people born more than a century apart, since face-to-face interviews using the same set of questions have been posed to Swedes born from 1892 onwards. Interviewees have been asked about their living arrangements growing up, about the extent of parental discord that they recall, and all about their mental health issues into adulthood, from insomnia to depression.


Many divorce trends over the 20th century suggest that children, on average, should have experienced noticeably less distress over time from their parents’ marriage ending. As divorce has become more common, it has become more socially acceptable. Female employment has risen and the welfare state has grown, meaning that single mothers are comparatively more able to provide for their offspring today than in the past. Custody arrangements have also changed, and children whose parents divorced in recent years are more likely than ever to maintain relationships with both parents.


But shockingly, divorcees’ kids in Sweden have seen no improvements in their relative educational attainment and psychological wellbeing. To this day, they are worse off by these measures than kids whose parents stay together. (And Sweden is, of course, a country with a far more generous welfare state and more liberal attitudes than most.)


The ongoing gap in educational performance appears to be due to families of a lower economic class becoming more prone to splitting up over the decades. Kids born into lower income families have always tended to do worse at school, so that trend isn’t due to divorce per se.


But the stubbornly lower psychological wellbeing of Swedish divorcees’ kids can’t be pinned entirely on income. Socioeconomics may explain part of it, but, instead, lots of family arguments appear to leave long term traces.


In short, the impacts of parental divorce are often subtle and long lasting. From the Stanford geniuses to Swedes born in the 1990s, the evidence suggests that kids whose parents have or are about to split up need more support than we realize.



Divorce continues to take a psychological toll on kids

1 Temmuz 2014 Salı

Grownup care providers at breaking point as squeeze on funding requires its toll | David Brindle

Oxfordshire county council has for the previous 4 many years pulled out all the stops to avoid passing on a 38% minimize in its grant for providers for homeless folks. But now the authority says it has nowhere left to turn and is reluctantly planning to phase in the reduction, including stopping all funding for dedicated support for those with substance misuse difficulties.


“It is not one thing I like to do, but we’re not uncommon in performing it,” says John Jackson, the council’s director for social and community companies. “The reality is that I have to shield providers for men and women I have a statutory responsibility for.”


According to new investigation published right now, Oxfordshire’s choice is emblematic of the state of adult social care services across England. Findings from a survey of adult social care directors reveal that half say that fewer people are getting solutions barely a single in three says they are safeguarding the size of the individual budgets older individuals and disabled adults acquire to pay for their care and support, and 6 in 10 directors are braced for much more legal difficulties.


The Association of Directors of Adult Social Companies (Adass), which conducted the survey, has hitherto been notably measured – critics may say overly so – in its response to cuts ordered by the coalition government since 2010. But now it warns that the social care program is on the brink of becoming unsustainable. Its president, David Pearson, calls on wider society to say how far it is ready to shield “a great number of vulnerable individuals who will fail to obtain, or not be ready to afford, the social care providers they require and deserve”.


Recalling that earlier this year the National Audit Office (NAO) questioned no matter whether councils had been approaching the limits of their capability to soak up pressures on social care budgets, Pearson says: “Our survey shows past doubt that we have reached the point in which we are unable to absorb the pressures they, and our survey, have recognized.”


The survey adds to the sense of financial crisis. Demands for extra cash for the NHS are mounting and this week the Neighborhood Government Association (LGA) warns that councils in England face a £5.8bn funding gap by March 2016 due to even more cuts in grant – forcing twelve.5% savings in 2014-15 alone – and escalating demand for services, especially for older folks.


The funding gap for adult social care on its very own will be £1.9bn by March 2016, the LGA estimated. Following yr, 2015, is “make or break” for social care with the introduction of the government’s Better Care Fund, expected to pool more than £5bn of current money from councils and the NHS to devote on integrated companies that are created to hold individuals out of hospital. Recent government funding for social care is £14bn.


Pearson, even so, says the scale of the challenge far outstrips any benefit that may possibly come from integration. “It is not the directors’ occupation, but that of the country as a complete and its politicians, to debate how significantly, in times of the most serious adversity, vulnerable people should be protected from the consequences of that adversity by the introduction of new cash into social care.”


Norfolk gives a flavour of the challenge. The county’s population is projected to rise 25% by 2033, but numbers of people aged 65-74 will increase 54% and numbers aged 75 or above will soar by 97%. Significantly of this growth will be in isolated rural communities in the north of the county.


Norfolk’s grownup social solutions department already reviews development of 53% in referrals above the past 5 years, collectively with a near-tripling of demand for intensive homecare assistance of ten hours a week or more, at the very same time as it has been creating £72m cost savings, which contains cutting the numbers of social perform posts and paring back preventive services. Nevertheless, it says paying on frontline care has been protected.


With more cuts of £59m in Norfolk social providers planned in excess of the following three years, nonetheless, continuing to safeguard care is no longer practical. Some £14m is coming out of people’s personalized budgets, £6m from support for people with learning or physical disabilities and £4.5m from the contract with the council’s very own residential care firm.


Asked what the future holds, Sue Whitaker, Labour chair of Norfolk’s adult social services committee, says: “I have a feeling that attempting to provide anything at all on best of what is needed statutorily is going to be exceptionally hard, if not impossible.”


This displays the national image painted by the Adass survey. Primarily based on returns from directors in 144 councils with adult social care responsibilities, 95% of the complete, Adass calculates that an additional £266m (1.9%) is becoming taken out of services in 2014-15, producing a complete 12% real-terms minimize in investing given that 2010 whilst demand for companies has risen 14%. The net effect, for that reason, is stated to signify complete cost savings given that 2010 of 26% or £3.5bn.


Questioned about the most likely affect in excess of the subsequent two many years, 47% of directors say men and women who employed solutions would get smaller sized individual budgets for their care and assistance 48% say fewer men and women would be ready to get solutions 50% forecast greater pressure on the NHS 55% expect care providers to encounter financial problems and 59% anticipate receiving more legal issues to cuts.


With most provision of care these days outsourced, 19% of directors admit not being aware of if all their contractors paid the national minimum wage and only three% are assured that all paid the larger, unofficial residing wage. As numerous as 75% say they commission some homecare visits of just 15 minutes, despite the fact that 90% of them say this kind of visits were merely to check on an individual’s wellbeing or medication.


Richard Humphries, assistant director of policy at the King’s Fund thinktank, says the survey rings painfully accurate. “This is the consequence of the 2010 paying settlement that supposedly protected the NHS but left the social care technique totally exposed,” he says. “It was all completely predictable.


“What we are seeing now is a double whammy with each the NHS and social care simultaneously facing a crunch year up coming yr. Most people cannot see how to get beyond this without extra income – not just funds for much more of the exact same, but for transformation of companies. The Better Care Fund is Ok, but it truly is a extremely modest step in direction of a lot larger measures that are needed.”


Back in Oxfordshire, Jackson thinks the county council has a sustainable – if unpalatable – 4-yr strategy for social care. His political boss, Conservative cabinet member Judith Heathcoat, has advised the Oxford Mail she is “as relaxed as I can be” with the planned 38% cuts in housing-associated support, which are component of a £64m financial savings package across the authority in excess of 4 years.


Other cost savings will come by means of less expensive help for men and women with finding out disabilities, moving them both out of residential care or perhaps from two-man or woman flats to shared accommodation for five. Older people will also be hit: individuals attending overall health and wellbeing centres might up coming year be charged £20 a day.


Jackson’s dread is that growing numbers of legal issues will be incurred over people’s statutory rights to care. “In the end we cannot not meet people’s care requirements” he says. “We would want to do that morally anyway, but the law is really clear about it. We will not require the courts to tell us that.”



Grownup care providers at breaking point as squeeze on funding requires its toll | David Brindle

7 Haziran 2014 Cumartesi

Reliving the war takes a toll on veterans

Sixty-1 many years later and aged 92, he retraced that journey and recorded his ideas and memories in a series of articles or blog posts for the Telegraph. Bill often had a basic matter-of-reality use of language but, increasingly, the tone of the content articles was unrelentingly bleak. The images that accompanied the daily reports seemed to recommend his rising frailty. It was clear that the journey was shining an all-also-vibrant light into his memory, highlighting items that had been laid to rest there for decades.


Bill was in no way one to throw in the towel. So, when many would have come home early, he pressed on. His war had appeared to finish in triumph with the award of the Military Cross and a citation that highlighted personal bravery and loyalty to his males. But for him it was a catastrophe. In April 1945, one month before VE Day, Bill’s organization were led by faulty intelligence into an ambush at a bridge above the Twente Canal. His actions led to his MC, but in the engagement 22 of his males have been killed and another 20 wounded. The dead incorporated Bill’s two favourite subalterns, each in their early twenties. The death of these youthful males, who so almost survived the war to develop new lives with the ebullience of youth, traumatised their commanding officer, who regarded their reduction as his duty.


Bill privately regarded as his years as a soldier to have been the most admirable of his profession surprising, maybe, for the only man to have ever been a cabinet minister and editor of a nationwide daily newspaper. But his recollections of the war many years had been hardly ever uncovered – and only to shut loved ones. They have been sealed up by scars inflicted at the finish.


Before Bill left for his VE Day memorial expedition, he was still formidably engaged with daily life. Only a yr earlier he had marked his 90th birthday by flying to Darfur in Africa to report on that country’s humanitarian crisis. But from his return home in 2005 till his death two many years later on, the enthusiasm and tenacity that had driven him on ebbed inexorably away.


So as their ranks thin like falling leaves, we should think cautiously about how we assume our veterans to engage with ceremonies and anniversaries. For us it is a proper and laudable marking of history. For some of them, as with Bill, it can be a journey into a previous that they have been relieved to depart behind. They were there, we had been not.


George Plumptre is chief executive of the Nationwide Gardens Scheme



Reliving the war takes a toll on veterans

6 Mayıs 2014 Salı

The actuality of the north-south divide and the grim toll of inequality | @guardianletters

Affluent Hale in Cheshire

‘Because there are wealthy folks in Cheshire and poor people in Kent does not mean there is no measurable variation among people in related situations.’ Photograph: Don McPhee/theguardian.com




Odd to see Owen Jones (The north-south divide is a myth and a distraction, five Might) following Tony Blair in dismissing the actuality of the north-south divide.


Due to the fact there are wealthy folks in Cheshire and poor people in Kent does not indicate there is no measurable distinction among individuals in comparable situations. The 1980 Black report on inequalities in wellness (which the Conservative government tried to bury) showed that the mortality and morbidity charges for folks in the same class and occupation have been much better for individuals in London and the south-east than in other areas.


More than 90% of non-university scientific investigation is spent in the so-named golden triangle among London, Cambridge and Oxford. The government spends twice as a lot on capital and revenue expenditure on transport in London in contrast with Greater Manchester and Merseyside or certainly any of our key regional centres. Astonishingly, 94% of capital expenditure on transport is spent on London. This is unjustifiable and unfair.


I have no disagreement with Owen Jones that electrical power and wealth resides in as well handful of hands and that this is our best issue, but this does not imply we need to pretend that other inequities do not exist. He and John Denham are mistaken attempting to bury this problem, and I and other folks will make confident it stays alive.
Graham Stringer MP
Labour, Blackley and Broughton


• The north-south disparity is undoubtedly not a myth. Appear at regional per-head figures for the government’s capital projects spending, and for arts paying. But calling it a divide perpetuates the erroneous notion that it could be bridged by some link such as HS2. For the north, HS2 will be a substantial waste of funds. Northern railways, and the north in common, definitely need to have £50bn of investment – but not on a single line that will just make it less difficult to run almost everything everywhere from London headquarters.
Brian Hatton
London


• While pleased to see you give front-page area (three May) to Britain’s poor functionality in stopping deaths amid children underneath five, and that inequality was mentioned in passing, we had been disappointed that both the report and the accompanying examination focused on poverty and deprivation as explanations. As lengthy in the past as 1992, study showed that even for households in the extremely leading social class, babies had been more probably to die in infancy in England and Wales than in far more equal Sweden. Individuals deaths have little to do with poverty, deprivation or access to medical care.


Inequality damages health across the social spectrum because of its psychosocial influence. The lately published little one mortality figures are drastically correlated with income inequality in wealthy, developed nations.


Investigation continues to demonstrate that in a far more unequal society we are all, even at the best of the social ladder, affected by higher ranges of stress and status anxiety. We must steer clear of conflating the results of materials poverty with individuals of inequality – the two are undesirable for population health but they need different answers.
Kate Pickett Professor of epidemiology, University of York
Nigel Simpson Senior lecturer in obstetrics and gynaecology, University of Leeds
Richard Wilkinson Emeritus professor of social epidemiology, University of York




The actuality of the north-south divide and the grim toll of inequality | @guardianletters

3 Mart 2014 Pazartesi

Grim toll of the government"s match-for-function exams | @guardianletters

ATOS demonstration held in Manchester

Anti-Atos protest, Manchester, 19 February 2014. Photograph: Steven Purcell/Demotix/Corbis




I read with increasing queasiness the story of Mark Wood, an employment and support allowance (ESA) claimant with mental health problems, whose death by starvation was largely attributable to the Atos assessment of his being fit for work and the subsequent stopping of his sickness benefits (Vulnerable man starved to death after cut to benefits, 1 March).


Years after the Holocaust, ordinary German citizens were called upon by the younger generation to justify themselves: Surely you knew what was going on? Why didn’t you put a stop to it?


I hope I may crave an indulgence to use your paper to put on public record that I was one of those opposed to this government’s policy of abscission against the vulnerable. I submitted to the Harrington reviews on ESA and its assessment processes. I inveighed against the callous manipulation of public attitudes against claimants by the popular press that has driven many people to turn a blind eye to the real agenda. And it is in vain that I now look towards other political parties to protect the weak, when they so obviously realise that the propaganda battle has been lost.


The benefits system has failed those that have most needed help for decades, but it has not until now sought to eradicate them entirely.
Simon Wagener
Wallasey, Merseyside


• Your article quotes a DWP spokesman stating: “A decision on whether someone is well enough to work is taken following a thorough assessment and after consideration of all the supporting medical evidence from the claimant’s GP or medical specialist”. But the DWP does not itself request medical documentation, and it is up to the ESA claimants to produce it. Reasons for claimants not doing this include them assuming the DWP has requested medical records, claimants not realising the importance of such records, and disability such as depression or psychosis resulting in default.


Assessors rely on claimants to say what their medical illnesses are, but claimants sometimes give the wrong diagnoses and often don’t understand the complexity of their illnesses. Although Atos assessors fill in a “medical report form”, Atos nurses and physiotherapists far outnumber medical practitioners. Even when hospital records are obtained, the nurse/physiotherapist may not understand important details eg that an eGFR of 17 means that renal function is severely impaired. Without medical records, the Atos medical practitioner assessors also make decisions having woefully inadequate information. On appeal to first-tier tribunals, a significant proportion of sessions are adjourned to get medical evidence covering several years. A “thorough assessment” it is habitually not.
Morris Bernadt
London


• Following the death of Mark Wood, who starved to death after his benefits were withdrawn, it is surely time for a citizen’s arrest campaign targeting Iain Duncan Smith. The death of Mr Wood, who was disabled, follows the call for a woman in a coma to attend job training, and cuts to benefits after letters were sent to a blind man that he could not read. The responsibility for these appalling infringements of basic human rights lies squarely with the minister who designed and implemented the system. Could legal experts please advise on the case for charging him with manslaughter? I would be happy to place a hand on his shoulder.
Nicola Grove
Horningsham, Wiltshire


• Our twin 41-year-old sons, who have learning difficulties, epilepsy and other problems, have just been informed that they will have to reapply for their welfare benefits through a process conducted on behalf of the coalition government by the French-owned private company Atos.


Dr Giles Youngs, who wrote a letter to the Guardian (19 February) about his recent resignation as a medical assessor for Atos, in which he referred to “unrealistic criteria, set by the DWP, for a claimant being awarded employment and support allowance”, is absolutely right in expressing his concerns that people with disabilities are unlikely to be given even a job interview, never mind a job. Despite the Disability Discrimination Act, discrimination still continues, eg in February 1999 we arranged for one of our sons to meet the North Wales personnel manager of the Benefits Agency, requesting that he give our son work experience in its Wrexham office. At the interview the manager said that although they had given work experience to physically disabled people, they had never done so for a person with a learning disability. We heard no more from him.


What confidence, if any, should all disability welfare claimants now have of the work capability assessment in light of Dr Youngs’ revealing and damning indictment of both Atos and the DWP?
Ken and Mary Mack
(72-year-old unpaid carers), Wrexham


• We are beginning to see the results of several years of campaigning against unjust welfare reforms that target disabled people. But Atos attempting to pull out of its contract (Report, 22 February) represents only a partial victory. Other private corporations are already lining up to take over. So long as the work capability assessment (WCA) regime continues, so will the misery it causes to disabled people and their families, and to the workers involved in implementing a system they don’t agree with.


The WCA should be replaced immediately with a rigorous and safe system that does not cause avoidable harm to disabled people or those with chronic health issues or terminal illnesses. The UK government and opposition should follow the Scottish government’s pledge that private for-profit companies are removed entirely from having anything to do with the assessment of disabled people. This area of public policy belongs firmly within the NHS and the public sector.


The PIP contract must be removed from Atos with immediate effect: targets in its handling of the WCA have affected thousands of disabled people, leading to hastened deaths, waits of up to a year, and leaving people without income or food.
Linda Burnip Co-founder, Disabled People Against Cuts
Tracey Lazard CEO, Inclusion London
John McArdle Co-founder, Black Triangle
Mark Serwotka General secretary, PCS Union
Frances O’Grady General secretary, TUC
John McDonnell MP
Len McCluskey General secretary, Unite
Francesca Martinez WOW petition
Pat Onions Pat’s Petition
Rosemary O’Neill CarerWatch
Sean Vernell National secretary, Unite the Resistance
Eileen Short Chair, National Anti Bedroom Tax and Benefit Justice Federation
Rev Paul Nicolson Taxpayers Against Poverty
Claire Glasman WinVisible (women with visible & invisible disabilities)
Ariane Sacco WinVisible
Mark Harrison CEO, Equal Lives
Kevin Caulfield Chair, Hammersmith and Fulham Coalition Against Cuts
Rahel Geffen CEO, Disability Action in Islington
Lyla Adwan-Kamara Merton Centre for Independent Living
Shaun O’Regan Southwark Benefit Justice Campaign
Barry McDonald Chair, Bromley Experts by Experience
Ian Hodson National president, Bakers Food & Allied Workers Union
Ronnie Draper General secretary, Bakers, Food and Allied Workers Union
Mick Carney National president, Transport Salaried Staffs’ Association
Manuel Cortes General secretary, Transport Salaried Staffs’ Association
Sean McGovern Unite executive councillor
Rob Murthwaite Equalities rep, UCU London region
Mike Cox Norfolk Disabled People Against Cuts
Dr Stephen Carty Medical adviser, Black Triangle Campaign
Debbie Jolly Co-founder, Disabled People Against Cuts
Andy Greene Islington Disabled People Against Cuts
Ellen Clifford Croydon Disabled People Against Cuts
Paula Peters Bromley Disabled People Against Cuts
Conan Doyle London Disabled People Against Cuts
Bob Ellard National steering committee, Disabled People Against Cuts
Anita Bellows National steering committee, Disabled People Against Cuts
Ciara Doyle National steering committee, Disabled People Against Cuts
Roger Lewis National steering committee, Disabled People Against Cuts
Jane Bence WOW petition
Rick Burgess WOW petition




Grim toll of the government"s match-for-function exams | @guardianletters

Grim toll of the government"s match-for-function exams | @guardianletters

ATOS demonstration held in Manchester

Anti-Atos protest, Manchester, 19 February 2014. Photograph: Steven Purcell/Demotix/Corbis




I read with increasing queasiness the story of Mark Wood, an employment and support allowance (ESA) claimant with mental health problems, whose death by starvation was largely attributable to the Atos assessment of his being fit for work and the subsequent stopping of his sickness benefits (Vulnerable man starved to death after cut to benefits, 1 March).


Years after the Holocaust, ordinary German citizens were called upon by the younger generation to justify themselves: Surely you knew what was going on? Why didn’t you put a stop to it?


I hope I may crave an indulgence to use your paper to put on public record that I was one of those opposed to this government’s policy of abscission against the vulnerable. I submitted to the Harrington reviews on ESA and its assessment processes. I inveighed against the callous manipulation of public attitudes against claimants by the popular press that has driven many people to turn a blind eye to the real agenda. And it is in vain that I now look towards other political parties to protect the weak, when they so obviously realise that the propaganda battle has been lost.


The benefits system has failed those that have most needed help for decades, but it has not until now sought to eradicate them entirely.
Simon Wagener
Wallasey, Merseyside


• Your article quotes a DWP spokesman stating: “A decision on whether someone is well enough to work is taken following a thorough assessment and after consideration of all the supporting medical evidence from the claimant’s GP or medical specialist”. But the DWP does not itself request medical documentation, and it is up to the ESA claimants to produce it. Reasons for claimants not doing this include them assuming the DWP has requested medical records, claimants not realising the importance of such records, and disability such as depression or psychosis resulting in default.


Assessors rely on claimants to say what their medical illnesses are, but claimants sometimes give the wrong diagnoses and often don’t understand the complexity of their illnesses. Although Atos assessors fill in a “medical report form”, Atos nurses and physiotherapists far outnumber medical practitioners. Even when hospital records are obtained, the nurse/physiotherapist may not understand important details eg that an eGFR of 17 means that renal function is severely impaired. Without medical records, the Atos medical practitioner assessors also make decisions having woefully inadequate information. On appeal to first-tier tribunals, a significant proportion of sessions are adjourned to get medical evidence covering several years. A “thorough assessment” it is habitually not.
Morris Bernadt
London


• Following the death of Mark Wood, who starved to death after his benefits were withdrawn, it is surely time for a citizen’s arrest campaign targeting Iain Duncan Smith. The death of Mr Wood, who was disabled, follows the call for a woman in a coma to attend job training, and cuts to benefits after letters were sent to a blind man that he could not read. The responsibility for these appalling infringements of basic human rights lies squarely with the minister who designed and implemented the system. Could legal experts please advise on the case for charging him with manslaughter? I would be happy to place a hand on his shoulder.
Nicola Grove
Horningsham, Wiltshire


• Our twin 41-year-old sons, who have learning difficulties, epilepsy and other problems, have just been informed that they will have to reapply for their welfare benefits through a process conducted on behalf of the coalition government by the French-owned private company Atos.


Dr Giles Youngs, who wrote a letter to the Guardian (19 February) about his recent resignation as a medical assessor for Atos, in which he referred to “unrealistic criteria, set by the DWP, for a claimant being awarded employment and support allowance”, is absolutely right in expressing his concerns that people with disabilities are unlikely to be given even a job interview, never mind a job. Despite the Disability Discrimination Act, discrimination still continues, eg in February 1999 we arranged for one of our sons to meet the North Wales personnel manager of the Benefits Agency, requesting that he give our son work experience in its Wrexham office. At the interview the manager said that although they had given work experience to physically disabled people, they had never done so for a person with a learning disability. We heard no more from him.


What confidence, if any, should all disability welfare claimants now have of the work capability assessment in light of Dr Youngs’ revealing and damning indictment of both Atos and the DWP?
Ken and Mary Mack
(72-year-old unpaid carers), Wrexham


• We are beginning to see the results of several years of campaigning against unjust welfare reforms that target disabled people. But Atos attempting to pull out of its contract (Report, 22 February) represents only a partial victory. Other private corporations are already lining up to take over. So long as the work capability assessment (WCA) regime continues, so will the misery it causes to disabled people and their families, and to the workers involved in implementing a system they don’t agree with.


The WCA should be replaced immediately with a rigorous and safe system that does not cause avoidable harm to disabled people or those with chronic health issues or terminal illnesses. The UK government and opposition should follow the Scottish government’s pledge that private for-profit companies are removed entirely from having anything to do with the assessment of disabled people. This area of public policy belongs firmly within the NHS and the public sector.


The PIP contract must be removed from Atos with immediate effect: targets in its handling of the WCA have affected thousands of disabled people, leading to hastened deaths, waits of up to a year, and leaving people without income or food.
Linda Burnip Co-founder, Disabled People Against Cuts
Tracey Lazard CEO, Inclusion London
John McArdle Co-founder, Black Triangle
Mark Serwotka General secretary, PCS Union
Frances O’Grady General secretary, TUC
John McDonnell MP
Len McCluskey General secretary, Unite
Francesca Martinez WOW petition
Pat Onions Pat’s Petition
Rosemary O’Neill CarerWatch
Sean Vernell National secretary, Unite the Resistance
Eileen Short Chair, National Anti Bedroom Tax and Benefit Justice Federation
Rev Paul Nicolson Taxpayers Against Poverty
Claire Glasman WinVisible (women with visible & invisible disabilities)
Ariane Sacco WinVisible
Mark Harrison CEO, Equal Lives
Kevin Caulfield Chair, Hammersmith and Fulham Coalition Against Cuts
Rahel Geffen CEO, Disability Action in Islington
Lyla Adwan-Kamara Merton Centre for Independent Living
Shaun O’Regan Southwark Benefit Justice Campaign
Barry McDonald Chair, Bromley Experts by Experience
Ian Hodson National president, Bakers Food & Allied Workers Union
Ronnie Draper General secretary, Bakers, Food and Allied Workers Union
Mick Carney National president, Transport Salaried Staffs’ Association
Manuel Cortes General secretary, Transport Salaried Staffs’ Association
Sean McGovern Unite executive councillor
Rob Murthwaite Equalities rep, UCU London region
Mike Cox Norfolk Disabled People Against Cuts
Dr Stephen Carty Medical adviser, Black Triangle Campaign
Debbie Jolly Co-founder, Disabled People Against Cuts
Andy Greene Islington Disabled People Against Cuts
Ellen Clifford Croydon Disabled People Against Cuts
Paula Peters Bromley Disabled People Against Cuts
Conan Doyle London Disabled People Against Cuts
Bob Ellard National steering committee, Disabled People Against Cuts
Anita Bellows National steering committee, Disabled People Against Cuts
Ciara Doyle National steering committee, Disabled People Against Cuts
Roger Lewis National steering committee, Disabled People Against Cuts
Jane Bence WOW petition
Rick Burgess WOW petition




Grim toll of the government"s match-for-function exams | @guardianletters