dedicated etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
dedicated etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

28 Eylül 2016 Çarşamba

Linda turned up at A&E twice a day. A dedicated team now stops that

In a desperate effort to get relief for excruciating pain caused by osteoarthritis, curvature of the spine, and abdominal discomfort following surgery, Linda Douglas went to A&E twice a day.


The chronically ill 48-year-old, who lives near Sunderland, was “at the end of [her] rope” because of the constant pain and frequent hospital visits, and felt life “was not worth living”. That was until a new team of health and social care professionals took over her case and improved her quality of life from “six to 99%” in early 2016.


The team comprising her GP, consultant, community matron, social worker and paramedic worked together to come up with a care plan tailored to her needs. Now, she can largely avoid hospital and live a much more normal life, mainly because John, her husband and carer, has been trained to administer her daily medication. She says: “My life was driven by fear. I was terrified of being unwell and not being able to get the care I needed to control my pain. I don’t need to worry any more. It’s like a weight has been lifted.”


Douglas was helped thanks to the All Together Better partnership, part of NHS England’s Vanguard programme that was ushered in last year via chief executive, Simon Stevens’s Five Year Forward View blueprint policy. This same programme, which was expected to champion ways of providing better, more efficient care for heavy users of NHS services, has not been given as much money as originally hoped. According to Kerry McQuade, head of vanguard delivery in Sunderland, the £4.8m the partnership received in 2016/17 did not match the initial bid, although it received more than similar projects in other parts of the country.


Sunderland is one of the most deprived cities in England. On average, people born there start having health problems more than 10 years before those born in wealthier parts of the country, and die more than six years sooner.


The NHS is a big part of many lives there, but a small minority of long term sick, vulnerable or frail elderly locals account for a large proportion of health and social care resources. Six per cent of the population – those with long-term, multiple illnesses – are responsible for half of the city’s health spend. With the pressure on from NHS England to reduce costs by nearly £1bn by 2021 in the Northumberland, Tyne and Wear region as central funding is squeezed, the focus on the most needy patients makes sense.


Local GP Dr Fadi Khalil describes Sunderland’s scheme – one of 14 across England – as “massive” in scale. Covering nearly 300,000 patients at 50 GP practices across the city, it is focused on reducing hospital admissions via a series of initiatives designed to offer care that aim to keep patients well and cared for where they live.


In the past, despite the “best intentions in the world”, the most needy patients weren’t getting the best care because of a disjointed and fragmented set of services, says Khalil. Patients had to undergo repeat visits to A&E, repeat crisis admissions to hospital, and had to repeat their stories to a string of frontline primary, community, acute and social care staff.


This was not only bad for them but a tremendous waste of precious resources. Finally, under the vanguard programme, local authority and health commissioners and providers are being encouraged to work together with patients.


“In the past when someone [got] a chest infection, they would end up in hospital. Now we’ve got things in place that keep them at home where they’re safer and more familiar with their environment,” Khalil says. Such patients, who have been identified by their GPs as at risk of rapid onset of health problems, have access to their GP, and a nurse or paramedic out of hours who can visit them at home, and who make regular check-ups to prevent urgent, unplanned visits to hospital.


Five teams, created late last year, are at the core of Sunderland’s scheme, with community matrons, district nurses and social workers all were moved into the same office.


It was a shock to the system at first and “initially quite daunting”, according to adult social care team manager Rachel Daurat, particularly to the social workers who had to move out of their dedicated offices at Sunderland city council.


She says health and social care have traditionally worked to entirely different agendas. However, working together on a patient case has meant they have been able to learn from each other’s perspectives and ensure different providers are working in harmony to improve circumstances for those receiving their care.


Sue Hughes, a district nurse taking part in the initiative agrees: “We are just a team now,” she says. “We understand the pressures we each face day to day and we support each other. It’s hard to ever imagine us going back – and I don’t think it could work.”


Join the Healthcare Professionals Network to read more pieces like this. And follow us on Twitter (@GdnHealthcare) to keep up with the latest healthcare news and views.



Linda turned up at A&E twice a day. A dedicated team now stops that

16 Eylül 2016 Cuma

Lib Dems poised to back dedicated tax to help rescue NHS

The Liberal Democrats are poised to become the first major political party to back a dedicated new tax to help rescue the NHS from its deep financial problems.


The party is about to start examining the wisdom and practicalities of introducing a ringfenced tax which would involve a one pence increase in either income tax or National Insurance.


The party has recruited a panel of senior doctors and NHS experts to advise it on how what it calls “a dedicated NHS and care tax” would help ease the health service’s decade-long financial squeeze.


Norman Lamb, the Lib Dem health spokesman, will on Saturday tell party activists gathered at its annual conference in Brighton that there is a very strong case for embracing the move, despite the political risk inherent in a tax rise.


“The uncomfortable truth is that we are falling further behind other European countries in how much we spend on health and care. So let’s look at the case for a dedicated health and care tax, shown on your pay packet,” Lamb will say.


“We must be honest with the British people. If we believe that more money is needed, if we conclude that we all need to pay perhaps an extra penny in the pound, then we must be prepared to say it. We must give this [idea] proper consideration,” he will add.


The Treasury has estimated that a 1p rise in income tax would raise £3.9bn this year, rising to £4.5bn next year and then £4.6bn in 2018-19. Without major reforms to how care is provided, the NHS in England is facing a £22bn gap in its finances by 2020-21.


The party’s “new Beveridge group” of advisers will include Dr Clare Gerada, the outspoken ex-chair of the Royal College of GPs, who recently defected to the Lib Dems from Labour; Prof Dinesh Bhugra, an ex-president of the Royal College of Psychiatrists; and Prof Nick Bosanquet, an expert in health economics at Imperial College London who has also worked with Reform, the right-of-centre thinktank that works on public sector reform.


Prof Chris Ham, chief executive of the King’s Fund thinktank, welcomed the Lib Dems’ consideration of the move as a sign of realism at Westminster that the NHS in England cannot survive intact without receiving more money than the £10bn extra it is due by 2020-21.


“It is not possible for the NHS to continue to meet rising demand for services and maintain current standards of care without additional funding,” said Ham. “Increasing funding for health and social care is affordable if hard choices are made about how to find the additional resources needed.


“As the party conference season begins, it is essential that all the parties face up to the need for an honest debate about how to provide adequate funding to meet future needs for health and social care,” he added.


Lamb will tell delegates that health and social care need special treatment in government spending because, unlike other public services, the costs involved are rising relentlessly by about 4% a year, due to the ageing and growing population and rise of lifestyle-related conditions such as obesity and lung diseases.


Government sources indicated that ministers were unlikely to embrace an NHS-specific tax rise any time soon.


A spokesperson for the Department of Health said: “On the back of a strong economy, we are giving the NHS the £10bn it asked for to fund its own plan for the future, including almost £4bn this year to transform services and improve standards of care.


“We know the NHS is under pressure because of our ageing population, but we rightly expect hospitals to have a grip on their finances and continue to ensure patients get treated quickly.”



Lib Dems poised to back dedicated tax to help rescue NHS