significantly etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
significantly etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

24 Şubat 2017 Cuma

Cancer patients could be significantly disadvantaged by Brexit, say experts

British cancer patients could be left “significantly disadvantaged” by the UK’s departure from the EU, leading oncologists have said, as collaboration with European scientists has been vital to making breakthroughs in the field.


In an editorial published on Friday in the ecancermedicalscience journal, six doctors, representing cancer physicians, patient advocacy groups and genomics researchers, said the UK government must be prepared to fill in the gaps in law, regulation and resource allocation that would open up after Brexit.


“It’s important that the UK’s cancer researchers and cancer care providers watch the ‘Brexit space’ very closely,” they wrote. “We need to take every opportunity to remind the UK government that cancer patients and cancer research could be significantly disadvantaged, unless great care is deployed in the negotiations of the legal and economic frameworks which will govern the UK’s relationship with the EU beyond Brexit.”


The authors are the Nobel prize winner Sir Paul Nurse, CEO of the Francis Crick Institute; Peter Selby, the president of the Association of Cancer Physicians UK; Mark Lawler, the chair of transnational cancer genomics at Queens University Belfast’s Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology; Richard Baird, a consultant at the Cambridge Breast Cancer Research Institute; Ian Banks, vice-president for patient advocacy at the European Cancer Concord; and Patrick Johnston, vice-chancellor of Queens University Belfast.


Lawler said: “It is vital that UK researchers continue to perform high-quality science that leads to new diagnostic tests and therapies for cancer patients. Research is no longer an ivory tower silo-type pursuit – collaboration is the key.


“UK scientists contribute greatly to the European research effort while having scientists from different countries working within our research institutions and hospitals contributes greatly to our battle against cancer.”


The authors, who in May argued the case for voting remain, said the consequences of the Brexit vote were unlcear, but expressed a lack of confidence over current regulatory structures being replaced by the UK government.


“There are widely held concerns among the cancer community,” they wrote. “Brexit would mean that the EU directive no longer applied in the UK, which is of concern to the manufacturers of devices and tests unless the EU and the UK share regulatory frameworks in future to allow ready import and export of devices/tests.”


Another complication is the fact that the headquarters of the European Medicines Agency is in London. “It is also possible that the EMA would not feel it appropriate to have its headquarters in a country not fully part of the EU,” Lawler said.


“If the EMA was to move to another jurisdiction, then the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) would have to step up to take over certain regulatory activities and conduct cooperations with other global regulators.”


The uncertainty about funding, Lawler said, could discourage senior researchers from relocating to the UK, particularly if they felt that prestigious funding such as European council grants were no longer available to them.


“Anecdotally, a number of UK institutions have already indicated that pre-Brexit recruits have turned down positions due to uncertainties related to continued EU funding,” he said.


Genetic analysis of tumour samples can help decide what course of treatment is best for individual patients, and help researchers fully understand the mutations behind many cancers. One recently announced international project, Harmony, seeks to centralise and make better use of genetic data from blood cancer patients across Europe. But a key issue is how sensitive patient data is handled.


“There would be considerable uncertainty about the movement of personal research data between the EU and the UK,” Lawler said. “Data protection regulations would influence UK companies wishing to trade in services to individuals within the EU. All of this is likely to be the subject of complex negotiations.


“We need to break down data silos not build them up. It is vital for cancer research and most importantly for our patients that we share information that can help to identify new targets for cancer therapy.”


After Brexit, the group wrote, the UK will have to establish its regulations for clinical trials with a view to achieving the minimum necessary bureaucracy, as well as compatibility with other European countries for multinational trials.


They noted that some assurances have been offered: it has been agreed that current EU funding held by UK individuals and institutions will be honoured, and the government is talking about increasing the total spend available for research, within which cancer might figure significantly.


“But will they continue to fund researchers who compete successfully for European grants? That is the key question that needs to be answered,” Lawler said.


The Guardian has contacted the Department of Health for comment.



Cancer patients could be significantly disadvantaged by Brexit, say experts

17 Ağustos 2015 Pazartesi

How To Sweat Significantly less In A Hot Climate

Sweat is the way our bodies cool down. When it is hot, we sweat more as our skin reply to the heat increasing and activates the mechanism of lively cooling. Partially the way we sweat depends on our genes. Genetics is not a sentence, although, and men and women can develop what they got with their genes. The exact same goes with sweat glands. For instance, folks, who have been engaged in active sports activities in their childhood, have a lot more designed sweat glands than those who preferred calmer actions. If you are from the 2nd group, there are some ways to reduce excessive sweating and make summertime far more pleasant.


Lower down physical routines


When we make big physical efforts to do exercise routines, we naturally sweat a lot more. The tougher we function out, the far more sweat there is. So, the right way right here can be to slow down a bit and revise your exercising method for the scorching climate. You sweat significantly less if you do the exact same exercise routines when it is not so scorching, appropriate? If so, it may possibly be the situation.


Alter your menu     


Often the extreme sweating is connected to your eating habits. For example, wine, scorching and spicy meals, coffee, soda, and so on. stimulate superfluous sweat. You can commence creating an consuming journal and describe your sweating circumstance right after specified merchandise it’ll assist you see some other meals that influence your sweating.


Decide on the right deodorant


Another easy way to lessen sweating is to locate your excellent deodorant. It is advisable to have a single with no scent or with a barely obvious one, as you can apply it not only on your armpits, but on other sweating areas. It is greater to apply it twice a day – prior to going to sleep and in the morning.


Modify your physique to heat


Yet another way is to modify your entire body to heat. I’ve already mentioned how our bodies react to heat: really do not keep away from working out, just lower the load and go to sauna a couple of occasions a weak. Sauna can actually aid your entire body adapt to the heat. This adapting can get a number of weeks, but it is absolutely really worth it.


Change your clothing


And the final, but also quite essential tip is to decide on the correct clothing for summer time. It shouldn’t be made of synthetic fabrics that wouldn’t allow your entire body breathe. Select great outfits, even if it will value you a bit more.


Hopefully, these suggestions were valuable for you. Take very good care of your physique, specially in summertime.


About the writer


The writer of the article is a career coach, speaker and licensed educator. She also writes educational content articles and blogs for EssayJedii.


Assets:


– Fitnessmagazine.com


– Everydayhealth.com



How To Sweat Significantly less In A Hot Climate

26 Haziran 2014 Perşembe

A healthier society is just as significantly about neighborhood as healthcare

A colleague in the States was telling me about a meeting he’d had with a campaigner from the Jamaica Plain neighbourhood in Boston. “She pointed out to me: ‘This town has significantly increased amounts of cancer than the rest of the state, notably amongst ladies. What would it mean to develop a cancer-free of charge, toxin-free of charge economic climate?’ When she stated that, a lot of bells rang in my head.”


They rang in my head as well. Over the previous handful of months, the Reside Much better Challenge has brought stories of inspirational tasks about the world developing foods, managing waste, saving and generating vitality in new ways. This kind of issues are normally imagined of as environmental, or sustainability initiatives. But how different may items seem if we were to reimagine them as public overall health initiatives?


When you believe about it, practically almost everything we want to do to create far more resilient, reduce-carbon communities would also aid develop cancer-free, healthier communities. Whether or not it is creating community renewable power firms, beginning urban food production tasks, marketing cycling, retrofitting houses, they all promote public well being. One particular could even argue that nearby currencies this kind of as the Bristol Pound, diversifying and strengthening regional economies and enabling community investment, must also be noticed as public wellness initiatives.


In the world of public wellness this conversation is currently taking area. In March this year, the Lancet published the exceptional Manifesto for Planetary Well being, calling for “a social movement to assistance collective public overall health action at all levels of society – personal, neighborhood, nationwide, regional, worldwide, and planetary. Our aim is to reply to the threats we face: threats to human overall health and wellbeing, threats to the sustainability of our civilisation, and threats to the all-natural and human-produced techniques that assistance us.”


I spoke to Martin McKee, professor of public overall health at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medication and 1 of the authors of the manifesto. He mentioned: “Individuals men and women who want to promote a healthier, safer, higher-high quality setting as nicely as the health of the population have significantly in typical. We ought to be operating together in some coalition of the inclined to try out and make the globe a better place.”


For David Pencheon, director of the NHS Sustainable Development Unit, this coming collectively is previously occurring, just not nevertheless at the scale necessary: “Hospitals could be wellness-improving civic structures … could they supply vitality via district neighborhood heating systems, biomass, mixed heat and energy? Could they offer allotments, could they supply green spaces, could they provide areas the place folks could truly see what it looks like to dwell healthier lives? Could they have great meals shops in the concourses, could they have honest trade coffee in the concourses? All of individuals issues sound really visionary. But really every single 1 of these issues is occurring now, but sporadically in isolated examples”.


Some NHS trusts have begun, or linked to, foods expanding projects, and are taking daring methods about renewable vitality. Some are doing work with “green fitness center” initiatives, and what’s referred to as “social prescribing”, in which men and women are prescribed environmental conservation or horticultural operate. Nottinghamshire Healthcare Believe in have altered their meals procurement so they now source 90% of fruit, vegetables and meat from inside of thirty miles of the hospital, an injection of £2m into the local economic climate every single year.


Islington council in London, together with NHS Islington, have started out a Seasonal Health Intervention Network (Shine) which seeks to decrease fuel poverty, seasonal deaths and hospital emissions, providing tips on energy efficiency and finances. It has led to the thousands of participants conserving £455,000 from their power payments. The Houghton-le-Spring Major Care Centre in Sunderland, a state-of-the-art ecological developing, combines well being and social care services, with an emphasis on workout and health.


But how might communities themselves try out to initiate this kind of an technique when it is not coming from their wellness providers? A single illustration is underway in Devon, led by transition town Totnes. Caring Town Totnes is an initiative functioning to carry folks from across the spectrum of care, wellbeing and public health collectively in the face of the austerity cuts. Their Totnes Welfare Conference in October 2013 brought collectively people from across the community involved in care, and was followed by a nicely-attended wellness and welfare day. They are now searching to develop a local community hub and seeing this various strategy as a catalyst for new livelihoods, new social enterprises, new models of social investment, peer-to-peer lending, skill sharing, and linking to wider financial localisation operate in the town. As David Pencheon says: “It is definitely clear that public wellness is by far the very best investment we could make in regional, meaningful, resilient, sustainable communities in which it is just a much greater spot to reside.”


My aim is set the very same bells ringing in your head as the conversation in Jamaica Plain set ringing in mine. At its root, this calls for some joined-up contemplating. For instance, it no longer tends to make sense to search at food procurement in isolation from how a hospital’s grounds are managed, who manages them, what’s taking place in the wider neighborhood in terms of neighborhood foods, social prescribing inside the hospital and so on. We need to have to join these issues up. The positive aspects of performing so could tackle more concerns simultaneously than we may well have ever believed attainable. Public healthcare as the catalyst for a local financial revolution? Why not?


Rob Hopkins is co-founder of the Transition Network and Transition Town Totnes. You can go through a lot more of his pondering on this topic right here.


Interested in obtaining out far more about how you can dwell much better? Take a search at this month’s Dwell Much better Challenge right here.


The Reside Better Challenge is funded by Unilever its emphasis is sustainable living. All material is editorially independent except for pieces labelled advertisement attribute. Discover out much more right here.



A healthier society is just as significantly about neighborhood as healthcare

8 Haziran 2014 Pazar

NHS "failing disabled and significantly sick teenagers" transferred to grownup solutions

Teenager Using Bedside Telephone in a Childrens Ward NHS Hospital London

Prof Field stated a single young patient informed him she had stopped making use of adult providers as she felt the attitude towards her was ‘poor and patronising’. Photograph: Alamy




The NHS is failing disabled and seriously sick teens by depriving them of essential companies this kind of as ache relief when they grow to be adults, the service’s watchdog warns right now.


In a highly vital report published on Monday the Care Quality Commission (CQC) castigates doctors and hospitals for leaving vulnerable young folks baffled and stressed when they begin becoming cared for as grownups by different wellness professionals.


Too numerous of the 40,000 beneath-18s in England with complicated and tough well being wants end up dropping access to key solutions they have relied on considering that childhood – this kind of as help with their mobility, breathing and swallowing – as they undergo what can be a quite challenging “transition” to becoming handled as grownups, the CQC says.


They contain younger individuals with often profound bodily disabilities, continual situations this kind of as diabetes and existence-threatening illnesses this kind of as cystic fibrosis.


Prof Steve Field, the CQC’s chief inspector of main health-related solutions and integrated care, said: “This report describes a wellness and social-care technique that is not functioning, that is letting down desperately unwell youngsters at a critical time in their lives. We have put the interests of a method that is no longer match for function above the interests of the men and women it is supposed to serve.


“In an age exactly where individuals can obtain organ transplants, keyhole surgeries and targeted cancer therapies, it really is actually disappointing that the standard care needs of many young folks with physical disabilities and other prolonged-phrase well being requirements are not currently being met,” added Area, a GP and ex-chair of the Royal University of GPs.


The CQC’s evaluation of care for this kind of younger men and women prior to, during and following the switch to grownup companies identified a host of troubles. They incorporated that “Some children’s health or treatment companies stopped at sixteen but there was no grownup support available right up until they had been 18. This resulted in crucial care getting efficiently withdrawn,” the report says.


The overview, based on the knowledge of 180 young individuals aged 14 to 25 or their dad and mom, identified that “from the standpoint of a lot of households we spoke to, transition by means of health was un-coordinated and often sudden. For some, it caused excellent tension and nervousness.”


In addition, current national advice on how to assistance them is typically ignored or medical professionals are unaware of it. Discipline also found “inconsistent and often poor details and planning from children’s services for younger individuals and their dad and mom about the changes they can expect as they move into grownup solutions. This led to a lack of comprehending of the method of transition.”


One particular parent summed up their child’s transfer to adult health care companies by saying: “From the pond, you are picked up and put in the sea.”


Area explained that a single youthful girl he had spoken to had felt so badly handled by adult providers that she stopped using them. “As a youngster she was being taken care of as a human getting whereas when she was transferred to grownup providers she felt the frame of mind in direction of her was poor and patronising,” he stated. As well many hospital doctors’ attitudes towards younger people who had transferred into their care was “outdated and paternalistic”, he explained.


Anna Bird, head of policy and research at Scope, the disability charity, explained: “Several young disabled people uncover that their good quality of lifestyle can ‘nose-dive’ when they move from childhood solutions into the adult world. They struggle to get their health demands met but also to find perform, to proceed their training and to discover a ideal place to live.”


Prof Gillian Leng, the deputy chief executive of the Nationwide Institute for Overall health and Care Excellence (Good), stated that “for a lot of young people on the cusp of adulthood, moving among overall health and social-care solutions can be a tumultuous and nerve-racking time. A poor transition between youngster and adult solutions can have a profound and prolonged-lasting unfavorable influence on a person’s existence.


“The last thing we want is for young people to fall between the gap in little one and grownup services and not get the support or care they require.” Her organisation is drawing up new advice to assist remedy the issues identified.


Area stressed that the CQC had uncovered some examples of excellent care. Even so, the NHS needed to undertake urgent technique-broad change, with GPs taking part in a essential part in smoothing the transition process, he stated.




NHS "failing disabled and significantly sick teenagers" transferred to grownup solutions

7 Haziran 2014 Cumartesi

Research exhibits you pretty significantly what ever you want


I do not know whether or not it is late-blooming hay fever, which they tell me is rampant, or much more probably the sinus infection that drops unerringly to my chest each and every yr, but every single cloud, as they say it appears that my refusal to resort to the final-chance alternative of a program of antibiotics may possibly pay out off. Great outdated “research shows” has come up with the irrefutable evidence (which, of course, will be dismissed within the week by new “research evidence”) that antibiotics make you body fat. So I might carry on to wheeze and cough, but at least I’ll be preserving my racing-snake figure. I can image my headstone even now: “Here lies the fittest man in the graveyard.”




I’ve ranted on about the healthcare profession’s obsession with the parlous health results of obesity prior to, so I’ll spare you, except to say that if getting obese is doing this kind of injury, how is it that we’re all living longer?




More “research shows” that if you go through even though you are sitting, you’ll reasonably burn up off the calories. Just sitting there, mumchance, hunting vacantly out the window, wondering if you must get up and make a cup of tea, will do you no very good at all, but it seems that people who sit with a excellent book for 75 minutes get rid of a hundred calories. Disappointingly, this calorie-burning is not due to eyeball motion but the vitality needed in the fingers to hold a guide and flip the pages. On the basis of this very good news, if you sit and wiggle your ears for a couple of minutes, it is as good as a stroll in the park.




Really do not just sit there, do one thing – something – but don’t go away on holiday or, in accordance to the latest Dutch study, you will uncover your self with a cold or infection as soon as you hit your favourite costa. As quickly as the stress of function eases and you start the chilling process, that’s when the actual chill strikes at chest or kidneys. “Leisure sickness” they contact it.




Of course, you could have presently caught it on the plane, the place (additional “research shows”) you are a hundred occasions more probably to catch a cold than in your regular existence on land. That’s if you haven’t got a toothache, which can be triggered by air travel. Modify in altitude, you see.




So, if you want a filling, really don’t go skiing, or up the Himalayas either.


The excellent news is that the effects of a holiday fade away in significantly less than a week.


A lot of many years in the past, a buddy of mine posited the concept, without having the help of any analysis, that most of the difficulties in the world was caused by people crossing the street. If everyone just caught to their very own side of the street, we’d all be a great deal happier. I would go additional don’t get out of bed, and if you need to, in no way go outside the front door. It is a minefield out there.




Research exhibits you pretty significantly what ever you want

27 Mayıs 2014 Salı

Dear Washington: consider severe mental sickness significantly. It"s a matter of lifestyle and death | Rep Tim Murphy

In the practically 12 months and a half since I have been investigating America’s broken psychological wellness technique – even with my 30-year background in clinical psychology – I have been shocked to discover just how considerably our country has failed these with significant psychological sickness.


Get Elliot Rodger, a 22-yr-old whose instability was known, but went overlooked ahead of he killed 6 school college students and himself in California more than the weekend. Or get Gus Deeds, yet another younger man who was in mental wellness crisis but was denied extended inpatient care before he killed himself and stabbed his father, a Virginia state senator. There was Adam Lanza in Connecticut, Jared Loughner in Tucson, James Holmes in Aurora, Aaron Alexis at the Washington Navy Yard, and on and on.


All had untreated or undertreated severe mental sickness. All spiraled out of manage inside a method that lacked the simple mechanisms to help.


mental well being beds above time

Whilst these are severe cases, they highlight how our broken technique does not respond until finally right after a crisis when we could be carrying out some thing to quit it from taking place. But even in the face of tragedy, we are also uncomfortable to acknowledge the information because the final bastion of stigma in mental overall health considerations these with critical mental illness.


The information are that psychological sickness is a brain ailment, and of the 9.6m individuals in this country with a severe psychological illness – like schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or key clinical depression – approximately 40% will not even get treatment this 12 months.


We have identified it less complicated to focus the two the discussion and public sources on gauzy packages for “behavioral wellness” and “emotional nicely-being” than to confront the agonizing actuality that these with schizophrenia or serious psychosis are a lot more probably to up with no care (four.4m), homeless (250,000), in prison or on parole (1.3m), or dead by or trying suicide (1.38m) than in appropriate psychiatric remedy (roughly 4m).


federal funding mental health

The time has come that we approach critical mental illness as a healthcare emergency demanding an method ideal described as “crisis psychiatry”. Which is the basis for a bill I very first introduced six months ago, the Assisting Households in Mental Health Crisis Act. My legislation fixes the shortage of psychiatric hospital beds, clarifies HIPAA privacy laws so families are portion of frontline care delivery crew, and aids sufferers get treatment method effectively prior to their sickness spirals into crisis.


In contrast to newer, more restricted legislation that lacks bipartisan help, my bill represents a extensive and broad-ranging overhaul, delivering acute psychiatric care to the most vulnerable. None of the difficult concerns surrounding significant mental sickness are taken up in a competing measure offered by Rep Ron Barber of Arizona.


Placing a lot more funds into the current failed technique will do absolutely nothing to avert the following Elliot Rodger, nor will it support the millions of households caring for a loved one particular with an acute untreated psychiatric sickness who refuses treatment and lacks insight into their problem.


And most assuredly, preserving the standing quo will only serve the monetary interests of legal advocates and anti-psychiatry activists who get federal taxpayer dollars to in fact stop patients from obtaining treatment and direct them into the criminal justice method or homelessness.


The status quo is not just uncompassionate it is inhumane.


Now is the time for courage just before yet another tragedy unfolds. For the hundreds of thousands of families in psychological well being crisis, we should have the courage to reject the failed status quo and provide true answers to aid SMI patients get life-saving therapy and recover. When it comes to conserving lives, there can be no compromise.


Rep Tim Murphy is a Republican US Representative from Pennsylvania and a training psychologist.


Interactive report: America’s psychological wellness care crisis, part a single – households left to fill the void of a broken technique



Dear Washington: consider severe mental sickness significantly. It"s a matter of lifestyle and death | Rep Tim Murphy

20 Mayıs 2014 Salı

Examine: Airplane Tray Tables Carry Significantly More Than Your Soda And Pretzels

We presently know that planes are airborne petri dishes, and that 1 open-mouthed sneeze can spread influenza through a cabin quicker than you can say “Blue Christmas.” But a new study suggests that it is not so significantly what you inhale on planes that brings about the genuinely massive issues, but what you touch.


Researchers from Auburn University coated surfaces in an airplane with two specifically virulent bugs: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (far better identified as the superbug MRSA, which kills about 19,000 men and women in the U.S. every single year), and E. coli bacteria, a germ responsible for abdominal cramping, nausea and diarrhea. The purpose of the experiment–conducted on behalf of the Federal Aviation Administration–was to locate out how extended these germs can survive and continue to be transmittable in the cabin of a normal airplane.




Micrograph of Methicillin-Resistant Staphyloco... Micrograph of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (Photo credit score: NIAID)




Researchers chose six surfaces that people frequently touch, like armrests, seatback tray tables, cloth magazine pockets, and the metal manage used to flush the toilet. Temperature and humidity in the cabin were controlled to emulate real problems, and researchers mixed the germs with three solutions that are frequent on airplanes: saline, simulated sweat and simulated saliva.


Here’s what they discovered:


MRSA survived for up to 168 hrs on cloth seatback pockets.


E. coli survived for 96 hours on armrests, 72 hours on tray tables, and 48 hrs on toilets.


The germs had been not, even so, transmittable for the duration of their lifespans on all of the surfaces.  When carried in sweat or saliva on porous materials (like cloth magazine pockets and armrests), MRSA was only transmittable about 1.1 % of the time after 24 hours and lost its effect completely after 48 hrs. But, when deposited in sweat on nonporous surfaces like tray tables, its transmission price was almost 45%.


E. coli remained hugely transmittable on tray tables even soon after 72 hrs.


The massive caveat for all of these outcomes is that researchers did not check the impact of cleaning goods on the germs. If airline personnel are doing their jobs, the charge of transmission for these and other pathogens need to, at least theoretically, be a lot reduce.


The takeaway from these findings is that we should maintain carrying out what we must have previously been carrying out – washing our hands early and usually. That, along with deciding on a bit far more meticulously what we touch (if you can avoid sticking your hand into the seat pocket, that would most likely be a very good thought) need to be ample to keep infection costs manageable.


Oh, and greatest to believe twice just before consuming your pretzels or peanuts right off the tray table.


The review results had been presented at a meeting of the American Society for Microbiology.


You can find David DiSalvo on Twitter @neuronarrative, at his website The Everyday Brain, and on YouTube at Your Brain Channel. His newest book is Brain Changer: How Harnessing Your Brain’s Energy To Adapt Can Modify Your Life.



Examine: Airplane Tray Tables Carry Significantly More Than Your Soda And Pretzels

21 Nisan 2014 Pazartesi

The New Yorker Claims Biotech Accomplishment Means Drug Growth Now Significantly less Risky: Say What?

Biotech researchers and traders – to say absolutely nothing of the patients waiting desperately for new medicines – may possibly conclude from the latest New Yorker that their difficulties are more than.


According to a new, otherwise thoughtful piece about drug pricing by James Surowiecki, the recent run-up in biopharma stocks (preceding the even-more current promote-off of same) belies the industry’s assertion that aggressive pricing is needed to justify the risk of drug advancement.



“Biotech companies declare that charges require to be higher to reward risky and high-priced innovation, but the truth that they are churning out medicines and earnings so regularly would seem to undermine that declare.” (emphasis extra)



It’s unclear how stock industry fluctuations, coupled with a number of prominent successes, change the standard, and quite brutal odds of drug growth.   The huge majority of candidate compounds fail, and the vast vast majority of biotech startups struggle to acquire traction, and attain profitability.


In his 2006 book Science Business, HBS professor Gary Pisano talked about how couple of biotechs (at the time) attained profitability, and made the important stage that biotech can seem to be much more profitable than it is simply because of ascertainment bias – the winners are evident, even though the losers (and there are several of them) tend to fade away.


It is also why it’s effortless to miscalculate the value of drug improvement when comparing big organizations versus modest ones, as a lot of biotechs tend to be.  The value of failure demonstrates up on the books of large firms, while a drug growth failure can kill a startup, properly burying the value if you really do not remember to account for it.


Regrettably, biology stays difficult, discovering new medicines stays a profound and risky challenge, and as Merck Merck’s Roger Pearlmutter told my colleague Matt Herper last yr, “it’s a bloody miracle” when you discover one thing that really functions.  If anything at all, business specialists fret that the reduced-hanging fruit has been picked, and the search for new therapeutics has grow to be progressively far more challenging — and much more pricey.


To recommend that all of a sudden biotech businesses have stumbled upon a way to overcome historically brutal odds misrepresents the recent state of drug advancement, and the underestimates the profound difficulties drug developers (and recall that I am a single) encounter when attempting to create new medicines, and that traders wrestle with when determining whether to fund this essential but exceedingly higher-risk endeavor.


Note: For a much more thoughtful perspectives on issues about drug pricing, I’d recommend Bernard Munos get in Forbes, David Grainger’s Drug Baron publish here, and Megan McArdle in Bloomberg See right here.



The New Yorker Claims Biotech Accomplishment Means Drug Growth Now Significantly less Risky: Say What?

4 Nisan 2014 Cuma

Genetic inheritance: How significantly do you want to know?

Angelina Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt … in spring 2013, Jolie had a double mastectomy right after discovering out that she carries the breast cancer gene. Photograph: Rex


Dr Sharon Moalem recently diagnosed a mother with a unusual type of hereditary ataxia, a neurological disorder for which there is no remedy. “It truly is a horrible, horrible, devastating issue equivalent to Huntington’s. When you start displaying symptoms, typically inside 10 many years you happen to be wheelchair-bound and you start off dropping memory function.”


There is a 50% likelihood that the woman’s kids have inherited the situation. “When I counselled her, she mentioned: ‘I come to feel like a youngster abuser.’ I informed her: ‘There’s practically nothing you could have completed to stop this.’


“You can imagine what she’s going by means of. She just identified out. Her very first considered, and this displays what variety of mom she is, was for her children. She saw what her father [from whom she inherited the issue] went by way of and stated she wouldn’t have had youngsters if she’d identified.”


Then the girl asked for anything that Moalem, a Toronto-primarily based American physician and geneticist, could not give her. “She said to me: ‘I want to check my kids but I will not want to tell them the outcomes.’ I mentioned: ‘My hands are tied. In most countries, you can not check young children like that – it really is taking away their autonomy.’”


The case is even far more poignant because many many years ago the girl cancelled her disability and daily life insurance coverage. “She imagined: ‘I’m youthful and healthful but I’m in fiscal issues, so I’ll minimize back on the insurance coverage.’ She said that was the worst determination she made in her lifestyle. She’s going to be close to for 10, 15 years and will require a good deal of assist, and she absolutely won’t be doing work.”


Moalem tells this story to illustrate how we want to change our – and our children’s – genetic inheritances. The level of his new book, Inheritance: How our Genes Adjust our Lives and our Lives Alter our Genes, is that, increasingly, we can.


Actor Angelina Jolie, for example, underwent a series of procedures last year at Beverly Hills’ Pink Lotus Breast Center such as a double mastectomy designed not to eliminate a cancer, but to avert it. Her decision to have the treatment method followed screening of her BRCA1 gene, revealing she had an 87% possibility of creating breast cancer and a 50% risk of ovarian cancer.


“Some of us carry genes that predispose us to cancer, like BRCA1. In the previous there was nothing at all we could do about it. Now we can,” says Moalem.


“For numerous of these females, viewing sisters and mothers be diagnosed with breast cancer may possibly make them go so far as to remove their breast tissue and ovaries due to the fact they say, ‘I’m not going to wait around for that to happen – that 70% or what ever it is danger of building breast cancer. I have carried out my little one rearing.’ It truly is the initial time in background you can be a previvor – it truly is a new word.”


But there are plenty of unforeseen problems in this brave new genetic globe. If you have a 50% likelihood of getting Huntington’s, say, it really is quite most likely that you would like to reside your existence with no knowing that, argues Moalem. Your loved ones, even though, may well come to feel otherwise. What is the correct issue to do?


Moalem came across an illustration of this dilemma just lately. The fiancee of a friend had lately been reunited with her biological father, who exposed that her biological mom had passed away soon after having symptoms that sounded like Huntington’s disease.


Lisa declined to get exams to discover out if she had inherited the issue, but David desperately wanted to know what, if something, he was up against if they married. There was a 50% possibility of Lisa getting the disease and if so, as Moalem puts it in his guide, David “wasn’t going to expand old with her. As an alternative, he would have to observe her personality alter as the disease remodelled her brain, slowly disassembling her mind. Would he have the emotional, psychological and physical strength to correctly care for her needs?”


When Moalem met his pal for a drink in New York, David recommended he get hold of Lisa’s toothbrush or a strand of her hair for Moalem to check. But Moalem mentioned he couldn’t oblige – it would have been ethically and professionally improper. In 2012, the US Presidential Commission for the Research of Bioethical Troubles referred to as for this kind of exams to be manufactured illegal due to the fact they infringed on the correct to privacy. “As the costs of genetic testing plummet and as it continues to get easier to do, we’ll encounter far more of these scenarios,” says Moalem. “To hack or not to hack into the genome is the query we’ll more and more be faced with.”


Often knowing about one’s genetic inheritance can conserve your existence. One particular of Moalem’s individuals, a New York chef, Jeff, followed doctor’s orders to lower back on red meat and eat a lot more fruit and vegetables – but got cancer as a end result. What his doctor did not know was that Jeff had a unusual genetic issue, hereditary fructose intolerance. “Had Jeff acknowledged his genetic inheritance, he would have carried on performing what he had been performing, which was avoiding fruit and vegetables. I do not believe anyone would ever envision that an apple a day would put you away, correct?”


The good news is, Jeff’s cancer was detected early and now he leads a lifestyle happily devoid of fruit and veg.


Sharon Moalem Sharon Moalem suggests drawing up a family tree for your descendants and including medical details, this kind of as drug sensitivities, generating it as comprehensive as achievable.


Jeff’s story is solace, Moalem argues, for all of us who have tried diet plans that don’t function. “For me, there is no better way to inform individuals that there will never ever be a universal diet program. You have day-to-day allowances and you consider, if I comply with these I’ll be healthy – but they don’t work for you. Or you hear about a friend who tries a diet plan and you attempt it and fail miserably.”


Jeff’s story also helps to make clear why, Moalem suggests, sitting down with your extended household and drawing up a genealogical history can be a wonderful present for your descendants. “Make it as detailed as achievable. You in no way know how some seemingly inconsequential detail of one particular generation, like sensitivity to a particular drug, can lead to a helpful bounty of household healthcare info.”


That said, Moalem argues that we are more and more likely to be able to modify our genetic inheritances. Considering that the human genome was sequenced in 2000, we have witnessed the rise of exams for individuals waiting to do just that. Genetic screening can now price US$ 2,000 (£1,200) – the value, he says, of a flat-screen Television.


“This is the initial time we’re actually taking evolution into our own hands, fully altering the direction of humanity. If we made the decision as a society that the only young children who are allowed to remain alive, for example, are individuals with 12 fingers simply because we want twelve-fingered pianists, in one particular or two generations we would completely shift genetically. We would all have twelve digits.”


Is not this hideous genetic engineering? “It truly is constructive eugenics – you can not truly get in touch with it any other point. We’re producing judgments about who ought to be born, primarily.”


This kind of judgments are particularly naked with couples contemplating IVF. “If you have 10 embryos you can determine which a single to implant primarily based on that screening info. You could say, ‘Do you want an embryo that has a risk of dyslexia, alcoholism, diabetes, cancer, or do you just want to roll the dice?’”


genetic testing Sharon Moalem: ‘It’s optimistic eugenics – you can’t actually get in touch with it any other factor. We’re making judgments about who must be born, primarily.’ Photograph: Rex


But absolutely you cannot assure that a kid will not increase up to have these difficulties? “It is not a guarantee but screening can indicate the risks. A parent will say, ‘OK, I am choosing an embryo not to have Huntington’s, why don’t I select the greatest possible embryo that I can?’ Perhaps they want to have the embryo implanted that can have light complexion and blue eyes. Exactly where does that finish? These are concerns society has to encounter.”


Moalem fears that we are ethically unprepared to encounter them. “We have gone over that cliff with no parachute or security net and no idea how to respond in a suitable or a just way.”


He saw a couple who needed to terminate their pregnancy because their little one had hereditary dyslexia. “The father mentioned, ‘You can’t think about how difficult it was for me to get through existence with this disability. I do not want my youngster to increase up to do the exact same.’”


What did Moalem inform him? “That that form of dyslexia is related with imaginative thinking and pondering in a different way. Consider of Jonathan Ive, the designer of several goods for Apple. There’s a really great chance that it truly is due to his dyslexia that he’s come up with so several creative types. That’s the question we’re not considering about sufficient. We’re yearning for inherited perfection but not knowing that which is going to come at a cost.”


Quickly, Moalem believes, people of us with funds will be capable to give our offspring genetic enhancements that will give them an advantage in studying, cognition and sports activities. Isn’t that grotesquely unfair? “It is no various from 19th-century European society the place the greatest leg up was appropriate nutrition,” he says.



Reading this on mobile? Click here


Much more unfair no doubt is genetic discrimination, which is becoming a thorny legislative situation. In the US, the so-called anti-Gattaca law (right after the 1997 film about a genetically tiered society), also known as the Genetic Data Nondiscrimination Act 2008, prohibits this kind of discrimination in workplaces, but not in lifestyle and disability insurance. As a consequence, insurance organizations are totally free to refuse cover for individuals who’ve disclosed genetic details online, for instance. “These days people are writing cancer blogs and posting on social media the results of genetic testing. Insurance businesses can read through that stuff. Individuals don’t realise they have produced it a lot more hard for their family members members to get insurance.”


Would Moalem genetically screen his youngsters? “We do not have children nevertheless, but my wife and I believe about these concerns constantly. Imagine if it turned out we were carriers for deafness and we could have had a youngster that was born deaf. What would we do? Is it little one abuse to bring into the globe a little one who has that sort of problem?”


So expertise is not just power but a horrible accountability?


“Appropriate. After you begin searching you have no notion what you happen to be going to uncover. And it’s frequently challenging to know what you’re going to do with what you discover.”



Genetic inheritance: How significantly do you want to know?

29 Mart 2014 Cumartesi

Healthful eating: too significantly saturated unwanted fat is nonetheless undesirable for you

Fried eggs with sausages, toasts and dips

The fantastic fry-up. Proceed with caution. Photograph: Alamy




Contrary to Joanna Blythman’s phone for a rethink on nationwide dietary recommendations about saturated fats, a main guidance modify at this stage would be premature (“Why virtually almost everything you have been told about unhealthy meals is wrong”, In Concentrate).


The review she highlights was certainly funded by the British Heart Foundation and its finding – that there was no association among the varieties of unwanted fat we eat and our threat of heart disease – was surprising.


But this examine alone is not enough to give the green light to eating as much saturated unwanted fat as you like. There is a wealth of evidence displaying that consuming also significantly saturated body fat raises our cholesterol amounts, which we know increases our threat of having a heart attack or stroke.


This new study isn’t going to change that, even although it plainly shows there is a lot more for us to discover out about how the body fat we eat has an effect on our chance of cardiovascular illness.


In the meantime, we will proceed to advise men and women not to target on any single nutrient in their diet plan but their diet plan as a entire. We advocate a Mediterranean-fashion diet plan, which has been associated with reduced chance of coronary heart ailment, obesity and sort 2 diabetes.  This represents a total diet plan approach with fats primarily from unsaturated sources as properly as more fruit and veggies, fish and fewer sugary and fatty treats.


Our guidance is carefully regarded and frequently reviewed it is primarily based on the evidence of robust research, funded by us and other folks.


These new findings in isolation are not enough to modify that. But there’s genuine uncertainty in the discipline and we’d welcome additional scientific studies to boost our understanding and aid us proceed to give the public the very best suggestions achievable, primarily based on robust study.


Professor Jeremy Pearson


British Heart Basis


London NW1


So things that is grown naturally, and might be discovered in the diet plan of our ancestors, is great for us. Bizarre concoctions this kind of as margarine are bad for us. Sugar, which we cannot discover in such abundance in our natural diet plan, is undesirable for us.


I guess the adage that you should not eat something that your grandmother would not recognise as foods must be amended to anything that your fantastic grandmother would not recognise as meals, with the codicil that we now know that greens are excellent for us.


“Doraseile”


On the internet contribution


The latest concentrate on sugars rather than calories as a trigger of weight problems and overweight does not aid individuals to realize that stability is key – not only in the diet plan but also in balancing calories taken in with calories expended throughout bodily exercise. The easy healthy life-style message is turning out to be lost.


Foods and Drink Federation members stay focused on operating by means of the Obligation Deal to play their part in tackling weight problems. The calorie reduction pledge, which eleven FDF members have presently signed, is straight supporting customers to decrease their calorie consumption, in some situation by also minimizing sugar.


Reformulating recipes is just a single strand of sector action on well being organizations are also creating new, more healthy alternatives and investing in client training. Calls for new structures are a distraction from the great function that is already underway, but, far more worryingly, they are perplexing public health messaging.


Men and women have entry to clear and consistent nutrition information, which involves complete sugar material, and which, in the vast vast majority of products, is also presented on the front of packets.


The labelling of additional sugars, as suggested by the chief healthcare officer in her yearly report, is not permissible below European legislation. In addition to the nutrition label, the diverse sources of sugars used in items will be listed in the substances list.


Terry Jones


Meals and Drink Federation


London WC2




Healthful eating: too significantly saturated unwanted fat is nonetheless undesirable for you

Turf Free of charge Lawns: Much less Function, Significantly less Water and A lot more Free of charge Time

We are searching into utilizing clover in place of grass in our fenced in backyard. We know that the lawn maniacs in our neighborhood would have us in court if we thought about removing our turf lawn in the front for something more eco-pleasant, this kind of as clover.


There is a developing motion in the U.S. to cut back on the amount of landscape consumed by lawn grass.  I located the internet site LessLawn.com to be a great resource for ideas on shifting out the water hungry, upkeep extreme turf lawns to a selection of other sorts of plants and landscape plans.


Drought, increased price for water, pesticides, herbicides, labor intensity and the require to continually aerate as properly as mowing are just a number of of the factors homeowners are ultimately looking far more critically into alternative ground cover.


Edible Landscaping with a Permaculture Twist: How to Have Your Yard and Eat It Too


I believed this joke that circulated the world wide web numerous years back exposed the insanity of lawn care perfectly:


GOD: Frank, you know all about gardens and nature.  What in the world is going on down there on the planet? What took place to the dandelions, violets, thistle and stuff I commenced eons ago?  I had a perfect no-servicing garden plan. These plants develop in any variety of soil, stand up to drought and multiply with abandon.  The nectar from the long-lasting blossoms attracts butterflies, honey bees and flocks of songbirds.  I expected to see a huge backyard of colors by now.  But, all I see are these green rectangles.


St. FRANCIS: It’s the tribes that settled there, Lord. The Suburbanites. They started out calling your flowers “weeds” and went to excellent lengths to kill them and change them with  grass.


GOD: Grass?  But, it’s so dull.  It is not colorful.  It doesn’t entice butterflies, birds and bees only grubs and sod worms.  It is delicate to temperatures.  Do these Suburbanites actually want all that grass growing there?


ST. FRANCIS: Apparently so, Lord.  They go to fantastic pains to grow it and keep it green.  They start every single spring by fertilizing grass and poisoning any other plant that crops up in the lawn.


GOD: The spring rains and warm weather possibly make grass develop really rapidly.  That need to make the Suburbanites satisfied.


ST.  FRANCIS: Apparently not, Lord.  As quickly as it grows a tiny, they reduce it-occasionally twice a week.


GOD: They minimize it?  Do they then bale it like hay?


ST.  FRANCIS: Not specifically, Lord.  Most of them rake it up  and put it in bags.


GOD: They bag it?  Why?  Is it a money crop?  Do they promote it?


ST. FRANCIS: No, Sir, just the opposite.  They pay to throw it away.


GOD: Now, let me get this straight.  They fertilize grass so it will increase, and, when it does grow, they lower it off and shell out to throw it away?


ST. FRANCIS: Yes, Sir.


GOD: These Suburbanites must be relieved in the summer season when we minimize back on the rain and flip up the heat. That surely slows the growth and saves them a lot of perform.


ST. FRANCIS: You aren’t going to think this, Lord.  When the grass stops expanding so fast, they drag out hoses and spend more funds to water it so they can continue to mow it and pay to get rid of it.


GOD: What nonsense.  At least they stored some of the trees.  That was a sheer stroke of genius, if I do say so myself.  The trees increase leaves in the spring to offer beauty and shade in the summer season.  In the autumn, they fall to the ground and form a organic blanket to keep moisture in the soil and defend the trees and bushes. It is a normal cycle of daily life.


St. FRANCIS: You better sit down, Lord.  The Suburbanites have drawn a new circle.  As soon as the leaves fall, they rake them into fantastic piles and shell out to have them hauled away.


GOD: No!   What do they do to protect the shrub and tree roots in the winter to preserve the soil moist and loose?


ST. FRANCIS: After throwing away the leaves, they go out and get one thing which they call mulch.  They haul it home and spread it all around in place of the leaves.


GOD: And the place do they get this mulch?

ST. FRANCIS: 
They lower down trees and grind them up to make the mulch.


GOD: Enough!   I do not want to feel about this anymore.  St. Catherine, you are in charge of the arts.  What movie have you scheduled for us tonight?


ST. CATHERINE: “Dumb and Dumber”, Lord.  It’s a story about….


GOD: Never mind, I believe I just heard the whole story from St. Francis.


Be Properly,


Beth


Wholesome Living Super Store



Turf Free of charge Lawns: Much less Function, Significantly less Water and A lot more Free of charge Time

27 Mart 2014 Perşembe

Women who eat natural food items no significantly less probably to build cancer, research finds

Vegetables

Findings particularly pertinent as wellness considerations have been recognized as a key issue for picking organic meals, scientists say. Photograph: Keith Leighton / Alamy




Ladies who always or mainly consume natural food items are no less very likely to create cancer than women who eat a much more traditional diet, in accordance to a review published right now.


Making use of information from the Million Girls Research, the biggest wellness study task in the Uk, Cancer Analysis Uk scientists from Oxford University discovered that consuming an natural diet program grown without having pesticides produced no distinction to general cancer risk.


The authors of the paper, published in the British Journal of Cancer, explained that the benefits have been “specifically pertinent given that health worries have been identified as the main determination for consumers’ buy of organic food”. Professor Tim Key stated: “The overall conclusion is truly simple – we don’t see any big difference in the total danger of any variety of cancer, dependent on whether individuals stated they decide on organic food. It truly is a quite massive examine so the total consequence is extremely robust.”


Past research have advised, albeit inconclusively, that pesticides could enhance the threat of risk of cancer. Pesticides are extensively utilized in agriculture, despite the fact that there are limits to the volume of residue that can be present in foods, and the Oxford researchers described the quantities current as low.


They asked around 623,080 females aged 50 or above about no matter whether they ate organic meals, and then tracked the advancement of sixteen of the most typical kinds of cancer more than a nine-year period.


They located no variation in total cancer threat when comparing the 180,000 ladies who reported never eating organic ally grown meals with about 45,000 ladies who said they typically or always eat natural foods.


Nevertheless, variations did emerge with respect to breast cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma when they looked at the final results for the sixteen varieties of cancer individually.


The researchers found a little enhance in threat for breast cancer but a 21% reduction in the danger for non-Hodgkin lymphoma in ladies who mainly ate natural meals. Of the 180,000 ladies who by no means consume natural foods, 685 designed that cancer while there have been 133 situations between the 45,000 women who mentioned they typically or often consume natural merchandise.


As the evaluation of person cancers involved smaller numbers, Essential explained that the final results were significantly less robust and could be down to “possibility” or other elements. But he mentioned that, offered previous research had suggested a link in between pesticides and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, it would be well worth investigating much more closely.


Peter Melchett, director of policy at the Soil Association, which promotesthe trade entire body for organic food and farming, launched a wide-ranging attack on the study. He said it was strange that the 21% lower in non-Hodgkin lymphoma amid females who reported typically or usually eating natural foods was becoming “so readily dismissed” by Cancer Study United kingdom, and stated the causes for getting organic food items varied, and ranged from the positive aspects to wildlife to the reality that organic specifications prohibit GM crops and elements, harmful hydrogenated fats and controversial artificial food colors and additives. “Men and women also purchase natural to reduce their publicity to pesticides – 320 of which can be routinely utilised in non-natural farming.” He also claimed that the research had a number of weaknesses compared with other investigation, which includes that women’s BMI and the volume of bodily activity they took part in had been only measured when during the examine.




Women who eat natural food items no significantly less probably to build cancer, research finds

14 Mart 2014 Cuma

Heart patients significantly less likely to get surgical procedure in Uk than US, says report

Hospital porters

The survey found that only 58% of United kingdom patients were presented emergency surgical procedure in contrast with 80% in the US. Photograph: Universalimagesgroup/UIG by way of Getty Images




Death from a ruptured aorta – the primary blood vessel from the heart – is a lot more likely in Uk hospitals than in the US, in which individuals have a greater opportunity of obtaining an operation that could conserve their lives, in accordance to a study.


American hospitals appear to be much more prepared to operate on a patient who arrives with a ruptured stomach aortic aneurysm (AAA), a lifestyle-threatening emergency specially in men more than 65. It takes place when an aneurysm – a bulge in the artery wall – abruptly bursts, which can result in substantial internal bleeding and death.


The NHS now provides screening to all men more than the age of 65 to detect these at threat, who will be offered surgical procedure to stop a rupture happening.


Good results rates even in such preplanned operations are highly variable close to the United kingdom, nonetheless, as a Guardian investigation making use of information obtained from hospitals under freedom of details legislation showed in 2010. Hospitals that did much more AAA operations had reduced death costs than individuals exactly where surgeons only seldom carried them out.


The NHS now collects mortality data from vascular surgeons that demonstrates the identical pattern. The more practice a surgeon has, the much more experienced it seems he or she becomes.


The review, published in the Lancet, looks at emergency operations when a rupture has occurred. Without having an operation, the patient will nearly certainly die. The option is palliative care.


Alan Karthikesalingam and colleagues from St George’s Hospital Vascular Institute in London found that only 58% of United kingdom individuals have been offered emergency surgical treatment compared with 80% in the US. Amongst American patients, there have been 13% fewer deaths.


“Most of the variation is attributable to the fact that when it seems in the US, patients are much more most likely to get surgical procedure than in the Uk,” stated Peter Holt, one of the authors.


The review exhibits that the greatest results – in each the United kingdom and the US – are in massive teaching hospitals. Surgeons in these hospitals have been much more most likely to make the decision to operate and also far more most likely to use a strategy named endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) – a newer, less invasive way of working to place in a graft to hold the blood flowing via the aorta, rather than open surgical procedure.


“The prevailing view is that EVAR is far better,” explained Holt. “You are more most likely to be discharged house rather than to nursing care. From the operative stage of view, this paper would recommend there is a advantage to EVAR in decrease mortality in the US and the Uk.”


The review also displays that sufferers who were taken at first to their district common hospital and then transferred to a educating hospital were also far more likely to survive.


The findings of the examine strongly assistance the case for centralising vascular surgical treatment in fewer hospitals, exactly where the surgeons will see much more cases and grow to be much more skilled at the operations. This is element of the contemplating behind the move to reconfigure NHS companies, but that regularly comes unstuck when politicians, local individuals and occasionally health-related staff oppose programs to shut below-carrying out hospital departments.




Heart patients significantly less likely to get surgical procedure in Uk than US, says report

5 Mart 2014 Çarşamba

Grownups need to cut sugar intake to significantly less than a can of coke a day, says WHO

Sugar cubes

An grownup with a daily consumption of 2,000 calories need to consume only 25g of sugar, less than the 35g in a coke can, stated the WHO. Photograph: Nick Ansell/PA




Grownups in the Uk ought to aim to lower their sugar intake to 5% of every day calories if they can, in accordance to the Globe Wellness Organisation – less than the amount, for an common particular person, in a single can of Coca Cola.


In a new draft guideline, the WHO mentioned that all men and women, at each stage of lifestyle, ought to attempt to reduce the quantity of sugar they consume. It reiterated its 2003 guidance that countries should set an upper restrict of 10% of day-to-day calories from sugar – but explained the excellent reduction would be to 5%.


For an adult of regular bodyweight, with an intake of around 2,000 calories a day, 5% would equate to one hundred calories – which at 4 calories in a gram would be 25g of sugar, stated Dr Francesco Branca, the WHO’s director of nutrition for health and advancement. A regular 330ml can of cola consists of 35g of sugar.


Even at a 10% restrict, explained Branca, a can of sugar-sweetened drink “approaches the sum that is acceptable for an adult. For a little one, because a little one has a decrease vitality necessity, that could be a great deal significantly less. Consumption of a single serving of sugar-sweetened soda may truly exceed the limit of 10% of vitality [from sugar] for a child.”


Branca additional that soft drink consumption “is a single of the components that has been much more constantly associated with elevated bodyweight achieve, particularly in young children. This is an spot exactly where far more extreme action wants to be taken if this guideline is to be implemented.”


The WHO’s intervention is triggered by concern over the quickly spreading weight problems epidemic, as properly as tooth decay. There are specific anxieties about the huge consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks, this kind of as colas, lemonades and sports drinks, which give us “empty calories”, devoid of the nutrients located in some other meals.


“Right now, debate continues as to regardless of whether the available evidence of adverse health effects connected to totally free sugars intake warrants appreciable reduction in cost-free sugars intake,” says the WHO consultation document. “Consequently, it was deemed crucial to overview the existing evidence in a systematic method, and update WHO’s guidance on free of charge sugars consumption via the new WHO guideline development procedure.”


The WHO’s nutrition advice expert advisory group (NUGAG) has been mulling over the evidence for nearly two years and commissioned scientific reviews of the proof on the risks posed by “cost-free sugars” – those that are extra to our meals and drinks rather than the intrinsic sugars in fruit and vegetables – to our well being.


The evidence is clearest on dental caries, the document demonstrates. Studies display an enhance in tooth decay in kids who get more than ten% of their calories from sugar. But there was also proof that youngsters consuming much less sugar than that – under 10kg a yr, which is approximately 5% of their calorie consumption – also produced dental caries, although at reduce levels.


“Due to the fact dental caries are the outcome of lifelong exposure to the dietary danger aspect (ie sugars), even tiny reductions in danger of dental caries in childhood is of significance in later on daily life,” says the document.


The link with weight problems and ailments for which it is a danger element, this kind of as strokes, diabetes, heart illness and some cancers, is significantly less clear cut. Nevertheless, analyses of all the offered, nicely-carried out trials advised that individuals who lower down on sugar also managed to minimize their excess weight – and people who ate more sugar place on bodyweight.


Scientific studies also showed that young children who drank a lot of sugar-sweetened beverages, such as colas, were a lot more likely to be obese than individuals who seldom drank them.


The new guideline is most likely to be strongly opposed by the food and drink business and their supporters, who argue that no one particular food or kind of meals is a difficulty – all foods and drinks are fine in moderation, they say.




Grownups need to cut sugar intake to significantly less than a can of coke a day, says WHO

22 Şubat 2014 Cumartesi

Cosmopolitan urges GPs to take consuming problems much more significantly


A major women’s magazine says GPs should get consuming issues far more critically and ensure sufferers obtain prompt treatment.




Cosmopolitan wants physicians to assessment the way they assess the circumstances. As several as one.six million individuals in Britain are thought to endure from consuming problems but half are diagnosed with “eating disorder not otherwise specified” or Ednos, a catch-all term for any eating disorder that does not match the criteria of anorexia or bulimia.




The magazine argues that despite the fact that Ednos is a critical mental illness, sufferers are frequently advised to return to their GP when they fulfil the criteria for anorexia or bulimia. It claims some girls are waiting up to two many years for therapy.




Louise Court, the editor-in-chief mentioned: “Ednos sufferers … are critically ill. The NHS is wonderful in so a lot of methods, but at the same time, it’s failing so numerous ladies — and guys – who desperately need assist now, not in a year’s time.




“We’re therefore urging GPs to move away from the ethos of merely ticking boxes when it comes to assessing eating problems.”




The campaign is backed by Clare Gerada, a former chairman of the Council of the Royal College of GPs, and Norman Lamb, the minister for care and support, who mentioned the Government is introducing waiting time requirements.


* Mental health charities have claimed that several personal schools are in denial about the extent of consuming disorders and psychological well being troubles between pupils, with ladies from aspirational families the “fastest growing” consumers of mental wellness solutions.




Cosmopolitan urges GPs to take consuming problems much more significantly

5 Şubat 2014 Çarşamba

As well significantly of a very good point: the death of antibiotics

Antibiotics have transformed human health and saved millions of lives. Now, as a result of overuse, they are no longer working. The golden age of medicine has come to an end


eedwood House Farm is easy to miss. Only a small sign – the bright pink image of a pig – suspended from a fence post hints at anything of significance down the one-way track that leads off the main road. After a few hundred metres of bouncing over mud and gravel, it is the pungent smell that smacks you first. Then, the sound; the squealing, grunting and growls of 5,000 pigs crammed into this corner of rural Staffordshire.


A hundred or so piglets are excitedly clambering over each other or snuffling around the muddy floor of the gated outdoor enclosure where they are waiting to be transported for slaughter. Inside the great barns, 500 sows lie side-by-side in pens while their offspring fight for space at their teats.The air hangs heavy with ammonia, so thick it stings the lungs.


This is the flagship operation of Midland Pig Producers, which runs nine farms across the country producing 80 tonnes of meat a week to supply leading supermarkets including Tesco, Marks and Spencer and Asda. It is big. But only a few miles away over the border into Derbyshire, something even bigger is planned.


A decision is expected shortly on Midland Pig’s so-called Foston Mega Farm, which will house 25,000 intensively reared indoor pigs, making it one of the largest in Europe. The proposal has attracted huge opposition, with more than 20,000 letters from across the world. Pig welfare is, of course, an emotive issue. But campaigners insist that something greater is at stake here – something that the Chief Medical Officer has referred to as one of the greatest threats of the 21st century, alongside terrorism and climate change, and which this spring, is expected to be placed on the national risk register. Such farms rely on the use of antibiotics for sick animals, but as we rush to produce industrial quantities of ever cheaper food, we have sleepwalked into a human health crisis.


Infographic


National Risk Register




The government’s list of the greatest threats facing the country. Adding antibiotic resistance is being actively considered



This remains the most significant civil emergency risk. Three worldwide influenza pandemics occurred in the 20th century (1918, 1957 and 1968)




The east coast floods of 1953 were the worst peacetime disaster to hit the UK. As a result a national emergency was formally declared




Major terrorist attacks are an ongoing threat. The likelihood of terrorists obtaining effective biological or nuclear weapons remains ‘not negligible’




Volcanic eruptions abroad, such as the 2010 Icelandic ash cloud, can affect the UK. Effusive (gas-rich) eruptions are the most dangerous




A newly-assessed risk, wildfires – such as the Swinley Forest blaze in 2011, the largest in Berkshire’s history – spark massive devastation




70 per cent of the world’s bacteria have now developed a resistance to antibiotics. We have used – or are using – the drugs of last resort




Antibiotics are no longer effective. The drugs that have transformed life and longevity and saved countless millions since penicillin was discovered by Sir Alexander Fleming in 1928 now saturate every corner of our environment. We stuff them into ourselves and our animals; we spray them on crops, dump them in rivers, and even – as emerged at a meeting of science ministers from the G8 last year – paint them on the hulls of boats to keep off barnacles.


As a result an invisible army of super-resistant bacteria has evolved, one that is increasingly claiming lives – currently more than 25,000 a year in Europe alone, around as many as die on the continent’s roads.


Many leading scientists and doctors and politicians are freely adopting the language of global catastrophe. Infections such as tuberculosis and septicaemia – the scourge of earlier centuries – are once again killing us at frightening rates. We have used, or are using, our so-called drugs of last resort. There is nothing left in the armoury and new drugs are not being developed. Welcome to the post-antibiotic age.


n 2012, at Needwood House Farm, a pneumonia outbreak swept through the herd. The piglets were taken off site and sows fed antibiotics with their food for six weeks. Those few that didn’t survive were incinerated. The outbreak – the first in eight years at the Farm – cost Midland Pig Producers £100,000.


“Antibiotics are expensive,” says owner James Leavesley. “The last thing we want to do as a business is use them. We don’t unless we have to. It’s done because an animal – just like a human – can fall ill. If we need to stop using them on farms, can we stop using them in hospitals as well, please?”


Pig Farming
At Needwood House Farm, Staffordshire, James Leavesley says antibiotics are only used as a last resort

Leavesley says intensive farming has come a long way since “barbaric” and “abhorrent” practices in the Sixties and Seventies. Nowadays, pens are better ventilated and excrement is sluiced away through grates.


“What we are proposing [at Foston] is going to be a cultural evolution. The whole point of the thing is to create an environment where we don’t need antibiotics.”


It is an admirable goal, but the reality is that modern British farms rely on antibiotics and on a vast scale. In 2012, some 409 tonnes of antibiotics were sold for animal use (a rise on the 346 tonnes sold the previous year), of which 85 per cent was for food-producing animals. The use of three classes of antibiotics classified by the World Health Organisation as “critically important in human medicine” has also increased. According to the latest Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) report, in 2012, 2.4 tonnes of fluroquinolone antibiotics were given to animals compared to 2.1 tonnes in 2011. Sales of the other “critically important” antibiotic classes – third and fourth generation cephalosporins (1.3 tonnes) and macrolides (40.9 tonnes) – also recorded small rises on the previous year.



“It’s getting worse, not better. It may be OK for five to 10 years but it’s not a sustainable model for the future. Otherwise we will lose our antibiotics.”


Zac Goldsmith MP


Veterinary medicine accounts for around 30 per cent of antibiotics use in this country, and yet, we are one of the better regulated in the world. An EU-wide ban on the use of antibiotics as growth promoters in livestock has been in place since 2006. In Britain, only vets can prescribe antibiotics for animals, although critics say this raises an obvious conflict of interest when they also sell them. Worldwide, the majority of the 100,000-200,000 tonnes of antibiotics manufactured every year is freely used in the agricultural, horticultural and veterinary sectors to keep animals healthy on industrial-scale farms. “It’s getting worse, not better,” says Zac Goldsmith, the Conservative MP for Richmond and treasurer of the newly-formed All Party Parliamentary Group on Antibiotic Resistance. “When you concentrate a very large number of animals, particularly pigs, in very cramped conditions, you are going to create all kinds of local and environmental problems.


“History tells us you can’t keep animals in those conditions without almost daily use of antibiotics. It may be OK for five to 10 years but it’s not a sustainable model for the future. Otherwise we will lose our antibiotics. There are all kinds of implications about mega farms. I know that the total use [of antibiotics] per head per animal has gone up 18 per cent in the past 10 years.”


Goldsmith talks with a quiet urgency from the corner of a tearoom in the Houses of Parliament. For a long time, he says, he has been one of the few outspoken voices from the backbenches on antibiotic resistance. But not any longer. There is growing concern at the highest levels of Government over the seriousness of the issue. The June meeting of the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee to discuss antibiotics was standing room only in the Commons committee room. Looking down from the wall was a portrait of Lord Palmerston (prime minister 1855 to 1858 and 1859 to 1865). Once more we are engaged in gunboat diplomacy, the rhetoric of war.


Interactive Graphic


The global habit that created a crisis




Six ways we have undermined a wonder drug. Click to read more




Animals




  • Agriculture


    Globally more than 70 per cent of antibiotics are used in animal agriculture including some of the most potent antibiotics available. In more than 100 countries antibiotics are routinely added to animal feed to promote growth. So-called mega farms, intensive meat and poultry farms where diseases can sweep through herds, are blamed in particular for overuse.




  • Aquaculture


    Intensive aquaculture (shrimp and fish farming) has led to growing problems with antibiotics routinely used to treat diseases. The industry supplies the world with 110 milllion metric tonnes of food fish per year. 75 per cent of the antibiotics fed to fish are excreted back into the water.




  • Veterinary


    In Britain the veterinary sector has been criticised for irresponsible prescription of antibiotics, as vets can profit by selling the same drugs they prescribe. The government does not track the use of veterinary antibiotics in detail, with the main data available the total annual tonnage of antibiotics sold. In 2012, 409 tonnes of antibiotics were prescribed by vets in Britain.






Medicine




  • Prescription


    Antibiotics are commonly prescribed for respiratory infections, but most of these are caused by viruses not bacteria. Most patients are prescribed antibiotics without the doctor knowing the cause of the infection. GPs in England currently prescribe 35million courses of antibiotics a year.




  • Patient pressure


    Doctors say they are put under huge pressure to prescribe antibiotics. Private doctors who see patients outside of hospital systems, such as those working in private offices, contribute disproportionately to the spread of antibiotic resistance. A 2012 survey in Australia, which has one of the highest rates of antibiotic use in the world, found 80 per cent of people who visited a doctor expected a prescription.




  • Over the counter sales


    Over the counter antibiotics are available in many countries and are also easy to order over the internet. In some countries, hospitals make money from antibiotic sales. Up to a quarter of revenues in some Chinese hospitals derive from antibiotic sales. In March, the sale of antibiotics over the counter in India will be restricted for the first time.






Environment




  • Water


    Urban wastewater treatment plants are among the main sources of the release of antibiotics into the environment. Hospitals and drug manufacturing sites have the highest concentrations of antibiotics in their effluent, especially in developing countries where the majority of drugs are manufactured. Antibiotics have been detected in drinking water.




  • Soil


    Many antibiotics are non bio-degradable and can persist in high concentrations in soil for a long time. An estimated 70 million tonnes of animal manure waste is spread on to agricultural land each year in Britain. Crops can take up substantial amounts of antibiotics by the roots. Antibiotics are also sprayed on to crops, such as high value fruit trees, to prevent bacterial diseases.




  • Wildlife


    Studies are now finding antibiotic resistant bacteria among wildlife. Resistant genes have been detected in the bacteria of numerous animals ranging from gulls, crows and moths, to foxes and sharks. A study conducted in the Wirral found high levels of resistant bacteria in the faeces of forest rodents.






Globalisation




  • Travel


    Last year the number of international tourist arrivals across the globe broke through the one billion barrier for the first time ever. We carry drug resistant pathogens everywhere we go. One recent study of Swedish world travellers found one in four young men were returning with antibiotic resistant bacteria present in their guts.




  • Migration


    Migrant workers have also led to unprecedented movement of antibiotic resistant organisms across international borders. Since 2004, more than one million migrants from Eastern Europe have arrived in Britain (around half have returned home) further spreading antibiotic resistant strains of tuberculosis. TB rates are higher than the UK in seven of the 12 accession countries.




  • Trade


    According to the World Health Organisation, the growth of global trade allows resistant microorganisms to be spread rapidly to distant countries and continents through food. Global meat trade is a complex web of supply and demand. 60 per cent of the pork eaten in the UK is imported and around 40 per cent of fish produced in China is bought by EU countries.






Medical tourism




  • Patient movement


    Many healthcare patients now travel to foreign locations for medical treatment. Cosmetic, dental and even organ transplants are becoming more common as experienced surgeons and hospitals offer care at a fraction of Western prices. By 2015, it is predicted 3.2 million people will travel to India for cosmetic surgery or other operations.




  • Hospital cleanliness


    Hospitals have become hotbeds for highly-resistant pathogens, like MRSA, ESBL, and CPE, increasing the risk that hospitalisation kills instead of cures. In many countries, the pharmaceutical industry is the principal source of prescribing information for doctors. Hospital patients generally have weaker immune systems and more wounds to infect.






Development failure




  • Profit


    Only four drug companies are left in the development of antibiotics. Antibiotics are not as profitable as other drugs taken for chronic conditions. Successful treatment with effective antibiotics takes only a few days compared to drugs for diseases like diabetes or blood pressure which people take for years.




  • Difficult science


    Between 1935 and 1968, 14 different classes of antibiotic were developed. In the 45 years since then, only five have been brought out. The pipeline for new replacement antibiotics is virtually dry. Mergers between pharmaceutical companies has reduced the number and diversity of teams seeking to discover new antibacterials.




  • Complex regulations


    Leading global drugmakers have said they need new incentives to stimulate research. Clinical trials are complex and cost a lot of money. The regulatory process is risk averse with high levels of bureaucracy and lack of clarity in the process.







Last autumn, Britain launched its new Five Year Antimicrobial Resistance Strategy. Ministers accept the urgent need to reduce the use on farms, but it is not just in the food chain where resistant bacteria thrive in a generous swill of antibiotics. According to Chief Medical Officer, Professor Dame Sally Davies, GPs in England currently prescribe 35 million courses of antibiotics a year. As patients we demand them, putting huge pressure on doctors to prescribe pills for viral infections such as a sore throat for which they are useless. Too many GPs who should know better acquiesce.


Dame Sally and other experts say it is a practice we must stop now. “I care about my children and grandchildren, let alone my own old age,” she says. “If we don’t sort this out, not just as a nation, but globally, we risk going back to a time where people die young.


“We risk going into a post-antibiotic era, and that could start any time in the next 10 or 20 years, when modern medicine becomes impossible. Routine surgical procedures – hip replacements, caesarean sections, modern cancer treatments – all are based on using antibiotics to prevent or treat infections. Without them, people will die.


“Before antibiotics, 43 per cent of people died of infection in this country. At the moment it is seven per cent. I predict without proper conservation and new antibiotics, our death rate will steadily creep up. We risk returning to a situation like that. And the stupidity is, we don’t have to.”


o truly understand the extent of the problem, one must look beyond Britain’s borders. Compared to other countries, in particular the emerging powerhouses of India and China, we are well ahead in reducing use of antibiotics. But there is only so much we can do alone.


This frustration was evident at the first evidence session of an ongoing parliamentary inquiry into antimicrobial resistance at Portcullis House which started in December. As Sharon Peacock, professor of clinical microbiology at the University of Cambridge told MPs: “Much of the resistance we see in this country is actually potentially imported from other places. We have to recognise that and understand what is happening in the bigger picture.”


Ours is a globalised world, and 70 per cent of the bacteria in it have now developed a resistance to antibiotics – including those drugs regarded as our last line of defence. Superbugs spawned in a Chinese hospital or a polluted Pakistani river cross continents quicker than we can discover them. One recent study of 100 Swedish travellers visiting countries outside of Northern Europe found one in four young men had antibiotic resistant bacteria present in their guts on their return.


Infographic


How resistance breeds


We carry resistant microbes wherever we go. In 2011, there were almost 35,000 cases of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis recorded in Europe – a six-fold increase in as many years. London is now known as the TB capital of the western world. During the past year around 3,500 residents were diagnosed with the disease (out of around 9,000 across the UK) with boroughs like Newham and Ealing experiencing rates of infection comparable with the developing world.Treatment of multi-drug resistant TB is vastly expensive, costing between £50,000 to £100,000 per patient over two years, and putting a huge strain on hospitals and budgets.


Necessity negates political correctness. Only last month, Professor Ajit Lalvani, from the National Heart and Lung Institute, called for more screening tests to identify latent symptoms of TB that could be brought into the country by immigrants. For it is from distant shores where much of this bacteria comes from.


About 75 per cent of the cases nationwide occur among people born in countries where TB is more common, mostly South Asia (60 per cent of cases) and sub-Saharan Africa (22 per cent). Multi-drug resistant cases are also increasing in Eastern Europe. The complicated therapies required to treat the disease are more difficult to impose over language barriers and with vulnerable patients, resulting in unfinished courses of antibiotics; another major factor that increases resistance.


TB is by no means the only disease of concern. In November, the EU’s disease monitoring agency warned that Europe now faces a growing threat from bacteria that are resistant to the last-resort class of antibiotics known as carbapenems, with almost all European countries now having reported cases. The data from the European Centre for Diseases Prevention and Control showed that the proportion of bloodstream infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae, a common cause of illness in hospital patients, that were resistant to carbapenems was now above five percent in 2012 in five countries – Greece, Cyprus, Italy, Romania and Slovakia. In 2009, only Greece and Cyprus exceeded that threshold.


Infographic


Antibiotic consumption in Europe




Defined daily doses per 1,000 inhabitants per day



Data applies to prescriptions outside of hospitals *Country provided only total care data, which applies to community sector and hospital use
Source: ECDC


Even some of those sent out to protect us are bringing back killer diseases from abroad. Multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacteria have been recorded in British and American soldiers returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. Bacteria fall into two categories: gram-negative and gram-positive. Gram-negative bacteria possess thin cell walls (5 to 10 nanometres) adept at flushing out antibiotics, making them much harder to treat. Gram-positive, which include methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus – better known as hospital superbug MRSA – have thick cell walls (20-80 nanometres) that better retain antibiotics.


So many infections of gram-negative Acinetobacter, which causes a variety of diseases ranging from pneumonia to serious blood or wound infections, were recorded in troops in Iraq, that the disease was nicknamed “Iraqibacter”. Pathogens would also blow into soldiers’ wounds in the dust and dirt of Helmand Province in Afghanistan, causing a variety of diseases ranging from pneumonia to serious blood or wound infections. The number of cases fuelled claims that insurgents were lining IEDs with excrement or rotting animals.


And then, there are the medical tourists. Those who visit hospitals in Asia for cheap cosmetic surgery or other operations to avoid waiting lists are another main driver of the problem. In 2015, it is predicted 3.2 million people will travel to India for surgery. Here antibiotics are freely available for sale over the counter (at least until later this year when new laws come into place). “I think things have got progressively worse in Southern Asia, largely because of the medical tourism industry,” says Professor Tim Walsh, a microbiologist at Cardiff University. “If you look at the Calcutta Times, on the front page is a huge advertisement for cosmetic operations. People come from all over the world.”



“It’s almost like the perfect storm. It’s going to be very difficult for us to win this battle. In fact, I would say it’s impossible.”


Professor Tim Walsh


Walsh was part of the team that discovered NDM-1, an enzyme that confers resistance on a range of bacteria. In short, it makes already dangerous bacteria such as E.coli and cholera, far worse. The ND stands for New Delhi, where it was discovered in 2008. In the ensuing years it has claimed lives and spread panic far beyond the subcontinent. Walsh is currently assisting the UK government with estimates on the extent of antibiotic resistance by 2030-2050 and at the same time overseeing the world’s largest clinical trial in Pakistan and India looking at multi-drug infection in extreme drug resistant bacteria. The data, he says, “is quite frightening”.


“Bacteria are able to adapt, mutate, their DNA is very fluid. This is all happening in real time. We are up against a foe and it is a scenario combined with antibiotic industries around the world pumping out drugs and polluting environments, as well as overuse in our communities. Lots of countries have no idea at all about resistance rates.


“It’s almost like the perfect storm. Putting all that information together I would say it’s going to be very difficult for us to win this battle. In fact, I would say it’s impossible. Certainly it is going about it the way we are at the moment.”


One British man who, unlike the medical tourists, ended up in an Indian hospital against his will is freelance journalist Russell Cronin. In April 2011, during a meditation trip to Bihar, in northeastern India, the 49-year-old Londoner was electrocuted by a faulty shower at his hotel. He suffered horrific burns, which eventually resulted in him having his left hand amputated. After being treated at two Indian hospitals, the hotelier agreed to pay for a flight home to England, if Cronin wrote a note exonerating him from further liability. When he landed he was rushed from the plane to Bristol’s Frenchay Hospital where it was discovered, aside from the devastating injuries, that he had contracted five multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacteria carrying the NDM-1 enzyme, including a super immune strain of cholera.


“I was in a really bad way,” he says. “I didn’t know about the bugs until I came round and found myself in the isolation unit. They told me what it was but I had no idea what it all meant. I was still in a state of shock to discover that my hand had gone.”


Russell Cronin was hospitalised in India and nearly died after contracting a host of multi-drug resistant bacteria.


Cronin was eventually discharged after 11 weeks in hospital. He was treated with colistin, an antibiotic so toxic it was discarded in the 1960s but has now been dug out again in desperation. Renal toxicity is the most common adverse effect of colistin treatment, none the less it may well have saved his life. “The doctors have told me how close I came to dying,” he says.


Hospitals are increasingly being confronted with cases such as Mr Cronin, with antimicrobial resistance now costing the economy an estimated £10 billion a year. But those within the medical profession say students exhibit a staggering lack of knowledge about the issues we face. “One of the major problems we find is the lack of microbiology training that junior students have,” one consultant microbiologist says. “It is just two hours, in that time you can’t do anything. And it is now a very common practice in hospitals to use antibiotics of last resort. It’s very widespread and I have seen a lot of drug-resistant bacteria.”


In November, a Europe-wide study of final year medical students tested knowledge of antibiotic prescribing and resistance. Laura Piddock, professor of microbiology and deputy director at the institute of microbiology at the University of Birmingham and director of Antibiotic Action, describes the results as “lamentable”. “It’s not the fault of the students or the medical schools. The problem is the curriculum. What it means is we don’t get the time we would like to teach this area properly.”


ithout new drugs, there is no hope. Between 1935 and 1968, 14 different classes of antibiotic were developed. In the 45 years since then, only five have been brought out. No new classes have now been developed since 1987. The problem, is profit potential and profit depends on volume. Many pharmaceutical companies have pulled out of development altogether, focusing attention instead on drugs for chronic conditions, such as diabetes or blood pressure which patients have to take for years, rather than courses lasting just days or weeks. Professor Anthony Kessel, director of Public Health Strategy at Public Health England, says it is time to engage in a “moral debate” over the lack of new drugs, and admits rationing could now be on the horizon.


“We may get to a situation where we have to think about rationing antibiotics. We are not there yet but if we really run out you can imagine that as a possibility. You can imagine a situation in the future where we have to develop a new antibiotic but not make it available straight away and keep it for emergencies. These are the type of solutions that we haven’t really talked about in great depth yet, but are possibilities.”


Interactive Graphic


A history of resistance





  • Antibiotic discovered

  • Antibiotic resistance identified



Some governments are now so concerned they are taking an active role in research. In a large glass and chrome facility near a small town called Collegeville, 30 miles northwest of Philadelphia, scientists are working to discover new antibiotics that can save the world. Since 2009, some 30 scientists and technicians have been based here in a GlaxoSmithKline “discovery performance unit”. Last year, the company was awarded up to $ 200 million by the U.S. government to develop new drugs to counter antibiotic resistance and bioterrorism – in particular, in case of anthrax attack. David Payne, head of the unit, says there are three possible molecules currently being tested, although admits the scale of the challenge is immense. “You’re working in very unknown territory because nobody has ever done it before.”



“A lot of companies have withdrawn from developing antibiotics. Only very few are doing it now”


David Payne


Payne says the difficulty is three-fold: poor profit potential; difficult science (the easier discoveries have already been made); and working around complex regulations, although he says the latter problem is now changing. According to a Chatham House report published last October, in 2004, only 1.6 per cent of drugs in development at the world’s 15 largest drug companies were antibiotics. GlaxoSmithKline is now just one of four major pharmaceutical companies left working on antibiotics.


“A lot of companies have withdrawn from this area,” Payne says. “If you go back 10 years just about every big pharmaceutical company you were aware of would have had a pretty large antibacterial discovery group. Only very few are doing that now.”


It may seem a bit rich for the global pharmaceutical industry to complain about profits when, this year, its value is expected to reach £550 billion. Yet it can cost, we are told, hundreds of millions of pounds to bring a new single drug to market. The profit imperative ensures that the drugs chosen for research are those most likely to provide high returns, while far more gets spent on marketing products than developing new ones. According to an analysis of drug company spending published in the British Medical Journal in 2012, for every £1 spent on basic research, £19 is spent on marketing.


The result is a yawning void, one that has prompted the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, among others, to call for a comprehensive review of the research and development environment. The UK government’s new five-year strategy to tackle resistance does address this in part; some £4 million being allocated for a new research unit on antimicrobial resistance to be established by the National Institute for Health Research from this April. There are also plans to encourage greater public-private investment in discovery and development and promote more streamlined research and collaboration within the industry.


here is a growing political will to address a complacency that set in as far back as the 1970s and even now – without new drugs in the pipeline – better infection control has been proven to make an immediate impact on winning the fight against resistant bacteria. Health professionals point to plummeting MRSA death rates in Britain, which have fallen by around 80 per cent since 2008. Improving public awareness is also key. Around half of people in the UK still do not know that antibiotics are inappropriate to treat colds, flu and viruses, according to evidence given a few weeks ago to the Commons Science and Technology Committee.


But it may yet still all prove to be too little, too late. Sir Alexander Fleming did warn us. During a speech in Stockholm in 1945 after accepting his Nobel Prize, Fleming sounded “one note of warning” over bacteria becoming resistant through inappropriate use of the drug. “The time may come when penicillin can be bought by anyone in the shops.’’ he said. The idea of his precious discovery being stockpiled by online pharmacies, used to fatten up our fish and livestock, dumped in rivers and sprayed over fields, would have baffled and horrified him in equal measure.


The laboratory where Sir Alexander Fleming discovered penicillin is kept preserved at St Mary’s Hospital.


At St Mary’s Hospital in London a plaque marks Fleming’s discovery in September 1928 “to the glory of God and immeasurable benefit to mankind”. His laboratory is perfectly preserved. His old Beck’s microscope sits on the wooden desk amid dusty glass bottles, books and test tubes. Fleming’s bacterial samples were deemed so vital to the future of mankind, contingency plans were drawn up in case of Nazi invasion during World War Two for them to be smuggled out of the country in the lining of his suit.


Today at St Mary’s – as in every other British hospital – that wonderful armoury, in which Fleming laid the first weapon, has been picked bare while the enemy has evolved. As Professor Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Trust, said in an interview last month, “We have been through a golden age and we have become complacent. We’re watching evolution happen. This will come up steadily over years and it has already started. It’s been happening for the last decade or more and will continue. It will creep up on us almost without noticing. This is getting to the tipping point where you and your families will start to see this.”


We are sleepwalking back into a time where something as simple as a grazed knee or a scratch acquired in the garden will start to claim lives. The golden age of medicine is behind us.


Author: Joe Shute
Editors: Liz Hunt, Joel Gunter, Cherrill Hicks
Designers: Mark Oliver, Scott Jones
Developer: Dan Palmer
Video: Julian Simmonds, Gregg Morgan
Title image: Alamy



As well significantly of a very good point: the death of antibiotics