politics etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
politics etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

26 Nisan 2017 Çarşamba

General election 2017: Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn square off in final PMQs before election – politics live

[unable to retrieve full-text content]


Live coverage of all the day’s campaign action with the last PMQs before the election and a row over Labour’s NHS funding promises


  • Labour will lift pay cap for ‘overworked’ NHS staff

  • Sign up for the Snap, our daily election email – and read today’s

  • PMQs – Snap verdict

  • PMQs – Verdict from the Twitter commentariat

  • Afternoon summary


You’d have to have a screw loose not to think things are pretty tough. I noticed when Jeremy addressed the PLP [parliamentary Labour party] he didn’t announce the key seats we’d need to take off the Tories to form a Labour government. I thought that was ominous.


It is a remarkable achievement for the leadership to have taken a catastrophic situation in Scotland and made it quite a lot worse. We seem to be doing worse in Wales … We’ve gone backwards amongst every demographic, every region of the country. Jeremy is behind Theresa May on managing the NHS! It’s quite a special achievement to put all of that together in a short period of time. Hats off to Jeremy and Seumas [Milne], Diane [Abbott] and John [McDonnell]. That’s pretty special.




In February the government announced that it would close the so-called Dubs scheme for taking unaccompanied child refugees from Europe after a total of 350 were admitted. This caused outrage because, when the government accepted Lord Dubs’ amendment to the Immigration Act committing it to take some unaccompanied child refugees, it was expected that around 3,000 could be admitted.


Today, in a written ministerial statement, the Home Office minister Robert Goodwill has admitted that a further 130 places are available for unaccompanied child refugees. The Home Office should have know about these extra places when it made its announcement two months ago but it didn’t because it lost the submission from a council saying it could provide the places.


The government remains fully committed to the implementation of our commitment under section 67 [the Dubs amendment] to transfer unaccompanied children to the UK from Europe and no eligible child has been refused transfer to the UK as a result of this error. The home secretary has written to her counterparts in France, Greece and Italy and we are working closely with member states, as well as the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) and NGO partners so we can identify and transfer children to the UK as soon as possible.


It is welcome that an extra 130 children will be brought to safety in Britain under the Dubs scheme. But it beggars belief that these children weren’t helped earlier because of a basic admin error. This shows a shameful failure by the Home Office to talk properly to local councils who were willing and able to help or to check they had counted the figures up right. This shows the Home Office simply hasn’t taken this seriously enough.


Time and again the select committee and local councils across the country told the Home office that there were more places available, but they wouldn’t budge and they failed to follow up. Surely on something as important as this, when children are at risk of trafficking and prostitution, they would have checked the numbers were right.



Here is another picture from Jeremy Corbyn’s NHS visit this afternoon.



The Scottish Labour party has named a former chief of the pro-UK Better Together campaign, Blair McDougall, and a leading Corbyn supporter, Rhea Wolfson, in their first tranche of general election candidates.


After its rout by the Scottish National party at the 2015 election, Scottish Labour was left with one MP, leaving it the major task of finding up to 58 new candidates when its popularity is at a record low of 14%. This is the first election where Scottish leader Kezia Dugdale and her officials have autonomy from the UK party in choosing candidates.



Leanne Wood, the leader of Plaid Cymru, has also criticised Jeremy Corbyn for not being willing to take part in a leaders’ debate without Theresa May. She is echoing what her friend and political ally, the SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon, said on Twitter earlier. (See 2.08pm.) In 2015 Wood and Sturgeon joined Ed Miliband, the Labour leader, Natalie Bennett, the Green party leader, and Nigel Farage, the Ukip leader, in a so-called “challengers’ debate” that did not feature David Cameron.


Wood said:


It is disappointing to hear that the leader of the Labour party is not prepared to take part in any televised leaders’ debates without the prime minister.


These debates are a good opportunity for people to engage with the election and for the leaders to put forward their vision to voters.



You have probably got the point about “strong and stable leadership” by now, but just in case you haven’t, the Guardian video team have produced a video pointing out just how frequently the Tories hammered home this message at PMQs.



Jeremy Corbyn has renewed his call for Theresa May to take part in TV election debates. And he has signalled that he won’t take part if she is not included. Speaking to Sky News, he said:


I asked Theresa May this morning about the TV debates, lots of people asked her about it, and she said they’re over because there are no more prime minister’s question times because parliament is now dissolved, or will be dissolved next week. And so, actually, the debate has to include the prime minister, the leader of the Conservative party, and we are up for that debate.


You will see me all over the country taking questions from people on the streets.



This is from the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg.


CPS source confirms they’ve received a file from Kent Police over election expenses in South Thanet



Jeremy Corbyn has been meeting health workers today.



A Panelbase poll is out today giving the Conservatives a 22-point lead over Labour. Here are the figures.


Westminster voting intention:


CON: 49% (+10)
LAB: 27% (-4)
LDEM: 10% (+4)
UKIP: 5% (-9)
GRN: 3% (-)


(via Panelbase)
Chgs. w/ Jan 2016



On BBC Radio 5 Live Michael Gove, the former Conservative justice secretary and a leader of the Vote Leave campaign, said he was “absolutely convinced” that Brexit would result in more money going to the NHS. When it was put to him that Vote Leave had said at one point that an extra £100m a week would go to the NHS if the UK left the EU, and he was asked if he still expected that, he replied:


I am absolutely convinced that we will be spending significantly more on the NHS [after Brexit.] I hope it’s £100m.



Tim Farron, the Lib Dem leader, has tweeted saying that he has “sacked” David Ward as a candidate. (See 2.26pm.)


I believe in a politics that is open, tolerant and united. David Ward is unfit to represent the party and I have sacked him.



Arlene Foster, Democratic Unionist leader and first minister in the last power sharing government in Northern Ireland, took time out today from electioneering to pay a highly symbolic visit to Irish language pupils at a Catholic school near the border.


Foster had been criticised earlier this year for her opposition to an Irish Language Act – a key demand by Sinn Fein – which would put Gaelic on an equal par to English throughout Northern Ireland.



Now Tim Farron, the Lib Dem leader, is accusing Jeremy Corbyn of “running scared” after it emerged that Corbyn will not take part in TV election debates if Theresa May is not included. Farron said:


Corbyn is running scared. He is running away from facing his opponents, he is running away from defending his policies, he is running away from leadership.



The Liberal Democrats have barred former Bradford East MP David Ward from standing again for the party, after Tim Farron said his comments about Jews had been “deeply offensive, wrong and antisemitic”, my colleague Jessica Elgot reports.


Related: Tim Farron sacks Lib Dem candidate for ‘deeply offensive and antisemitic’ comments



In the huddle for lobby journalists after the final PMQs of the parliament, Jeremy Corbyn’s spokesman struck an upbeat note about Labour’s prospects. He said the Conservatives’ poll lead will narrow once the campaign gets underway and the public get to hear Labour’s message, “in our own voice”.


We are confident that we can win this election, and we’re fighting for every seat, and we’re confident that once Labour’s message is clearly heard, and there is a chance for the public to hear policies that many of them won’t have heard before, but which are extremely popular, and we know to be so, that will have cut-through, and Labour support will increase.


The politics and the polling is actually quite complex and quite varied across different countries, and I don’t think it’s just a technical issue to do with the polling companies that we’re in; I think it’s to do with the volatile and fluid political situation, with much more fragmentation.


This was all dealt with when the allegation first came out, and it’s not the case that John McDonnell signed any such statement. When the story was first run about a year ago it was made clear that it was confusion about another statement; he never signed the statement involving MI5, it was another story entirely. This is recycled fake news.



Nicola Sturgeon, the Scottish first minister, has been campaigning in Stirling today.



On the World at One Andrew Gwynne, Labour’s general election coordinator, said the party’s manifesto would be published on Monday 15 May. Asked how Labour would fund its promises, he replied:


I’m not in a position to spell out the Labour party’s full manifesto here. But we will have to wait until May 15 for the manifesto.



Conservatives have denied that Boris Johnson is being sidelined from the party’s general election campaign by Theresa May, the Press Association reports.


Reports have suggested the foreign secretary has been told to keep a low profile because he is vulnerable to challenge over his pre-referendum claims that Brexit would deliver £350m a week to spend on the NHS.


A senior Conservative source dismissed the claims as speculation, and said Johnson would soon enter the fray.



Nicola Sturgeon, Scotland’s first minister, has criticised Jeremy Corbyn for apparently refusing to take part in an election debates if Theresa May is not involved. She posted this on Twitter.


Faced with an open goal, Corbyn decides against even attempting to score . Unbelievable, if true. https://t.co/JkRBLxgLID


Source close to Jeremy Corbyn reveals he won’t take part in TV debates if Theresa May doesn’t. #GE17



This is what political journalists and commentators are saying about PMQs.


Mostly people are quite positive about Jeremy Corbyn, although several people think Angus Robertson was more effective.


Corbyn uses last #PMQs to attack May on triple lock, NHS, housing, education spending cuts. Weak ground 4 May but no real blows dealt #PMQs


May is a master at not answering the question. That is why Corbyn should use #PMQs to ask her the same one 6 times. Makes her uncomfortable


Corbyn channelling impressive levels of passion at #PMQs


Corbyn is doing rather well, as he did last week. Spitting out the questions. May quite pugnacious in reply


There’s much more to being a good PM than PMQs, of course, but May remains quite weak at this. No wonder she’s dodging tv debates


COMMENT AR shows JC how to do #PMQs but remember TM wants to drop pensions triple lock. If this is the worst this gets for her…


Theresa May savages Jeremy Corbyn at final PMQs before election #GE2017 https://t.co/9X2W54WHBL pic.twitter.com/hsy094eOaX


.@AngusRobertson there proving he’s the best opposition leader in the Commons. Skewers May on pension lock #pmqs


SNP’s Angus Robertson doing what Corbyn cd hv done: forcing May to wriggle on triple lock for pensions. May refuses to guarantee it. #pmqs


Corbyn channelling Miliband 2013: “He may be strong at standing up to weak, but always weak when it comes to standing up against the strong”


Corbyn with decent election lines the tories are for ‘the rich not the rest, the strong against the weak, and weak against the strong’


Corbyn quoted both Blair (“many not the few”) and Miliband (“weak against the strong”) at #PMQs. https://t.co/Q15ztRfeIH


Some very glum faces from Labour moderates sitting behind Corbyn during PMQs.


This is #PMQs at its worst – neither answering questions, talking about completely different subjects and shouting slogans #PMQs



Labour sources are also criticising Theresa May for referring to Jeremy Corbyn at PMQs as a terrorist sympathiser.


Senior Labour source says May calling Corbyn “a terrorist sympathiser” in #pmqs was a “discredit to the office of Prime Minister”


I Like Corbyn, But… https://t.co/xZPMEvtpjH


It gets so much better #ILikeCorbynBut pic.twitter.com/YzQwd7xrC8



Labour are ruling out Jeremy Corbyn taking part in any TV debates that do not feature Theresa May, Huffington Post’s Paul Waugh reports.


Labour source just ruled out Corbyn taking part in any TV debates that don’t feature Theresa May.



Theresa May refused to commit to keeping the triple lock at PMQs. But, according to today’s Times, the Tories are thinking of keeping the policy, which ensures pensions rise every year in line with earnings, inflation or 2.5%, whichever is highest, on the grounds that it would be cost free. Here’s an extract from Francis Elliott and Oliver Wright’s story (paywall).


Theresa May is considering keeping the “triple lock” guarantee on state pension increases because it is likely to be a cost-free promise for the next parliament, according to senior ministers.


Labour has promised to increase the state pension by a minimum of 2.5 per cent a year, despite warnings that it could cost taxpayers an additional 1 per cent of GDP by 2036. The lock is triggered only if inflation falls below that figure and the Office for Budget Responsibility is predicting that wages and prices will increase at a faster pace in the next few years.



The Lib Dem peer Olly Grender, who worked in Number 10 as deputy communications director during the coalition, says Theresa May was wrong at PMQs to argue that the Conservatives deserved credit for increasing council house building during the coalition.


Under Coalition NOT Con Govt increase in council house building thanks to LibDems who insisted (Tories at time didn’t give a ****) #PMQs



This is from Politico Europe’s Tom McTague.


French ambassador Sylvie Bermann in the chamber for PMQs. Chuckling away. Would love to read her diptel!



The SNP’s Alex Salmond says Liam Fox went to the Philippines and said we had “shared values” with it. What shared values do we have with Rodrigo Duterte?


May says we need trade deals after Brexit to ensure a strong economy.



Sir Simon Burns, a Conservative, says he has been Chelmsford MP for 30 years. They are perspicacious, he says. They want a government with a strong economy, strong defences and strong leadership. May will deliver that for the next five years, he says.


May thanks Burns for his contribution as an MP and as a minister.



Douglas Carswell, the independent MP, asks what assurance May can give to the 3.8m people who voted Ukip at the last election.


May says she wants to see the UK getting control of its borders and control of its laws.



Dame Angela Watkinson, a Conservative, asks May why people should continue to vote Conservative.


May says every vote for her and the Conservative candidate will be a vote to strengthen her hands in the Brexit talks.



Labour’s George Howarth says Andy Burnham had a debate yesterday on contaminated blood. He called for a Hillsborough-style panel to get to the truth. Will May join the SNP and Labour in backing the idea.


May says the government has put more money into compensation. The department of health will respond to the consultation.



Mike Wood, a Conservative, says it is good to be back. Doctors saved his life in January. Will May look at what can be done to reduce deaths from sepsis.


May says it is fantastic to see Wood back. She says he is right to focus attention on this problem. The department of health is working on a new sepsis action plan.



Labour’s Grahame Morris asks why May is afraid of TV debates. One should be held in Easington, he says, where May could see the impact of her policies.


May says she has been debating Corbyn every week.



Sir Gerald Howarth, a Conservative who is standing down, says he came into the Commons in 1983, when the country had a strong woman leader, and he leaves as another one is restoring British sovereignty. He appeals to Howarth to protect the armed forces guarding “this sceptred isle”.


May says people will have a choice at the election. The Tories will continue to protect the armed forces.



Tim Farron, the Lib Dem leader, says May once berated her party as the “nasty party”. But it has never been nastier. And Labour is not holding to account. Doesn’t the country need the Lib Dems?


May says Farron talks about a decent opposition. She says Farron cannot say that when the Lib Dems have just elected a candidate with a questionable record on antisemitism.



Sir Eric Pickles, the Conservative, asks May about anti-semitism, and if she shares his disgust at the selection of David Ward, a former MP accuses of anti-semitism, as a Lib Dem candidate. (See 10.35am.)


May pays tribute to the work Pickles had done tackling anti-semitism. She says people will be disappointed to see the Lib Dems adopt a candidate with a questionable record on anti-semitism.



Jeffrey Donaldson, the DUP MP, asks May if she agrees that those who refuse to take their seats (Sinn Fein) and who are refusing to form a government in Northern Ireland are not serving their constituents.


May agrees. She says she wants to work for the restoration of a government in Northern Ireland.



Peter Lilley, the Conservative, says he is standing down because of Theresa May. He says he has confidence that she will deliver Brexit properly. And we must accept that no deal is better than a bad deal. To deny this would be to admit that no price would be too high. That would be the worst possible deal, he says.


May thanks Lilley for everything he has done, not just as an MP, but as a minister in government. She says it is right to get on with delivering Brexit. The only way to ensure that is to get a Conservative government elected.



PMQs – Snap verdict: At PMQs you can deploy the sniper’s rifle or the shotgun, and today we saw Angus Robertson try one, and Jeremy Corbyn use the other. They were both effective in their way, although Theresa May’s shield of slogans and talking points managed to protect her quite adequately. It did not feel as if anyone secured a great triumph.


But in the circumstances, and with polling organisations pouring humiliation over Corbyn by the hour, that probably amounted to something of a win for the Labour leader. He asked about a range of topics, resorting to the “here’s a question from a viewer” formula that he used frequently in his first PMQs outings and neatly skewering May over her reluctance to take questions from members of the public. It was not flashy or eye-catching, but it was honest and solid and his points were strong. In response, May resorted to carpet-bombing Corbyn with the “strong and stable” leadership stuff. Her message discipline is outstanding, and conventional wisdom has it that you cannot repeat these slogans too often (although May seems to be testing that theory to destruction.)



Angus Robertson, the SNP leader at Westminster, asks for a clear and unambiguous commitment to keeping the triple lock for pensioners.


May says she has been very clear that pensioners have benefited to the tune of £1,250 a year. Under her pension incomes will continue to increase.



Ben Howlett, a Conservative, asks if May agrees that his voters should give him a renewed mandate to improve traffic around Bath.


May agrees. A vote for any other party is a vote for wrecking the economy.



Corbyn says millions of women will have heard that answer. Labour will guarantee the triple lock. And it won’t move the goalposts. Sybil, who witnessed the founding of the NHS, said she is 88. She has had wonderful service from the NHS. But now she is scared of going into hospital. With more delayed discharges, isn’t she right to be frightened.


May says the NHS is treated more people than ever before. But that is only possible with a strong economy. She says she will defend her record. She says Diane Abbott has been directing her followers to a website “I like Corbyn but ..”. It addresses questions about Corbyn not being able to pay for his policies and being a terrorist sympathiser. Even Corbyn’s supporters know he is not fit to run the country.



Corbyn says the last Labour government delivered a decent homes standard for every council in the country. House building has fallen to its lowest level since the 1920s. Children are being held back by cuts. Laura, a teacher, said she was seeing less cash every year to pay for children, and more reliance on parent funding. Is May still denying funding per pupil is being cut.


May says record levels of funding are going into schools. People will have a choice, she says. The government has delivered more good school places. Corbyn believes in a one-size-fits-all, take-it-or-leave-it approach to education.



Corbyn says Andy is concerned about how his children are being held back. All three of his children, in their mid 20s, cannot afford to move out of the family home. Don’t we need a housing strategy to deal with it?


May asks what happened under Labour. Under Labour, house building starts fell by 45%. And the number of social homes fell. Under the Conservatives more than twice as much council housing has been built as under Labour.



Jeremy Corbyn says this is the last PMQs of this parliament. It would be appropriate to pay tribute to MPs who are leaving, he says. And he thanks the speaker for presiding over these exchanges.


He says when he became leader 18 months ago he said he wanted people’s voices to be heard in parliament. So, instead of just speaking to handpicked audiences, will May today answer questions from the public. Christopher wrote to him this week saying hus husband had only a 1% increase in wages. But their buying power had gone down 15%. So where is his share in the stronger economy.



Richard Drax, a Conservative, asks about a leftwing campaign for socialist victory that proposed disbanding M15. Would May allow anyone like that to draft her manifesto?


No, says May. She says the plan to disband MI%, disarm the police and scrap the deterrent was endorsed by Jeremy Corbyn’s policy chief, Andrew Fisher. Corbyn is “simply not up to the job”, she says.



Theresa May starts by answering a closed question from the Conservative MP Michael Fabricant about the economy in the West Midlands. It is doing well, she says. And so are public services, because you can only have those with “strong and stable leadership”.


Fabricant says the country needs “strong and stable leadership”.



This is from the Daily Mail’s Jason Groves.


More Labour MPs in for #PMQs than there have been for a while – some taking a last look around?



Very loud cheers for Theresa May as she enters Commons chamber for #PMQs



Here is the list of MPs down to ask a question.


#PMQS LIVEBLOG: These lucky MPs will be grilling the PM from 12. Follow all the action here – https://t.co/B8kBRMA48K pic.twitter.com/mTlwnKdOKL



This is from the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg.


This Parliament has only sat for 299 days – and had 61 PMQs – for some MPs, today’s the leaving do! Election will decide which ones



PMQs will start in 10 minutes. It is the last of this parliament.


And it is also only the second, and last, election TV debate between Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn (counting last week’s PMQs as the first.)



Ipsos MORI has more good news for the Conservatives on the polling front. As Joe Murphy reports in the Evening Standard, Theresa May has the best ratings on “best PM” since the firm started polling on this in the 1970s. Here’s an extract from Murphy’s story.


Theresa May’s leadership score has soared higher than either Margaret Thatcher or Tony Blair enjoyed in their best years, an exclusive poll reveals today


The Ipsos MORI survey shows the Conservatives on 49 per cent, with an extraordinary 23 per cent lead over Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour who are on 26 …



Mahatma Gandhi was one of the great figures of the 20th century. He led India to independence and championed a form of non-violent civil disobedience that inspired campaigners around the world. It is hard to think of a modern equivalent, but the Ukip leader Paul Nuttall has suggested a possible candidate: himself.


Nuttall did quite put himself in the same league as the great Gandhi, but in an interview with the Wolverhampton Express and Star suggested they had something in common and the paper’s website has headlined the story: “I’m like Gandhi, says Ukip leader Paul Nuttall in Wolverhampton.” This is what Nuttall told the paper:


Raising issues of equality, women’s rights, and FGM are the issues other parties don’t want to tackle.


Ukip will lead on these and as I said in our press conference I feel as if we are a decade ahead of our time – a bit like we were a decade ahead of our time on getting out of the EU, and on mass immigration.



YouGov has released some new polling this morning. Since February, Theresa May’s net favourability rating has gone up (from +6 to +10) and Jeremy Corbyn’s has gone done (from -40 to -42).



Peter Lilley, the Conservative former social security secretary regarded as one of the Eurosceptics cabinet “bastards” once denounced by John Major, is standing down, the Guido Fawkes blog reports. In a statement announcing his decision Lilley said:


Now we have in Theresa May an outstanding Prime Minister in whom I have great confidence.


I profoundly hope she will be returned with a strong mandate to complete the process of leaving the EU and to seize the opportunities which regaining control of our laws, border, money and trade will give our country.



Lib Dem leader Tim Farron is continuing his tour of remain seats with Brexiteer MPs, after vowing to unseat Labour’s Kate Hoey in Vauxhall. His stop today is St Albans, where more than 62% of voters backed staying in the EU but Conservative MP Anne Main campaigned for leave.


Farron used the campaign stop to highlight the risk to the economy of leaving the EU and tell businesses they should stop funding the Conservatives while they pursue a hard Brexit.


My message to business is this – dump the Tories. Every penny you give them will hurt you; you are funding your own funeral. The success of British business matters. Strong British businesses mean more jobs and a stronger society.


With this disastrous hard Brexit the government is hurting businesses, both big and small, costing jobs and hitting families. All this means fewer jobs, higher prices and spiralling costs of things like fuel. This is a Brexit squeeze affecting millions of people.


.@timfarron visits the National Pharmacy Association in St Albans with @libdemdaisy talking about the #NHS & care pic.twitter.com/ZImwhVQEX1



The Conservatives have also produced a briefing accusing Labour of spending the money it proposes to raise from corporation tax over and over again. The Lib Dems cited 10 examples, although two items on their list were essentially the same. (See 9.09am.) In a note for journalists a few days ago, the Tories cited 11 examples. Most of the Tory ones were the same as the Lib Dem ones, but the Tories had three examples not on the Lib Dem list. Here they are, as set out in the Tory briefing.


Scrapping university tuition fees. Jeremy Corbyn said:‘At the moment what we’re doing is asking students to fund universities rather than the public to fund universities. I would rather move in to the other way around, with public funding of it … It would be largely on levels of corporate taxation’ (Victoria Derbyshire Labour Leadership Hustings, 17 August 2016).


Reversing changes to Universal Credit. John McDonnell:‘Universal Credit. We’re hoping on Wednesday the government will reverse that … If you had a fair taxation system, you weren’t giving the tax giveaways to corporations and to the rich, if you seriously tackle tax evasion and tax avoidance, if you grew the economy we’d be able to afford – we’d be able to afford our public services’ (The Andrew Marr Show, BBC One, 21 November 2016).



Tuition fees will be scrapped and maintenance grants brought back, the Green party are announcing as key features of their election manifesto.


Co-leaders Jonathan Bartley and deputy leader Amelia Womack will also say in a speech today that students and universities will be protected after Brexit if the Green party were in power.


The Green party is the only party standing up for students and putting young people at the heart of its campaign.


Education is a right not a commodity to be bought and sold, and we need a level playing field so everyone has the chance to go to university or college.



If the referendum result had gone the other way David Cameron – remember him? – would be in Downing Street this morning preparing for PMQs. Instead he happens to be in Bangkok, where he has just finished speaking at a tourism conference. My colleague Oliver Holmes was there and he has sent me the highlights.


Here are some of the key points he made.


Let me be optimistic … It’s very good that we are having this election, because I think if Theresa May is successful, she’ll actually have a larger majority and, potentially, more time to deal with Brexit and its consequences.


Arguably, you could say, looking at the state of British politics, the Conservative party having accepted the referendum result and got on with the process and responsibly delivering it, is probably the most healthy mainstream political party anywhere in western Europe.


It was a legitimate cause of populist concern, that Britain was a member of this organisation, the organisation had changed a huge amount over the last forty years, it had gained more powers, it had passed more treaties, it had become more important in more areas. And yet in spite of the fact that the British people were occasional offered a referendum by their leaders, most famously by Tony Blair, they never got a referendum.


If you want to address the causes of populism, it was necessary, in my view, to have a referendum.


But I think it was the right thing. The lack of a referendum was poisoning British politics and so I put that right.


These terrorists and their apologists are trying hijack a great religion and twist and pervert it for their own ends. We must not play into their hands. And that was to me, the biggest problem with President Tump’s travel ban. It would be seen, could be seen, as labelling whole countries as extreme and dangerous because they were predominately Islamic. It’s not a clash between civilisations that we face. That is what the extremists want us to think. This is if you like a war within Islam.”


There would have been a big lesson learn. I thought it was misconceived from the very outset.



Paul Johnson, the director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, told the Today programme earlier that Labour would have to raise “significant extra sums” to fund its plan to give NHS staff a pay rise. He said:


Each 1% on pay, just 1%, costs half a billion pounds each time. It’s not possible to say from what the Labour party have said quite how much more they intend to spend on the NHS.


If you are going to do that over the next two or three years you will also clearly need to raise significant extra sums in tax revenue.



Norman Lamb, the Lib Dem former health minister, told the Today programme that he agreed with Labour about the need for NHS staff to be paid more. He said the current 1% cap on NHS pay increases was unsustainable.


In effect we are asking very many staff across the NHS to just, year on year, take a pay cut in real terms in order to sustain our NHS. And I don’t think that’s acceptable. I think ultimately it’s dangerous. We are seeing widespread vacancies … Actually people will vote with their feet and leave if you don’t maintain wages at least in real terms.


The problem with the Labour position is their proposal just isn’t credible … The money from corporation tax increase has been spent about 10 times over.


Labour have already committed to using funding from an increase to corporation tax ten times since the last general election:


1. Bringing back the education maintenance allowance and university maintenance grants.



Jonathan Ashworth, the shadow health secretary, will announce his guarantees for NHS staff in a speech to the Unison conference in Liverpool. According to extracts released in advance he will say:


NHS staff have been taken for granted for too long by the Conservatives. Cuts to pay and training mean hard working staff are being forced from NHS professions and young people are being put off before they have even started. Now Brexit threatens the ability of health employers to recruit from overseas.


What is bad for NHS staff is bad for patients too. Short staffing means reduced services and a threat to patient safety. Labour’s new guarantees for NHS staff will help keep services running at the standard which England’s patients expect …



In his Today interview earlier Jeremy Hunt admitted that Brexit would have an impact on the NHS.


There’s no point saying that Brexit and the Brexit negotiations won’t affect the NHS. This is absolutely critical for our public services.



Q: Are you saying you will give the NHS whatever it needs?


Ashworth says the NHS has not had what it needs.



Good morning. I’m taking over from Claire.


Jonathan Ashworth, the shadow health secretary, is on Today now.


We will outline what level corporation tax will be in our manifesto when we publish it in the coming days … The whole programme that the Labour Party will be putting to the country in this election campaign will be costed.



I’m now handing over the live reins to Andrew Sparrow, who’ll take you through the rest of the day’s political news.


A quick reminder: you can sign up for the Snap, our daily election briefing email, here.



In a video for the Guardian, Paul Mason pushes back against the argument from the Daily Mail and others that those who oppose the government and its Brexit plans are “saboteurs”. Meaningful opposition to the Tories is necessary for the country and for democracy, he argues:



Meg Hillier, the Labour MP who chairs the cross-party public accounts committee, has been talking about its free schools report.


We will consider the recommendations carefully and respond in due course.



As well as Labour’s own NHS pledges, we might expect Jeremy Corbyn to press Theresa May on this damning MPs’ report on free schools when the two leaders meet for the final PMQs of this parliament at noon.


In the – so far – planned absence of televised head-to-head debates during the campaign, today could be the last time we see May and Corbyn take each other on ahead of 8 June.


The DfE is spending well over the odds in its bid to create 500 more free schools while other schools are in poor condition. Many free schools are in inadequate premises, including many without on-site playgrounds or sports facilities …


The department is in a weak negotiating position and commonly pays well in excess of the official valuation. On average, it has paid 19% over the official valuation, with 20 sites costing over 60% more.



Leaders in Europe will demand that Theresa May respects the right of EU nationals who have lived in the UK for five years to acquire permanent residence, Daniel Boffey and Lisa O’Carroll report:


In a sign of growing anger over the perceived bureaucratic hurdles being put in their way, the call will be made at a summit on Saturday, where the leaders of the 27 other EU member states are set to sign their negotiating guidelines.


The guidelines were amended by officials on Monday to strengthen demands over Britain’s €60bn divorce bill, open the door to further cooperation on EU-UK foreign policy and law enforcement, and add a call for transparency during the talks.


Such guarantees must be effective, enforceable, non-discriminatory and comprehensive, including the right to acquire permanent residence after a continuous period of five years of legal residence. Citizens should be able to exercise their rights through smooth and simple administrative procedures.


Related: Brexit: EU leaders to demand May respect citizens’ residency rights



Pressed on the issue of social care – which Theresa May has pledged to “stop ducking” – Jeremy Hunt is similarly reticent about what the not-ducking will look like:


We need a long-term sustainable solution.


You’ll have to wait and see what manifesto says … I’m not going to speculate on what the contents of our manifesto are.



And here’s Jeremy Hunt, the health secretary, who’s popped up to defend his record against the Labour claim that staff are “ignored, insulted, undervalued, overworked and underpaid by this Tory government”.


I think they are working harder than they’ve ever worked before … You see a government that’s responding to that.


We will be able to train record number of nurses.


Applications do then recover.


You’ll have to wait and see what the manifesto says.



Labour will be attempting to shift the debate today on to the NHS, with shadow health secretary Jon Ashworth making a number of pledges:


Related: Labour will give pay rise to ‘overworked and underpaid’ NHS staff



Jonathan Bartley, co-leader (with Caroline Lucas) of the Green party, has been updating Radio 4’s Today programme on the progress of the progressive alliance, their proposed anti-Tory electoral pact.


The response from Jeremy Corbyn and Tim Farron, says Bartley, has been


very disappointing … they haven’t responded.


On a local level, people are talking to each other …


We want people to vote Green [but] we will support whatever the local party wants to do. But it has to be a reciprocal arrangement.



Good morning and welcome back to another day on the campaign marathon.


I’m Claire Phipps, bringing you this morning’s essential – should your morning be incomplete without news of constituency selection battles – briefing, and steering the live blog until Andrew Sparrow joins us later.


Remember, the opinion polls were wrong in the 2015 general election; they were wrong in the referendum; and Jeremy Corbyn himself has said that he was a 200-1 outsider for the Labour leadership in 2015 – and look where that got him.


In effect, this is EU Referendum 2. This is the chance for those who didn’t vote/couldn’t vote, to come out. It’s a chance for Remainers to convert more people, help their friends to see the catastrophe that Brexit is …


‘My own constituency voted Remain,’ Theresa May announced in the Commons as an example of her adhering to the ‘will of the people’. But if everyone in Maidenhead who voted Remain backed the Lib Dems in June, the PM could lose her seat.


The Labour party will need more than a wish list and a collection of grievances. I’ll offer three topics for starters. How do we ensure a fair intergenerational settlement? How can our education and tax system respond to the changes of the world of work and employment? Where do we anchor democratic accountability in a world of global flows of goods, money and people?


Planning for parliamentary deadlock and pacts with other parties might be tempting. But these are the methods of counter-insurgents. If Labour instead wants to be a party of government, it has to go into the 2017 election fighting for every vote.


The gap between first- and second-place party in 2015, 2010 or earlier, as well as any byelection result, is not the only factor. Strategists are having to look at how many people in a given seat voted leave or remain in last year’s EU referendum. This information is especially crucial for the Liberal Democrats …


A 30- to 40-point improvement (that is, a 15% to 20% swing that went entirely from the first-placed party to the Lib Dems) would do the job in seats where a majority voted remain – but that is an incredibly ambitious target.


I do not want the people of Scotland to think that English eurosceptics put their dislike of Brussels ahead of our bond with Edinburgh and Glasgow.


It took two months but Trudy Harrison’s first speech as MP was good. “Who knows if you’ll be back,” SNP MP replies in praise. “Or any of us”


Continue reading…



General election 2017: Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn square off in final PMQs before election – politics live

13 Ocak 2017 Cuma

Politics and protocol leave Indian teen"s life in the balance pending TB drug ruling | Amrit Dhillon

Shreya Tripathi sleeps most of the day. At night, she lies awake. Only 18, she has been fighting tuberculosis for five years. Her voice on the telephone from her home in Patna, eastern India, is a whisper. If she speaks for more than a few minutes, she becomes breathless.


Though exhausted, Shreya is also fighting another battle – in the Delhi high court – to demand a new TB drug. Every other medication she has tried has failed to beat the disease.


Shreya has a form of TB caused by bacteria resistant to treatment even with the most powerful drugs. She wants the Indian government to give her bedaquiline, the first new TB drug to be registered in more than 50 years. Its use is tightly controlled. Only six government hospitals are allowed to administer it, and even then only as a last resort.


India has one of the highest levels of drug-resistant tuberculosis in the world. To preserve bedaquiline’s effectiveness – if the bacteria mutate to resist it, there is nothing else available – the Indian government is strict on who can have it and how they are monitored. The National Institute of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases in New Delhi, one of the authorised six centres, has refused to give Shreya the drug.


Shreya was diagnosed with TB in 2012, when she was 13. Doctors in Patna started her on a TB regimen but she proved resistant to the first and second lines of treatment. She and her father, Kaushal, a civil servant, are tired of running around hospitals getting nowhere, while Shreya’s condition worsens.


Two years ago, she had to drop out of school because she was so weak. She needs a wheelchair to get around. Swimming and badminton – her favourite sports – have become distant memories.


Shreya is a category five patient, which means she needs treatment for “extreme” drug resistant tuberculosis, or XDR-TB.


The family only became aware of bedaquiline in October, after a visit to Dr Zarir Udwadia, a consultant chest physician at Hinduja hospital in Mumbai. “It gave us hope. I was desperate by then because nothing had worked for my daughter,” says Kaushal.


Udwadia knew the exact combination of drugs that Shreya needed to take with bedaquiline, which does not work on its own. However, government protocol concerning the drug prevents him, as a private doctor, from accessing it. He told the family to get the drugs from the national institute in New Delhi, but they were refused because Shreya was not a resident.


“We argued and fought with them,” says Kaushal. “They agreed to take a sputum sample from Shreya in November for a drug susceptibility test to see which drugs she is resistant to, but they already knew she was drug resistant from earlier such tests. They wasted precious time.”


They kept calling the hospital for the result. Two months later, they were told the sample had been contaminated. On 28 December, Shreya provided a fresh sample and was told to wait four to six weeks for the culture.


“It was then I told Papa to go to court. Even if it’s too late for me, at least other patients will benefit from it. Just imagine how hard it must be for really poor people to get this drug,” says Shreya.


The case has been heard in Delhi high court this week.Saket Sikri, counsel for the national institute, says that the hospital cannot prescribe the other drugs that must be administered with bedaquiline until it gets the culture report.


“A wrong combination can kill and, since this drug is her last hope, we have to get it right. We are being humane, not bureaucratic, and are following World Health Organisation guidelines,” says Sikri. “The institute cannot choose which parts of the WHO protocol to follow and which to ignore.


“I think the judge’s final decision will hinge on whether he thinks my client is following WHO’s guidance on the use of [bedaquiline]. The judge can’t decide which doctor or which line of treatment is correct but he can judge if the guidelines are being followed and, in that respect, the institute is justified in waiting for the drug susceptibility test report to come.”


However, TB experts have said the culture the institute is awaiting is unnecessary, since it is already known that Shreya is drug resistant.


Anand Grover, a senior lawyer with the Lawyers Collective, which represents Shreya, says that the government has failed to update its own protocol to reflect the latest WHO guidance on bedaquiline, under which several XDR-TB patients have been put on drug regimens similar to the one prescribed by Udwadia. “There is evidence from other countries, including South Africa, showing that this combination has been successful in treating XDR-TB,” says Grover.


Grover has told the court that the prospect of Shreya losing her life without access to bedaquiline should outweigh concerns about any possible resistance that might occur. He has also told the court that the government is following the WHO protocol dating from 2013, when there was limited data on the efficacy and safety of the new drug.


Backing Shreya’s team is testimony from Dr Jennifer F Furin, from the Department of Global Health and Social Medicine at Harvard Medical School, who said Shreya should have been started on a bedaquiline-containing regimen in October.


“Additional delays … threaten her life and the effectiveness of this agent. It is unfortunate that there have already been so many significant delays in providing [bedaquiline] to Ms Tripathi,” said Dr Furin in her written testimony.


Dr Furin has previously criticised India for its slow rollout of the drug. In her Delhi high court testimony she said that scientific publications have set a benchmark that between 30% and 45% of patients with multi-drug resistant TB in a country should be able to access bedaquiline.


“In India, this means a minimum of 30,000 persons per year, based on 2016 estimates. As of 1 December 2016, only 164 individuals had been reported … to be receiving [bedaquiline]. This slow rollout … was noted as a problem by the WHO,” said Dr Furin.


There will be a further hearing on 18 January. “I don’t think the court will give it to me,” says Shreya. “But because of Papa’s efforts, at least other patients may get it later.”



Politics and protocol leave Indian teen"s life in the balance pending TB drug ruling | Amrit Dhillon

22 Kasım 2016 Salı

Playing politics with passports to the NHS | Brief letters

The government’s sudden interest in tackling health tourism (Show your passport for NHS treatment, 22 November) is a transparent distraction tactic. The unclaimed cost of treating non-entitled patients is said to be £200m, a mere 1% of the amount the government is trying to strip from the NHS budget through its ludicrous and unachievable “efficiency savings” target.
Dr Bob Bury
Leeds


• Last year, while staying with French friends, I fell down a short flight of steps which resulted in my going to A&E. At reception, I was asked for my passport along with my EHIC card and the usual name, address etc. It took no longer to process than any of the other information. If it can be done in France, why not here in the UK?
Freda Worland
Harpenden, Hertfordshire


• To understand the present state of British universities, institutions whose success depends on free and open discussion, we need only read your letters pages where academics fear to have their names and employing universities displayed (Letters, 21 November).
Nick Williams
Auchenblae, Aberdeenshire


• So the Department for Transport can pay £50m to provide Wi-Fi on some trains (Report, 22 November) and yet families are being turned out of their house to wander the streets. We seem to have lost our way.
Gill Johnston
Peterborough


• As students at UEA 40 years ago, my boyfriend and I had a friend in the coypu eradication unit on the Broads. He left a freshly eradicated coypu on our doorstep in Norwich which we skinned and butchered. I roasted it with carrots and potatoes and we found it delicious (Letters, 21 November) – even better cold the next day.


Certainly not rats!
Helen Wolvey
St Albans


• Will the Queen insist that all the plumbers working on the palace (Report, 19 November) are Corgi registered?
Gerard Gordon
West Kirby, Merseyside


• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com


• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters



Playing politics with passports to the NHS | Brief letters

20 Ekim 2016 Perşembe

5 Shocking Examples of Food Lies and Politics

Food politics is always controversial, and it exists because there’s a clear separation between profitable food and public health.


Our food is supposed to sustain our health, but big corporations are always seeking greater profits. By selling the cheapest possible food for the highest possible price, they make their money. At the same time, people who regularly eat this ultra-processed food lose their health.


Rather than admit the food they sell is unhealthy, commercial food corporations use their massive wealth to promote it as healthy.


As part of these food lies, they lobby to the government and spend huge sums on public advertising. All this is to convince us that their factory-made food is healthy.


In shocking examples of food lies and politics, this article will look at five unethical events that jeopardized (or are currently compromising) public health.


#1 Dietitians Taking Money From Coca-Cola to Oppose a Soda Tax


A flurry of activity on Twitter drew suspicion in early October 2016. Many dietitians suddenly, and in tandem, started tweeting against a soda tax. Included in these tweets were clear examples of fear-mongering, attempting to persuade their followers that a soda tax will push up the overall price of groceries.


Several newspapers and media sources broke stories about it early. Under pressure, coca-cola admitted that they had been funding dietitians and released the list of names. Unsurprisingly, the dietitians who spoke out against a soda tax had all received financial compensation from the soda giant for doing so.


The question to ask is this: what place does the promotion of sugar have in public health? Dietitians are the ‘official source’ for dietary advice, yet they promote an ingredient that destroys health.


Of course, there are many great dietitians out there, and I don’t want to paint all with the same brush. However, why are some dietitians (health advisors) even able to take money from companies who make ultra-processed food?


Isn’t that a conflict of interest in itself?


#2 Healthy Professionals Taking Money to Promote Coca-Cola


Interestingly, a very similar thing happened in 2015. Coca-cola were caught paying nutrition professionals (mainly dietitians again) to pen nutrition articles in the media. If you’re wondering what these articles regarded, then the answer is “how coca-cola mini cans are a healthy drink”.


When the information became public, Coca-Cola apologized and said they would aim for greater transparency in the future. It seems like they haven’t quite got there yet?


#3 Food Lies, Labels and Unknown Animals


It’s important to realize that food labels can be wildly incorrect. Whenever you buy refined, packaged food with a list of ingredients you never truly know what you’re getting.


The primary example I want to talk about here is burgers. Burgers obviously come in different scales of quality, ranging from 100% beef to a big list of unpronounceable ingredients.


However, 100% beef doesn’t sound too bad right?


Well, thousands of Europeans probably thought the very same thing when they bought their burgers from a range of stores and fast food joints. The only problem was that these burgers were not 100% beef at all, and instead, they were a random mixture of horse meat and beef.


Among the stores selling “100% beef burgers” (made of horse meat) were the British retail giant Tesco and Burger King.


However, at first, Burger King gave their “absolute assurance” that their products were in no way involved. A few weeks later they had to backtrack on their position after tests revealed horse DNA in their burgers. In an apology, Burger King stated they were “deeply troubled by the findings.”


Probably not as troubled as the people who ate horse meat after receiving “absolute assurance” it was beef.


#4 Margarine is ‘Heart Healthy’


Study after study shows that saturated fat isn’t truly a dietary villain.


Despite this, big food spends huge sums of money to promote their “low in saturated fat” products.


In reality, any product that claims to be low in saturated fat is most likely bad for you. Additionally, it probably contains a huge load of refined carbohydrates, sugar and vegetable oil.


The reason for this is likely the profits involved. Margarine and vegetable oils can be made entirely from machinery; it’s an automated process, cheap to produce, and sold for a large profit.


The fact that it’s bad for us is a threat to these profits, and so the industry uses advertising funds to convince us that it’s healthy.


Sure, it’s morally and ethically wrong, but for the companies involved it makes sense for business.


An obvious example of this is Australia’s ‘health star’ system. The general idea of this scheme is to rate a food based on its health properties, with ratings on a 5-star score system.


How does butter score? 0.5 stars. As for margarine, it gets five health stars!


So, they are telling us that butter, made naturally from cream, is a terribly unhealthy product.


At the same time, they are telling us that solidified vegetable oil that is chemically flavored (to hide the terrible taste) and chemically colored (to make it look yellow instead of gray) is a perfect example of a health food.


The truth is that margarine, as well as vegetable oils in general, are damaging to our health.


As for butter, there’s nothing to fear about healthy fats.


#5 The Myth of a Balanced Diet


“<insert any junk food> is healthy as part of a balanced diet.”


This kind of promotion is pretty much the slogan of every company that produces ultra-processed food.


In addition, health authorities (commonly sponsored by the food companies) repeat the balanced diet mantra.


The simple truth is this: an unhealthy food in moderation is moderately harmful.


Unfortunately, this truth isn’t very profitable, and that’s why the ‘balanced diet’ myth persists.


There’s no problem with someone enjoying unhealthy food from time to time if that’s what they want.


But enough of these food lies; it’s about time the food industry were honest about their products rather than purposefully trying to mislead people.


If you are interested in food politics, then here are some great books that cover food politics and big industry.



5 Shocking Examples of Food Lies and Politics

13 Ekim 2016 Perşembe

The Guardian view on social care: a crisis of politics as well as finance | Editorial

No one who has experienced adult social care – whether as patient or provider – will have been surprised by the Care Quality Commission’s verdict this week that cuts to local authority services had reached a “tipping point”, with grave consequences for the NHS. Council-run care services were not included in the Treasury “ringfence” around health spending. Since local authorities face cumulative budget cuts of up to 40%, much of the burden of looking after elderly people is transferred to hospitals. Elderly inpatients, many of whom should be discharged for treatment at home, then “block” beds on wards. There is nothing sustainable or conscionable about a system that treats the elderly as a liability to be shunted around an unfathomably complex system.


For that reason a consensus in policy circles has emerged around the idea that NHS and social care services should be merged. But there is no agreed method. One attempt to integrate a range of national services in eastern England failed last year in the ninth month of a five-year contract worth £800m. The National Audit Office blamed failure to anticipate demand on services, underestimated costs, and structures that meant patient accountability slipped through gaps between commissioners and outsourced providers of care. Many people do not realise that social care is a labyrinth of NHS, local government and private-sector provision until they are lost in the maze. And ministers have shied away from confronting voters with painful truths about cost. A cap on the amount any individual should expect to pay, originally due this year, has been deferred to 2020. Even then, the cap will not include bed and board, so residential care will quickly consume the savings of those who do not pass a stringent means test.


The government has tried to divert a few extra resources towards this cinderella service, but there has been nothing to match the scale of the challenge, which grows as society ages. The number of citizens over 85 will double within a generation. A first step towards grappling with the crisis involves setting aside tribal party hostilities. When the last Labour government considered a levy on inheritance to fund social care, the Tories cynically denounced the measure as a gruesome “death tax”. Labour’s preference in opposition for impugning the motives of Conservatives – as if they are incapable of compassion – hasn’t raised the tone of debate.


Politicians will have to decommission these old rhetorical weapons. The left will have to accept that Conservatives who see a role for the private sector in reforms are not driven by evil intent to denude the public realm of assets. The right must concede that Labour looks at taxes not because it relishes confiscation from the middle classes, but because taxation might be the best way for a society to pool resources in the collective interest. As Theresa May told the party faithful, tax is “the price we pay for living in a civilised society”. A crisis of this order transcends party allegiance. Social care and the NHS will have to be better integrated. Any feasible solution will involve a mix of public and private provision, coupled with public funding through higher taxes. Traditional divisions at Westminster make it difficult to build the kind of consensus required to design a solution along those lines. But without such a consensus, the prospects for a solution – and an ageing society – are bleak.



The Guardian view on social care: a crisis of politics as well as finance | Editorial

1 Ekim 2016 Cumartesi

Patients over politics: Sudanese breast cancer clinic that beat sanctions

For many women living in Sudan, breast cancer means certain death. Treatment is too expensive or they simply feel too embarrassed to seek help.


But until recently, yet another obstacle was seriously hampering efforts to cut breast cancer deaths in Sudan. Since the early 1990s, the country has been on the US blacklist for state sponsors of terrorism – imposed for human rights violations and for harbouring Osama Bin Laden.


Even the Khartoum Breast Care Centre (KBCC), the Horn of Africa’s first and only dedicated breast cancer clinic, has been hit by the sanctions, with a ban on international money transfers and the restriction on imports of medical equipment and spare parts.


Founded by British-trained Sudanese radiologist Dr Hania Fadl, the KBCC offers hi-tech digital mammography screening for a fraction of the usual price elsewhere. Since it opened in 2010, it has treated more the 18,000 patients from across the region and has received widespread acclaim and international support.


Using private funds and a $ 14m donation from the charitable foundation run by her ex-husband, Sudanese-British businessman Mo Ibrahim, Fadl has managed its 11-year development from start to finish.


However, the US sanctions meant the centre was unable to buy and maintain crucial diagnostic machinery. In February 2014, it decided to begin a year-long application process for a US Office of Foreign Assets Control (Ofac) exemption, which would make it easier to maintain its General Electric digital mammography machine.



Dr David Lawis, medical director of KBCC.


Dr David Lawis, medical director of KBCC. Photograph: Yassir Bukhari/Elephant Media

During the application process the machine broke down. It ended up being out of action for 10 weeks. The clinic was paralysed, with doctors forced to use alternative screening methods. “The problem is the poor women. You do ultrasounds and biopsies but an ultrasound is not an internationally approved screening modality,” Fadl says. “There are patients and I have to do something, even if they’ll put me in jail. I can’t let them wait and risk that their cancers spread.”


After heavy campaigning and several trips to Washington by Fadl to meet members of Congress, Ofac eventually issued a blanket licence exempting all medical equipment in Sudan from sanctions.




Ignorance is rife and I really hope and pray that women will come to the centre at least for a simple check up


Fatma Abdelmajid, KBCC patient


The result was a welcome surprise to doctors at the KBCC, who say the move is a milestone for Sudanese healthcare in that it has put the needs of patients above international politics.


“All of our equipment in the clinic is from a US company, General Electric, as are the majority of advanced medical machines in Sudan. For there to be an exemption from sanctions, our lives as doctors will be much easier and the lives our patients will drastically change,” says Dr David Lawis, medical director of the KBCC.


Lawis says access to radiotherapy remains a huge issue, with just two machines in the country. One, in Khartoum a hospital, has been broken for about seven months. The second is in Madani hospital, two hours’ drive from Khartoum.


Anyone who can afford to pay for treatment abroad usually leaves Sudan to get radiotherapy, but the blanket Ofac licence has the potential to change this. “People won’t have to leave their country to get the treatment they deserve,” says Lawis.


Word of mouth


Other challenges remain, however, and Fadl says the battle to educate and inform women about self-examination and the local availability of affordable treatment is the next healthcare frontier.


“We did a little survey to ask the women how they heard about us. We found that the most effective, at 49%, was word of mouth. We are still a tribal community: we trust relatives, friends and neighbours who tell us ‘I went to that place and it is good’. We don’t have that culture of research on the internet,” says Fadl.


This was the case for 60-year-old Sudanese patient Fatma Abdelmajid, who regularly takes a six-hour bus from Atbara in north-east Sudan to Khartoum for treatment after a local doctor told her that “one of Atbara’s boys” worked at the KBCC clinic.



Women wait to be seen at the KBCC.


Women wait to be seen at the KBCC. Photograph: Yassir Bukhari/Elephant Media

“The mentality around breast cancer here is absolutely wrong. When you tell women in the village that you’ve been diagnosed, they are so disturbed as if you’re about to drop dead in front of them. It’s really sad,” says Abdelmajid.


“They tell you, go to a fakeeh [spiritual healer], who will give you herbs and spiritual remedies to treat you. Ignorance is rife and I really hope and pray that women will come to the centre at least for a simple checkup.”


While the Sudanese health ministry keeps no full records, Lawis says that breast cancer accounts for approximately 35% of all cancer cases among Sudanese women. An estimated 60% of the 2,000 women diagnosed with breast cancer who die each year could have survived if given proper care.


Fadl strongly believes that stories like Abdelmajid’s will help end the taboo that often stops women from seeking a diagnosis. “A woman who has the experience of being treated should tell her stories, to new patients here at the centre and women in their villages. The best thing is to have these examples and success stories,” she says.


Fadl, who lives above the centre in Khartoum, patrols the corridors every day, greeting patients. “If I just walk downstairs and see the patients, see their kindness and deep gratitude, I just can’t help but want to help them. Sudanese women deserve everything I do – really and truly. I can’t tell you enough.”



Patients over politics: Sudanese breast cancer clinic that beat sanctions

23 Ağustos 2016 Salı

Politics is killing mothers in Texas | Jessica Valenti

When it comes to women’s progress, the United States doesn’t exactly bring home the gold. We rank 72nd in women’s political participation, with women holding less than 20% of congressional seats. Paid maternity leave? The United States comes in last. But at long last, we’re number one at something: Texas has the highest maternal mortality rate in the developed world.


This dubious honor is a recent one, with a study showing that the rate of women dying from pregnancy complications doubled from 2010-2014. It’s not a coincidence, of course, that there was another major happening around women’s health in Texas during those years: the deliberate closure of clinics that provide abortion and a drastic funding cut to the state’s family planning budget.


As my colleague Molly Redden points out, Texas gutted the state’s family planning budget by more than $ 73m in 2011, forcing clinics to shut down and dramatically reducing the number of women they could provide services to. By 2014, 600 women had died from pregnancy-related complications.


It’s almost as if what feminists have been saying for years is true: limiting reproductive rights hurts women across the board. Access to reproductive care is necessary not just to prevent or end pregnancies, but to ensure healthy outcomes for those who choose to carry their pregnancies to term.


Sarah Wheat of the Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas told the Dallas Morning News that these clinics were “an entry point into the health care system” for many women, especially those with fewer resources.


“Chances are they’re going to have a harder time finding somewhere to go to get that first appointment.”


It’s an ironic but telling turn of events for the activists and legislators in Texas who insisted that laws shuttering abortion clinics were about protecting women’s health – a claim that the supreme court thoroughly debunked.


In the decision to overturn Texas’ extreme anti-choice law, the opinion read: “When directly asked at oral argument whether Texas knew of a single instance in which the new requirement would have helped even one woman obtain better treatment, Texas admitted that there was no evidence in the record of such a case.”


Instead of helping women, the law hurt women. But for the politicians and activists who want to stop them from accessing their right to abortion at all costs, women’s health was never really the point.


If Texas wants to turn this horror show around, officials need to start supporting women’s choices, give up their transparent and cruel war on reproductive rights, and stop rejecting the expansion of Medicaid, which could provide much-needed help and care to the state’s vulnerable communities. And with Zika becoming more of a risk for Americans, these steps cannot come soon enough.


Women’s health is not a political chip to be played; it’s not an afterthought. Our health and lives – whether we choose to have children or not – are central to the health of our country and communities. Women in Texas, women in America, deserve better than this.



Politics is killing mothers in Texas | Jessica Valenti

15 Nisan 2014 Salı

Is there a stigma around psychological illness in nearby politics?

Lambeth Town Hall

“In all parts of our society the stigma close to psychological sick wellness is robust,” wrote Lambeth councillor Edward Davie. Photograph: Alamy




“In all components of our society, the stigma around psychological ill health is sturdy,” wrote Lambeth councillor Edward Davie in an write-up for the Regional Leaders Network.


Davie said that, as a politician, talking about his knowledge of NHS psychological healthcare had made him come to feel vulnerable. “As opposed to a physical ailment, psychological difficulties are often regarded as a indicator of a flawed character, weakness or a lack of self-manage. These are not perceptions that get individuals elected or promoted and so, understandably, most politicians do not publicise their own experiences of mental ill wellness,” Davie wrote.


There are more than 20,000 elected councillors in England and Wales, and in accordance to the charity Mind two.6 in one hundred folks endure from depression. That indicates that potentially there could be as many as 500 councillors struggling from some form of mental illness, but but so few have openly discussed it. Does this reflect a stigma surrounding local politicians speaking about their mental health difficulties?


We want to hear from councillors about whether or not they really feel comfortable talking about their experiences, and from constituents about whether or not they would vote for a councillor who had openly talked about overcoming psychological sickness. Do individuals in positions of energy require to be more open about their experiences, and how can they be encouraged to do so?


Charles Walker MP and Kevan Jones have spoken about psychological health circumstances in the past, but we want to hear from you about what far more can be accomplished to fight this issue.


Share your views and ideas in the feedback box under, and if you would like to create a blog or post a comment anonymously then electronic mail sarah.marsh@theguardian.com.


Not already a member? Join us now for more comment, evaluation and the newest occupation opportunities in nearby government.




Is there a stigma around psychological illness in nearby politics?

13 Mart 2014 Perşembe

Shell out decisions announced for NHS workers and other public sector employees: Politics dwell blog

We’re acquiring a slab of announcements about public sector shell out these days.


The primary target will probably be on the well being one. In accordance to the Everyday Telegraph, Jeremy Hunt, the overall health secretary, is going to veto a proposed one% pay out rise.



The Overall health Secretary is anticipated to defy calls for a pay out rise for a lot more than one.three million NHS workers, warning that increases would jeopardise patient care and result in occupation cuts.


Independent pay overview bodies are expected to contact for a 1 per cent rise for nurses, midwives, paramedics and auxiliary staff.


But Jeremy Hunt is set to say that the NHS can not afford such a rise, and will as an alternative make a smaller sized award which does not maintain pace with inflation – amounting to a lower in actual terms.


The Wellness Secretary is expected to say that restrictions in pay out indicate the NHS is ready to retain as numerous staff as achievable, at a time when budgets are underneath significant stress.


But actually we are obtaining four separate shell out overview body reports, covering: wellness, the armed forces, the prison service and senior civil servants. There is also an announcement from the Treasury about public support pensions.



I will be covering all the announcements as we get them, and the response they provoke.


Otherwise, it is relatively quiet. Here’s the agenda for the day.


9am: Nick Clegg hosts his Get in touch with Clegg cellphone in.


10am:The spend review physique reports are published.


11am: David Cameron continues his tour of the Middle East with a meeting with Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian president.


Close to 12pm: MPs start a debate on a backbench motion saying the government need to finish badger culls.


I strategy to concentrate right now on the pay overview announcements. But, as typical, I will also be flagging up any breaking political information, posting summaries with a round-up of all the day’s developments, and highlighting the most interesting political posts on the world wide web.


If you want to adhere to me on Twitter, I’m on @AndrewSparrow.



Shell out decisions announced for NHS workers and other public sector employees: Politics dwell blog