John Oliver has criticized the latest healthcare reform, referring to it as “shitty Obamacare”.
On Last Week Tonight, the comic took apart the American Health Care Act, championed by the House speaker, Paul Ryan, saying: “You may not have wanted it, it looks awful but it’s here anyway” which he likened to “Pirates of the Caribbean 5: The Curse of Johnny Depp Getting Divorced & Needing the Money.”
He then discussed the negative reaction the bill has already encountered, even from many Republicans. “Much like the life behind Melania’s eyes, the AHCA looks dead by the time it was introduced in Washington,” he said.
Oliver called it “shitty Obamacare, the way Old Navy is a shitty version of the Gap” before talking about the mechanics of the plan. Older people will get more money towards their healthcare leading him to joke: “The older you get, the more money you get. Think of it as the exact opposite of being a woman in Hollywood.”
[embedded content]
Despite all of the negativity, Ryan has been doing the publicity circuit, explaining why the bill is so great. Oliver joked during one of his TV calls-ins that “somehow you can almost hear his erection during that”.
He then played the much-criticized clip of congressman Jason Chaffetz recommending that people should reconsider buying an iPhone if they plan to need any form of healthcare.
“It’s frankly a little hard to take a lecture on good choices from a man who presumably entered a barbershop and said give me the wet poodle pubes,” Oliver said.
He then highlighted that the people who will be most affected by the reform will be poorer Americans who voted for Trump. “It’s like if the people in Pompeii voted for the volcano,” he said.
When asking who exactly will benefit from the plan, Oliver showed stats that prove richer Americans will receive major tax cuts as a result. “So this plan is literally taking money from the poor and giving it to the very rich,” he said. “It’s essentially a reverse Bernie Sanders which is also the name of a sex act which consists of very aggressive fingering.”
In discussing the response, Oliver referred to it as “almost universally hated in Washington” and “truly the Ted Cruz of healthcare legislation”.
He also played footage from Sean Spicer’s press briefing where he used two different paper stacks to somehow prove the new bill is better. “That is the most aggressively stupid thing I have ever seen and I just saw Jason Chaffetz suggest paying for health insurance by retroactively not buying an iPhone,” he said.
Trump has spoken this week about how no one knew how difficult and complicated healthcare was until now. “It’s like saying ‘who knew King Tut was dead’ – everybody did!” Oliver said.
The president is also not attaching his name to it or talking about it at great length. “Trump is not clamoring to put his name on this bill and he has put his name on some of the shittiest products in human history,” he said.
Oliver ended by talking about his plan to get a message to Trump about how awful the new plan is: he’s bought ad time on Fox & Friends, a show the president clearly watches. The ad will feature an older actor explain in detail how his life will be harder from now on. It will air in the DC area on Wednesday morning.
“One out of every six children has a neurodevelopmental disorder according to the CDC” –JFK Jr.
JFK Jr doesn’t even have any family or friends with developmental disorders or neurological disorders problems. And yet here he is, fighting for the health of all our children.
The great JFK Jr used to give talks about mercury emissions from power plants. At the end of nearly every talk, he had women coming to talk to him, telling him that if he was interested in mercury poisoning problems, then he should look at the mercury in vaccines. He met a woman named Sarah Bridges with a son named Porter. Sarah had spent 8 years in a vaccine court due to Porter’s injuries, where she was finally awarded many millions of dollars. “She showed me some of the science,” says JFK Jr.
We all owe Sarah a huge thank you for giving him the final nudge to come fight for the health and lives of our children.
The CDC Patent Ownership Debacle
You could be forgiven for thinking that the CDC is above being bought, after all, they are looking after the health of you and your children, right? With recent reports of cover-ups, unethical behavior and non-transparency, the ethics of the CDC have been called into question.
Ginger Taylor of healthchoice.org had Mark Blaxill (one of her partners in advocacy) help her to expose the list of vaccine patents owners, including some 23 held by the CDC. It was long rumored, but now the facts have been revealed. He ran the patent search (can be viewed in the references section below)
There is something sneaky and sinister about the fact that a government regulatory body that is charged with protection our health is taking money from the very companies they are supposed to protect us from. Now how do we discern what is safe from what is not?
How can we now put our faith in government bodies, when it seems we can’t trust them to do the right thing when it comes to the most important thing in life; health?
With nearly 300 vaccines in development, what’s next for the vaccine industry and the CDC?
The sincere hope of all vaccine injured children and their parents is that one day soon, the CDC will be held accountable and that we finally get some unbiased and honest scientific research on the table.
What Can You Do To Protect Your Family?
Firstly, avoid any vaccines with toxins in them. Ask for the inserts. It’s your right as a human being and a parent, to demand to know what’s in those syringes they are injecting into you and your children.
If you don’t like what you see in there, find out more. Go back and ask the doctor about any ingredients that you don’t understand. Keep asking questions until you are satisfied with the answers OR you realize that all vaccines contain a toxic chemical cocktail.
It’s your right to know. Knowledge is power!
Some More Quotes From JFK Jr
“I’ve happily endured” the risks associated with shining light on this subject because he wants to save our children from the “greedy, greedy bullies.”
“God gave these children a brain. God gave them the ability to think, to read, to reason, to interact with their peers, to laugh, to enjoy their lives and these companies are stealing that from them.”
“…The force I’m up against has been the force that has been able to compromise every major institution in our democracy. And the people that stand up against them get crushed. But, I know how to fight them.”
“I’ve spent a lifetime fighting these bullies. People that think they can get away with anything including destroying the lives of our children. And I’m not going to let them do that. I’m going to fight until the last day of my life, with my last bit of energy I have. To make sure we get justice for these children.”
“We deserve good regulators, we deserve good science, we deserve healthy children, and that’s what I’m going to fight for. I promise you that nobody is going to fight harder for this or more effectively that I’m going to”
The Guardian asked a number of doctors working in A&E departments across the country to explain how their departments have coped over the past seven days, said to have been the worst week ever for NHS emergency departments. These are some of their responses:
‘We are devastated by underemployment’
It’s been like an absolute war zone recently. The government at the moment, not to mention my regulatory bodies, are ignoring the worst hospital conditions in my memory. We have a brilliant team, but are devastated by underemployment and underinvestment. We have two permanent registrars on a rota of seven places.
On a recent shift, I walked in to patients waiting four and a half hours to see a doctor. This means every patient has failed the “breach” target by the time they’re seen. A diligent staff nurse asked me to take a look at a patient she was a ‘bit worried about’. The woman was devastatingly ill with a perforated bowel, and could have easily become fatally unwell. She survived thanks to the observational diligence of my colleague, and later our excellent surgical team.
The London ambulance service is similarly overwhelmed. They couldn’t provide me with a transfer ambulance for another emergency case, and 11-year-old with a sight-threatening infection, in less than 70 minutes. The target is eight minutes. It is a miracle the child didn’t lose an eye.”
‘Nothing can be done’
Our hospital is crumbling and is unsafe on a daily basis. On Thursday, there were 75 patients in an department that has 18 majors’ beds. Thirty-five of those were medical patients awaiting beds, 20 hadn’t been seen as there was nowhere to see them or no staff to triage them.
We have expressed our concerns verbally, via formal emails to trust, incident reports etc, but nothing can be done as it can’t elsewhere either. Medical professionals are talking about quitting as they believe soon someone will die on our watch … [It is] completely out of control. Maybe it has already happened and we just don’t know. I’m talking about a cohort of 11 doctors. God knows what people feel nationally. It scares me what we are heading for.
When a family member got admitted last weekend I panicked, not because it was that serious but I actually felt they may not be safe in hospital.
I am angry that it is being ignored and swept under the carpet. I am angry that we are left to pick up the pieces and apologise for a system we’ve put our hearts and souls into, but now have no control over.
‘It’s not acceptable to practise medicine in this way’
This past week in A&E has been horrendous. There are no beds in this busy teaching hospital. There are more than 20 patients queueing in the corridor at any given time. We’re seeing, treating and discharging patients in the queue. It’s undignified to ask a miscarrying pregnant woman about her blood loss in a queue, never mind in one filled with loud drunks. It’s just not acceptable to have to practise medicine in this way, but what choice do we have?
Patients in the queue have a substandard quality of care. Fact. So much for calling 999 in an emergency, then waiting an age for the crew to arrive because they’re all waiting in the corridors of A&E to unload patients. Even once you arrive at the department with said emergency, you’ll be waiting hours for any sort of assessment or treatment. My collusion in this depravity is solely in an attempt to keep my patients as safe as possible, but mistakes are being made and this is not sustainable.
‘We were truly swamped’
I was on call at night for the last week at a small district general hospital. We had to put the hospital on divert. There were 15 ambulances waiting for entry and consultants doing their assessments in the back of them. On surgery, despite phenomenal work from the registrar on call, we were truly swamped.
‘These are just some of my experiences this week in A&E …’
A four-bedded resus unit expected to make capacity for eight patients; leaving a shift to come back 24 hours later and finding some of the same patients still in resus; being in charge of the emergency department [ED] overnight with rota gaps; and requesting a divert for a few hours to allow us to catch up, only to be told that the policy has changed and capacity issues now had to be dealt with internally.
‘Everybody is terrified’
In the accident and emergency department where I work there is provision to keep up to 12 people overnight in case the wards are too full. On Tuesday night there were 27 sick patients all requiring hospital treatment who were kept on corridors and in the laundry room, being cared for by three nurses and one doctor.
It’s normal at the moment for 20 to be there overnight. We are having to send patients home we would rather admit, with little to no access to social care. Everybody is terrified. Everybody is waiting for something terrible to happen, because no matter how hard you work, there are too many cracks that are widening for patients to slip through. Stafford is where everything went down a few years ago. It seems the same situation is now happening on a nationwide level. I hope desperately that nobody I love or care about needs to be admitted to hospital right now. I just can’t believe how bad it is compared to last year.
‘The entire system is crumbling’
There are not enough staff and 12 ambulances regularly sitting in the corridor. There are designated corridor nurses. In this ED the patients can wait for eight hours. The emergencies do get seen first, as do the strokes, and the triage nurses pull the sickest out the corridor but sometimes they are seen in the corridor. A consultant is designated for the corridor to ensure safety.
A consultant has been staying overnight often lately due to the safety concerns, but that is unsustainable and they are burning out. No one is bothered about breaches anymore, it’s the 12-hour trolley waits because the CCG [clinical commissioning group] has to know then and trust board get involved. The entire system is crumbling. On New Year’s Eve our hospital asked for a divert when the wait was eight and a half hours with only 14 ambulances left on the roads in Merseyside. This is not uncommon. The divert was denied because the wait was not the longest, and every other department was in the same situation.
‘We have a daily lack of beds’
I’m a registrar in one of the busiest emergency departments in the country. This past week saw our busiest day on record with nearly 200 people waiting in our department at one point. There was a five-hour wait just to be seen, and a 14-hour wait for beds. I have people queuing to get a space in resuscitation and it regularly becomes dangerous. We have a daily lack of beds due to poor flow of patients out of hospital backing up to the emergency department. Patients are coming to harm and there are undoubtedly deaths arising from the current state of emergency medicine.
The Almighty plays a central part in the hallowed 12 steps of Alcoholics Anonymous. Six of them make reference to God, Him or Power. In one step, members vow to hand “our will and our lives” to God while another implores Him to remove their shortcomings.
Now the organisation’s religious undertone – and its utility in fighting alcoholism – has come under fire in Canada, where an atheist has lodged a human rights complaint alleging AA discriminated against him.
For more than two years, Lawrence Knight has watched his complaint snake through the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal. Earlier this year, the tribunal said the complaint raised a number of complex legal issues and recommended it go to a full hearing.
More than 23 years sober, Knight says he always found that the world of AA was an uneasy fit. “I come from a long line of humanists,” said the 59-year-old.
We Agnostics, a Toronto secular AA group created in 2010, seemed the perfect solution, offering all the support and companionship of AA but without the trappings of God. Here the 12 steps were still followed – each carefully rewritten to scrub out any mention of God or prayer.
But the group’s separation of church and sobriety didn’t sit well with some. In 2011, We Agnostics and Toronto’s other secular AA group, Beyond Belief, were delisted from the Toronto AA website and directory, in effect removing them from the city’s network of 500 weekly meetings.
The decision prompted tears and shock among the three dozen or so people who had embraced the secular groups. “It was painful. It’s shunning,” said Knight. “It was unbelievable that an organisation that can’t kick anybody out, and that prides itself on that, had kicked us out.”
Members of the secular groups – worried that their hard-won efforts at staying sober were now in jeopardy – vowed to push forward. What emerged was a parallel system of sorts, one that has today swelled to about 350 members in 12 secular AA groups across Toronto.
As the secular movement grew in numbers, Knight and others continued to push to be brought back into Toronto’s AA fold. They appealed to the city’s coordinating body, urging them to reconsider the decision. “We ran into a brick wall,” said Knight.
Frustration drove him to lodge a human rights complaint two years ago, claiming that AA had discriminated against his group on the basis of creed. While directed at Toronto’s coordinating body, the complaint also names the highest levels of the organisation in North America. “They didn’t make any decisions directly,” said Knight. “But there is something that they did do, in my opinion, and that is the fact that there have been agnostic meetings for 40 years, but they haven’t clarified anything; they didn’t have any human rights protocols in place.”
The result is a scattered approach to secularism around the world. In some places, such as New York City, secular groups are allowed to operate freely and under the umbrella of the local AA hierarchy. Other secular groups – from Des Moines to Vancouver – have been treated similarly to those in Toronto, pushed out and left to their own devices over their rejection of God.
Knight’s complaint will head to mediation in the coming weeks. To date, AA has argued to the tribunal that it is a special interest organisation, a status that affords it the right to restrict its membership.
The dispute hints at a broader question being asked among the group’s two million members worldwide as they seek to incorporate 12 steps first penned in the 1930s into modern times: How important is God and religion in AA’s quest to empower people to fight alcoholism?
Some, like Knight, argue that AA’s curative power lies not in religion, but instead in the fellowship it fosters. A growing body of research, he pointed out, now suggests that the roots of addiction are tangled in isolation and loneliness.
The argument clashes with the Toronto coordinating body, which has argued to the tribunal that a belief in the higher power of God is a bona fide requirement for groups in Toronto.
Officials in Toronto declined to comment, while a spokesperson from AA World Services in New York City said the organisation was unable to comment as the matter was before the Human Rights Tribunal.
Knight is hoping that the human rights complaint will force the organisation to definitively address the long-simmering issue. “Alcoholism kills more people than it saves. It’s killed a lot of my friends, it’s killed a lot of my family, it’s an insidious thing. And the best support system in the world is AA.”
But the strength of that support hinges on AA being accessible to all. “The point is that anybody should be able to go to a meeting and not feel intimidated, not feel forced out or that they have to believe in something that somebody else believes,” he said. “Because that’s just ludicrous in this day and age.”
All 193 United Nations member states are set to sign a declaration agreeing to combat “the biggest threat to modern medicine” in Wednesday’s high-level meeting on antibiotic resistance.
The agreement was reached just before the general assembly convened to discuss the threat of antibiotic resistance, which is only the fourth health issue to trigger a general assembly meeting.
“It’s ironic that such a small thing is causing such an enormous public threat,” said Jeffrey LeJeune, a professor and head of the food animal research program at Ohio State University. “But it is a global health threat that needs a global response.”
The declaration routes the global response to superbugs along a similar path as the one used to combat climate change. In two years, groups including UN agencies will provide an update on the superbug fight to the UN secretary general.
It is estimated that more than 700,000 people die each year due to drug-resistant infections, though it could be much higher because there is no global system to monitor these deaths. And there has been trouble tracking those deaths in places where they are monitored, like in the US, where tens of thousands of deaths have not been attributed to superbugs, according to a Reuters investigation.
Scientists warned about the threat of antibiotic resistance decades ago, when pharmaceutical companies began the industrial production of medicine. The inventor of penicillin, Alexander Fleming, cautioned of the impending crisis while accepting his Nobel prize in 1945: “There is the danger that the ignorant man may easily underdose himself and by exposing his microbes to non-lethal quantities of the drug make them resistant”.
But in the last few years, studies have dramatically increased awareness about antibiotic resistance. There has also been considerable advocacy by health officials, like Sally Davies, chief medical officer of the UK.
“Drug-resistant infections are firmly on the global agenda but now the real work begins,” Davies said in a statement. “We need governments, the pharmaceutical industry, health professionals and the agricultural sector to follow through on their commitments to save modern medicine.”
Signatories to the UN declaration committed to encouraging innovation in antibiotic development, increasing public awareness of the threat and developing surveillance and regulatory systems on the use and sales of antimicrobial medicine for humans and animals.
Only three other health issues have been the subject of general assembly high-level meetings: HIV/Aids, non-communicable diseases and Ebola.
Mark Woolhouse, professor of infectious disease epidemiology at the University of Edinburgh, said he was encouraged that unlike with HIV/Aids and Ebola, the UN is addressing this health crisis before it has spun out of control.
“It’s very serious indeed – it’s killing people around the world at the rate of hundreds of thousands of year and we all expect it to get worse if something isn’t done now,” Woolhouse said. “But the UN is coming in at just the right time, in a sense.”
“How was your daughter’s wedding? I thought of you when the sun came out.”
“Yeah, it was good.”
And then, she burst into tears.
“Is everything OK?”
“Look love, I don’t mean to be rude but can you just tell me what my test showed? I haven’t slept all week and am nauseous with worry. I can’t take this anymore.”
“You had a test? But I didn’t order one. Your breast cancer has been stable for some years.”
“My GP did, and said you’d have the results. You mean you don’t know?”
Conventional medical training teaches doctors to start with perfunctory questions and build rapport before delivering significant news. After all, patients, especially in the public health system, don’t always see the same doctor and it’s important to cover or recap important details.
I used to greet patients at the door, ensure they were comfortably seated with phone turned off, hearing aid tuned in and notebook ready. I’d exchange a few pleasantries to humanise the interaction. But frankly, I am surprised it has taken me so long to appreciate that no oncology consultation goes far without first relaying the news of “the test”. “The test” is an umbrella term encompassing all manner of bloods and x-rays – haemoglobin, biochemistry, liver function, tumour markers, CT scans, PET scans and the rest. From the moment of their cancer diagnosis, patients are wedded to “the test”.
It’s different for brand new patients who are resigned to repeating their story multiple times to multiple doctors but when long-term patients return for their regular check-up they have one thing on their mind. So I have learnt to get to the point fast.
If the news is good, I tell the patient as soon as we’re out of earshot: “Your tests were fine, come and sit down.” Grips loosen, shoulders relax and some days you can feel the hiss of dissipating tension. When the news is bad, I escort the patient to a chair, make eye contact, and say, “I’m afraid the scans found a problem – we’ll have plenty of time to discuss this.”
Everyone does it differently but over time, I have decided this is kinder than, “How are you? Let’s go over any symptoms before we get to your results.”
Every patient has a story about spending sleepless nights and nail-biting days, fearing the worst but praying for a reprieve. When someone cries with relief at a scan that I’d always expected to be normal, I can’t help reflecting on how automatically scribbled test slips have the power to govern people’s lives.
“Your bone scan was normal again. There was no sign of cancer in your spine, only arthritis,” I recently reassured an elderly man with prostate cancer. He suffered from chronic back pain but the moment he mentioned it to a new provider, he scored himself another test. This time, a chiropractor had encouraged him to ask his GP for a scan.
Tests crowded his life – he rued that there wasn’t an event in recent times that hadn’t been disrupted by an appointment or a test, from his nephew’s wedding to his sister’s funeral. Knowing that I’d played a part in his misery, I suggested, giving him a break from tests. “They don’t really help nearly as much as talking to you and seeing how you are doing,” I said. But his wife was quick to squash his glee, “Oh no, I’d go mad not knowing! You must do a blood test at least.”
As cancer patients are living longer, they are seeing their oncologists more and many visits are accompanied by some sort of test. In the case of breast cancer, but also others such as prostate and colon cancer, blood tumour markers are used to track tumour activity, with changing markers often triggering costly scans. Patients regard painful and inconvenient tests as the cross to bear if they are to stay alive. After all, without tests how will their oncologist know what’s going on inside their body? For oncologists, writing test slips is as routine as breathing.
But the evidence suggests that cancer patients who are not receiving chemotherapy and are not enrolled in clinical trials do not need frequent testing. Depending on the disease, professional guidelines have long recommended against so-called “routine” testing in cancer surveillance but patients continue to receive them. Not all tests are ordered by oncologists – in a fragmented environment, patients see multiple providers. They order a test hoping it will reveal something that a good history won’t but this is seldom the case.
Tumour marker measurements in a range of advanced cancers altered management in a mere 2% of patients.
Pathology and radiology tests have grown by around 10% each year. The Grattan Institute estimates the overall cost of wasteful healthcare spending to be as much as a billion dollars.
It might seem intuitive that early detection of disease progression through tests might be helpful in instituting or switching therapies, avoiding unnecessary toxicity and guiding therapeutic choices but there is no evidence that a particular test done at a particular interval alone determines a change in course.
On the other hand, there is evidence that more tests cause more anxiety. Up to 65% of patients with advanced cancer are said to suffer some form of psychological distress. Undergoing frequent tests, not clearly understanding why and waiting weeks, even months, for results traps them in an unenviable situation. Patients who are preoccupied by test results have been shown to have a worse quality of life.
A recent study of more than 2,000 American women with metastatic breast cancer published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology found that more than a third of their providers were “extreme users” of blood tests and scans. (Here, extreme use was defined as more than 12 tumour marker tests and more than four scans per year.) Patients who were cared for by these providers had a 60% higher cost of care, more hospital-based care and later use of palliative care. A previous study found that tumour marker measurements in a range of advanced cancers altered management in a mere 2% of patients.
The overuse of pathology and radiology tests is by no means a problem specific to oncology but cancer patients are among the most heavily investigated, with the direct cost of cancer care in Australia reaching over $ 4.5bn.
Entrenched physician practice is hard to change through guidelines alone. In one study, over 90% of oncologists reported that repeat tests were ordered by someone simply copying the previous order. Without being constrained by rigid rules, doctors must be accountable for the tests they order. Making doctors aware, individually where possible, of the cost of tests, has been shown to influence practice, at least in the short-term. Awareness of the myriad costs of over-investigation must begin early in a doctor’s career. Good clinical practice means asking with every test ordered, “How will the results change my management?”
Patient expectations play a role in the prescribing habits of doctors. Comparisons in cancer are rife. “My neighbour with the same cancer gets a test every time, why don’t I?” is a common question posed to oncologists. The answer is not to order the test, rather to educate the patient. Patient surveys show a willingness to understand and avoid the harmful effects of indiscriminate testing. A key motivation for enduring tests is a feeling of security but patients need to understand that a good doctor-patient relationship, where concerns are promptly heeded, is no match for a battery of tests.
When I tell patients I’d rather not order tests that don’t provide meaningful results in their clinical context, they often ask what else they can do to look after themselves, as if submitting to tests were a proxy for self-care. I tell them that there is growing evidence that they should maintain a healthy weight, eat everything but in moderation, get some form of regular exercise, stop smoking and nurture good relationships.
Frequent testing improves neither quality nor quantity of life but these other recommendations nod to the foremost tenet of medicine, first do no harm.
This schooling needs to start with young folks, each gay and straight. Nevertheless, we very first have to address the reality that several adults believe that it is inappropriate to talk to young men and women about intercourse in complete and frank detail, out of concern that doing so will inspire them to indulge in risky behaviours. In many conditions, these attitudes are primarily based on moral or religious views rather than any actual proof, and as a end result have severely constrained HIV and AIDS training in the Uk. It is just incorrect to presume that talking to young folks about safer intercourse and the value of employing condoms prospects to an improve in sexual exercise.
Younger men and women, gay and straight, are possessing intercourse, and they are experimenting with medication and alcohol, just as their mothers and fathers did. It’s a truth that we, and particularly parents, shouldn’t disregard. Some experiment a lot more than other folks, some perform it really secure. Some experiment with behaviour that some adults would see as “immoral”. We of program want to defend kids from likely harm, but in teaching them about sex we want to make sure we never target on the negatives, the dangers, and reduce it to argument about what’s moral or immoral.
There is still an assumption amid several in our society, which is currently being passed on to the younger generation, that indulging in “immoral” sex and unlawful drug use will lead to HIV infection. This merely perpetuates the stigmatisation of folks who are residing with HIV, and risks implying that any individual who has HIV is therefore concerned in “immoral” routines, and has got what was coming to them.
The WHO tips truly feel like a phase backwards, advertising a unfavorable gay stereotype that I imagined we have been moving away from. Let us be clear: a more relaxed mindset to HIV is not exclusive to the gay local community. It truly is an perspective that’s become prevalent across all communities. The report will encourage straight people to believe that HIV is basically a gay problem, and that they themselves are off the hook.
I am not towards antiretroviral medication exactly where they are required. The report correctly highlights that antiretroviral drug use can lessen the possibility of passing on HIV by up to 92 per cent. Even so, other studies tell us that, when utilized correctly, a condom is about 98 per cent effective. Shouldn’t we be focusing our efforts on educating individuals to use condoms (which are more affordable than medicines and side-impact cost-free) as an alternative?
A fraction of the expense of investing in huge amounts of antiretroviral medication would go a lengthy way to making a programme that educates us all – gay and straight – about responsible sexual overall health.
Alternatively, the WHO appears to have developed a scenario with a really clear winner (medication companies) and a extremely clear loser (gay guys).
Is there an English country mansion with a background far more rich than the Hertfordshire outpost of the wellness spa empire Champneys in Tring? It was built as a home for 1 lady, the Rothschild dowager her 54 servants moved in but she never ever did. Later, it was owned by Walter Rothschild, who filled the grounds with zebras and kangaroos and could typically be noticed riding a giant tortoise. Far more recently, it has hosted British royalty and played a minor role in the phone-hacking scandal thanks to its owner’s generosity in the direction of police chiefs and newspaper editors. Absolutely there is a fantastic documentary in right here somewhere?
Sadly, Champneys (ITV) wasn’t fairly it. In retaining with ITV’s recent obsession with providing us a peek behind the frayed velvet curtain of Britain’s luxury business (see final week’s Within Asprey: Luxury by Royal Appointment), this mildly amusing movie showed the Tring resort and celebrity haunt barely coping with a pile-up of dissatisfied visitors, internecine warfare amongst the employees, and competitors from wannabe spas that – as place-upon owner Stephen Purdew had it – are merely hotels with “a handful of poxy pictures of a pool” in the brochure.
Champneys, Purdew was at pains to stage out, is a overall health spa and not just another 5-star hotel. But the delights of the reiki treatment method rooms, the blood-freezing kriotherapy chamber and the healthier-residing menu seemed lost on numerous. One guest was most put out by the dimension of the portions and the lack of chocolate gateau, one more baffled by the daytime alcohol ban. The location appeared to be complete of girls there just for a dip in the scorching tub and a spot of flirting with the waiters.
A lot of the material here felt like something out of Small Britain: new recruit Bettina’s efforts to “Champney-fy” the reception staff’s phone manner housekeeper Irena, who kept hunting daggers at her superior and operations manager Lee’s very certain instructions for preparing a space for Arab royalty (covered floors and furniture, a Harrods catalogue, “citrus blush” soap in the bathroom).
It was brave – some may possibly say foolish – of Purdew to permit the cameras to present his valiant attempts to cease Champneys looking a lot more like Alan Partridge’s Travel Tavern than a five-star hotel. But this movie sorely lacked a touch of Champneys’ significantly-vaunted glamour. Daniel Craig and the Arab royal investing £250,000 have been talked about, but in no way observed. Who did we get as an alternative? Bobby Davro on a treadmill and a member of Ladies Aloud.
Contrast that with the Jess of nowadays. Not content material merely to attend the music festival, she carried out there, to an audience of thousands. “I did six exhibits, two a day, on the Sensation Seekers stage,” she says. Jess teamed up with an act referred to as Captain Hotknives to carry out an improvisation display in which the Captain turned Jess’s tics into comedic songs and stories.
It is the type of exposure that would strike fear into the heart of a seasoned performer, so it is straightforward to forget that it is only two many years considering that Jess burst on to the nationwide consciousness, when she gave an interview to Radio 4’s Right now programme, in which she unleashed her special tic-peppered voice to hundreds of thousands of listeners in an attempt to increase awareness of the issue.
Considering that then, the inspirational girl who says “biscuit” 16,000 instances a day has turn into the poster girl for Tourette’s. Glastonbury wasn’t even the culmination of her dreams, but merely the very first step in a summertime campaign to demystify a neurological condition that impacts much more than 300,000 young children and grownups in Britain. It is even now erroneously referred to by several as “the swearing disease”. (In truth, only ten per cent of sufferers curse uncontrollably.)
When she is not working at the Oasis Children’s Nature Garden, a children’s undertaking in south London, in which her remit consists of fundraising, support growth and volunteer management, Jess will devote the subsequent few weeks rehearsing for the Edinburgh Fringe. Her debut display there is named Backstage In Biscuit Land, and characteristics comedy, storytelling and puppetry.
“One of my motivations for doing the show is to reclaim the laughter linked with Tourette’s. Humour is one thing that can be missing in discussions about disability, but for me humour is 1 of the factors that can make difficult occasions manageable. Tourette’s is so much funnier than just people swearing in the supermarket.”
As if on cue, Jess all of a sudden squeals “Aladdin is dead!”, ahead of breaking into laughter and explaining: “I announce Aladdin’s death quite a great deal. I have no thought why, it’s just a random thing, but when I’m all around youngsters, I have to right away include: ‘Not actually.’ The other hilarious 1 is when I announce ‘Biscuit time!’ at the children’s venture, and all the little ones are flummoxed until I say: ‘Actual biscuit time.’ ”
Jess has co-written the Edinburgh show with puppeteer and co-performer Jess Mabel-Jones. “My tics have named her Chopin, for some purpose, so that types portion of the demonstrate, as does a section that created when we have been at the workshop stage and I try to explain what Tourette’s feels like to a dolphin… in language he could understand.”
It sounds quite madcap, and after just a single hour in Jess’s organization I can vouch for her comic timing: “I really do not require to be concerned about any awkward silences on stage – my tics will fill any gap with some thing humorous, random and probably irrelevant. The only heckler I’m concerned about is myself – I mean, truly, who could say something worse to me?”
Jess also has what Simon Cowell calls the likeability issue, anything each aspiring performer seeks but only a couple of are born with. Accurate, her conversation is peppered with words this kind of as “biscuit”, “squirrel” and the occasional “f—”, but soon after a although you stop noticing and concentrate alternatively on her eloquence and uplifting, wise message.
“I used to find it really tough to talk or think about my tics with no crying or receiving upset. But in 2010, encouraged by a good friend, I started a weblog known as Touretteshero and wrote a book about my experiences. Making it possible for myself that area to think about how Tourette’s has had a positive influence – by triggering laughter or opening up a conversation with someone, for illustration – has given me a greater comprehending of the situation, and of myself. I observed the great things about obtaining Tourette’s – the humorous incidents and the kindness of strangers – and I’m glad I did. That has had a far better influence than any other intervention.”
Jess’s verbal and bodily tics are continuous, but she identified that the anti-psychosis drugs normally administered to Tourette’s sufferers did little to assist. They also came with side results such as permanent tiredness. Rather, she will take Baclofen, a muscle relaxant usually provided to cerebral palsy sufferers. She also requires useful methods this kind of as sporting knee pads and padded gloves to avert injuries when she falls or bangs her chest at evening, she sleeps beneath a weighted blanket that stops her moving about, so that she can sleep.
Nowadays, nothing seems to faze Jess. Two years ago, she started employing the wheelchair because walking had become unsafe, and she says that, far from becoming restrictive, it has liberated her, permitting her more freedom to get about.
“I possibly must have mentioned that at times my tics intensify to such a degree that I entirely lose handle of my entire body and speech,” she tells me. “It’s like a seizure and requires related management, in that I should both place on a security belt in my chair, or be put into the recovery position to stop me hurting myself.”
And with one particular final flourish of her comic timing, she deadpans: “But don’t worry, I’ve previously had a single of these these days.”
‘Backstage In Biscuit Land’ is at the Pleasance Courtyard, Edinburgh (0131 556 6550, pleasance.co.united kingdom) from August one to 16, at one.55pm. touretteshero.com
Till last week, The Fault In Our Stars was just a greatest-selling novel about teenagers with cancer. The runaway, actuality-biting Youthful Adult book by John Green had taken Penguin and tens of millions of readers for a extended sufficient, jolty trip. Now the story, advised from the point of view of a sixteen-12 months outdated woman with thyroid cancer in her lungs, has become a significant motion picture.
Early on in The Fault In Our Stars, you will catch children with cancer texting, driving, enjoying video games, reading and flirting. They go in and out of hospital emergency rooms and scanning machines even though their mothers and fathers view, anxiously, uncertain what to do or what will occur up coming.
Fox Fox’s T.F.I.O.S. – as people in-the-know refer to what I may get in touch with “The Massive Cry” – is a hit. Perhaps against the odds, this movie took the amount 1 spot at box offices last weekend, and it’s nevertheless operating robust. A side result, probably, as judged by my Facebook feed, is a run on Kleenex Kleenex
‘The Fault In Our Stars,’ Fox
I liked this significant movie, despite all the sentiment and blatant over-use of metaphors. Kids who frequent hospitals and live near death lead fascinating lives. They don’t mince words they call spades, spades. And they’re Ok, is element of the messaging amongst the afflicted fictional youngsters. They want their genuine audiences in theaters to know that significantly about their conditions. The dilemma is, what Green’s kids with cancer decide on to say, and the movie reveals about them, could not be real. Surely it is not the same for all youngsters with serious illness. Okay-ness won’t, always, final.
Hope lives. As do parents, following youngsters die. Supreme sadness.
Feel of Otto Frank, the only Holocaust survivor among his family members. Following all that hiding, and wishing, it is he who lives to study Anne’s diary and share the story. Not surprisingly, he pops up in TFIOS. This film is loaded.
The protagonist, Hazel Grace Lancaster, worries about her parents’ really like for her and their long term nicely-getting. Gingerly portrayed by the actress Shailene Woodley, she suffers from flashbacks from age 13 or so, right after her cancer diagnosis, when she was bald and remedies were failing and her mom was crying. Hazel feels accountable for ache she may well deliver, unwittingly or generously by opening up, or by letting down the barriers for receiving to know her, intimately, prior to she dies.
“I’m a grenade” she tells the handsome younger guy she meets at the cancer support group. Augustus (“Gus”) Waters, smilingly played by Ansel Elgort, has lost a leg to osteosarcoma. He’s unafraid.
An oncologist viewing this slick movie may possibly get this – what it is like to get to technique a particular person with terminal sickness. The closer you get, the harder it is. For this purpose, some medical professionals hold a distance. Others lean in. They thrive, genuinely, on the privilege of getting “near.” But it can be a pleasure to hold the hand of a individual who’s seriously sick. You really feel like, perhaps, you can support them, if not physically, in other techniques. And that is component of what this movie is about.
Hazel has a preferred guide, “An Imperial Affliction” by the fictional writer Peter Van Houton. She grapples with the fact that his book stops mid-sentence. Hazel wants, practically far more than anything, to make contact with the writer to uncover out what occurs to the characters right after the “Affliction” ends. Willem Dafoe terrifically depicts a joyless man, the guide-within-the-book’s creator. Not to give it away, I must leave his pained, self-destructive soul at that point.
picture with official film trailer (TFIOS Facebook web page)
A detail I loved in this story is Hazel’s oxygen tank. She carries it close to, like small luggage on wheels, literal “baggage,” wherever she goes. She needs oxygen simply because her lungs are impacted by the thyroid cancer. With no it she fatigues and would, within minutes, endure organ harm. A quirk is that she drags it all around virtually constantly with no support, such as from her mother and father. Gus gets this. He does not right away offer you to carry it for her. He perceives that Hazel wants to deal with it on her personal, and that she’s capable of asking for help when essential. He treats her with no condescension, as she likes to be taken care of.
Last but not least, I should mention that the social media phenomena occurring all about TFIOS. There is a blurring of boundaries between individuals and the stories that encompass or adhere to them. John Green, the author of the unique guide says he was inspired by Esther Earl, a teenager in Quincy, Massachusetts. She created a actual-existence following on YouTube and Twitter Twitter before dying from metastatic thyroid cancer.
Like many movies, The Fault has a YouTube channel, Facebook web page and Twitter account. A number of of the characters are assigned their exclusive virtual spaces.
Only you can make a decision if you like this film. And the only way of deciding, to know if you can manage it, is to be inclined to get nearer to the subject of children with cancer, to invest a short interval of time there, in a theater. Not to worry – the framed, carefully layered picture is nowhere shut to the place exactly where Hazel and Gus and their buddies genuinely dwell. But it might give you a clue, an insight, or a excellent cry.
‘I want to get GP locums away from the mindset of currently being the underdog,’ says Richard Fieldhouse.
Describe your part in one particular sentence: I stability operating as a freelance GP in a number of dozen distinct surgeries with supporting the expert interests of up to half the GP workforce who choose not to function as partners.
Why did you want to operate in healthcare? Simply because humans are so fascinating, and when their extremely complex thoughts or entire body goes incorrect, it is actually great to perform with them to unravel their unexpected complexity and support restore it. And GPs are folks as well, and given that we’re not very very good at seeking following ourselves, I became interested in assisting them seem soon after their welfare too.
How do you want to see the sector adjust in the following five years? I want to end the skilled isolation faced by salaried and GP locums. It is not very good for them, and it is even worse for sufferers.
My proudest achievement at work was … in 2002 when I chaired a national doing work group of locum group leaders, the place we jointly came up with the locum GP chambers notion.
The most challenging issue I’ve dealt with at function is … seeing a salaried GP bullied by the partners in her practice. It would seem that when things get difficult, individuals build siege mentalities and can just turn on their colleagues, rather than working together to come up with creative answers.
I believe the Well being and Social Care Act is … our possibility for a much better voice for individuals and a lot more locally responsive solutions. But there are ominous and perplexing signs of leading-down interference, with GPs getting given too a lot obligation with no the required reciprocal handle. This all leaves me questioning if CCGs are becoming set up to fail. It has received to be effectively funded, and it has acquired to uphold all the unique values of our NHS.
The men and women I perform with are … all totally experienced GPs and represent about forty% of the GP workforce, but on the entire tend to be marginalised, unappreciated and in some instances blamed as bringing about the demise of standard practice.
I do what I do since … general practice is the jewel in the NHS crown, but as GPs we continually undermine it ourselves by only focusing on 1 specific model of providing care. We want to perform with each other.
Often individuals consider that … by advertising the interests of sessional GPs I am bringing about the demise of general practice as we know it. Far from it. I see nearby groups of engaged, flexible GPs delivering essential support, and certainly a enhance, to the ever escalating demands on practices.
Proper now I want to … get GP locums away from the mindset of getting the underdog – working in a state of competitive enforced underperformance – and to function with each other in cooperative teams the place the services we’re then capable to provide is so much far better than the sum of its parts.
At perform I am often studying that … every issue has a resolution. Just keep listening engage with the issue, request much more and far more queries. A answer will often emerge.
The one issue always on my mind at operate is … how chaotic and inefficient so a lot of the NHS would seem to be, and how effortless it would be to correct it.
If I could go back ten many years and meet my former self I’d inform them … never fret, you’re carrying out the proper factor.
If I could meet my future self I would anticipate them to be … greyer but nonetheless happy, and nonetheless running. I hope.
What is the ideal element of your occupation? Sharing a joke with a patient. Despite what men and women may possibly believe, there is hardly ever a predicament in which you can not have a laugh together.
What is the worst component of your occupation? Struggling with arcane NHS IT. It is self-inflicted industrial espionage priming ourselves for private takeover.
What tends to make you smile? When our youngsters tell me I make the greatest pizza in the world. I will not they just like pizza.
What keeps you awake at evening? Restless legs, but only when I’ve been out working and have not drunk ample water. I can’t believe how much water I need to drink.
Dr Richard Fieldhouse is chief executive of the National Association of Sessional GPs
Are you a member of our online local community? Join the Guardian healthcare network to receive standard emails and exclusive gives.
Harry Leslie Smith’s account of his sister’s death in 1926 and his eulogy to the NHS moved numerous readers. Photograph: Sarah Lee for the Guardian
I was born in 1937, and when I was a month outdated my father collapsed in Stratford Substantial Street with pneumonia and pleurisy. When he was sufficiently recovered, he invested some weeks convalescing, for the duration of that time my mother had no revenue and the last of my parents’ funds went on having to pay for an ambulance to deliver him home.
Later on I keep in mind my father when he was working as an orthopaedic technician, receiving off his pushbike, and possessing heard about the new NHS, greeting my mom with the phrases “Thank goodness, we shall never ever have to fear about obtaining sick once more” (What happened to the globe my generation developed?, G2, five June)
So my generation is healthier and living longer thanks to the care we have obtained throughout our lives from a support run by devoted clinicians and not run for profit by the least expensive supplier. We have heard so a lot about the excessive “cost” of the NHS, but this belies the truth that in England we devote much less per capita on overall health than most other produced nations.
Of course those promulgating this myth typically have vested interests in the private firms, typically foreign, that are gathering like vultures in the hope of the excess fat earnings they hope to make from our illnesses and well being demands.
The politicians behind these insidious programs are intent on dismantling a service which was, before they interfered, the envy of the planet. But then they are far too youthful to bear in mind life prior to the NHS, and if factors get actually grim they can afford to shell out for private care. Mabel Taylor Knutsford, Cheshire
Illustration: Gary Kempston
• The solution to Harry Leslie Smith’s question is that Conservative MPs, this kind of as Oliver Letwin and John Redwood, received their hands on it. When doing work for Rothschild bank’s international privatisation department, they laid strategies for the Well being and Social Care Act which have been fleshed out in the Adam Smith Institute’s report, The Wellness of Nations, in 1988, the very same year Previous Etonian Letwin published his book Privatising the World. In 2004, Letwin, then Tory shadow chancellor, invited businessmen to his West Dorset constituency, encouraging them to work with each other to win contracts for a new PFI regional hospital. In accordance to a single participant, Letwin informed his audience that inside of five years of a Conservative victory “the NHS will not exist any more”.
Letwin, now minister of government policy, has overseen each overall health secretarys’ operate considering that the 2010 election. The bill widens the door, opened by New Labour, to NHS privatisation, closure of hospital solutions, promoting off hospital land to produce a support funded, not from standard taxation but by personal payments to insurance companies. As Harry puts it: ” … the NHS stripped down like a derelict home …”
As Michael Portillo said: “They [the Tories] did not think they could win an election if they informed you what they have been going to do [to the NHS]…” David Murray Wallington, Surrey
• My father was born in the workhouse infirmary in Colchester in 1900. My mother’s loved ones fled from the horrible poverty of Glasgow’s Gorbals to London in 1904. I was fortunate to invest my early life in a country in which situations enhanced. I am only 79, but I keep in mind when the Labour get together defended the weak the sick and the bad. I pray that the two Eds, Miliband and Balls, read through Harry’s touching story of his sister Marion’s life and death. John Munson Maidstone, Kent
• Dear Harry, thank you for reminding us of the terrible conditions that the NHS replaced. Rarely have I been so moved by an report in the Guardian. The piece by Harry Leslie Smith, so superbly written, ought to be sent to every MP and member of the Home of Lords who voted for the Health and Social Care Act so that they can realise the enormity of what they have carried out. Ann Lynch Skipton, North Yorkshire
• I am in my 70th 12 months, rather than the 91 many years of Harry, but I also despair at the dismantling of the welfare state that meant so a lot to working-class folks. How is it that the elderly can neglect so effortlessly and vote for political events, which now includes the Labour party, who want to privatise all the services that working-class men and women rely on? Colin Lewis Blackwood, Gwent
• 3 words stood out for me: “taxation advantages absolutely everyone”. Go over. Mike Pender Cardiff
• Harry Leslie Smith’s eulogy to the NHS measures the amounts of improvement in society following the second globe war and the opportunities that have been missed. The NHS did not develop an equal society, but it gave accessibility to healthcare irrespective of signifies to pay out and created strides in medicine which have been offered to absolutely everyone. It grew to become a model to aspire to. The NHS as a public services has saved or ameliorated many lives during most of Harry’s daily life. The answer to the growing value is raising contributions, not offering it off. If we were a more equal society, there wouldn’t be a difficulty. Dr Graham Ullathorne Chesterfield, Derbyshire
• My mother is 89 and misplaced the sight in one eye as a little one simply because her parents could not afford any treatment method. I was born in 1945 and survived pneumonia and rheumatic fever as a young little one because of the NHS. Harry Leslie Smith’s great lament created me weep. Andrew McCulloch Collingham, Nottinghamshire
• Very best piece of creating I’ve observed in years. Mr Gove should make it compulsory studying in all colleges. Rosemary Adams Hunmanby, North Yorkshire
• How ironic that at a time we are commemorating the outbreak of the initial planet war and the D-day landings of 1944, we are betraying the hopes and aspirations of the generations involved. They desired a better long term for their kids and grandchildren, one which eliminated the worry of sickness, poverty and lack of chance. We, their young children and grandchildren, should be deeply ashamed of our wilful destruction of their legacy. Carole Rowe Bradford-on-Avon, Wiltshire
Harry Leslie Smith’s account of his sister’s death in 1926 and his eulogy to the NHS moved numerous readers. Photograph: Sarah Lee for the Guardian
I was born in 1937, and when I was a month outdated my father collapsed in Stratford High Street with pneumonia and pleurisy. When he was sufficiently recovered, he spent some weeks convalescing, for the duration of that time my mom had no income and the final of my parents’ funds went on paying out for an ambulance to deliver him house.
Later on I bear in mind my father when he was doing work as an orthopaedic technician, obtaining off his pushbike, and having heard about the new NHS, greeting my mother with the phrases “Thank goodness, we shall never have to worry about acquiring sick again” (What took place to the planet my generation developed?, G2, 5 June)
So my generation is more healthy and residing longer thanks to the care we have acquired all through our lives from a services run by dedicated clinicians and not run for profit by the cheapest provider. We have heard so significantly about the excessive “price” of the NHS, but this belies the truth that in England we devote less per capita on health than most other designed nations.
Of course individuals promulgating this myth usually have vested interests in the private firms, frequently foreign, that are gathering like vultures in the hope of the fat income they hope to make from our illnesses and wellness requirements.
The politicians behind these insidious programs are intent on dismantling a service which was, just before they interfered, the envy of the world. But then they are far also young to don’t forget daily life ahead of the NHS, and if items get actually grim they can afford to shell out for personal care. Mabel Taylor Knutsford, Cheshire
Illustration: Gary Kempston
• The answer to Harry Leslie Smith’s query is that Conservative MPs, this kind of as Oliver Letwin and John Redwood, got their hands on it. When operating for Rothschild bank’s international privatisation department, they laid strategies for the Wellness and Social Care Act which have been fleshed out in the Adam Smith Institute’s report, The Wellness of Nations, in 1988, the very same year Old Etonian Letwin published his book Privatising the Planet. In 2004, Letwin, then Tory shadow chancellor, invited businessmen to his West Dorset constituency, encouraging them to function together to win contracts for a new PFI local hospital. In accordance to one participant, Letwin told his audience that inside of 5 years of a Conservative victory “the NHS will not exist any more”.
Letwin, now minister of government policy, has overseen both health secretarys’ work given that the 2010 election. The bill widens the door, opened by New Labour, to NHS privatisation, closure of hospital services, marketing off hospital land to generate a services funded, not from general taxation but by personal payments to insurance companies. As Harry puts it: ” … the NHS stripped down like a derelict house …”
As Michael Portillo explained: “They [the Tories] did not believe they could win an election if they told you what they had been going to do [to the NHS]…” David Murray Wallington, Surrey
• My father was born in the workhouse infirmary in Colchester in 1900. My mother’s loved ones fled from the terrible poverty of Glasgow’s Gorbals to London in 1904. I was lucky to devote my early life in a nation in which situations enhanced. I am only 79, but I bear in mind when the Labour party defended the weak the sick and the bad. I pray that the two Eds, Miliband and Balls, study Harry’s touching story of his sister Marion’s life and death. John Munson Maidstone, Kent
• Dear Harry, thank you for reminding us of the terrible circumstances that the NHS replaced. Seldom have I been so moved by an article in the Guardian. The piece by Harry Leslie Smith, so superbly written, ought to be sent to every single MP and member of the House of Lords who voted for the Overall health and Social Care Act so that they can realise the enormity of what they have completed. Ann Lynch Skipton, North Yorkshire
• I am in my 70th 12 months, rather than the 91 many years of Harry, but I also despair at the dismantling of the welfare state that meant so significantly to operating-class men and women. How is it that the elderly can forget so very easily and vote for political events, which now includes the Labour party, who want to privatise all the services that operating-class people rely on? Colin Lewis Blackwood, Gwent
• 3 words stood out for me: “taxation positive aspects everybody”. Discuss. Mike Pender Cardiff
• Harry Leslie Smith’s eulogy to the NHS measures the ranges of improvement in society following the 2nd planet war and the opportunities that have been missed. The NHS did not generate an equal society, but it gave entry to healthcare irrespective of means to spend and manufactured strides in medicine which were available to everybody. It became a model to aspire to. The NHS as a public service has saved or ameliorated a great number of lives all through most of Harry’s daily life. The resolution to the rising price is raising contributions, not offering it off. If we had been a a lot more equal society, there would not be a difficulty. Dr Graham Ullathorne Chesterfield, Derbyshire
• My mom is 89 and misplaced the sight in a single eye as a kid due to the fact her dad and mom could not afford any remedy. I was born in 1945 and survived pneumonia and rheumatic fever as a young youngster simply because of the NHS. Harry Leslie Smith’s great lament created me weep. Andrew McCulloch Collingham, Nottinghamshire
• Best piece of creating I’ve seen in years. Mr Gove ought to make it compulsory studying in all colleges. Rosemary Adams Hunmanby, North Yorkshire
• How ironic that at a time we are commemorating the outbreak of the 1st globe war and the D-day landings of 1944, we are betraying the hopes and aspirations of the generations involved. They needed a greater future for their kids and grandchildren, one particular which removed the fear of illness, poverty and lack of possibility. We, their young children and grandchildren, need to be deeply ashamed of our wilful destruction of their legacy. Carole Rowe Bradford-on-Avon, Wiltshire
‘At work I am always learning that I really do not have all the solutions and there is worth, constantly, in listening to others and their tips.’ says Jackie Smith. Photograph: PR
Describe your role in a single sentence: Chief executive and registrar of the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), the regulator of nurses and midwives in the United kingdom.
Why did you want to function in healthcare? I have worked in regulation all my existence healthcare touches everybody and is essential to all of us.
How do you want to see the sector adjust in the subsequent five years? The sector need to function greater together, to control and meet expectations and to provide on promises.
My proudest achievement at work was … to stabilise the NMC at a time of crisis we are now creating actual progress.
The most challenging point I’ve dealt with at function is … bringing the NMC back from the brink – everyone deserved much more from it and it is starting to make a big difference.
I consider the largest challenge the NHS faces is … escalating demand, the bodyweight of public expectation and the escalating price of delivering health which is free of charge at the level of delivery.
The individuals I work with are … committed to what we are trying to obtain. They are a great group of personnel – loyal and supportive of each other.
I do what I do since … I feel in regulation and in producing a big difference.
At times men and women believe that I … require to present a lot more of my human side.
At function I am often understanding that … I will not have all the answers and there is value, always, in listening to others and their concepts.
The one issue often on my mind at operate is … that you are only as great as your final contact with the public – try out usually to give a much better support.
If I could go back 10 many years and meet my former self I would inform them … that life teaches you most of the lessons to find out – pay attention and learn, that is the the advice I would give any person now.
If I could meet my future self I’d anticipate them to be … pleased with what I have – existence is full of opportunities and some of us are fortunate enough to encounter them, get pleasure from!
What is the very best element of your work? Being ready to make a distinction.
What is the worst portion of your occupation? Not becoming able to predict what may well happen subsequent.
What makes you smile? Getting in a position to do one thing constructive, even so large or small.
What keeps you awake at night? If I feel I could do far more – life is short and we have minor time to make an influence.
If you would like to characteristic in our “Five minutes with …” series, or know an individual who would, allow us know by emailing healthcare@theguardian.com
Are you a member of our on the internet local community? Join the Guardian healthcare network to acquire regular emails and unique delivers.
Though anxious not to be observed as blowing his very own trumpet – or worse, striving to drum up trade – the comedian is clearly so inspired by Sutton’s heroic example that he’s willing to relive the whirlwind occasions of the past number of days.
It was seeing Sutton’s poignant farewell posting on Tuesday that got his attention, he says. “I looked at his internet site, and noticed some of the stuff he had written. It was so intelligent and profound. He had each and every correct to be bitter and angry and he wasn’t. It put things in point of view. I’d invested the whole morning moaning. I couldn’t uncover the youngsters shoes, then I couldn’t discover a parking space. I received stuck in traffic, got a flat tyre – had to invest an hour acquiring it changed. Then I read through by means of what he had written and considered “None of these troubles matter”.”
“I noticed that his challenge was to raise a million. I thought “I’ve acquired 700,000 individuals on my Facebook web page. He only has to make one more half a million. If everyone donates a pound, content days.” That’s all I thought. But I watched it grow and then I considered “We can hit two million”. I remembered the ‘no make-up selfies’ and thought “Let’s get a load of celebrities to begin it off, carrying out a thumbs up for Stephen.” I got in touch by email with Chris O’ Dowd and Steve Coogan and sent messages via other folks to reach the likes of Paul Whitehouse. It actually kicked off that initial evening.”
His voice is incredulous. “Within 24 hrs, 90,000 people had used the hashtag “thumbsupforstephen” – it was incredible. I texted his dad to say “Has Stephen seen that it has hit a million?” He texted back to say “Cool”. 7 million people looked at the image of that text – phenomenal.”
On Thursday, on finding out that Sutton had rallied, he popped in to see him in Birmingham Children’s Hospital and invested a couple of hrs with him. “He’s one of the most incredible folks I’ve ever met,” he says simply. “To nevertheless be considering, even on his death bed, “How could I assist other individuals?” – he is completely inspiring.” Manford made the decision to donate the revenue from the up coming month of his bold new initiative of Uk comedy club nights – manfordscomedyclub.com, aimed at encouraging audiences to enjoy the ideal of the stand-up circuit – to the result in – and a swiftly organised gig in Birmingham this Sunday evening sold out in 4 minutes.
Is he amazed by just how much compassion the campaign has tapped? “I feel individuals are good anyway,” he replies. “There are far more good men and women than horrible folks.” May some individuals out there be cynical about his motives, or query the publicity he’s acquiring? “I stopped asking men and women to donate on Thursday, due to the fact you don’t want to give it the complete Geldof. You really don’t want folks going “All right mate, that’s enough”.” But if men and women paint him as an opportunist, he’s not bothered.
3 and a half many years ago, he identified himself at the centre of a media storm about his actions on social media for quite diverse causes. The father of 3 resigned as co-host of BBC One’s The One Present in November 2010 right after becoming unveiled as obtaining exchanged sexually explicit messages on Twitter with female fans. Is there an irony that this week his use of Twitter has completed the energy of very good? He is sanguine about that episode. “You can have great days and undesirable days on social media, it’s a microcosm of society. I don’t believe your total existence and personality can be summed up in one particular moment. Good people do silly things often. I am the exact same particular person I’ve often been. I’ve always accomplished as a lot charity operate as I can and I’ve usually aided out people who are less lucky than I am. I cannot help what the media decides to select up on but I’m not a diverse man or woman to the a single I’ve been all my existence.”
The cause comedians are so susceptible to getting caught into good brings about, he believes, is easy. “I think we can not believe that someone will spend us income to tell jokes and mess about, so we feel guilty a good deal of the time and every single so frequently we consider “I’d far better do some thing good.” But I don’t feel “I will do this wonderful point simply because of what other individuals might think”. You are in no way going to win some folks in excess of, whether you have donated funds or assisted to increase funds for charity – individuals people are gone, allow them go.” He pauses, and says it once again. “There are numerous much more good men and women than horrible folks out there. You’ve received to bear in mind that.”
Text STEPHEN to 70300 to donate £5 and support Teenage Cancer Trust or pay a visit to justgiving.com/stephen-sutton-TCT
Although anxious not to be observed as blowing his very own trumpet – or worse, attempting to drum up trade – the comedian is plainly so inspired by Sutton’s heroic example that he’s prepared to relive the whirlwind occasions of the past couple of days.
It was seeing Sutton’s poignant farewell posting on Tuesday that acquired his consideration, he says. “I looked at his site, and saw some of the things he had written. It was so intelligent and profound. He had each correct to be bitter and angry and he wasn’t. It place factors in viewpoint. I’d spent the total morning moaning. I couldn’t discover the little ones footwear, then I couldn’t discover a parking room. I acquired stuck in targeted traffic, received a flat tyre – had to invest an hour receiving it transformed. Then I read by way of what he had written and thought “None of these problems matter”.”
“I observed that his challenge was to increase a million. I thought “I’ve acquired 700,000 men and women on my Facebook page. He only has to make one more half a million. If absolutely everyone donates a pound, pleased days.” That’s all I imagined. But I watched it grow and then I thought “We can hit two million”. I remembered the ‘no make-up selfies’ and thought “Let’s get a load of celebrities to commence it off, carrying out a thumbs up for Stephen.” I acquired in touch by electronic mail with Chris O’ Dowd and Steve Coogan and sent messages by means of other people to reach the likes of Paul Whitehouse. It truly kicked off that initial evening.”
His voice is incredulous. “Within 24 hrs, 90,000 individuals had utilised the hashtag “thumbsupforstephen” – it was incredible. I texted his dad to say “Has Stephen seen that it has hit a million?” He texted back to say “Cool”. 7 million men and women looked at the image of that text – phenomenal.”
On Thursday, on understanding that Sutton had rallied, he popped in to see him in Birmingham Children’s Hospital and invested a couple of hours with him. “He’s one of the most remarkable individuals I’ve ever met,” he says just. “To nonetheless be considering, even on his death bed, “How could I help other folks?” – he is completely inspiring.” Manford determined to donate the profits from the next month of his daring new initiative of Uk comedy club nights – manfordscomedyclub.com, aimed at encouraging audiences to get pleasure from the greatest of the stand-up circuit – to the lead to – and a swiftly organised gig in Birmingham this Sunday evening offered out in 4 minutes.
Is he amazed by just how significantly compassion the campaign has tapped? “I feel folks are wonderful anyway,” he replies. “There are far more wonderful people than horrible people.” May some folks out there be cynical about his motives, or question the publicity he’s acquiring? “I stopped asking people to donate on Thursday, simply because you really do not want to give it the total Geldof. You really do not want people going “All appropriate mate, that is enough”.” But if folks paint him as an opportunist, he’s not bothered.
3 and a half years ago, he identified himself at the centre of a media storm about his routines on social media for quite distinct motives. The father of 3 resigned as co-host of BBC One’s The A single Present in November 2010 following becoming revealed as getting exchanged sexually explicit messages on Twitter with female supporters. Is there an irony that this week his use of Twitter has completed the electrical power of good? He is sanguine about that episode. “You can have good days and bad days on social media, it is a microcosm of society. I really don’t believe your whole daily life and persona can be summed up in one minute. Good individuals do silly items at times. I am the same man or woman I’ve constantly been. I’ve often carried out as a lot charity function as I can and I’ve usually helped out people who are significantly less lucky than I am. I can’t help what the media decides to pick up on but I’m not a distinct person to the 1 I’ve been all my daily life.”
The explanation comedians are so prone to acquiring caught into very good causes, he believes, is basic. “I think we can not think that an individual will pay out us income to inform jokes and mess about, so we really feel guilty a good deal of the time and every so usually we think “I’d much better do one thing very good.” But I really do not believe “I will do this wonderful issue since of what other individuals might think”. You’re in no way going to win some men and women over, regardless of whether you’ve donated cash or helped to raise funds for charity – people individuals are gone, let them go.” He pauses, and says it once again. “There are numerous more good folks than horrible people out there. You’ve received to keep in mind that.”
Text STEPHEN to 70300 to donate £5 and help Teenage Cancer Trust or check out justgiving.com/stephen-sutton-TCT
Melissa Morris: ‘If individuals are prevented from seeing their GP they can finish up with far worse conditions which are a lot more high-priced to deal with this could bankrupt the NHS.’ Photograph: Network Locum
Describe your role in 1 sentence Chief executive of the very best team in London, helping to resolve massive challenges dealing with the NHS.
Why did you want to operate in healthcare? There are great individuals on the frontline functioning really tough but inefficiencies in the program mean that healthcare solutions usually can’t be delivered at the proper time, scale and high quality. I genuinely think this can alter if the staffing model is more reasonably priced, far more flexible and of a greater good quality, which is what our organization is striving to achieve.
How do you want to see the sector adjust in the subsequent five many years? I would like to see all patients becoming able to get a GP appointment when they need one and to do this not only with a practice close to their home but wherever in the United kingdom they take place to be at that stage.
My proudest achievement at work was … when GPs commenced to recommend the Network Locum internet site to their pals.
The most hard point I’ve dealt with at work is … the sum of bureaucracy in the NHS and outdated resourcing designs.
The most significant challenge dealing with the NHS is … fixing accessibility to primary care. If men and women are prevented from seeing their GP they can end up with far worse problems which are far more expensive to deal with this could eventually bankrupt the NHS.
The folks I work with are … experts in their field who are quite passionate about healthcare. They are all really wise, tech savvy and fantastic fun to be about.
I do what I do because … I needed to see if I could make a variation.
Often people feel that I … am overly crucial of myself, being an entrepreneur, it comes with the territory.
Appropriate now I want to … win the Common Practice Awards which we have been shortlisted for.
At work I am always understanding that … people are wonderful. I am consistently astonished by the creativity and capacity of the men and women who operate with me, the suggestions they have and the pace with which they can execute them is astounding.
The 1 thing often on my thoughts at work is … cashflow. All efforts and achievements would be misplaced if we run out of funds we could not afford to let that come about.
If I could go back 10 years and meet my former self I’d tell them … read through much more books, have faith in by yourself and don’t be afraid to do issues your way.
If I could meet my future self I would count on them to be … energetic, but much less naïve and proud of my business achievements.
What is the best portion of your work? Doing work with wonderful people, no matter whether it is my group, GPs or practice managers.
What is the worst component of your job? Fundraising. It truly is a needed evil for any organization as it can be time consuming and demoralising answering the identical inquiries each time with a smile on your encounter.
What can make you smile? Craig, our chief technology officer, is most likely 1 of the funniest folks I have ever met, and Matt, our head of corporate, can do each and every accent from the quite north of Scotland to the bottom of Cornwall.
What keeps you awake at evening? Working a begin-up, I stress about funds and generating our projections each and every evening but I’m passionate about what I do and that makes it worthwhile.
If you would like to characteristic in our “Five minutes with …” series, or know somebody who would, let us know by emailing healthcare@theguardian.com
Are you a member of our online neighborhood? Join the Healthcare Experts Network to get typical emails and exclusive offers.
