Labour’s 2017 general election manifesto is a big break with the recent past. Whether the manifesto allows the party to make a fresh connection with the British electorate won’t be clear until 9 June. What is beyond doubt is that this manifesto proclaims that politics and government in Britain do not have to be done in the way the country has long been accustomed to. That is true, and Labour is offering the country a real choice. So far, so very good, on both counts.
Jeremy Corbyn’s biggest achievement is to put several propositions back into the arena that had been thought extinct. That does not mean all of them deserve a new lease of life equally. Nationalisation in the shape of expensive, centralised public ownership is one to treat with caution, not least because of the power it gives to trade union leaders to drive up costs. There are signs that Labour’s economic team recognises that, but not enough detail about how it can be done. Other changes, though, are more straightforwardly welcome. The most important of these concerns taxation.
For 30 years or more, taking its cue from America, British politics took it as axiomatic that all voters will always recoil from increased taxes. Understandable though this was in some ways, it was a denial of the principle of social responsibility. As a result, throughout this era, parties have had to contrive ways of providing good levels of public provision without overt tax increases. Not surprisingly, this has become increasingly hard to maintain, and the effect on public goods has often been brutal. The no-tax assumption reached its nadir in 2015 when David Cameron and George Osborne promised no rises in income tax, VAT or national insurance for all. But it was an unachievable fantasy, as Philip Hammond found in the recent budget.
Labour is right to level with voters that tax rates cannot be set in stone for ever. Governments must be able to respond to economic changes, and those that want to invest in new programmes or projects must either borrow or tax to do so. Labour proposes to do both, which may alarm some voters. But the principle that fair and necessary taxes are a mark of a civilised society is the right one, and voters understand that they must rise as well as fall. Too few parties have been honest about this in recent times – the Liberal Democrats are an exception. Today it is not just Labour that is striding boldly into this territory. Even the Conservatives see the point of keeping options open. But it is Labour that confronts the issues with welcome audacity.
The real question is whether Labour is proposing the right level of tax take and the right mix of taxes and spending. There is a discussion to be had here. Taxes on income are very important, but taxes on wealth, including houses and land, which are less easy for the asset-rich to avoid, do not get as much focus as they should. Labour’s boldness does not extend to uprating and reforming council tax bands, for instance; instead only a review into reform is promised. There is nothing in the manifesto about fuel or alcohol taxes, both of which raise money and have social dimensions too. Abolishing tuition fees is an expensive subsidy to the better-off.
It is possible that the election has simply come too quickly for Labour to work everything out properly here. Some of the changes that have been made to the leaked draft last week add to that impression, though politics is involved too. The section on Trident and Nato has been sharpened at Mr Corbyn’s expense. The earlier plan to halt NHS reforms has wisely been replaced by a review. Looked at overall, Labour’s manifesto is a mixed bag of pledges, with some strange inclusions and other surprising omissions. Though radical in some ways it is conservative in others. The section on union rights is detailed and extensive, but that on the future of the United Kingdom is perfunctory. There is not as much sense of the future as there should be.
At 124 pages, this is a long manifesto. But it is not a suicide note. In terms of its social democratic credentials, the 1983 manifesto it most resembles is that of the Liberal/SDP Alliance rather than Labour’s. Its achievement is to expand the limits of the thinkable in British politics. Its weakness is that it does too little to make the thinkable seem realistic and practical. That reflects Mr Corbyn’s preference for energising his own support rather than persuading those outside it. This manifesto may not win Mr Corbyn the general election, but it could cement his support within his party.
For seven years, people in Britain have been forced to hold their breath and wait for a comprehensive plan to tackle the nation’s toxic air crisis. After a series of humiliating defeats in the courts, Friday’s government plan was meant to finally deliver.
But instead ministers hit the brakes and slammed the policy into reverse – the farcical new strategy has even less detail than the one already ruled illegal. What was the impassable roadblock in the way of finally starting to cut the 23,000 early deaths diesel pollution causes every year? Nothing but pure political expediency.
The only sure way to bring the toxic nitrogen dioxide spewed out by dirty diesel vehicles down to legal levels is to keep them out of cities and towns. The law demands the fastest possible action, which means deterring polluting drivers with charges – as will happen in London. But backing new taxes on drivers in the heat of an election campaign promises a political car crash, so ministers have simply swerved and crashed into the nation’s health instead.
The most shocking aspect is that buried in the documents are candid admissions that the crisis is the “largest environmental threat to public health in the UK” and that it is a “direct result” of car makers gaming emissions tests for years, so that their vehicles pump out far more pollution on the road than in the official lab tests.
Ministers even say: “We will continue to press car manufacturers to develop options for recalling existing vehicles to improve their real world emissions performance.” But unlike in Germany and France, the government’s pressing of car makers has driven precisely zero action.
Rather than tackle air pollution head on, the government has passed the buck to local authorities, daring them to impose the needed charges instead and face the electoral consequences. Ministers suggest councils should penalise any diesel cars more than two years old – most of them – but lack the courage of their convictions.
In place of meaningful action, the government’s plan suggests gimmicks such as removing speed bumps and re-phasing traffic lights, measures as likely to increase traffic and emissions as to cut them.
One of the few good parts of the new plan is funds to clean up older buses, lorries and taxis but even this is old money, already announced in the budget. The much vaunted scrappage scheme is mentioned only as a possibility and even then would only cover 0.1% of all diesel cars.
The new plan will leave the nation gasping for years to come and it seems likely that ClientEarth, the lawyers who have twice had the government’s plans declared illegal, will return to the courts for a third time.
The government is likely to view its manoeuvring as a political success, having buried its feeble plan under the local election results. The government’s cynical calculus is that diesel drivers are more of a political force to be feared than people angry about the health damage being caused to them and their children.
It was during a walking holiday in Snowdonia, says Theresa May, after ‘long and hard’ reflection that she made the decision to call a June election. So much for walking and creative inspiration. But is there a connection between the two?
Neuroscience would say that depends on the difficulty of the task. Using a mathematical example, you can test this out for yourself. When you start with an easy challenge like counting in fives, fast walking isn’t a problem, but try multiplying 37 and 23 and you’ll find your feet slow down no matter how hard you try and keep up the pace.
We only struggle to walk and problem solve when the task is sufficiently difficult (if deciding on an election was a no-brainer for May, it’s unlikely her walking pace suffered). Various theories have been advanced to explain the finding, but really it’s down to attention being a limited resource in the brain. It’s not as good at multitasking as you’d expect. In May’s case, it could even be that the opposite was happening; the effort required to maintain a steady walking pace distracted her from the everyday preoccupations of running the country, enabling her to hatch a fiendish plot to steal a march on the opposition.
Dr Daniel Glaser is director of Science Gallery at King’s College London
Writer Jack Monroe has announced she is standing in the general election and thanked her “campaign sponsor”, Katie Hopkins.
Monroe, a food blogger who also campaigns on poverty issues, said she will stand in the Southend West constituency.
She announced the news on Twitter and retweeted a post by the National Health Action (NHA) party that said it was “delighted” that Monroe was standing.
Earlier this year, outspoken columnist Hopkins was ordered to pay £24,000 damages to Monroe at the end of a case dubbed “Twibel” by media pundits.
The former Apprentice star, who faces a costs bill running into six figures, was also ordered to pay £107,000 on account within 28 days.
Monroe had complained that two May 2015 tweets accused her of “vandalising a war memorial and desecrating the memory of those who fought for her freedom, or of approving or condoning such behaviour”.
Hopkins’s defence was that her tweets did not bear the meanings complained of, were not defamatory and it had not been shown that they caused serious harm to Monroe’s reputation.
But Mr Justice Warby ruled in Monroe’s favour and said the publications “not only caused Ms Monroe real and substantial distress, but also harm to her reputation which was serious”.
Jack Monroe (@MxJackMonroe)
Aaaaand we’re off. It’s official. I’m standing against David Amess in Southend West, for our NHS. https://t.co/FajeOVp8nA
April 28, 2017
Responding to Twitter users suggesting that she will lose her deposit, Monroe wrote: “For all those gloating that I may lose my deposit, I may well do, but you should be directing your glee to my campaign sponsor, Katie.”
And she rounded off the series of tweets by thanking Hopkins.
Jack Monroe (@MxJackMonroe)
So from the bottom of my heart, thankyou Katie for your generous – if unwitting – contribution to saving the National Health Service.
Live coverage of all the day’s campaign action with the last PMQs before the election and a row over Labour’s NHS funding promises
Labour will lift pay cap for ‘overworked’ NHS staff
Sign up for the Snap, our daily election email – and read today’s
PMQs – Snap verdict
PMQs – Verdict from the Twitter commentariat
Afternoon summary
You’d have to have a screw loose not to think things are pretty tough. I noticed when Jeremy addressed the PLP [parliamentary Labour party] he didn’t announce the key seats we’d need to take off the Tories to form a Labour government. I thought that was ominous.
It is a remarkable achievement for the leadership to have taken a catastrophic situation in Scotland and made it quite a lot worse. We seem to be doing worse in Wales … We’ve gone backwards amongst every demographic, every region of the country. Jeremy is behind Theresa May on managing the NHS! It’s quite a special achievement to put all of that together in a short period of time. Hats off to Jeremy and Seumas [Milne], Diane [Abbott] and John [McDonnell]. That’s pretty special.
In February the government announced that it would close the so-called Dubs scheme for taking unaccompanied child refugees from Europe after a total of 350 were admitted. This caused outrage because, when the government accepted Lord Dubs’ amendment to the Immigration Act committing it to take some unaccompanied child refugees, it was expected that around 3,000 could be admitted.
Today, in a written ministerial statement, the Home Office minister Robert Goodwill has admitted that a further 130 places are available for unaccompanied child refugees. The Home Office should have know about these extra places when it made its announcement two months ago but it didn’t because it lost the submission from a council saying it could provide the places.
The government remains fully committed to the implementation of our commitment under section 67 [the Dubs amendment] to transfer unaccompanied children to the UK from Europe and no eligible child has been refused transfer to the UK as a result of this error. The home secretary has written to her counterparts in France, Greece and Italy and we are working closely with member states, as well as the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) and NGO partners so we can identify and transfer children to the UK as soon as possible.
It is welcome that an extra 130 children will be brought to safety in Britain under the Dubs scheme. But it beggars belief that these children weren’t helped earlier because of a basic admin error. This shows a shameful failure by the Home Office to talk properly to local councils who were willing and able to help or to check they had counted the figures up right. This shows the Home Office simply hasn’t taken this seriously enough.
Time and again the select committee and local councils across the country told the Home office that there were more places available, but they wouldn’t budge and they failed to follow up. Surely on something as important as this, when children are at risk of trafficking and prostitution, they would have checked the numbers were right.
Here is another picture from Jeremy Corbyn’s NHS visit this afternoon.
The Scottish Labour party has named a former chief of the pro-UK Better Together campaign, Blair McDougall, and a leading Corbyn supporter, Rhea Wolfson, in their first tranche of general election candidates.
After its rout by the Scottish National party at the 2015 election, Scottish Labour was left with one MP, leaving it the major task of finding up to 58 new candidates when its popularity is at a record low of 14%. This is the first election where Scottish leader Kezia Dugdale and her officials have autonomy from the UK party in choosing candidates.
Leanne Wood, the leader of Plaid Cymru, has also criticised Jeremy Corbyn for not being willing to take part in a leaders’ debate without Theresa May. She is echoing what her friend and political ally, the SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon, said on Twitter earlier. (See 2.08pm.) In 2015 Wood and Sturgeon joined Ed Miliband, the Labour leader, Natalie Bennett, the Green party leader, and Nigel Farage, the Ukip leader, in a so-called “challengers’ debate” that did not feature David Cameron.
Wood said:
It is disappointing to hear that the leader of the Labour party is not prepared to take part in any televised leaders’ debates without the prime minister.
These debates are a good opportunity for people to engage with the election and for the leaders to put forward their vision to voters.
You have probably got the point about “strong and stable leadership” by now, but just in case you haven’t, the Guardian video team have produced a video pointing out just how frequently the Tories hammered home this message at PMQs.
Jeremy Corbyn has renewed his call for Theresa May to take part in TV election debates. And he has signalled that he won’t take part if she is not included. Speaking to Sky News, he said:
I asked Theresa May this morning about the TV debates, lots of people asked her about it, and she said they’re over because there are no more prime minister’s question times because parliament is now dissolved, or will be dissolved next week. And so, actually, the debate has to include the prime minister, the leader of the Conservative party, and we are up for that debate.
You will see me all over the country taking questions from people on the streets.
This is from the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg.
CPS source confirms they’ve received a file from Kent Police over election expenses in South Thanet
Jeremy Corbyn has been meeting health workers today.
A Panelbase poll is out today giving the Conservatives a 22-point lead over Labour. Here are the figures.
On BBC Radio 5 Live Michael Gove, the former Conservative justice secretary and a leader of the Vote Leave campaign, said he was “absolutely convinced” that Brexit would result in more money going to the NHS. When it was put to him that Vote Leave had said at one point that an extra £100m a week would go to the NHS if the UK left the EU, and he was asked if he still expected that, he replied:
I am absolutely convinced that we will be spending significantly more on the NHS [after Brexit.] I hope it’s £100m.
Tim Farron, the Lib Dem leader, has tweeted saying that he has “sacked” David Ward as a candidate. (See 2.26pm.)
I believe in a politics that is open, tolerant and united. David Ward is unfit to represent the party and I have sacked him.
Arlene Foster, Democratic Unionist leader and first minister in the last power sharing government in Northern Ireland, took time out today from electioneering to pay a highly symbolic visit to Irish language pupils at a Catholic school near the border.
Foster had been criticised earlier this year for her opposition to an Irish Language Act – a key demand by Sinn Fein – which would put Gaelic on an equal par to English throughout Northern Ireland.
Now Tim Farron, the Lib Dem leader, is accusing Jeremy Corbyn of “running scared” after it emerged that Corbyn will not take part in TV election debates if Theresa May is not included. Farron said:
Corbyn is running scared. He is running away from facing his opponents, he is running away from defending his policies, he is running away from leadership.
The Liberal Democrats have barred former Bradford East MP David Ward from standing again for the party, after Tim Farron said his comments about Jews had been “deeply offensive, wrong and antisemitic”, my colleague Jessica Elgot reports.
Related: Tim Farron sacks Lib Dem candidate for ‘deeply offensive and antisemitic’ comments
In the huddle for lobby journalists after the final PMQs of the parliament, Jeremy Corbyn’s spokesman struck an upbeat note about Labour’s prospects. He said the Conservatives’ poll lead will narrow once the campaign gets underway and the public get to hear Labour’s message, “in our own voice”.
We are confident that we can win this election, and we’re fighting for every seat, and we’re confident that once Labour’s message is clearly heard, and there is a chance for the public to hear policies that many of them won’t have heard before, but which are extremely popular, and we know to be so, that will have cut-through, and Labour support will increase.
The politics and the polling is actually quite complex and quite varied across different countries, and I don’t think it’s just a technical issue to do with the polling companies that we’re in; I think it’s to do with the volatile and fluid political situation, with much more fragmentation.
This was all dealt with when the allegation first came out, and it’s not the case that John McDonnell signed any such statement. When the story was first run about a year ago it was made clear that it was confusion about another statement; he never signed the statement involving MI5, it was another story entirely. This is recycled fake news.
Nicola Sturgeon, the Scottish first minister, has been campaigning in Stirling today.
On the World at One Andrew Gwynne, Labour’s general election coordinator, said the party’s manifesto would be published on Monday 15 May. Asked how Labour would fund its promises, he replied:
I’m not in a position to spell out the Labour party’s full manifesto here. But we will have to wait until May 15 for the manifesto.
Conservatives have denied that Boris Johnson is being sidelined from the party’s general election campaign by Theresa May, the Press Association reports.
Reports have suggested the foreign secretary has been told to keep a low profile because he is vulnerable to challenge over his pre-referendum claims that Brexit would deliver £350m a week to spend on the NHS.
A senior Conservative source dismissed the claims as speculation, and said Johnson would soon enter the fray.
Nicola Sturgeon, Scotland’s first minister, has criticised Jeremy Corbyn for apparently refusing to take part in an election debates if Theresa May is not involved. She posted this on Twitter.
Faced with an open goal, Corbyn decides against even attempting to score . Unbelievable, if true. https://t.co/JkRBLxgLID
Source close to Jeremy Corbyn reveals he won’t take part in TV debates if Theresa May doesn’t. #GE17
This is what political journalists and commentators are saying about PMQs.
Mostly people are quite positive about Jeremy Corbyn, although several people think Angus Robertson was more effective.
Corbyn uses last #PMQs to attack May on triple lock, NHS, housing, education spending cuts. Weak ground 4 May but no real blows dealt #PMQs
May is a master at not answering the question. That is why Corbyn should use #PMQs to ask her the same one 6 times. Makes her uncomfortable
Corbyn channelling impressive levels of passion at #PMQs
Corbyn is doing rather well, as he did last week. Spitting out the questions. May quite pugnacious in reply
There’s much more to being a good PM than PMQs, of course, but May remains quite weak at this. No wonder she’s dodging tv debates
COMMENT AR shows JC how to do #PMQs but remember TM wants to drop pensions triple lock. If this is the worst this gets for her…
Theresa May savages Jeremy Corbyn at final PMQs before election #GE2017 https://t.co/9X2W54WHBL pic.twitter.com/hsy094eOaX
.@AngusRobertson there proving he’s the best opposition leader in the Commons. Skewers May on pension lock #pmqs
SNP’s Angus Robertson doing what Corbyn cd hv done: forcing May to wriggle on triple lock for pensions. May refuses to guarantee it. #pmqs
Corbyn channelling Miliband 2013: “He may be strong at standing up to weak, but always weak when it comes to standing up against the strong”
Corbyn with decent election lines the tories are for ‘the rich not the rest, the strong against the weak, and weak against the strong’
Corbyn quoted both Blair (“many not the few”) and Miliband (“weak against the strong”) at #PMQs. https://t.co/Q15ztRfeIH
Some very glum faces from Labour moderates sitting behind Corbyn during PMQs.
This is #PMQs at its worst – neither answering questions, talking about completely different subjects and shouting slogans #PMQs
Labour sources are also criticising Theresa May for referring to Jeremy Corbyn at PMQs as a terrorist sympathiser.
Senior Labour source says May calling Corbyn “a terrorist sympathiser” in #pmqs was a “discredit to the office of Prime Minister”
I Like Corbyn, But… https://t.co/xZPMEvtpjH
It gets so much better #ILikeCorbynBut pic.twitter.com/YzQwd7xrC8
Labour are ruling out Jeremy Corbyn taking part in any TV debates that do not feature Theresa May, Huffington Post’s Paul Waugh reports.
Labour source just ruled out Corbyn taking part in any TV debates that don’t feature Theresa May.
Theresa May refused to commit to keeping the triple lock at PMQs. But, according to today’s Times, the Tories are thinking of keeping the policy, which ensures pensions rise every year in line with earnings, inflation or 2.5%, whichever is highest, on the grounds that it would be cost free. Here’s an extract from Francis Elliott and Oliver Wright’s story (paywall).
Theresa May is considering keeping the “triple lock” guarantee on state pension increases because it is likely to be a cost-free promise for the next parliament, according to senior ministers.
Labour has promised to increase the state pension by a minimum of 2.5 per cent a year, despite warnings that it could cost taxpayers an additional 1 per cent of GDP by 2036. The lock is triggered only if inflation falls below that figure and the Office for Budget Responsibility is predicting that wages and prices will increase at a faster pace in the next few years.
The Lib Dem peer Olly Grender, who worked in Number 10 as deputy communications director during the coalition, says Theresa May was wrong at PMQs to argue that the Conservatives deserved credit for increasing council house building during the coalition.
Under Coalition NOT Con Govt increase in council house building thanks to LibDems who insisted (Tories at time didn’t give a ****) #PMQs
This is from Politico Europe’s Tom McTague.
French ambassador Sylvie Bermann in the chamber for PMQs. Chuckling away. Would love to read her diptel!
The SNP’s Alex Salmond says Liam Fox went to the Philippines and said we had “shared values” with it. What shared values do we have with Rodrigo Duterte?
May says we need trade deals after Brexit to ensure a strong economy.
Sir Simon Burns, a Conservative, says he has been Chelmsford MP for 30 years. They are perspicacious, he says. They want a government with a strong economy, strong defences and strong leadership. May will deliver that for the next five years, he says.
May thanks Burns for his contribution as an MP and as a minister.
Douglas Carswell, the independent MP, asks what assurance May can give to the 3.8m people who voted Ukip at the last election.
May says she wants to see the UK getting control of its borders and control of its laws.
Dame Angela Watkinson, a Conservative, asks May why people should continue to vote Conservative.
May says every vote for her and the Conservative candidate will be a vote to strengthen her hands in the Brexit talks.
Labour’s George Howarth says Andy Burnham had a debate yesterday on contaminated blood. He called for a Hillsborough-style panel to get to the truth. Will May join the SNP and Labour in backing the idea.
May says the government has put more money into compensation. The department of health will respond to the consultation.
Mike Wood, a Conservative, says it is good to be back. Doctors saved his life in January. Will May look at what can be done to reduce deaths from sepsis.
May says it is fantastic to see Wood back. She says he is right to focus attention on this problem. The department of health is working on a new sepsis action plan.
Labour’s Grahame Morris asks why May is afraid of TV debates. One should be held in Easington, he says, where May could see the impact of her policies.
May says she has been debating Corbyn every week.
Sir Gerald Howarth, a Conservative who is standing down, says he came into the Commons in 1983, when the country had a strong woman leader, and he leaves as another one is restoring British sovereignty. He appeals to Howarth to protect the armed forces guarding “this sceptred isle”.
May says people will have a choice at the election. The Tories will continue to protect the armed forces.
Tim Farron, the Lib Dem leader, says May once berated her party as the “nasty party”. But it has never been nastier. And Labour is not holding to account. Doesn’t the country need the Lib Dems?
May says Farron talks about a decent opposition. She says Farron cannot say that when the Lib Dems have just elected a candidate with a questionable record on antisemitism.
Sir Eric Pickles, the Conservative, asks May about anti-semitism, and if she shares his disgust at the selection of David Ward, a former MP accuses of anti-semitism, as a Lib Dem candidate. (See 10.35am.)
May pays tribute to the work Pickles had done tackling anti-semitism. She says people will be disappointed to see the Lib Dems adopt a candidate with a questionable record on anti-semitism.
Jeffrey Donaldson, the DUP MP, asks May if she agrees that those who refuse to take their seats (Sinn Fein) and who are refusing to form a government in Northern Ireland are not serving their constituents.
May agrees. She says she wants to work for the restoration of a government in Northern Ireland.
Peter Lilley, the Conservative, says he is standing down because of Theresa May. He says he has confidence that she will deliver Brexit properly. And we must accept that no deal is better than a bad deal. To deny this would be to admit that no price would be too high. That would be the worst possible deal, he says.
May thanks Lilley for everything he has done, not just as an MP, but as a minister in government. She says it is right to get on with delivering Brexit. The only way to ensure that is to get a Conservative government elected.
PMQs – Snap verdict: At PMQs you can deploy the sniper’s rifle or the shotgun, and today we saw Angus Robertson try one, and Jeremy Corbyn use the other. They were both effective in their way, although Theresa May’s shield of slogans and talking points managed to protect her quite adequately. It did not feel as if anyone secured a great triumph.
But in the circumstances, and with polling organisations pouring humiliation over Corbyn by the hour, that probably amounted to something of a win for the Labour leader. He asked about a range of topics, resorting to the “here’s a question from a viewer” formula that he used frequently in his first PMQs outings and neatly skewering May over her reluctance to take questions from members of the public. It was not flashy or eye-catching, but it was honest and solid and his points were strong. In response, May resorted to carpet-bombing Corbyn with the “strong and stable” leadership stuff. Her message discipline is outstanding, and conventional wisdom has it that you cannot repeat these slogans too often (although May seems to be testing that theory to destruction.)
Angus Robertson, the SNP leader at Westminster, asks for a clear and unambiguous commitment to keeping the triple lock for pensioners.
May says she has been very clear that pensioners have benefited to the tune of £1,250 a year. Under her pension incomes will continue to increase.
Ben Howlett, a Conservative, asks if May agrees that his voters should give him a renewed mandate to improve traffic around Bath.
May agrees. A vote for any other party is a vote for wrecking the economy.
Corbyn says millions of women will have heard that answer. Labour will guarantee the triple lock. And it won’t move the goalposts. Sybil, who witnessed the founding of the NHS, said she is 88. She has had wonderful service from the NHS. But now she is scared of going into hospital. With more delayed discharges, isn’t she right to be frightened.
May says the NHS is treated more people than ever before. But that is only possible with a strong economy. She says she will defend her record. She says Diane Abbott has been directing her followers to a website “I like Corbyn but ..”. It addresses questions about Corbyn not being able to pay for his policies and being a terrorist sympathiser. Even Corbyn’s supporters know he is not fit to run the country.
Corbyn says the last Labour government delivered a decent homes standard for every council in the country. House building has fallen to its lowest level since the 1920s. Children are being held back by cuts. Laura, a teacher, said she was seeing less cash every year to pay for children, and more reliance on parent funding. Is May still denying funding per pupil is being cut.
May says record levels of funding are going into schools. People will have a choice, she says. The government has delivered more good school places. Corbyn believes in a one-size-fits-all, take-it-or-leave-it approach to education.
Corbyn says Andy is concerned about how his children are being held back. All three of his children, in their mid 20s, cannot afford to move out of the family home. Don’t we need a housing strategy to deal with it?
May asks what happened under Labour. Under Labour, house building starts fell by 45%. And the number of social homes fell. Under the Conservatives more than twice as much council housing has been built as under Labour.
Jeremy Corbyn says this is the last PMQs of this parliament. It would be appropriate to pay tribute to MPs who are leaving, he says. And he thanks the speaker for presiding over these exchanges.
He says when he became leader 18 months ago he said he wanted people’s voices to be heard in parliament. So, instead of just speaking to handpicked audiences, will May today answer questions from the public. Christopher wrote to him this week saying hus husband had only a 1% increase in wages. But their buying power had gone down 15%. So where is his share in the stronger economy.
Richard Drax, a Conservative, asks about a leftwing campaign for socialist victory that proposed disbanding M15. Would May allow anyone like that to draft her manifesto?
No, says May. She says the plan to disband MI%, disarm the police and scrap the deterrent was endorsed by Jeremy Corbyn’s policy chief, Andrew Fisher. Corbyn is “simply not up to the job”, she says.
Theresa May starts by answering a closed question from the Conservative MP Michael Fabricant about the economy in the West Midlands. It is doing well, she says. And so are public services, because you can only have those with “strong and stable leadership”.
Fabricant says the country needs “strong and stable leadership”.
This is from the Daily Mail’s Jason Groves.
More Labour MPs in for #PMQs than there have been for a while – some taking a last look around?
Very loud cheers for Theresa May as she enters Commons chamber for #PMQs
Here is the list of MPs down to ask a question.
#PMQS LIVEBLOG: These lucky MPs will be grilling the PM from 12. Follow all the action here – https://t.co/B8kBRMA48K pic.twitter.com/mTlwnKdOKL
This is from the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg.
This Parliament has only sat for 299 days – and had 61 PMQs – for some MPs, today’s the leaving do! Election will decide which ones
PMQs will start in 10 minutes. It is the last of this parliament.
And it is also only the second, and last, election TV debate between Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn (counting last week’s PMQs as the first.)
Ipsos MORI has more good news for the Conservatives on the polling front. As Joe Murphy reports in the Evening Standard, Theresa May has the best ratings on “best PM” since the firm started polling on this in the 1970s. Here’s an extract from Murphy’s story.
Theresa May’s leadership score has soared higher than either Margaret Thatcher or Tony Blair enjoyed in their best years, an exclusive poll reveals today
The Ipsos MORI survey shows the Conservatives on 49 per cent, with an extraordinary 23 per cent lead over Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour who are on 26 …
Mahatma Gandhi was one of the great figures of the 20th century. He led India to independence and championed a form of non-violent civil disobedience that inspired campaigners around the world. It is hard to think of a modern equivalent, but the Ukip leader Paul Nuttall has suggested a possible candidate: himself.
Nuttall did quite put himself in the same league as the great Gandhi, but in an interview with the Wolverhampton Express and Star suggested they had something in common and the paper’s website has headlined the story: “I’m like Gandhi, says Ukip leader Paul Nuttall in Wolverhampton.” This is what Nuttall told the paper:
Raising issues of equality, women’s rights, and FGM are the issues other parties don’t want to tackle.
Ukip will lead on these and as I said in our press conference I feel as if we are a decade ahead of our time – a bit like we were a decade ahead of our time on getting out of the EU, and on mass immigration.
YouGov has released some new polling this morning. Since February, Theresa May’s net favourability rating has gone up (from +6 to +10) and Jeremy Corbyn’s has gone done (from -40 to -42).
Peter Lilley, the Conservative former social security secretary regarded as one of the Eurosceptics cabinet “bastards” once denounced by John Major, is standing down, the Guido Fawkes blog reports. In a statement announcing his decision Lilley said:
Now we have in Theresa May an outstanding Prime Minister in whom I have great confidence.
I profoundly hope she will be returned with a strong mandate to complete the process of leaving the EU and to seize the opportunities which regaining control of our laws, border, money and trade will give our country.
Lib Dem leader Tim Farron is continuing his tour of remain seats with Brexiteer MPs, after vowing to unseat Labour’s Kate Hoey in Vauxhall. His stop today is St Albans, where more than 62% of voters backed staying in the EU but Conservative MP Anne Main campaigned for leave.
Farron used the campaign stop to highlight the risk to the economy of leaving the EU and tell businesses they should stop funding the Conservatives while they pursue a hard Brexit.
My message to business is this – dump the Tories. Every penny you give them will hurt you; you are funding your own funeral. The success of British business matters. Strong British businesses mean more jobs and a stronger society.
With this disastrous hard Brexit the government is hurting businesses, both big and small, costing jobs and hitting families. All this means fewer jobs, higher prices and spiralling costs of things like fuel. This is a Brexit squeeze affecting millions of people.
.@timfarron visits the National Pharmacy Association in St Albans with @libdemdaisy talking about the #NHS & care pic.twitter.com/ZImwhVQEX1
The Conservatives have also produced a briefing accusing Labour of spending the money it proposes to raise from corporation tax over and over again. The Lib Dems cited 10 examples, although two items on their list were essentially the same. (See 9.09am.) In a note for journalists a few days ago, the Tories cited 11 examples. Most of the Tory ones were the same as the Lib Dem ones, but the Tories had three examples not on the Lib Dem list. Here they are, as set out in the Tory briefing.
Scrapping university tuition fees. Jeremy Corbyn said:‘At the moment what we’re doing is asking students to fund universities rather than the public to fund universities. I would rather move in to the other way around, with public funding of it … It would be largely on levels of corporate taxation’ (Victoria Derbyshire Labour Leadership Hustings, 17 August 2016).
Reversing changes to Universal Credit. John McDonnell:‘Universal Credit. We’re hoping on Wednesday the government will reverse that … If you had a fair taxation system, you weren’t giving the tax giveaways to corporations and to the rich, if you seriously tackle tax evasion and tax avoidance, if you grew the economy we’d be able to afford – we’d be able to afford our public services’ (The Andrew Marr Show, BBC One, 21 November 2016).
Tuition fees will be scrapped and maintenance grants brought back, the Green party are announcing as key features of their election manifesto.
Co-leaders Jonathan Bartley and deputy leader Amelia Womack will also say in a speech today that students and universities will be protected after Brexit if the Green party were in power.
The Green party is the only party standing up for students and putting young people at the heart of its campaign.
Education is a right not a commodity to be bought and sold, and we need a level playing field so everyone has the chance to go to university or college.
If the referendum result had gone the other way David Cameron – remember him? – would be in Downing Street this morning preparing for PMQs. Instead he happens to be in Bangkok, where he has just finished speaking at a tourism conference. My colleague Oliver Holmes was there and he has sent me the highlights.
Here are some of the key points he made.
Let me be optimistic … It’s very good that we are having this election, because I think if Theresa May is successful, she’ll actually have a larger majority and, potentially, more time to deal with Brexit and its consequences.
Arguably, you could say, looking at the state of British politics, the Conservative party having accepted the referendum result and got on with the process and responsibly delivering it, is probably the most healthy mainstream political party anywhere in western Europe.
It was a legitimate cause of populist concern, that Britain was a member of this organisation, the organisation had changed a huge amount over the last forty years, it had gained more powers, it had passed more treaties, it had become more important in more areas. And yet in spite of the fact that the British people were occasional offered a referendum by their leaders, most famously by Tony Blair, they never got a referendum.
If you want to address the causes of populism, it was necessary, in my view, to have a referendum.
But I think it was the right thing. The lack of a referendum was poisoning British politics and so I put that right.
These terrorists and their apologists are trying hijack a great religion and twist and pervert it for their own ends. We must not play into their hands. And that was to me, the biggest problem with President Tump’s travel ban. It would be seen, could be seen, as labelling whole countries as extreme and dangerous because they were predominately Islamic. It’s not a clash between civilisations that we face. That is what the extremists want us to think. This is if you like a war within Islam.”
There would have been a big lesson learn. I thought it was misconceived from the very outset.
Paul Johnson, the director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, told the Today programme earlier that Labour would have to raise “significant extra sums” to fund its plan to give NHS staff a pay rise. He said:
Each 1% on pay, just 1%, costs half a billion pounds each time. It’s not possible to say from what the Labour party have said quite how much more they intend to spend on the NHS.
If you are going to do that over the next two or three years you will also clearly need to raise significant extra sums in tax revenue.
Norman Lamb, the Lib Dem former health minister, told the Today programme that he agreed with Labour about the need for NHS staff to be paid more. He said the current 1% cap on NHS pay increases was unsustainable.
In effect we are asking very many staff across the NHS to just, year on year, take a pay cut in real terms in order to sustain our NHS. And I don’t think that’s acceptable. I think ultimately it’s dangerous. We are seeing widespread vacancies … Actually people will vote with their feet and leave if you don’t maintain wages at least in real terms.
The problem with the Labour position is their proposal just isn’t credible … The money from corporation tax increase has been spent about 10 times over.
Labour have already committed to using funding from an increase to corporation tax ten times since the last general election:
1. Bringing back the education maintenance allowance and university maintenance grants.
Jonathan Ashworth, the shadow health secretary, will announce his guarantees for NHS staff in a speech to the Unison conference in Liverpool. According to extracts released in advance he will say:
NHS staff have been taken for granted for too long by the Conservatives. Cuts to pay and training mean hard working staff are being forced from NHS professions and young people are being put off before they have even started. Now Brexit threatens the ability of health employers to recruit from overseas.
What is bad for NHS staff is bad for patients too. Short staffing means reduced services and a threat to patient safety. Labour’s new guarantees for NHS staff will help keep services running at the standard which England’s patients expect …
In his Today interview earlier Jeremy Hunt admitted that Brexit would have an impact on the NHS.
There’s no point saying that Brexit and the Brexit negotiations won’t affect the NHS. This is absolutely critical for our public services.
Q: Are you saying you will give the NHS whatever it needs?
Ashworth says the NHS has not had what it needs.
Good morning. I’m taking over from Claire.
Jonathan Ashworth, the shadow health secretary, is on Today now.
We will outline what level corporation tax will be in our manifesto when we publish it in the coming days … The whole programme that the Labour Party will be putting to the country in this election campaign will be costed.
I’m now handing over the live reins to Andrew Sparrow, who’ll take you through the rest of the day’s political news.
A quick reminder: you can sign up for the Snap, our daily election briefing email, here.
In a video for the Guardian, Paul Mason pushes back against the argument from the Daily Mail and others that those who oppose the government and its Brexit plans are “saboteurs”. Meaningful opposition to the Tories is necessary for the country and for democracy, he argues:
Meg Hillier, the Labour MP who chairs the cross-party public accounts committee, has been talking about its free schools report.
We will consider the recommendations carefully and respond in due course.
As well as Labour’s own NHS pledges, we might expect Jeremy Corbyn to press Theresa May on this damning MPs’ report on free schools when the two leaders meet for the final PMQs of this parliament at noon.
In the – so far – planned absence of televised head-to-head debates during the campaign, today could be the last time we see May and Corbyn take each other on ahead of 8 June.
The DfE is spending well over the odds in its bid to create 500 more free schools while other schools are in poor condition. Many free schools are in inadequate premises, including many without on-site playgrounds or sports facilities …
The department is in a weak negotiating position and commonly pays well in excess of the official valuation. On average, it has paid 19% over the official valuation, with 20 sites costing over 60% more.
Leaders in Europe will demand that Theresa May respects the right of EU nationals who have lived in the UK for five years to acquire permanent residence, Daniel Boffey and Lisa O’Carroll report:
In a sign of growing anger over the perceived bureaucratic hurdles being put in their way, the call will be made at a summit on Saturday, where the leaders of the 27 other EU member states are set to sign their negotiating guidelines.
The guidelines were amended by officials on Monday to strengthen demands over Britain’s €60bn divorce bill, open the door to further cooperation on EU-UK foreign policy and law enforcement, and add a call for transparency during the talks.
Such guarantees must be effective, enforceable, non-discriminatory and comprehensive, including the right to acquire permanent residence after a continuous period of five years of legal residence. Citizens should be able to exercise their rights through smooth and simple administrative procedures.
Related: Brexit: EU leaders to demand May respect citizens’ residency rights
Pressed on the issue of social care – which Theresa May has pledged to “stop ducking” – Jeremy Hunt is similarly reticent about what the not-ducking will look like:
We need a long-term sustainable solution.
You’ll have to wait and see what manifesto says … I’m not going to speculate on what the contents of our manifesto are.
And here’s Jeremy Hunt, the health secretary, who’s popped up to defend his record against the Labour claim that staff are “ignored, insulted, undervalued, overworked and underpaid by this Tory government”.
I think they are working harder than they’ve ever worked before … You see a government that’s responding to that.
We will be able to train record number of nurses.
Applications do then recover.
You’ll have to wait and see what the manifesto says.
Labour will be attempting to shift the debate today on to the NHS, with shadow health secretary Jon Ashworth making a number of pledges:
Related: Labour will give pay rise to ‘overworked and underpaid’ NHS staff
Jonathan Bartley, co-leader (with Caroline Lucas) of the Green party, has been updating Radio 4’s Today programme on the progress of the progressive alliance, their proposed anti-Tory electoral pact.
The response from Jeremy Corbyn and Tim Farron, says Bartley, has been
very disappointing … they haven’t responded.
On a local level, people are talking to each other …
We want people to vote Green [but] we will support whatever the local party wants to do. But it has to be a reciprocal arrangement.
Good morning and welcome back to another day on the campaign marathon.
I’m Claire Phipps, bringing you this morning’s essential – should your morning be incomplete without news of constituency selection battles – briefing, and steering the live blog until Andrew Sparrow joins us later.
Remember, the opinion polls were wrong in the 2015 general election; they were wrong in the referendum; and Jeremy Corbyn himself has said that he was a 200-1 outsider for the Labour leadership in 2015 – and look where that got him.
In effect, this is EU Referendum 2. This is the chance for those who didn’t vote/couldn’t vote, to come out. It’s a chance for Remainers to convert more people, help their friends to see the catastrophe that Brexit is …
‘My own constituency voted Remain,’ Theresa May announced in the Commons as an example of her adhering to the ‘will of the people’. But if everyone in Maidenhead who voted Remain backed the Lib Dems in June, the PM could lose her seat.
The Labour party will need more than a wish list and a collection of grievances. I’ll offer three topics for starters. How do we ensure a fair intergenerational settlement? How can our education and tax system respond to the changes of the world of work and employment? Where do we anchor democratic accountability in a world of global flows of goods, money and people?
Planning for parliamentary deadlock and pacts with other parties might be tempting. But these are the methods of counter-insurgents. If Labour instead wants to be a party of government, it has to go into the 2017 election fighting for every vote.
The gap between first- and second-place party in 2015, 2010 or earlier, as well as any byelection result, is not the only factor. Strategists are having to look at how many people in a given seat voted leave or remain in last year’s EU referendum. This information is especially crucial for the Liberal Democrats …
A 30- to 40-point improvement (that is, a 15% to 20% swing that went entirely from the first-placed party to the Lib Dems) would do the job in seats where a majority voted remain – but that is an incredibly ambitious target.
I do not want the people of Scotland to think that English eurosceptics put their dislike of Brussels ahead of our bond with Edinburgh and Glasgow.
It took two months but Trudy Harrison’s first speech as MP was good. “Who knows if you’ll be back,” SNP MP replies in praise. “Or any of us”
The government has made a last-minute application to the high court to delay the publication of its plan to tackle the air pollution crisis.
Ministers were under a court direction to produce tougher draft measures to tackle illegal levels of nitrogen dioxide pollution, which is largely caused by diesel traffic, by 4pm on Monday. The government’s original plans had been dismissed by judges as so poor as to be unlawful.
But following the announcement by Theresa May of a general election on 8 June, ministers lodged a lengthy application to the court late on Friday. It is understood they are asking judges to allow them to breach Monday’s deadline and submit a draft in June – after the general election.
It is understood that a full policy will not be produced until September this year.
The government has had months to come up with its air quality plans and Whitehall sources indicated to the Guardian this week they would be published in time.
The late application to delay publication was condemned by the environmental lawyers group ClientEarth, which successfully took the government to court over its air quality plans. MPs have said air pollution in the UK is a public health emergency that causes 40,000 premature deaths a year.
James Thornton, CEO of ClientEarth, said: “We are urgently considering the government’s application to delay the publication of the draft air quality plan which was received on Friday evening, less than one working day before the plans are due.
“It is far from acceptable that ministers have left this to the very last minute. The government proposes to delay the publication of the air quality plan despite the clear public health risk caused by illegal air quality. These plans are essential to safeguard public health and they should be put in place without delay.”
The application is likely to be considered by judges on Monday. Judges have already told ministers that their plans were taking too long and imposed the deadline to force the government to come up with new measures more quickly.
The government lodged a lengthy application shortly before 7pm on Friday to the court, which was too late for the court to accept. It will now be considered early next week.
Thornton said the general election was not an acceptable reason to delay taking action against air pollution.
“This is not a political issue but a public health issue. Whichever party is in power, the British public need to see an air quality plan which relies on good scientific evidence and which ensures that people no longer have to breathe toxic air and suffer the grave consequences to their health as a result,” he said.
Greenpeace also condemned the delaying tactics. Anna Jones, from Greenpeace UK said: “Ministers have had months to come up with a robust plan to tackle illegal air pollution. They have no excuses to delay its publication any further.
“The Cabinet Office guidance makes it clear that essential consultations can still be launched during purdah, and even mentions safeguarding public health as a ground for exceptions.
“Air pollution is a full-blown public health emergency, linked to thousands of premature deaths and a host of health problems. If the government intends to use the election as a pretext to buy more time, that would only be a sign that they just don’t get the gravity of the situation.”
A joint Guardian/Greenpeace investigation revealed this month that hundreds of thousands of children were being educated within 150 metres of a road where levels of nitrogen dioxide from diesel traffic breached legal limits.
A spokesman for the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs said: “We are firmly committed to improving the UK’s air quality and cutting harmful emissions. We are seeking an extension to comply with pre-election propriety rules.”
Jeremy Corbyn has pledged to put the NHS crisis and lack of school funding at the heart of Labour’s local election campaign, and blamed the party’s poor polling on the media for failing to give those issues due prominence.
The Labour leader launched the campaign in Newark, Nottinghamshire, against a backdrop of low support in the polls and warnings that his party could lose dozens of seats on 4 May.
His supporters booed when Corbyn was asked whether the local elections would be the ultimate and perhaps final test for his leadership.
“These elections are a chance for us to take our case out to the country about how we want to make a fairer Britain, an investment-led Britain, a Britain that isn’t in health crisis, schools that are not underfunded where they have to collect from the parents, that we don’t have to go around the whole country seeing Sure Start centres closed, libraries closed, all these things,” the Labour leader said.
“We will take the case out there for what Labour councils can do and do their best in a period of austerity but show that a Labour government will invest in the needs of people not in tax giveaways.”
He added: “Our party is very strong and very active on all of the doorsteps.”
During his speech, Corbyn highlighted figures suggesting life expectancy in Britain for pensioners is falling.
When asked why opinion polls show support for the Conservatives is so much higher than for Labour when the NHS is struggling and life expectancy falling for some groups, Corbyn said: “Too often our media do not deal with the issues people face day to day. There are more than a million people waiting for social care in this country and there are many people stuck in hospital who frankly shouldn’t be in hospital but can’t leave … and so I’m not expecting or wanting an easy ride from the media, I don’t care about that.
“But what I do care about is an obsession by so many to ignore the reality of homelessness, of social care … It simply doesn’t have to be the case in modern Britain. So these elections give us an opportunity and I hope all newspapers and radio and TV will at least get involved in the serious debate about health, social care, schools, housing because at the end of the day if people grow up in poverty they tend to underachieve at school and if they underachieve at school, they tend to lead less fulfilling lives. If they lead less fulfilling lives, we all lose.”
The local government elections – including many county council seats – will take place across England, Scotland and Wales, alongside a number of mayoral elections in areas such as Greater Manchester and the West Midlands.
Prof John Curtice, the leading election expert, has warned there could be a 12-point swing from Labour to the Conservatives in May’s contests, with Corbyn’s party at risk of losing control of councils in Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire.
The latest Guardian/ICM poll put Labour at 25%, their lowest support in these polls since the 2015 general election and joint equal to their lowest performance going back to 1983.
Full moons are always a time of heightened hormonal energies. Police departments and hospital experience rises in incidents of aggressive behavior and lunacy during the pull of the full moon. As the tides rise, so do our emotions, pulled by the same energetic forces. The Supermoon on November 14th comes on the heels of an already tense and divisive (s)election cycle in the United States.
Exposing Corruption
Evidence of profound corruption by the Clinton Foundation and the disclosure of financial support for both ISIL and Hillary Clinton by the Saudi Royals has fueled momentum to the public unwillingness to accept corruption as “politics as usual”.
Accusations of hacking made by Clinton against Russia have been proven false but the build-up of NATO troops along the Russian border and a recent cyber-attack against Russia from inside the United States are real, as President Obama and our former Secretary of State Clinton moves us closer to a deliberate war with Russia.
Agents within law enforcement and national security agencies bravely honored their oaths to defend our constitutionally guaranteed rights from enemies, foreign and domestic; leaking the proof of corruption that permeates the Clinton Foundation, and manifested as system of “pay for play” in the Office of the Secretary of State under Hillary Clinton.
Julian Assange, WikiLeaks, the internet and social media have been the voices for the people in this election. Journalism has returned to the people and to the streets.
The Trump Card
Trump’s candidacy may have been politically strategized or even manufactured to make a corrupted Hillary Clinton appear to be the more tolerable choice. Then again, the millions of silent voters who have studied the corruption in government are using this unlikely wildcard to literally trump the Presidential selection process. With protest support from George Soros’ Move On, and Hillary Clinton’s challenge to the Electoral College, Donald Trump’s wildcard Presidency may continue to be so divisive that States may secede from the Union and realign with neighboring States, into Regional Governments. Such an outcome has long been desired by forces for Globalization and consolidation of power. If George Soros wanted to harvest a revolution on American soil to institute global governance, he must have assumed that we had forgotten our roots…and grossly underestimated our instinct for reason and independence.
The wide base of support for a Trump presidency, unrecognized by the MSM, came from those discarded and disaffected by long failed democratic socialist and Neocon policies alike. It came from those whose recognition of criminality in media and government stirred their consciences to disconnect from the status quo. It came from those who understood that freedom of speech has room to include the venting of suppressed resentments and suffering. It came from the lessons of the past beginning with the fact that all peoples who have given up the right to defend their persons and their property have been overrun by tyrants. The Second Amendment is key to the defense of our freedom. The tyranny of theocracy such as Islamic Sharia are incompatible with our constitutional, democratic Republic in as much as it is an obligation, particularly in the Saudi fundamentalist version of Islam to aggressively conquer and repopulate a host land as their own.
Trump’s support came from a vast range of people who realized that politically correct speech is a censure of the ability to sound an alarm when a threat is faced. His support came from those whose consciences demanded a break from corruption and were willing to work within a system of checks and balances to temper the blustery storm. Support came from those who recognized the build up to another unwanted and catastrophic war. Making no excuses for the bombastic behavior of Trump or his most vocal supporters, real support came from the reasoned logic that is unwilling to submit to the racism, sexism and violence inherent in the acceptance of Sharia law on American soil. Lastly, support came from those who believe in local and national government, in that order and who refuse to submit sovereign authority to the influence of either the Saudi terror network or to a global elite.
Supermoon November 14th
As the Supermoon approaches, it would be too simple to surrender to the impulse to anger, to revenge, to hatreds and violence. The provocateur most dangerous is the one that resides in our own frustration; the one who is justified is seeking or meeting out justice but will not find it in harming himself or others. Instead, the moon that heightens our assertive drive and our sexuality is also the moon that heightens our creativity, our ability to redirect energy into a positive idea or invention or way of interacting with another person. This is the energy that is a gift to each of us and a gift that we can share.
Traditionally, the November moon always marks a time of preparation for winter. It is a time of responsibility, of evaluation and looking forward. The seeds we have sown, both physical and spiritual, have come to harvest and now our stores are laden with the products of our intentions, our actions and the lessons of conscience.
As we prepare for winter and the deep reflection of the long night, let us reflect on the seeds that we have planted with our words and our intentions, with our actions and our inaction. Let us consider what we can learn from those whose voices have been ignored by the MSM. We have been too long distracted by propaganda, by revival tent politics, by twerking and texting and trusting others to tend to our lives. We’ve been told how to think and how to teach and how to depend on the Church and the State, when neither will tend our gardens. The seeds they’ve planted have tainted the harvest. What we now harvest is burdened with bitter weeds and hurtful, bitter words born from gardens poorly tended and starving from neglect. The harvest is heavy with rotted fruit and withered vines and with the stones that weigh down our hearts. Now we fear one another and the long cold nights with rancor and disillusionment. As tenders of our souls, like tenders of the land, we have reaped the harvest sown.
Consequences of Compliance
Our land and our homes, our water and our skies have been co-opted by corporate and government jurisdictions, treaty agreements, liens and lies. The water of life carries nourishment to plant and beast alike. It too has been tainted by our treatment of it as a lifeless resource. We have allowed its contamination with our waste and by use of chemicals, by fracking and by privatization to corporations owned by the political elite. We are made of water and minerals and the spirit that resides within. Without living water, we too will wither and the children will die. The awaited rains of winter will not save us if the water is not safe to drink.
Nature herself has been forced to adapt to the carcinogenic chemicals in Geo-engineering. Aluminum, barium and strontium fall from our skies damaging our bodies, our water and our soil. We’ve been forced to accept the raping of our land and our spirits to draw forth every resource past the point of regeneration and threatening the roll of these resources to maintain an ecological balance. The black snake pipeline trespasses the planes and promises to poison the garden. The protectors of the water are trying to save us all.
Our rights as free people have been weighed against threats to our freedom back room terror and false flag events. For too long we trusted in the globalization of care, when it was the globalization of corruption at play on our land. Our lives and actions are under constant surveillance, monitored and cataloged for control. We have been played, manipulated and nearly harvested as fodder in an effort to make permanent the cycle of a forever war.
As we process the harvest of this season, sorting that which nourishes from that which does not, we can give thanks for the disclosure of corruption, its tentacles reaching deep within our political and economic structures. We can give thanks that there are still those whose voices and discernment have challenged us to see and understand our world….and one another with clarity and truth.
It is said that we should never go to sleep angry. As we settle in for the contemplative sleep of winter, we are angry at one another in large part because we trusted others to tell us how to think and behave. We forgot that we are individuals whose unique points of view cannot be duplicated or replaced by an imposed consensus. Likewise, responsibility is first and foremost, personal. Giving authority away diminishes our potential to connect with the consciousness that underlies all of existence. Instead, it feeds the tentacles of a pale simulation of our reality. We mourn for those who have been lost to war, lost to lies and corruption. We mourn for those whose faiths have been manipulated by propaganda and war to hate one another. We mourn for the land and water and sky. We mourn because it took us this long to say “that’s enough” and “no more!”
As we sort our harvest in this season of change, remember that we must salvage our souls from the corruption into which we all grew complicit. Healing requires that we must address those whose participation in deceit made possible the bombing of children, the starving of continents and the genocide of cultures. Forgiveness will come only with contrition, reparations and the cessation of crimes.
An Agenda for Healing
Abolish fracking and restore the damaged waterways and lands. Make reparation to all those injured by the imposition or employment of fracking.
Revisit, replace or dismantle NAFTA, CAFTA and all global corporate treaties and trade agreements such as those who have driven Mexican farmers off of their land shifted American manufacturing out of the United States. Eliminate any and all trade agreements that supersede national laws with international decrees.
Dismantle the monopolies of corporate agriculture. Abolish terminator seeds and chemical herbicides. Encourage a return to family farms, non-GMO crops and urban gardening.
Restore non-chemical methodologies and natural technologies for the healing of our water, our skies and our land.
End the American Medical Association’s monopoly on defining health care. End the influence of the pharmaceutical industry on the standards of health care in the United States. Effective non-invasive and non-pharmaceutical healing modalities must be recognized and restored.
Rescind the Patriot Acts and other 911 legislation that militarized our law enforcement and created a surveillance state. The war on terror was manufactured to manipulate our participation in unending wars of profit by fostering, arming and radicalizing religious extremism and by sacrificing American lives in false flag events.
Restore to the inventors and families of inventors, the suppressed patents and inventions that may have long ago given us energy independence, free of “fossil fuels”.
Respect and restore all treaty agreements made between the Native American tribes and any agency or department of the United States Government. Stop the Dakota Access Pipeline.
American involvement in and military support for the endless wars in the Middle East must end. American and British involvement in the radicalization of terrorists now paid for by Saudi Arabia must end. The Middle East must come to a negotiated peace that respects all parties and persons without violence. China, Russia and the United State working in concert can encourage a negotiated peace in the Middle East. Healing and rebuilding must replace radial terror and eternal revenge.
American Christian support of Israel for the sake of forcing the fulfillment Biblical prophecy must be abandoned. Bring our troops home and help them to heal.
Saudi Arabia has spread fundamentalist Islamic Jihad by means of its extreme wealth and influence, weaponizing religion as a tool of conquest. Saudi inspired Muslim refugees who wish to maintain Sharia customs should be repatriated to the Saudi homeland.
End the Federal Reserve banking system. Abolish the debt money system controlled by those who own the Federal Reserve. Globalization projects, Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030, which seek the abolition of private property and the consolidation of resources under the authority of wealthy elites, must also end.
Climate change science must consider the influence of commercial weather manipulation for stock market profit on our weather cycles and climate change. Temperature shifts on other planets in our solar system indicate that our climate change discussion needs to consider the ramifications of climate impact our housing and lifestyles.
Disclose the pay for play system of corruption that has infiltrated our government and tainted our interactions with global powers and corporations. Hold all parties responsible, without Presidential pardon.
Conclusion
We can be grateful to have one another in this time of division, so that we can reach our arms out to reconcile our differences and seriously discuss those issues that divide us. We need not be of one voice, or one faith or one political persuasion. Consensus, like division, is for control or the many by the few. Personal sovereignty, personal responsibility and the protections of our rights as guaranteed by the Constitution and Bill of Rights……that is what we need.
In this time of reflection and contemplation, consider the potential for truly healing our world, our nations and ourselves. We may not have a better opportunity than we do at this juncture in time to “trump” the corruption, contamination and globalization of our nation and our world. As we contemplate under the light and strength of November’s Supermoon, let us find the light and strength within ourselves to disengage from corruption, restore our Constitutional rights, and restore our health and the health of the land, water and sky.
Labour is launching its pivotal election pledge on the NHS on Tuesday, promising 36,000 more workers and the repeal of privatisation laws. It also guarantees to end the culture of 15-minute visits by care staff by recruiting an additional five,000 care employees and changing to the incentive structure.
Labour said the amount of days that individuals had been left in hospital beds due to the fact they could not be discharged was at a record large in the previous 12 months, more than a million days have been lost, incorporating £278m to the NHS bill.
Ed Miliband will make the NHS pledge in Trafford, Manchester, the web site of the initial NHS hospital as a new BBC poll by Populus exhibits the NHS is seen as the single most critical issue for the electorate in terms of subjects they want covered in the news, slightly various from asking what is the most crucial concern in figuring out someone’s vote. The Labour leader will say there is no nation that runs a world-class national well being care service with public investing as reduced as a proportion of GDP as proposed in 2019-twenty by the government in the autumn statement.
He will claim: “One of the country’s most valuable institutions faces its most perilous moments in a generation. The potential of our NHS is at stake in this general election.”
Labour has presently set out strategies that will provide the NHS with an extra £2.5bn every single year by the finish of the parliament, but health authorities have recommended the figure is below the additional funding essential to meet growing demand.
Labour helps make six distinct pledges like integrating care from home to hospital, ending the neglect of mental wellness, a greater emphasis on stopping sick well being and investing in twenty,000 a lot more nurses, eight,000 far more GPs, 3,000 more midwives and 5,000 new care workers functioning inside the NHS.
The pledge guarantees to repeal privatisation laws, strengthen democratic control and deliver in tougher restrictions on hospitals which are “increasing their focus on private patients”.
Although all the major political events say they assistance greater integration of social care and NHS budgets, the shadow health secretary Andy Burnham can legitimately claim he has been pushing the concern for at least 5 many years including his ultimate time period as wellness secretary in 2009-10.
Mark Porter, who chairs the BMA council, stated the truth that “politicians are taking a longer phrase view on the NHS is a phase in the appropriate direction”. He extra: “If the NHS is to survive in the face of huge challenges, investment should keep up with demand and each health and social care providers need to have to be properly funded and operating with each other much more efficiently.
“While the guarantee of more frontline workers, greater joined-up care and enhancements in psychological health solutions are essential actions in the appropriate path, these will consider time to deliver and have to be backed up with the needed long-term funding to make them a actuality.”
The NHS England chief executive, Simon Stevens, has called for £8bn of added sources, even though the Overall health Basis thinktank insisted: “This can not be noticed as the starting point for negotiation that can be whittled away, nor does it enable politicians to commit the NHS to tons of new initiatives”.
By Jonathan Ingram, Nic Horton and Josh Archambault—Mr. Archambault and Mr. Ingram are Senior Fellows, and Mr. Horton Policy Analysis Analyst, at the Foundation for Government Accountability.
U.S. Property Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s gorgeous loss in the Virginia principal to underfunded insurgent candidate David Brat sent shock waves by means of the nationwide political establishment, but its affect on the American men and women may rival the outcome of a state senate major in Arkansas, as the architect of the “Private Option” Medicaid growth lost his major largely on the expansion issue. Lawmakers in the 24 states that have not expanded are beginning to see the prospective political fallout from supporting an “alternative” Medicaid expansion program.
Voters Driven by ObamaCare’s Medicaid Expansion Situation
In Arkansas, three-term Republican State Representative John Burris misplaced a main runoff for a State Senate seat to first-time candidate and political novice Scott Flippo. Rep. Burris, an architect of the ObamaCare “Private Option” Medicaid expansion, need to have walked away with the GOP nod right into the State Senate right after a November vote for which Democrats failed to area their personal candidate.
Rep. John Burris: Private Choice ObamaCare Growth Architect
Burris had much more identify ID and substantially a lot more funding: the most recently offered campaign reviews display Burris obtaining outraised Flippo almost three-to-one—including tens of thousands of dollars in contributions from hospital lobbyists and other Personal Selection-supportive well being care special interests.
By all accounts, Rep. Burris has been the face of the ObamaCare Private Choice. Not only did he sponsor the ObamaCare growth bill, he came up with numerous of the empty guarantees utilised to squeeze just enough help to enact the plan.
Despite the political frenzy induced by the Personal Choice debate, Rep. Burris was still the favored. Flippo was a political unknown when he announced his candidacy earlier this yr, but as he hit the trail his message was simple and clear: ObamaCare growth is undesirable for Arkansas taxpayers, and John Burris is to blame for it.
Rep. Burris must have been a minor weary heading into the runoff.
An anti-Private Selection message throughout a specific election for a State Senate seat last yr vaulted Republican John Cooper to workplace in a district that hadn’t elected a Republican given that Reconstruction.
As Flippo’s anti-PO message seemed to take root, Rep. Burris’ campaign message seemed to vacillate among help and opposition for the system. While he claimed to have by no means shied away from his assistance for the Private Selection, he explained on at least a single voter’s manual that he “opposed” the Private Option law he crafted. And later on, he claimed in a Television ad to have blocked the ObamaCare exchange, even though he truly voted for it.
Despite his try to muddy the waters, and his supporters’ complaints that Flippo was making the entire race about ObamaCare, Rep. Burris couldn’t escape his direct involvement with expanding Medicaid below ObamaCare in Arkansas.
The Future of ObamaCare’s Medicaid Expansion Personal Alternative is Uncertain At Best
Final 12 months, funding for the Personal Alternative just barely squeaked by in the Arkansas Legislature. This previous legislative session, the plan barely survived a funding-reauthorization vote in March. Soon after 4 failed attempts, weeks of arm-twisting and legislators publicly trading their votes for pet projects, the system just barely survived, without having a single vote to spare in the Senate. Principal elections have previously tipped the stability strongly against the Private Choice.
The Senator whose retirement designed a pitched battle among Burris and Flippo was also a supporter of the ObamaCare Private Choice. And prior to this runoff, another Personal Option supporter, Senator Bruce Holland, was defeated in his own major by a committed anti-Personal Selection candidate.
