chancellor etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
chancellor etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

8 Mart 2017 Çarşamba

Budget will hold no big surprises on spending or tax, chancellor says

Philip Hammond has played down the significance of the spring budget and denied he plans to surprise parliament with big spending plans or tax reforms.


This was always going to be a “just in case” budget, only bursting into life should the public finances need rescuing from a further slowdown in the economy. But the economy is performing strongly, even as it slows, leaving the chancellor to continue where he left off in the autumn statement: focusing on relatively limited measures to improve the UK’s infrastructure, skills and education.


Austerity will continue to drive down government spending to levels not seen since before the financial crisis, while the tax burden is on track to reach its highest level as a proportion of GDP in 30 years.


What does that mean for the public finances and the choices the chancellor has before him?


The economic outlook


Growth
The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) – the Treasury’s independent forecaster – is expected to take an optimistic view of the short-term growth prospects, possibly raising the target from 1.4% this year to nearer the Bank of England’s 2% forecast. This could prove controversial. Critics say the recovery from the Brexit vote is built on consumer spending, which is about to face a squeeze from slowing wages growth and higher inflation. The OBR may also be forced to downgrade last year’s growth from its own estimate of 2% to the Office for National Statistics’ 1.8%. In March last year the OBR forecast 2017 growth at 2.2%.


Wages
How much the OBR expects wages to slow will be crucial. Average annual pay slipped in the final three months of 2016 from 2.7% to 2.6%, according to the latest figures. The most recent report for the Bank of England showed that average wage rises could slip from 2.7% down to 2.1% by the end of the year. Slowing wages growth would rob the economy of its main engine.


Inflation
Until now the OBR has said it expects this year’s inflation rate to be no more than 2.3% and then to peak at 2.5% in 2018. However, these forecasts are now among the lowest around and are likely to be revised upwards amid strongly rising food and petrol prices – probably to 2.6% this year.


Business investment
The OBR has always believed business investment will return to pre-crisis norms, whatever the evidence. It has mostly been wrong. But it is unlikely to drop its optimistic forecasts at such a delicate political moment, ahead of the article 50 negotiations, and risk accusations from Brexit campaigners that it is supping with the remain camp. It was forecast in November to remain negative this year, but pick up dramatically for the rest of the decade.


Trade
The lower pound means exports are likely to pick up and imports to decline. The OBR in November was considered by some to be conservative in forecasting a 0.3% increase in net trade this year. The new estimate could be higher.


The public finances


Deficit
Viewed from the economic depths in November last year, the forecast for this year’s government’s budget deficit will look rosy. The spending shortfall could be as much as £12bn less than previously feared, reducing the forecast budget deficit for 2016-17 from £68bn to about £56bn. This would offset upward revisions to borrowing over the next five years that the OBR said followed the decision to leave the European Union. Extrapolated over the next four years, it could put up to £40bn more in the chancellor’s pocket than he expected in November. The Resolution Foundation has pencilled in a conservative £29bn.



Demonstrators in Parliament Square on 4 March 2017 protesting against cuts to NHS funding. An increase in NHS England


Demonstrators in Parliament Square on 4 March protesting against cuts to NHS funding. Photograph: Daniel Leal-Olivas/AFP/Getty Images

Social care and the NHS
Social care has suffered a series of cutbacks, especially to local authority provision, despite rising need. Hammond is expected to loosen the purse strings, but possibly only to get him through the next six months before announcing a more substantial review in the autumn. Increases in NHS England’s budget, which amount to about 11% in real terms by 2020, are partly offset by cuts in other spending by the Department of Health. It is this cut – which ministers claim can be achieved by efficiency savings – that keeps spending in check.


Business rates
This is based on commercial property rents and raises about £29bn. Hammond is under pressure to dampen the effects of a business rates revaluation, delayed from 2015, that will send bills in London and the south-east rocketing. Figures from the Valuation Office Agency show businesses in London face an average 23.7% rise in their business rate. Treasury sources indicate that the chancellor will adjust the complicated business-rate capping regime to make life easier for the worst-affected, but will refuse calls for a complete rethink.


Income tax
The government wants to raise the income tax personal allowance to £12,500 and the higher-rate threshold to £50,000 by the end of this parliament. In April the personal allowance will rise to £11,500, and the basic rate limit will be increased to £33,500, meaning that the effective threshold for the 40p rate becomes £45,000.


Inheritance tax
Osborne’s inheritance tax giveaway, which will allow estates with gains from property sales to pass on an extra £175,000 tax-free on top of the existing £325,000, is another costly item for the chancellor to endorse. The new rates will be phased in by 2019-20. Under rules allowing spouses to receive a tax-free inheritance from their deceased partners, children will then be able to receive £1m tax-free.


Whitehall departments
Hammond has demanded further cuts amounting to £3.5bn, or 6%, by the end of the parliament. This sum is in addition to departmental cuts already going through the system and £12bn of welfare cuts targeted at housing benefit and tax credit claimants, which will deliver real-terms cuts in every year and maintain the combined cost of these two benefits at £50bn until 2019-20. The Treasury says there are efficiency savings to be made by the police and other government services. But the Institute for Public Policy Research thinktank says many of the savings are illusory and cuts will hit frontline services.


Education
Theresa May has revealed plans for a new generation of free schools and grammar schools costing £320m. Meanwhile, schools in England face the first real-terms cuts to their funding since the mid-1990s, with spending per pupil due to fall 6.5% by 2019-20. The Institute for Fiscal Studies said cuts to sixth-form and further education funding will mean funding for 16- to 18-year-olds is no higher than it was almost 30 years ago.


Skills and trainingIn the autumn statement last November, Hammond said he wanted to rebalance spending towards long-term infrastructure projects. An apprenticeship levy on large employers comes into effect in April, which will bring £3bn into the exchequer. This money is supposed to go back to employers that carry out training, but initially it will be banked by the Treasury. Also, a new category of technical qualifications called T-levels will be introduced in an effort to improve skills in the British workforce and boost productivity. Hammond said an extra £500m would be made available by 2022 to improve the quality of training in schools and colleges and offset the loss of foreign workers after Brexit.


Self-employment
In recent years self-employment has become synonymous with low pay and insecure employment, driven by firms seeking to cut their tax bills. Employers pay no national insurance when they commission work from someone who is self-employed and such workers pay a reduced rate of 9%, compared with the 12% paid by PAYE staff. Hammond could raise about £1bn from increasing the national insurance rate for the self-employed to 12%.



Budget will hold no big surprises on spending or tax, chancellor says

24 Kasım 2016 Perşembe

Andrew Lansley chides chancellor lack of NHS and social care funding

The former health secretary Andrew Lansley has joined MPs from across the political spectrum in criticising the autumn statement for its lack of extra funding for the NHS and social care.


Lansley, who is now a peer, said he was disappointed there was not extra cash for the health service, which is under increasing pressure because adult social care budgets have been cut.


“I think the time is now to put some measure in place to try and help health and social care through the next two years,” he told the BBC’s World at One.


Asked whether he had been surprised at the lack of a funding announcement, he said: “Not being surprised doesn’t mean I’m not disappointed.”


He said the NHS and social care were facing an “incredibly difficult” period in the coming years.


“In the last parliament a challenging target was set and it was achieved,” he said. “The trouble is in this parliament, what has been asked of the National Health Service is not just more of the same but even more, and I’m afraid what was evident in the last financial year was when you take the level of support for the NHS below a 2% increase – to hospitals, that is – and the demand is rising at 4% there comes a point where they start to go in to significant deficit.


“The front-end loading of the money for the NHS in this parliament in to this financial year will probably mean those deficits come down this year, but without action next year and the year after those deficits will rise again and the accumulated deficit will make it very difficult for hospitals in particular to cope.”


He said the Better Care Fund, which brought together money from the NHS and social care, amounted to “robbing Peter to pay Paul”.


“That is not going to be remedied simply by taking money out of the NHS budget and passing it to local authorities,” he said.


Labour politicians led criticism of the chancellor, Philip Hammond, after his autumn statement for his failure to mention the NHS or social care in his fiscal document or to allocate any more money, instead prioritising infrastructure and projects such as more grammar schools.


Some Conservatives also voiced concern, including Sarah Wollaston, the chair of the health committee, who has said NHS and social care are at a tipping point. She and four other members of the health committee have also criticised the government’s claim to be putting an extra £10bn into the NHS by 2020.


“The continued use of the figure of £10bn for the additional health spending up to 2020-21 is not only incorrect, but risks giving a false impression that the NHS is awash with cash,” Wollaston and her four fellow committee members told the chancellor in a letter earlier this month.



Andrew Lansley chides chancellor lack of NHS and social care funding

24 Ekim 2016 Pazartesi

MPs urge chancellor to honour leave campaign"s £350m NHS promise

Dozens of MPs have signed a joint letter, organised by a group that aims to hold leave campaigners to their pre-referendum promises, which calls on the government to uphold the most infamous Brexit promise of all – £350m more a week to be spent on the NHS.


The letter, signed by 41 MPs, mainly from Labour but also some Liberal Democrats and Caroline Lucas of the Greens, demands that the chancellor, Philip Hammond, make the pledge in his autumn statement a month from now.


The £350m pledge was a key element of the Vote Leave campaign’s promise to voters, billed as money that would be saved after leaving the EU which could instead go to health spending.


In the wake of the 23 June referendum many leading pro-Brexit figures began to distance themselves from the idea, a process highlighted in a new Vote Leave Watch video to accompany the letter.


Last month it emerged that a successor group to Vote Leave, Change Britain, had not included the pledge among its aims.


The letter, addressed to Hammond, noted that the chancellor’s speech to the Conservative party conference earlier this month said that “the message of the referendum result had been ‘received, loud and clear’ by the government”.


The letter continued: “We accept the verdict of the British people. Yet it is clear that, if this mandate is to mean anything, it must include the single most visible promise of the leave campaign – spending £350m more a week on the NHS.


“In just under a month you will present your first autumn statement. We are calling on you to commit to increase national NHS spending by £350m a week – that is £18.2bn a year – as soon as this money becomes available by leaving the European Union. This additional funding must be over and above the amount that is currently planned to be spent on the National Health Service.


“Anything else will be a betrayal of the wishes of the British people. We challenge you, when you stand up in the House of Commons on 23 November, to show us the money and commit to Vote Leave’s promise; or explain why you cannot, and why your cabinet colleagues so cynically misled the British people.”


Chuka Umunna, the Labour MP who chairs Vote Leave Watch, said the message to Hammond was that “this Brexit government will not be able to run away from the promises of Brexit campaigners”.


Umunna said: “He has a month to work out how the government are going to find the money to keep this promise. If he can’t his pro-leave colleagues will have to explain why they misled voters during the campaign and are now breaking their promises.”


The full letter and signatories


Dear Chancellor,


We believe in a Britain with an excellent, well-funded public sector that provides a world-class service to the British people, pays its hard-working staff well and treats them with respect.


This was the vision of Britain promised by your cabinet colleagues who campaigned for a leave vote in the EU referendum. Vote Leave promised that, if Britain left the EU, £350m a week extra would be spent on the NHS. They travelled the country in a bus which said: “We send the EU £350m a week, let’s fund our NHS instead.” In the press conference suite at their London headquarters, a large sign read: “Let’s give our NHS the £350m the EU takes every week.”


The foreign secretary, the secretary of state for international trade, the secretary of state for the environment, the secretary of state for transport and the secretary of state for international development all appeared in photo opportunities featuring these messages. They made a very clear promise to the British people, and it is clear that a very large number of people believed this promise.


In your speech to Conservative party conference earlier this month, you said that the message of the referendum result had been “received, loud and clear” by the government. Members of the government talk of the “mandate” from the voters for Brexit.


We accept the verdict of the British people. Yet it is clear that, if this mandate is to mean anything, it must include the single most visible promise of the leave campaign – spending £350m more a week on the NHS.



Chuka Ummuna, the Labour MP who chairs Vote Leave Watch:


Chuka Ummuna, the Labour MP who chairs Vote Leave Watch: ‘this Brexit government will not be able to run away from the promises of Brexit campaigners.’ Photograph: Jack Taylor/Getty Images

In just under a month, you will present your first autumn statement. We are calling on you to commit to increase national NHS spending by £350m a week – that is £18.2bn a year – as soon as this money becomes available by leaving the European Union. This additional funding must be over and above the amount that is currently planned to be spent on the National Health Service.


Anything else will be a betrayal of the wishes of the British people. We challenge you, when you stand up in the House of Commons on 23 November, to show us the money and commit to Vote Leave’s promise; or explain why you cannot, and why your cabinet colleagues so cynically misled the British people.


Yours sincerely,


Chuka Umunna, Chair of Vote Leave Watch


Tom Brake, Patron of Vote Leave Watch


Norman Lamb, Patron of Vote Leave Watch


Emma Reynolds, Patron of Vote Leave Watch


Rushanara Ali


Ian Austin


Adrian Bailey


Kevin Baron


Tom Blenkinsop


Ben Bradshaw


Dawn Butler


Vernon Coaker


Mary Creagh


Stella Creasy


Julie Elliott


Chris Evans


Mike Gapes


Lilian Greenwood


David Hanson


Carolyn Harris


Tristram Hunt


Graham Jones


Stephen Kinnock


Peter Kyle


Caroline Lucas


Holly Lynch


Seema Malhotra


Conor McGinn


Alison McGovern


Ian Murray


Melanie Onn


Toby Perkins


Bridget Philipson


Rachel Reeves


Gavin Shuker


Ruth Smeeth


Angela Smith


Owen Smith


Wes Streeting


Anna Turley


Phil Wilson


John Woodcock



MPs urge chancellor to honour leave campaign"s £350m NHS promise