saving etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
saving etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

10 Mayıs 2017 Çarşamba

Designed by patients: the mental health centre saving the NHS £300,000 a year

Soft, neatly folded blankets hang invitingly over the backs of the modern but comfy armchairs in the Gellinudd Recovery Centre’s communal living room. In the en suite bedrooms, there are white waffle slippers and dressing gowns embroidered with the centre’s tree symbol.


Staff and guests – those who stay are not termed patients – join forces to cook, clean and tend the fruit and veg they then sit down to eat together at Gellinudd, which is the UK’s first inpatient mental health centre to be designed by service users and their carers. “If you’re a psychiatrist you’ll still be expected to be in the kitchen chopping vegetables alongside everyone else,” says the centre’s director, Alison Guyatt.


Over three years, via consultation meetings attended by up to 50 people and annual general meetings attracting as many as 300, service users and carers who are also members of the Welsh charity Hafal, which runs the centre, have influenced everything from the policies and procedures to the decor, facilities and recovery-focused activities on offer.


“They’re the experts,” says Guyatt. “They can say how it feels to be on the receiving end of care, how anxious you would be, what your concerns would be. They have such powerful stories to tell.” The lack of privacy and dignity in hospital settings, together with old and decrepit buildings that provide little access to fresh air, were common themes among those who gave input. “A lot of them feel very clinical, rather than homely and welcoming,” Guyatt says.


Ensuring a different atmosphere at Gellinudd, which opened in April 2017, was therefore critical. Members met the architects in the earliest stages, and Guyatt arranged for furniture makers to bring chairs, tables and beds to consultation events to be tested.


Hafal believes co-produced, recovery-focused services improve outcomes for patients and reduce costs. It has estimated that Gellinudd, which was developed with Big Lottery funding of £1m and £500,000 from the Welsh government’s Invest to Save scheme, will generate year-on-year NHS savings of £300,000 in Wales.


Could the model be copied elsewhere in the UK? Commissioners are increasingly interested in co-production, according to Grazina Berry, director of performance, quality and innovation at the Richmond Fellowship, a voluntary sector mental health support provider that involves its users in shaping services. But the resources to make it happen are not necessarily available.


“We’re seeing many more opportunities coming up which directly ask for co-produced innovations,” Berry says. “But the money to match that isn’t always there because funding is reducing. We as a provider can say we’ll implement a whole range of innovative services. But to prove they work we want to evaluate them, and evaluation costs money.” Berry has no doubt that services designed with users bring better outcomes: “They give power to the people who understand recovery the most.”


At the National Survivor User Network (NSUN), a charity which helps mental health service users shape policy and services, managing director Sarah Yiannoullou believes the extent to which service users are listened to remains patchy. “There are some really good examples where the rhetoric is starting to become the reality, but it’s not consistent,” she says.


“I think we’re still in a system where the medical model is dominant and there’s this culture that the professional still knows best. The problem for the voluntary sector is that quite often what you say works and helps is regarded as anecdotal or dismissed as not credible.”


But it is crucial service users are listened to: “Meaningful, effective involvement can transform people’s lives, improve the quality and efficiency of services and develop the resilience of communities,” says Yiannoullou. “If commissioners and clinicians really listen to us, respect us and treat us as equals then our experience of services will improve.”



Designed by patients: the mental health centre saving the NHS £300,000 a year

20 Şubat 2017 Pazartesi

Hesitant To Ask What’s In That Vaccine? – The 1 Life Saving Question I Urge You To Ask

Despite what you may have been fed by the CDC and their cohorts in the media, vaccines are not an argument of duality.


There are, in fact, 4 different ways of looking at this increasingly important vaccine debate, and they are;


-Pro vax


– Anti vax


– Delayed scheduling vax and


– Selective vaccinating.


Anti vaxxer!”


So, why is it that any time someone questions the safety of vaccines, everyone loses their minds, and starts screaming “Anti vaxxer!” That seems a bit odd to me, as it does to a lot of other sane and rational people that wonder about vaccine safety.


Why is that?


With all 4 opinions of vaccines, safety is supposed to be the paramount consideration, so this is bound be be an emotive subject for everyone.


Ok, so let’s get our logical, scientific and rational thinking caps on for a bit. Forget everything else for a second, and ponder this stand alone statement…


We are INJECTING organic AND INORGANIC substances into our tiny babies.


Inorganic Compounds In All Vaccines


In a 2017 research study it was found that of 44 vaccines, 43 had inorganic compounds in them such as; aluminium, hafnium, tungsten, nickel, antimony, chromium, silver, bismuth, strontium, iron, chromium, lead, cerium, platinum, zinc, gold and zirconium…all injected into human bodies.


That 1 vaccine that did not have inorganic compounds? A cat vaccine.


Can We Agree?


I’m not really sure if an ‘agree to disagree’ attitude is really appropriate on this subject. There is a LOT of money and lying going on and that is why you MUST do the research AND follow EVERY trail back to it’s source AND comprehend what it all means. If you don’t, you MIGHT be putting your child at risk of death or life long disability. NO parent wants that pain, shame and guilt on their conscience!


Ask That 1 Question


Do everyone a favour and ask just this ONE, potentially life saving question, of your doctor: “What’s in it?”


Watch them carefully to see what kind of bluster comes out of them. When requesting to know the ingredients that are in a vaccine, you can expect a lot of different responses.


Those varied responses will range from an indulgent smile (the kind reserved for cheeky children) to out right indignation. Odd responses to a question concerning your child’s safety, I’m sure you will agree.


If You Get Past That 1, Here’s Your Next Question…


What kind of brain dead zombie would do that?” The truth is that there are a million reasons why.


Some just haven’t stumbled upon the hidden-in-plain-sight corruption in the industry, some people are cowed down by fear spewed at them via all media outlets. Some people think that these stories of death and disability couldn’t possibly be true, and others just don’t know how prevalent they are.


My excuse is that, I was young, yes all mine were vaxxed before I thought “Duh! ASK!”


The Life Gift Of Questioning


I got lucky, eventually, that I matured into a nosey and questioning type of person. But, some people find it hard, I get that. Just remember your questions, and keep your child’s safety uppermost in your mind as you resist the fear tactics and pressure exerted to have these shots, that’s IF you don’t want them.


I’m passing this gift of questioning to you, right now, for your children. What’s wrong with asking? Nothing. Everything is right with asking “What is being injected into my child?”


(There’s always a chance that you find the ingredients list acceptable and continue on your merry way with vaccinating your children. I wish you good luck and I’m here for you when you’re ready for your heavy metal detoxing.)


What Information Can You Trust?


I highly recommend starting with Robert Kennedy Jr (RFK), someone that has no financial stake in the outcome of this issue. ALL his 6 kids were vaccinated before he learned what was in them. Even HE didn’t know to ask questions and blindly trusted others to tell him what was safe.


In addition, he has sued 500+ companies when he was litigating the issue of mercury contaminated areas in the U.S. ie when it comes to heavy metal contamination, AND being very familiar with reading scientific research papers, this guy knows what’s going on and has done his research.


One out of every 6 children has a neuro-developmental disorder according to the CDC”


1micro gram equals a trace amount. The flu vaccine has 25micro grams. There are concerns that foetuses of pregnant women could be getting up to 1 million times the CDC safe limits.”RFK Jr


Does that sound like our kids are healthy to you? Doesn’t that statistic seem heartbreakingly absurd!?


More Important Questions


– Who wouldn’t want to make sure what was injected into their child is safe?


Why is there 25micro grams of mercury in some vaccines when the CDC says that only 1micro gram is the safe level of exposure to mercury?


Please, Please, Start Asking Questions!


I can’t urge you any more strongly to thoroughly investigate this issue of what’s in vaccines before you allow anyone to inject your child with them. I’m pretty sure your kids would do it for you!


Remember this well…ALL vaccines, to get approved for use, rely SOLELY on the manufacturers research.


References


https://worldmercuryproject.org/ 


http://vactruth.com/vaccine-inserts/ 


http://files.slobodavockovani.sk/200002051-54955558f5/Gatti_-_New_Quality_Control_Investigations_on_Vaccines_Micro_and_Nanocontamination_-_sk.pdf



Hesitant To Ask What’s In That Vaccine? – The 1 Life Saving Question I Urge You To Ask

4 Ekim 2016 Salı

Nine Tips for Watching Your Weight and Saving Money When Traveling Away from Home

Traveling and eating out are synonymous with one another. When you’re on the road, you’re not planning meals as you normally would at home, and you typically have less time to prepare anything healthy to eat. Most of the time you opt to eat out at restaurants, fast-food joints, or go for snacks throughout the day rather than full meals. While the convenience of these practices is undeniable, it can have a noticeable effect on your health (and on your wallet). Below are nine helpful tips and strategies to keep your heart healthy and your bank account happy.


1. Shop at Local Grocery Stores


While we typically associate traveling with eating out, you would never eat three meals per day at restaurants if you were at home. Eating out not only costs more than buying from a grocery store, but it also pulls funds away from experiencing the area you’re visiting beyond the local cuisine. You can save a substantial amount of spending money by simply saving 1 or 2 (even 3) meals per day from the grocery store. Plan out your grocery lists for breakfast, lunch, and dinner, and leave space for yourself to go out once or twice for each daily meal (so you can still get the local culinary experience). A good hybrid strategy is to find a local market that you can get both groceries and locally grown/distributed items.


2. Try to Avoid Restaurants When Possible


Whether you’re traveling for business or pleasure, being away from home can mean that eating out at diners and restaurants could be your only option. As mentioned above, eating out can drain your finances fast, and according to an article published on OneCape Health News, those meals may be packing more calories than you may be aware of. In fact, “More than 92 percent of the meals studied exceeded caloric recommendations for a single meal.” So eat out sparingly, because your wallet and your health can be affected adversely.


3. Look for Housing with a Kitchen


Many hotels and Airbnbs have kitchens that are available if requested. While this will not always save you money, you will have greater control over your health and calorie intake. This is also a good way to maintain a natural/specialized diet if you’re looking to eat healthier as well as save money.


4. Pack Smart Snacks


Bring what you can. If you’re able to take a box of healthy granola bars on the plane, you should do so. If you can keep your motor running throughout the day and keep everyday meals small, you’ll be able to control your spending, appetite, and health all at once.


5. Don’t JUST Snack – Eat Full Meals, Too


Even though it’s a great penny saver, it’s not always realistic to pack a full set of snacks and meals for a trip. If you can’t avoid spending money on food as you travel, or if you’re unable to carry snacks with you, make sure to consume real meals. A bag of chips, coffee, a scoop of yogurt, and a piece of fruit can end up costing more than a heartier and more satisfying meal. While it might seem cheaper when you look at the lower prices of each item, it also adds up quickly. Ideally, you’re looking for best value (nutritional and price) which isn’t found in the snack section alone (and especially not in an energy drink).


6. Find a Free Lunch


Many conferences and hotels have some free meal that they’ll give away throughout the day. While you won’t be able to control your diet as easily, this can be a good way to supplement eating out and cooking wit


7. Combine Food with Entertainment


Try to keep an eye out for areas where you can combine your meals with an experience. This doesn’t mean you have to go to a fair or a hotdog stand.  You can take a cooking class, or visit a farmer’s market or specialty store. These activities can be a perfect way to ensure cost-effectiveness and personal health/diet.


8. Bring Reusable Water Bottles


This is rather self-explanatory, but the hidden costs of water bottles can add up quickly. Staying hydrated is critically important to living healthy, and can come in handy throughout the day during meals when you’re looking for something to quench your thirst or wash down a sandwich.


9. Find Deals in Advance


You can leverage deal sites like Groupon, Yelp Deals, and TravelZoo to find packages and discounts for restaurants and other meal solutions for a good cost.


Sources:


21 Reasons to Avoid Energy Drinks



16 Ways to Eat Cheap & Save on Food While Traveling on Vacation



How to eat healthy on the road




Nine Tips for Watching Your Weight and Saving Money When Traveling Away from Home

24 Haziran 2014 Salı

Longitude Prize 2014: Saving antibiotics for humanity"s future

• Individuals not finishing the complete course of antibiotics.


• Use in food manufacturing – growth promotion in animals


Incorrect use in these ways means that bacteria and are in a position to produce resistance.


AMR is a worldwide dilemma. Infectious agents recognise no boundaries and borders. In Europe alone 25,000 individuals a 12 months currently die from infections which are resistant to our medicines of final resort. We have reached a vital level and need to act now on a international scale to slow down AMR.


International momentum is creating – last month the Globe Health Organisation released a report on antimicrobial resistance, confirming that WHO now regards AMR as a major threat to public wellness. I was delighted to see that WHO is taking methods to lead a international, coordinated hard work to tackle this dilemma.


It is time to build on this impetus to build a check that can establish the first, and critical, place – if the patient wants an antibiotic at all. If AMR wins the Longitude Prize, some of our brightest minds will concentrate on the growth of a diagnostic device that can confirm a bacterial infection. This is the first phase in conserving antibiotics by guaranteeing that antibiotics are only prescribed for bacterial infections, that means that we can slow the development of resistance.


We truly require one thing that could be utilized across the world – this is the minute to harness the clarion get in touch with to action that has been issued. I urge the public to engage with this wonderful initiative and vote for AMR to win this year’s Longitude Prize.


LONGITUDE PRIZE 2014


The Longitude Prize provides a £10 million prize fund for an innovation that will fix one particular of the major problems of our time. And we can all help to decide which of 6 themes the prize must focus on. The six issues are:


• To assist men and women with dementia live independently for longer


• To assist avoid the rise of resistance to antibiotics


• To support us to be ready to fly without having damaging the setting


• To aid guarantee everybody has nutritious, sustainable meals


• To help restore motion to those with paralysis


• To support ensure absolutely everyone can have entry to protected and clean water


You can vote for the challenge you believe the Longitude Prize need to pursue at bbc.co.united kingdom/horizon. Voting closes at seven.10pm on June 25 2014. The winning challenge will be announced on June 25 and will become the target of the £10 million prize fund. The Longitude Committee will then finalise the criteria for how to win the prize, and from September tips can be submitted. The Longitude Prize will run for up to five many years.



Longitude Prize 2014: Saving antibiotics for humanity"s future

21 Haziran 2014 Cumartesi

Generation Selfie might hold the secret to saving the NHS

At a time when the NHS is struggling to survive – never mind evolve to meet the needs of a society undreamed-of at its inception – as far as Generation Selfie is concerned, if you caused your illness, you pay for your treatment. End of.


None of this bleeding-heart, touchy- feely stuff acknowledging the poverty trap or ignorance or bog-standard depression or just plain bad luck.


It might be a bit hardline, but it comes as something of a tonic after the acquired helplessness created by a broken welfare system.


As Benefits Street so deftly demonstrated, for too many people, working still doesn’t pay, despite Iain Duncan Smith’s ongoing attempts to reform the welfare state, a process he has compared with William Wilberforce’s 18th-century campaign against the slave trade; by which I take it he means, “This is going to be bloody difficult”.


But having said that, the oversimplistic “fat people should pay for their own gastric bands because they are greedy” and “alcoholics should stump up for their own liver transplants” lead to further moral judgments.


“You should have thought about the risk of skin cancer before you booked that villa in Greece”, and “You’re old, it makes more sense to spend all the resources on babies, who, let’s face it, are also cuter”, is the kneejerk response of those of an age when they, quite rightly, consider themselves immortal.


But I think I speak for everyone planning to live beyond 70 when I say we’d prefer a more compassionate National Health Service, thanks.


Shocking figures newly released by the Office for National Statistics show an abrupt rise in “lifestyle” cancers. Liver cancer leapt by 66 per cent from 2003 to 2012, cancers of the mouth are up by 48 per cent, cancer of the womb by 31 per cent and kidney cancer by 46 per cent.


While some of the increase is due to our ageing population, there is no denying that over-consumption of food and booze, cigarettes and sun exposure are doing their worst.


We’re all accustomed to the “how many units of alcohol do you drink a week?” question and the “do you smoke?” inquiry. It’s no exaggeration to say we can expect a questionnaire longer than the average A-level paper. How many pizzas do you eat a month? What’s your daily biscuit intake? Please list the destination of all holidays taken from the age of 11. Include all sun factors used and details of your working.


Can it really be so difficult to change our lifestyles in a bid to not just stay alive, but to feel alive?


Eat less, exercise more. Drink in moderation. Don’t smoke. It’s hardly rocket science, but according to the World Cancer Research Fund, around 80,000 cancer cases could be prevented in this country every year.


I hope it’s not too late for my generation, but for Generation Right, perhaps there’s an upside to their unsentimentality about the NHS.


Their sense of personal responsibility, coupled with a collective agreement that the NHS can’t and won’t fix everyone, might just be enough to prompt them to turn away from excess and choose a healthier path.


Man and mobile are one at last


Hailing, as he does, from north of the border, my husband is not given to public displays of emotion over anything but the really important stuff: Culloden, Tunnock’s teacakes, England losing to Uruguay.


So when on Thursday this week he turned to me and confirmed, misty-eyed as MacDiarmid’s Drunk Man Looking at the Thistle, that he had just undergone the biggest epiphany since the Act of Union, he meant it.


Don’t panic, he wasn’t suddenly persuaded to vote Yes in the forthcoming J  K Rowling referendum on economic disas… sorry, independence. No, on Thursday he went and got himself a mobile phone.


I say “got himself”, but I orchestrated his smartphone rite of passage by selflessly gifting him my sleek new iPhone upgrade.


It was heartbreaking (technologically speaking), but worth it just to witness the conversation in the Carphone Warehouse when my spouse strode in, brandishing a goose quill and asking to place his signature on a contract.


“How many, like, minutes do you spend on your mobile every day?” asked the assistant.


“None. I’ve never had a mobile before.”


“Yeah, but like, how many texts do you send every day?”


“None. I’ve never had a mobile before.”


“Yeah, but like, how many gigs do you use every day?”


And so on.


So he has a phone. For him, it’s Year Zero. And for me?


People, the waiting – in car parks and shops, railway stations and foreign ports, in hospitals and hotels – is finally over. I only hope it was worth it.


Give me some of what you’re on, Victoria, even if it is pink quartz


The future’s bright. In fact, the future’s glittering. Put down your entrepreurial manuals! Bin your business books! Regift that new-and-still-reproachfully-unread Thomas Piketty economics hardback!


Victoria Beckham has spoken. And what has she said? She has said she uses crystals to promote success when she stages her fashion shows.


Yes folks, pink quartz is the new black tourmaline; pop them in your handbag and fame and a photogenic family fathered by a hot husband will be yours, too. Possibly.


It’s easy to laugh. So I do. But I shouldn’t. I, too, have had recourse to the realms of the bizarre and the bonkers.


To wit: I have bought (white) witches’ herbs online and hidden them beneath my daughter’s pillow in an attempt to cure her chronic insomnia.


When faced with paralysis after an accident, my first response (after chanting a decade of the rosary) was to insist my husband contact a faith healer. Oh, and I telephoned a diviner and asked him for help in finding my lost wedding ring and my vintage Cartier watch.


And I bought a money plant in order to – well, that one speaks for itself, really. I initially kept it outdoors, where it failed to thrive in the cold. Two days after I moved it indoors, I won £1,350 worth of premium bonds. Yay! Sadly, it has since died.


I like to think all this reflects a laudable “there are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio” open-mindedness rather than out-and-out lunacy.


I’m a practising Catholic, but I still believe the Holy Ghost isn’t necessarily the only one. When we moved into our house, 11 years ago, there was a crystal hanging from a nail and I haven’t dared move it.


So Victoria, whether you are harnessing the spiritual power of pink quartz or just fiddling about with it in your expensively tailored pocket, I salute you. Or I would, if my fingers weren’t permanently crossed.


Coffee bars are not for kids


From the moment my younger daughter could reach out and grab a wooden brick, she would extend her arm right past it and strain towards my coffee mug instead.


By the time she was cruising round the furniture, her mission wasn’t to strengthen her chubby toddler legs, but to seek out and drink any cold dregs she could find.


Now aged five, she has an illicit passion for strong coffee that would put the Brazilian national team to shame. Three heaped spoonfuls of Nescafé? That’ll do nicely.


I certainly don’t let her drink coffee often. But if she could, she’d be a little caffeine junkie, while her 12-year-old sister has a crippling mocha-latta-chocca-frappuccino habit that costs £3.10 a go.


Maybe this is why I feel uncomfortable about Costa opening small coffee bars in secondary schools, even though it is my favourite of the high street chains. On the scale of stimulants, moreover, the caffeine in coffee is hardly a huge concern; there are 40mg of it in a 100g cup of filtered coffee.


That’s twice the caffeine content of 100g of brewed tea, but “energy shots” such as Ammo contain 570mg per 100g and Jolt Endurance shots have a caffeine level of 339mg per 100g.


But there’s a world of difference between sixth- formers carefully budgeting for coffee in the common room and schoolchildren splashing their (or rather our) cash on the sort of high-end, bespoke beverages most of us couldn’t have afforded in our first jobs. Possibly even our second.


There are so few pleasures that are the exclusive domain of grown-ups. Please let’s keep good coffee one of them.



Generation Selfie might hold the secret to saving the NHS

10 Nisan 2014 Perşembe

Copper Is The New Gold Regular For Saving Lives

“I never go to hospitals, that’s where all the sick people are.”

It’s an old joke, but, unfortunately, it has elements of truth.  Hospitals are indeed dangerous places, and the emerging statistics on hospital-acquired infections (HAI) are more dire than ever.


According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), about 1 in every 25 inpatients has an infection related to hospital care.  Each year, at least 2 million Americans acquire serious bacterial infections that are resistant to one or more of the antibiotics designed to treat them.  At least 23,000 people die each year as a direct result of these antibiotic-resistant infections.  That’s the equivalent to the population of a small city.  HAIs are also very costly.  According to the Journal of Medical Economics, HAIs in U.S. acute-care hospitals lead to direct and indirect costs totaling $ 96 – 147 billion annually.  As shown in the video by Seema Marwaha below, infections can spread quite easily and rapidly through normal daily activities.


One effective strategy for combating these deadly infections is replacing some of the physical surfaces in clinical settings with antimicrobial copper.  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) granted a public health registration to certain copper alloys for its ability to kill specific bacteria, including MRSA and e-coli.  Unlike silver or any other touch-surface metal, copper is recognized by the EPA as being able to continuously kill greater than 99.9% of bacteria that cause hospital-acquired infections (within 2 hours).


Unfortunately, there are a number of misconceptions slowing down the shift towards anti-microbial copper in our hospitals.  Let’s explore a few of the more common myths surrounding copper.


Myth #1:  “We don’t need antimicrobial copper.  We have good compliance with hand-washing in our hospital.”

Fact:  Many hospital executives believe that their staff members wash or sanitize their hands before and after each patient contact, but many studies have found that healthcare providers adhere to national guidelines for hand hygiene less than 50% of the time.  Using antimicrobial copper products are intended to be a supplement to, and not a substitute for, standard infection control practices.  However, its effectiveness is not dependent on the behavioral compliance of medical personnel.  Dr. Archelle Georgiou, former Chief Medical Officer of United Healthcare and currently a strategic advisor to several innovative healthcare companies, added that “Despite the focus on hand washing to combat the HAI problem, bacteria are winning the battle, and antibiotic-resistant superbugs are on the increase.  Why?  Hand washing effectiveness requires that people repetitively comply with a behavioral process, but humans are busy, forgetful, and yes, human.  Compare that to copper’s effectiveness.  Copper kills bacteria within two hours and is effective 24/7 without coaxing, monitoring, or incentives.”


Myth #2:  “Copper is too expensive to install in a hospital.”


Fact:  According to the Copper Development Association, the estimated cost to convert primary surfaces in a hospital room (bed rails, IV poles, tables, chairs, etc.) is estimated to be between $ 7,700 and $ 15,000 per room.  Based on a business model that assumes a 20% reduction in infections (a modest reduction compared to the almost 60% reduction demonstrated in clinical trials), this one-time investment generates a positive return within a year.  Scott Adams, CEO of Pullman Regional Hospital, added that “installing copper in just about 10 percent of surfaces in an ICU can cut hospital acquired infections by 58 percent.  Data like this clearly supports our ongoing commitment.  The cost of adding some copper surfaces in our facility far outweighs the financial and personal costs of ongoing care and prolonged illness in our patients.”


 


Myth #3:  “Copper hospital equipment is hard to get and product supply is limited.”


Fact:  The number of antimicrobial products skyrocketed after the EPA registration in 2008.  Currently, there are more than a dozen manufacturers in the U.S. and around the world using antimicrobial copper alloys to produce bedrails, handrails, door handles, grab bars, IV poles, trays and carts, sinks and faucets, computer keyboards, and face plates.  One of the largest companies to launch a collection of antimicrobial copper products is Ingersoll Rand, with its suite of ActivClean™ products.


Myth #4:  “Copper is an ugly orange color and it tarnishes.”


Fact:  More than 450 antimicrobial copper alloys are available, with colors ranging from red to yellow to silvery-gray.  The color and tarnishing properties are dependent on the alloy mixture.  Those with higher percentages of nickel more closely resemble the silver tone of stainless steel and do not tarnish.


Copper is rapidly becoming the new “Gold Standard” in patient safety.  The evidence seems clear that selectively converting physical surfaces in hospitals and other clinical settings to antimicrobial copper can reduce the spread of infection and save lives.


Robert J. Szczerba is the CEO of X Tech Ventures and author of the Forbes column “Rocket Science Meets Brain Surgery.”  Follow him via TwitterFacebook, or LinkedIn.



Copper Is The New Gold Regular For Saving Lives

Copper Is The New Gold Standard For Saving Lives

“I never go to hospitals, that’s where all the sick people are.”

It’s an old joke, but, unfortunately, it has elements of truth.  Hospitals are indeed dangerous places, and the emerging statistics on hospital-acquired infections (HAI) are more dire than ever.


According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), about 1 in every 25 inpatients has an infection related to hospital care.  Each year, at least 2 million Americans acquire serious bacterial infections that are resistant to one or more of the antibiotics designed to treat them.  At least 23,000 people die each year as a direct result of these antibiotic-resistant infections.  That’s the equivalent to the population of a small city.  HAIs are also very costly.  According to the Journal of Medical Economics, HAIs in U.S. acute-care hospitals lead to direct and indirect costs totaling $ 96 – 147 billion annually.  As shown in the video by Seema Marwaha below, infections can spread quite easily and rapidly through normal daily activities.


One effective strategy for combating these deadly infections is replacing some of the physical surfaces in clinical settings with antimicrobial copper.  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) granted a public health registration to certain copper alloys for its ability to kill specific bacteria, including MRSA and e-coli.  Unlike silver or any other touch-surface metal, copper is recognized by the EPA as being able to continuously kill greater than 99.9% of bacteria that cause hospital-acquired infections (within 2 hours).


Unfortunately, there are a number of misconceptions slowing down the shift towards anti-microbial copper in our hospitals.  Let’s explore a few of the more common myths surrounding copper.


Myth #1:  “We don’t need antimicrobial copper.  We have good compliance with hand-washing in our hospital.”

Fact:  Many hospital executives believe that their staff members wash or sanitize their hands before and after each patient contact, but many studies have found that healthcare providers adhere to national guidelines for hand hygiene less than 50% of the time.  Using antimicrobial copper products are intended to be a supplement to, and not a substitute for, standard infection control practices.  However, its effectiveness is not dependent on the behavioral compliance of medical personnel.  Dr. Archelle Georgiou, former Chief Medical Officer of United Healthcare and currently a strategic advisor to several innovative healthcare companies, added that “Despite the focus on hand washing to combat the HAI problem, bacteria are winning the battle, and antibiotic-resistant superbugs are on the increase.  Why?  Hand washing effectiveness requires that people repetitively comply with a behavioral process, but humans are busy, forgetful, and yes, human.  Compare that to copper’s effectiveness.  Copper kills bacteria within two hours and is effective 24/7 without coaxing, monitoring, or incentives.”


Myth #2:  “Copper is too expensive to install in a hospital.”


Fact:  According to the Copper Development Association, the estimated cost to convert primary surfaces in a hospital room (bed rails, IV poles, tables, chairs, etc.) is estimated to be between $ 7,700 and $ 15,000 per room.  Based on a business model that assumes a 20% reduction in infections (a modest reduction compared to the almost 60% reduction demonstrated in clinical trials), this one-time investment generates a positive return within a year.  Scott Adams, CEO of Pullman Regional Hospital, added that “installing copper in just about 10 percent of surfaces in an ICU can cut hospital acquired infections by 58 percent.  Data like this clearly supports our ongoing commitment.  The cost of adding some copper surfaces in our facility far outweighs the financial and personal costs of ongoing care and prolonged illness in our patients.”


 


Myth #3:  “Copper hospital equipment is hard to get and product supply is limited.”


Fact:  The number of antimicrobial products skyrocketed after the EPA registration in 2008.  Currently, there are more than a dozen manufacturers in the U.S. and around the world using antimicrobial copper alloys to produce bedrails, handrails, door handles, grab bars, IV poles, trays and carts, sinks and faucets, computer keyboards, and face plates.  One of the largest companies to launch a collection of antimicrobial copper products is Ingersoll Rand, with its suite of ActivClean™ products.


Myth #4:  “Copper is an ugly orange color and it tarnishes.”


Fact:  More than 450 antimicrobial copper alloys are available, with colors ranging from red to yellow to silvery-gray.  The color and tarnishing properties are dependent on the alloy mixture.  Those with higher percentages of nickel more closely resemble the silver tone of stainless steel and do not tarnish.


Copper is rapidly becoming the new “Gold Standard” in patient safety.  The evidence seems clear that selectively converting physical surfaces in hospitals and other clinical settings to antimicrobial copper can reduce the spread of infection and save lives.


Robert J. Szczerba is the CEO of X Tech Ventures and author of the Forbes column “Rocket Science Meets Brain Surgery.”  Follow him via TwitterFacebook, or LinkedIn.



Copper Is The New Gold Standard For Saving Lives

29 Mart 2014 Cumartesi

Daylight saving switch and misplaced sleep boost heart attack chance, review says

Switching more than to daylight saving time and dropping 1 hour of rest raised the threat of possessing a heart attack the following Monday by 25%, compared to other Mondays in the course of the year, according to a new US study released on Saturday.


By contrast, heart assault chance fell 21% later on in the year, on the Tuesday after the clock was returned to common time, and men and women acquired an additional hour’s rest.


The not-so-subtle impact of moving the clock forward and backward was noticed in a comparison of hospital admissions from a database of non-federal Michigan hospitals. It examined admissions just before the start off of daylight saving time and the Monday immediately right after, for four consecutive many years.


In basic, heart attacks historically arise most typically on Monday mornings, possibly due to the anxiety of commencing a new operate week and inherent changes in our sleep-wake cycle, stated Dr Amneet Sandhu, a cardiology fellow at the University of Colorado in Denver who led the research.


“With daylight conserving time, all of this is compounded by 1 significantly less hour of rest,” explained Sandhu, who presented his findings at the annual scientific sessions of the American School of Cardiology in Washington.


A link in between lack of rest and heart attacks has been witnessed in previous scientific studies. But Sandhu explained authorities even now do not have a clear understanding of why people are so sensitive to rest-wake cycles. “Our study suggests that sudden, even modest adjustments in sleep could have detrimental effects,” he explained.


Sandhu examined about 42,000 hospital admissions in Michigan, and found that an common of 32 sufferers had heart attacks on any given Monday. But on the Monday right away following springing the clock forward, there had been an regular of eight extra heart attacks, he said.


The all round number of heart attacks for the full week right after daylight saving time didn’t modify, just the quantity on that initial Monday. The number then dropped off the other days of the week.


Folks who are previously vulnerable to heart illness may be at greater threat proper right after sudden time changes, mentioned Sandhu, who additional that hospital staffing should probably be improved on the Monday soon after clocks are set forward.


“If we can recognize days when there could be surges in heart attacks, we can be prepared to much better care for our individuals,” he mentioned.


The clock typically moves ahead in the spring, so that evenings have a lot more daylight and mornings have much less, and returns to regular time in the fall. Daylight saving time was extensively adopted in the course of Planet War I to conserve power, but some critics have questioned whether it truly does so and whether or not it is even now needed.


Researchers cited limitations to the research, noting it was limited to one state and heart attacks that essential artery-opening procedures, this kind of as stents. The research therefore excluded patients who died prior to hospital admission or intervention.



Daylight saving switch and misplaced sleep boost heart attack chance, review says

10 Ocak 2014 Cuma

3.2 million think there is "no point" saving for old age as it will be swallowed by care payments

1 current review estimated that more than a million families have had to sell their property in the last five many years alone in order to pay out care payments for loved-ones.


With council budgets below intense strain, much more than 450,000 frail elderly and disabled men and women who would have acquired state assistance for the care even a handful of years ago are now shut out of the technique, academics at the London School of Economics have calculated.


Ministers say the package of reforms ought to lastly allow individuals to stay away from “catastrophic” care costs enough certainty about how considerably they may possibly have to pay to allow them to make strategies.


But polling, carried out for Age United kingdom, suggests that the reforms have so far failed to persuade sufficient reassurance to individuals to program for their potential requirements.


It comes soon after ministers were accused of betraying elderly folks right after it grew to become clear that a promised “universal” scheme meant to avert people having to promote their home to pay for care would not be available to hose with modest cost savings.


The TNS survey identified that nearly three in ten men and women in excess of 50 – the equivalent of five.8 million folks in mainland Britain – are no longer conserving for their future needs specifically because they believe there is basically “no point”.


Of individuals who took that view a lot more than half especially singled out a see that anything they conserve now “will just be taken away later” when they need to have care. That equates to about 3.2 million men and women.


Age Uk warned that a lack of clarity from the Government about how the fine print of changes could be fuelling he uncertainty and failing in its essential aim of providing folks the protection they need to prepare for their outdated age.


Caroline Abrahams, director of Age United kingdom, said: “The Government demands to give individuals a sensible notion of what the can assume to be paying for in the future.


“There is an urgent want for a frank and truthful debate about the funding of care and who will have to shell out for what.”


Ruth Isden, the charity’s head of public solutions, stated: “If we are seeking at a method which was made to motivate individuals to save in direction of the value of later lifestyle and care by making an attempt to give some certainty about the expenses and it seems to be like in reality it is not encouraging individuals men and women to do so, then it is not going as far as it demands to go.”


She added: “Anything that discourages individuals from conserving in putting the right programs and preparations in area for their later existence is not going to be a constructive improvement.


“This is partly historical and partly the truth the people really do not really recognize the new technique but, that is why in our view the Government genuinely does need to step up and make certain that it is clear to individuals what they need to have to do.


“The worst point would be if people both consider that it is all sorted and they really don’t require to be concerned any much more or due to the fact of the way they consider the new technique is going to pan out they really don’t strategy any financial savings then we are not actually making certain the enhancements we need to have to see.”



3.2 million think there is "no point" saving for old age as it will be swallowed by care payments