block etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
block etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

5 Nisan 2017 Çarşamba

Dementia sufferers to receive devices to block nuisance calls

The UK government is to fund high-tech call-blocking devices to protect dementia sufferers and vulnerable people from nuisance phone calls, although only around 1,500 people will be given the gadgets under the initial funding.


The £500,000 project will install trueCall devices in the homes of elderly and vulnerable people identified by doctors. The machines block all recorded messages, silent calls and calls from numbers not pre-identified by the homeowner, which the government says will offer particular protection for dementia sufferers.


Around £300,000 of the budget will be spent on the devices themselves, with the remaining funds allocated to management of the service and raising public awareness of scam calls.


Ministers have been pressed by health and consumer campaigners to do more about nuisance calls. One firm alone has been fined £350,000 for making more than 46m automated calls.


Announcing the fund, prime minister Theresa May said: “We want to create a fairer society by cracking down on unscrupulous practices which target the most vulnerable. This new, targeted scheme is the latest step in the government’s fight against nuisance calls, protecting those who are most at risk, including those with dementia.


“We have seen people tricked out of thousands of pounds by scam callers and this government is determined to clamp down on their activities once and for all.”


A trial of the devices last year by the National Trading Standards scams team resulted in 93% of participants feeling safer in their homes, the government said, including one person who had previously paid £150,000 to a scam caller.


Hilda Hayo, chief executive of Dementia UK, said the funding was a step in the right direction. “These calls can not only have a negative financial impact but can also lead to psychological affects such as anxiety, depression and a loss of self-esteem,” she said.


“We frequently receive calls to our national helpline from family members who are concerned that their relative with dementia has fallen prey to rogue traders.”


Further plans are being drawn up to combat the wider problem of nuisance calls, the government said, including a plan to issue fines of up to £1m if companies are found to be in breach of privacy and electronic communications regulations.



Dementia sufferers to receive devices to block nuisance calls

3 Şubat 2017 Cuma

60 Healthy Foods That Can Block Inflammation and Ease Pain

As a part of the body’s immune response, inflammation can damage your body when it’s out of control, then you may have several health problems such as obesity, heart disease, arthritis, fatigue and even cancer. That’s why it’s necessary to reduce inflammation to reduce the pain and the risk of other illnesses.


Here are some foods with strong anti-inflammatory properties to help you block inflammation and reduce pain:


1.Fatty fish


Studies found that consuming fish high in omega-3 fatty acids may relieve back pain. Eat fish high in omega-3 fatty acids and low in mercury 2 times a week to reap the benefits, such as salmon, sardines, and herring.


2.Almonds


A small handful of almonds every day may lower the risk of cardiovascular disease, according to studies. They are also a good source of monounsaturated fats and vitamins, so eat some regularly even they’re not so low in calories.


3.Olive oil


Just like almonds, olive oil is also rich in monounsaturated fats, which are good for your blood vessels. Olive oil improves health in many ways, including reducing inflammation, reducing bad cholesterol levels and preventing cancer.


4.Beets


Beets are rich in betalains, that has strong anti-inflammatory properties to battle inflammation-related diseases. Eat beets often can prevent obesity, heart disease, and even cancer.


5.Turmeric


Turmeric helps cure achy joints and arthritis due to the compound curcumin, which has good anti-inflammatory properties. It’s easy to add turmeric into your diet, while keeping in mind of that it has low bioavailability, so increase the bioavailability of turmeric in your body is also important.


6.Ginger


This spice is well known for its anti-inflammatory properties, it can relieve migraines, joint pain, arthritis and muscle aches effectively.


Know more about this spicy root: Ginger: An Amazing Spice That Promotes Healthy Life


Also take care don’t over-use it: Ginger is Healthy, But… Who Should Avoid This Spice


7.Garlic


Diallyl sulfide (DAS) and thiacremonone in garlic have anti-arthritic properties, it has also been proven to improve other inflammatory conditions.


8.Peppermint


Botanist James A. Duke, PhD, author of The Green Pharmacy Guide to Healing Foods, said that we could call peppermint as herbal aspirin, as the menthol in peppermint can help relieve muscle spasms and headaches.


More Natural Anti-inflammatory Foods to Prevent the Inflammation-related Chronic Diseases


  1. Cinnamon

  2. Rosemary

  3. Goji berries

  4. Papaya

  5. Cruciferous vegetables

  6. Spinach

  7. Sweet potatoes

  8. Cherries

  9. Cranberries

  10. Apples

  11. Oranges

  12. Kiwifruit

  13. Rhubarb

  14. Lemon

  15. Limes

  16. Avocados

  17. Guavas

  18. Bell peppers

  19. Kale

  20. Bok Choy

  21. Salads

  22. Chards

  23. Green beans

  24. Fennel bulb

  25. Spring onions

  26. Leeks

  27. Cod

  28. Tuna

  29. Pineapple

  30. Strawberries

  31. Mulberries

  32. Raspberries

  33. Herring

  34. Trout

  35. Striped Bass

  36. Oregano

  37. Licorice

  38. Walnuts

  39. Halibut

  40. Whitefish

  41. Sardines

  42. Blueberries

  43. Snapper Fish

  44. Oysters

  45. Basil

  46. Cloves

  47. Thyme

  48. Chili pepper

  49. Parsley

  50. Linseed

  51. Hazelnuts

  52. Sunflower seeds

Additional Sources: naturalantiinflammatory.org/


Related Reading:


Smart steps to increase the bioavailability of turmeric in your body




60 Healthy Foods That Can Block Inflammation and Ease Pain

5 Ocak 2017 Perşembe

NHS groups "paying millions to private firms that block GP referrals"

NHS organisations are paying millions of pounds to private firms that stop patients being referred to hospital by their GPs, an investigation has found.


Controversial referral management centres are used by some clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) to scrutinise patient referrals to hospitals by family doctors.


Supporters say they can reduce inappropriate referrals, saving the NHS money, but critics argue that adding an extra layer of scrutiny risks delaying diagnosis. There is also doubt over the effectiveness of such schemes.


In an investigation, the British Medical Journal (BMJ) sent freedom of information requests to all 211 CCGs in England. Of the 184 that responded, 72 (39%) said they commissioned some form of referral management scheme.


Almost a third (32%) of the schemes are provided by private companies, while a further 29% are provided in-house and 11% by local NHS trusts. Some 69% of the CCGs with schemes gave details of operating costs. These CCGs combined have spent at least £57m on schemes since April 2013.


Most CCGs were unable to provide evidence showing the scheme saved money. Only 14% could show that the scheme had saved more cash than it had cost to operate, while 12% showed that their schemes had not saved money overall.


Meanwhile, 74% of CCGs (53 groups) failed to supply figures to show whether any money had been saved, the BMJ reported.


Some CCGs did not collect data on savings, some said their referral scheme was designed not to save money but to improve the quality of referrals, and others declined to disclose details of savings on the grounds of commercial confidentiality.


Overall, there were 93 referral management schemes in operation across 72 CCGs, with some CCGs having more than one.


Dr Richard Vautrey, deputy chairman of the British Medical Association’s GPs committee, told the BMJ: “[CCGs] are leaping at these schemes without any clear evidence of benefit. They are just hopeful that it might reduce their costs.


“It is a very short-term approach to healthcare management. We need to see much more evaluation … and not just keep making the same mistakes year after year. As public bodies, there should be an expectation on every CCG to account for what it is doing.”


Vautrey said some schemes were helpful because they gave GPs rapid access to advice from local specialists.


Graham Jackson, co-chair of NHS Clinical Commissioners, the membership organisation representing CCGs, said referral management was only one way of managing demand for services.


“In many cases they provide a useful and effective role which is more than a redirection service,” he said. “CCGs will balance the cost of commissioning with the benefit they provide to GPs and patients in terms of peer review, education, caseload management and choice.”


In October, Roberta Blackman-Woods, Labour MP for City of Durham, criticised a local scheme to screen referrals for conditions including cardiology, gynaecology and gastroenterology.


The North Durham CCG has awarded a contract to the private firm About Health to manage referrals.



NHS groups "paying millions to private firms that block GP referrals"

29 Mayıs 2014 Perşembe

Stress on Richard Branson to block deportation of Nigerian FGM mom

Sir Richard Branson

Sir Richard Branson, proprietor of Virgin Atlantic. His daughter, Holly, has spoken out publicly about FGM. Photograph: Todd Vansickle/AP




Billionaire businessman Sir Richard Branson came underneath rising strain on Thursday to personally stage in to avert the deportation of a Nigerian mom and her two little ladies, who she says are at threat of female genital mutilation.


Supporters of Afusat Saliu, 31, and her two daughters, Basirat, 3, and Rashidat, one particular, have been contacting Branson on Twitter, following it emerged that the family have been due to be sent to Lagos on a flight operated by his airline Virgin Atlantic.


Politicans on both sides of the divide entered the row on Thursday, with the deputy prime minister, and shadow immigration secretary, David Hanson, writing to home secretary, Theresa May possibly, about the situation.


Nick Clegg – who yesterday praised the anti-FGM campaign lead by Lib-Dem colleague Lynne Featherstone – confirmed he had written to the Residence Secretary Theresa May demanding a lot more information about Saliu’s case. Answering a query on Nick Ferrari’s LBC these days, he explained: “I will make positive that the situation is brought to the consideration of the Residence Workplace in the proper way, so they can get the proper choices, because there are clear rules everybody has to abide by when deportations get area.”


He said the Lib Dems had campaigned to finish youngster detention in immigration centres and had pushed the anti-FGM up the agenda. “It is a actually great stage in the correct route that men and women are now talking about this and saying that no cultural sensitivity can excuse this variety of mutilation and cutting of girls who are terrified and have terrible consequences for the rest of their lives,” he stated.


Hanson MP, shadow minister for immigration, stated he and Saliu’s MP, George Mudie, had written to May possibly to ask her to halt the deportation until the final result of the judicial assessment was heard. “The specifics of the case are for the Home Office to determine but it truly is crucial appropriate process was followed and the determination was created in a honest way, with affordable consideration offered to the risk of FGM, especially given the property secretary’s statements on this issue and the push by Lib Dem ministers to raise awareness of it,” he said


“Theresa May possibly must evaluation this case in light of the injunction and give proper consideration to the fears of what may come about to her children if she returns”


Saliu and her kids were taken into custody by Property Workplace officials and have been transported from their property in Leeds to London for elimination, the family’s attorney told the Guardian. They are currently getting held at Heathrow airport, according to her attorney.


Saliu, a victim of female genital mutilation, has previously spoken of her conviction that her daughters will also be mutilated and her fear that, as Christians, they could be targeted by the Nigerian Islamic extremist group Boko Haram, which lately kidnapped a lot more than 200 schoolgirls.


Far more than 120,000 have signed a petition on the internet site Change.org calling on the Property Office to reconsider the situation. Several of them have bombarded Branson on Twitter, urging him to intervene.


Supporters of Saliu pointed out that the entrepreneur’s daughter Holly Branson has previously spoken out about FGM. Creating on the Virgin web site, she named it “a horrendous practice and a severe violation of internationally recognised human rights”, including that “far more demands to be accomplished”.


John Coventry of Alter.org said 1000′s of men and women have been supporting Saliu simply because they feared for the safety of her daughters.


“It really is a outstanding outpouring of support and testament to the energy of social media to build powerful movements in a short room of time,” he said. “In the previous number of months, FGM and asylum have turn into big problems for Adjust.org customers and we have noticed some effective stories and moving campaigns on the site.”


A spokeswoman for Virgin stated: “The House Office tends to make the flight arrangements for all deportee passengers. It is not for the airline to refuse to carry a deportee passenger on the grounds of their immigration situation, as the airline has no information of individual cases. It is for the Residence Office to make immigration policy and consider selections of this nature.”


Bhumika Parmar of BP Legal, Saliu’s attorney, explained her consumer had utilized for permission to carry a judicial evaluation and had expected the deportation to be put on hold whilst that was regarded. Parmar accused the Residence Office of failing to stick to its own guidelines by not providing Saliu the minimum 72 hours’ observe of elimination.


“Her therapy has been very unfair,” she stated.


Home Workplace officials did not inform Parmar that her consumer was getting detained and refused to tell her in which she was currently being taken on Wednesday, she added. “The truth that the House Office did not come back to me to inform me the place she was meant that I could not file a bail application,” she mentioned.


In a letter to Residence Workplace officials, Parmar stated Saliu and her daughters had been getting deported prior to their welfare and proper to a honest hearing had been appropriately regarded. She threatened the Property Workplace with a claim for damages if the elimination was not delayed right up until due process could be observed.


She wrote: “You have plainly breached your very own policy. Additionally, you have not advised that our consumer will receive the relevant safety necessary in Lagos, specially in light of the public curiosity in her situation. You have failed to think about that our client has no assistance if she is to be returned, specifically with two very young youngsters. What proposals are there to residence and sustain the household unit when she arrives in Lagos?”


Anj Handa, a good friend of Saliu who set up the petition on Change.org, explained: “We have asked, please do this properly. It is virtually like they are hell-bent on receiving rid of her due to the fact we acquired the campaign going. The political timing is undesirable due to the fact the Home Workplace needs to display it is challenging on immigration.”


She said she did not want to see her pal turn out to be a victim of “political posturing”.


Nigeria is house to the highest amount of girls subjected to FGM in the planet and Saliu stated her loved ones do not want to subject her daughters to it. She won a short-term reprieve in April, with the help of her MP George Mudie and following an write-up in the Guardian.


“I will not want [my young children] to be mutilated. I know it will occur if I have to go back with them, I know it due to the fact it is the culture of my family members,” she stated. “They feel in it and I will not be capable to do anything about it. Every single female need to stand up for her youngsters and do what ever is required to defend them from some thing like this.”


Saliu arrived in the United kingdom in 2011, and says she fled Nigeria when her stepmother informed her that her oldest daughter would be subjected to FGM. Her youngest daughter was born in Britain. The House Workplace mentioned it does not comment on certain instances.




Stress on Richard Branson to block deportation of Nigerian FGM mom

16 Nisan 2014 Çarşamba

Is Arkansas" "Personal Option" A Block Grant? Insurance Skilled Bob Laszewski Thinks So, But He Is Wrong

Throughout the previous couple of months, insurance coverage industry insider Bob Laszewski has chronicled a lot of of the failures of ObamaCare’s launch. He has raised some very critical questions and concerns from the insurance business about future policy and premium bumps that lay ahead below the ACA. Sadly, his recent assault on Republican governors and state lawmakers who have rejected ObamaCare’s misguided Medicaid expansion totally misses the mark. He contends that Arkansas’ “Private Option” is genuinely just a block grant for Medicaid. But the truth lies in the fine print, and even though there is no question the Private Option puts state taxpayers at risk, it also produces a new entitlement and ceded most of the manage for the plan to the federal government. It’s like putting the fox in charge of the hen property.


Laszewski praises the Obama administration for getting “very cooperative and flexible” on Medicaid expansion, by permitting states to improve Medicaid eligibility via applications this kind of Arkansas’ “Private Choice.” There’s just one dilemma: the promised “flexibility” in no way materialized.


We not too long ago talked to Arkansas State Senator Bryan King, chairman of the Legislative Joint Auditing Committee, who has been monitoring Private Option implementation. Here’s what he had to say about that promised versatility:



Arkansas’ negotiations with the Obama Administration manufactured 1 factor clear: the bureaucrats in Washington hold all the cards and their primary concern is implementing ObamaCare, not providing states with any true flexibility. They could relent on tweaks that quantity to nothing at all more than window dressing, but their intent is for states to expand Medicaid and enroll much more Americans into government-run well being care. Arkansas produced a grave error in trusting the Obama Administration’s false promise of flexibility and our state’s sense of buyer’s remorse grows worse by the month. I only hope that leaders in other states are not fooled by these empty guarantees.



Senator King is correct: Arkansas was given no meaningful flexibility at all.


The Federal Government Did not Grant Arkansas A Medicaid Block Grant


The Private Alternative Medicaid growth produces a new entitlement for in a position-bodied, operating-age grownups.  It is not a Medicaid block grant. By definition, a block grant calls for a state to acquire a fixed amount of funding in exchange for meeting particular policy goals. Although the federal government positioned a per-individual cap on Private Option spending—though kept an open-ended funding scheme for an unlimited amount of eligible individuals—it did not accompany that cap with accurate versatility. It’s the worst of each worlds for Arkansas: capped per-individual funding from the federal government and no meaningful flexibility to manage charges.


The Federal Government Did not Grant Arkansas Versatility On Who To Cover


The Personal Choice Medicaid growth covers all of the ready-bodied grownups that ObamaCare envisioned. The vast bulk of these ready-bodied grownups are operating age, have no dependent young children and are ineligible for most other sorts of welfare, such as money support and extended-term foods stamps.


In order to safe its waiver, Arkansas was forced to guarantee to cover men and women who have been already purchasing private insurance coverage – either via an employer or in the personal industry – as well as people who would otherwise qualify for federal subsidies on the ObamaCare exchange.


Other states that have explored partial expansions or various prepare types, like South Dakota and Indiana, have been smacked down by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services—the choice-making arm of the U.S. Division of Well being and Human Services when it comes to Medicaid-associated negotiations with the states.


Is this the cooperation and flexibility that Mr. Laszewski praised the Obama Administration for?


The Federal Government Didn’t Grant Arkansas Flexibility On What To Cover


Personal Alternative enrollees are assured the same Medicaid rewards they would acquire below a conventional growth. All positive aspects not typically covered by private insurance coverage, like non-emergency medical transportation (NEMT) and early and periodic screening, diagnosis and treatment (EPSDT) benefits, are merely delivered through the traditional fee-for-support Medicaid program.


The Federal Government Did not Grant Arkansas Flexibility On What To Charge


Beneath the terms of the waiver, the vast bulk of enrollees in Arkansas’ Private Option have no cost-sharing whatsoever. Even between these who have to shell out nominal copays, cost-sharing is reduced than what existing Medicaid principles allow.


The Federal Government Didn’t Grant Arkansas Versatility To End The Expansion Whenever It Wishes


Practically nothing in the Personal Alternative waiver provides the state new authority to roll back its ObamaCare Medicaid growth. Federal law and regulation nonetheless classifies the growth population as a new “mandatory population” for states that opt into the expansion, which authorizes the federal government to consider away all federal Medicaid money if a state were to roll back eligibility for that group.



Is Arkansas" "Personal Option" A Block Grant? Insurance Skilled Bob Laszewski Thinks So, But He Is Wrong

9 Nisan 2014 Çarşamba

Copper can block development of unusual cancer


A want for copper could be the Achilles’ heel of some cancers, scientists feel. It could permit them to be tackled with medication utilized to block copper absorption in sufferers suffering from a unusual illness.




Cancers with a mutation in the BRAF gene need copper to encourage their growth, in accordance to analysis published in the journal Nature. They contain melanoma, the most unsafe kind of skin cancer that kills a lot more than two,000 men and women in Britain every year.




The lead scientist, Professor Christopher Counter, from Duke University School of Medicine in the US, explained: “BRAF-constructive cancers like melanoma practically hunger for copper.”




Laboratory experiments performed by Prof Counter’s group showed blocking the copper uptake of tumour cells with the mutation suppressed their development.


Equivalent final results have been attained with drugs utilized to deal with sufferers with Wilson illness, a genetic disorder in which copper builds up in entire body tissues and damages the brain and liver.


“Oral drugs utilized to reduced copper levels in Wilson condition could be repurposed to deal with BRAF-driven cancers like melanoma, or perhaps even other folks like thyroid or lung cancer,” explained the report’s co-author Dr Donita Brady, also from Duke University.


A clinical trial has been approved, permitting the Duke staff to check copper-lowering medicines in melanoma patients.




Copper can block development of unusual cancer

10 Mart 2014 Pazartesi

Move to block hospital closures law backed by 20 coalition MPs

Move to block hospital closures law backed by 20 coalition MPs

Jeremy Hunt, the wellness secretary, put forward clause 119. Photograph: Neil Hall/PA




About 20 MPs from the coalition parties prepare to rebel on Tuesday towards government ideas that could depart properly-run hospitals in danger of becoming closed if neighbouring ones get into trouble.


Paul Burstow, the former Liberal Democrat well being minister who is spearheading opposition to the move, mentioned that at least twenty MPs from his get together and the Conservatives had indicated that they would not back the programs in a Commons vote either by voting towards or abstaining.


He is searching for to amend clause 119 of the care bill, dubbed the “hospital closure clause”, which as it stands would give a “believe in particular administrator” appointed to kind out a failing hospital trust the energy to buy alterations in the makeup of an additional local hospital’s services as component of an total solution, including downgrading it or even shutting it.


Jeremy Hunt, the overall health secretary, place forward clause 119 right after the high court ruled that it was illegal for the unique trust administrator hired to kind out the heavily loss-generating South London Healthcare trust to purchase the rundown of services at nearby Lewisham hospital as a way of reorganising healthcare in south London.


Burstow wants to give neighborhood medical professionals who commission solutions from a distinct hospital not straight concerned in the other’s difficulties the right to veto any this kind of ideas for an administrator to interfere in its running.


“Support for my amendment has been increasing. It feels to me that there is a growing disquiet on the Conservative side of the coalition about these strategies, plus there are Liberal Democrat MPs who share the concern”, Burstow mentioned.


Lib Dem MPs like Andrew George, Julian Huppert and Michael Thornton have pledged to assistance Burstow’s amendment, as has Green celebration MP Caroline Lucas. Labour MPs will also back it.


Burstow has also spoken to a quantity of Tories who have concerns, which includes Jeremy Lefroy, the Tory MP for Stafford. The town’s hospital is due to drop important services, this kind of as its A&ampE and maternity units, when Mid Staffordshire NHS Basis believe in, which runs it, is broken up due to a blend of the scandal of poor care there in 2005-09, economic troubles and recurrent staffing difficulties.


“While it is vital that there is a clear and productive method to provide services and stability to a nearby location when a single hospital fails, that should not suggest ignoring the experience, experience and preferences of nearby people and clinicians in hospitals that are carrying out nicely. My new clause aims to place some democracy and fairness back into the program to ensure that it operates for the good of everyone”, Burstow added. Labour on Tuesday warns that men and women in 32 communities across England could end up with no true say in the long term of their neighborhood hospital if clause 119 is passed.


It has named 32 hospital trusts about which the NHS Believe in Advancement Authority (TDA) or Keep track of, the NHS regulators, have raised issues about their finances or viability. They consist of twenty trusts which the TDA expects to end 2013-14 in the red and twelve basis trusts exactly where Keep track of has ordered enforcement action due to the fact it fears they may not be in a position to maintain delivering all their solutions.


Burstow is hoping that the Division of Wellness may possibly offer concessions on clause 119 that would assauge his fears. But if it does not, he will push his clause to a vote after the debate on Clause 119, which is expected on Tuesday afternoon.




Move to block hospital closures law backed by 20 coalition MPs